The truth only matters if you can prove it. And even then, we’ve seen it doesn’t matter if the right people are in power. 



But, regardless of what the President or mainstream media say, the truth about the vaccines gets revealed when someone we know gets harmed by them.



For many, vaccine injury seems like a conspiracy theory until it hits home. And with the COVID vaccines, they’re hitting home unlike any other vaccine in history.



To avoid admitting this reality, our politicians (both Trump and Biden alike) and the media gaslight the public, acting as though there’s no public health threat from the vaccines, and continuing to vilify the unvaccinated.



Many say we’re just beginning to see what the vaccines could do to us. Something like myocarditis, one of the most common severe adverse events, takes time to kill people. At 3-5 years, it has a 56-83% survival rate. That means, at best, 17% of people who develop it will be dead five years later.



Instead of facing this head on, we’re told that the condition is extremely rare and people recover quickly. Yet, that contradicts the scientific evidence.



The point is, many are hellbent on hiding the truth and canceling the truth-tellers. Given enough time, the truth will be hard to find unless the unvaccinated remain committed to their choice, even in the face of social and political pressure.



The unvaccinated may eventually become the only source of truth when it comes to the health effects of the vaccines.



The Control Group's Role in Scientific Evidence



Random, controlled trials form the basis of “scientific evidence” that supports or denies the health benefits of a given treatment. 



Researchers use RCTs to study drug treatments, diets, supplements, exercise protocols, psychological counseling methodologies, and numerous other methods to improve human health, fitness, or performance. 



RCTs require a minimum of two groups:




The treatment group: The study participants who get the treatment.



The control group: The study participants who either get a placebo when it’s appropriate (such as with a drug or supplement) or who carry on their life like normal without the treatment. 




In the COVID vaccines clinical trials, the treatment group got injected with the vaccines, and the control group (a.k.a. placebo group) got injected with saline.



Being that mRNA vaccine technology has never been used in humans before, it's crucial to be able to identify long-term safety issues. Logically, you'd do so by keeping the control group "the control group" for years, if not decades, to come. That would be the only way to use clinical trial data to identify the long-term safety of the vaccines.



On the other hand, if you wanted to avoid the responsibility of long-term safety issues, you'd eliminate the control group early on in your research. That's just what Pfizer and Moderna did.



After six months, which was around the time the companies received Emergency Use Authorization approval, they notified the control group participants that they'd received the placebo and offered them the real vaccines. The majority happily accepted the offer. This choice by the vaccine makers eliminated their ability to measure long-term safety data.



The decision by the vaccine companies was almost unheard of in scientific research. Of course, they spun their decision as ethically justified, suggesting that the vaccine was so effective that it would be ethically wrong to not offer it to the placebo group.



In reality, the vaccines are nowhere near as effective at controlling COVID as we were told. And they do pose a serious risk for both healthy and unhealthy people, even in the short-term. We've yet to find out what they'll do in the long-term.



Stephanie Seneff, co-author of the peer-reviewed paper, Worse than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19, recently wrote: