Alleged Corruption, Bias, and Fraud: Allegations of the Corruption of Joe Biden, Bias of the Media and Big Tech, and Fraud in the 2020 Election

By Gary F. Zeolla

This book covers events from October 2020 to New Year’s Day 2021 that are directly related to the 2020 presidential election. Those events include revelations about the alleged corruption of Joseph R. Biden via his son Hunter Biden. That corruption was discussed during the Trump/ Ukraine impeachment proceedings of the year before. But much more information came out just prior to the 2020 election.

However, the mainstream media (MSM) and Big Tech did their best to hide that potential corruption from the American public, so that it would not affect how they voted. And that worked, in that Biden won the election, or so it was said. But allegations of voter fraud and anomalies abounded.

In fact, there were claims of widespread fraud, glitches, and irregularities in the election. This book recounts those claims. It then examines many of them as to if they are valid or not. It also reports how they were resolved or left unresolved. With many questions left unanswered, that puts Biden’s presidency on less than firm footing.

This book also looks at the bias of the MSM and Big Tech in other regards. These three main issues, Biden’s alleged corruption, the bias of the MSM and Big Tech, and alleged election fraud, leave many to not trust Joe Biden and to be leery about his presidency.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Lulu.com
• Release date: May 10, 2021
• ISBN: 9781667106021

Book preview

Alleged Corruption, Bias, and Fraud: Allegations of the Corruption of Joe Biden, Bias of the Media and Big Tech, and Fraud in the 2020 Election

By Gary F. Zeolla

Copyrighted © 2021, 2023 by Gary F. Zeolla.

All rights reserved.

ISBN: 978-1-6671-0602-1

Introductory Pages

About the Author

The author has a B.S. in Nutrition Science (Penn State; 1983) and attended Denver Seminary from 1988-1990. Zeolla is the director, webmaster, and primary writer for his four websites:

Zeolla.org personal website (www.Zeolla.org)

Darkness to Light Christian Ministry (www.Zeolla.org/Christian)

Fitness for One and All (www.Zeolla.org/Fitness)

Biblical and Constitutional Politics (www.Zeolla.org/Politics)

Zeolla is the translator of the Analytical-Literal Translation of the Bible and the author of over 30 Christian, fitness, and politics books. He is also a top-ranked powerlifter, holding fifteen all-time world records and over a 100 federation records.

A detailed autobiography is available on his personal website. Details on these writings are found in Appendixes Two and Three.

Preface

This book covers events from October 2020 to New Year’s Day 2021 that are directly related to the 2020 presidential election. Those events include revelations about the alleged corruption of Joseph R. Biden Jr. via his son Hunter Biden. That corruption was discussed during the Trump/ Ukraine impeachment proceedings of the year before. But much more information came out just prior to the 2020 election.

However, the mainstream media (MSM) and Big Tech did their best to hide that potential corruption from the American public, so that it would not affect how they voted. And that worked, in that Biden won the election, or so it was said. But allegations of voter fraud and anomalies abounded.

In fact, there were claims of widespread fraud, glitches, and irregularities in the election. This book recounts those claims. It then examines many of them as to if they are valid or not. It also reports how they were resolved or left unresolved. With many questions left unanswered, that puts Joe Biden’s presidency on less than firm footing.

This book also looks at the bias of the MSM and Big Tech in other regards. These three main issues, Biden’s alleged corruption, the bias of the MSM and Big Tech, and alleged election fraud, leave many to not trust Joe Biden and to be leery about his presidency.

Time Period and Related Books

This book is a follow-up to my three-volume set Dems Cannot Beat Trump, So They Impeach Trump and my book Trump’s 2020 Election Tweets, Georgia Phone Call, and January 2021 Speeches: Did Trump’s Claims of Election Fraud Lead to the Capitol Building Uprising?

The Impeach trilogy covers the impeachment of President Donald J. Trump that occurred from the summer of 2019 through February 2020. It includes details on the aforementioned alleged corruption of Joe Biden via his son Hunter. It also provides non-election related updates through October 2020.

The Trump’s Tweets book then presents all that Trump said about the election from the day before Election Day 2020 through the end of his presidency on January 20, 2021.

This Corruption book backs up a bit and covers events from October 2020 that are directly related to the 2020 presidential election. The time period covered is from October 2020 to New Year’s Day 2021. This book was mostly written as the events were unfolding. That is why much is written in the present tense. I mostly waited until updates were available to update an issue later in the book.

In some cases, an update was not yet available during this time frame. That is why a follow-up book is available to this book that covers updates and events that occurred in early 2021.

That book is Tragic Ending to Donald J. Trump’s Great Presidency: Capitol Building Uprising Leads to Impeachment 2.0, as Media and Big Tech Bias and Claims of Election Fraud Continues.

This Tragic Ending book covers events to the end of Trump’s presidency, plus the second impeachment and trial that occurred in February 2021 and additional later updates.

The only later updates in this Corruption book are by way of the mentions of these and other of my books.

Add in my Impeach trilogy and my earlier book Tearing the USA Apart: From Kavanaugh, to Incivility, to Caravans, to Violence, to the 2018 Midterm Elections, and Beyond, along with my politics website (www.Zeolla.org/Politics), and you have a detailed record of the entirety of the presidency of Donald J. Trump.

Documentation for Claims

The Bibliography in Appendix One of this book contains an extensive list of references documenting the claims of corruption, bias, and fraud made in this book, evidence thereof, and their resolutions or refutations, if any. In digital versions of this book, those are clickable links. In that way, readers can finish reading this book then check out the linked to documentation of claims made.

Definitions

This Introductory Page will define some terms that are important to understand in reading this book.

First, the name of this writer’s politics website is Biblical and Constitutional Politics. I describe it as, Political news and commentary from a conservative Christian and politically conservative perspective.

To define these terms, Conservative Christian includes the belief that the Bible is God-breathed and fully reliable in all that it teaches and is the divine and final authority on all matters it addresses, including politics. Conversely, a liberal Christian would deny the divine inspiration, reliability, and ultimate authority of the Bible.

      Politically conservative refers to the belief in limited government, separation of powers, traditional values, personal and national security, capitalism, freedom and liberty, and most of all, an adherence to the Constitution of the United States, following an originalist interpretation thereof.

The definition of politically liberal would be mostly opposite of all these aspects of politically conservative, beginning with big federal government instead of limited government. That would then lead to an erosion of the rest of the points.

Conservatives are often said to be on the right, while liberals are said to be on the left.

Republicans generally claim to be conservatives, while Democrats are generally liberal, though some prefer the term progressive. That word is seen in YourDictionary’s definition of liberal. Progressive is someone who advocates for reform and change.

The term leftist is often used interchangeable with liberal, though the two are not exactly the same. A leftist is defined as, a person whose political position is of the left (noun), esp., a communist or socialist.

The difference is, liberals will advocate for some socialist policies, such as universal government run health care, but is not fully a socialist, while leftists will advocate for full socialism.

Also, the definition of liberal says tolerant of views differing from one’s own. That is truer of conservatives than liberals, and not at all true of leftists. As a result, leftists will try to shut down speech they disagree with, while liberals and conservatives encourage free exchange of ideas. Leftists are also more likely to engage in civil disobedience and even uncivil disobedience than a liberal or conservative.

States and areas are color coded as to how they tend to vote. A red state tends to vote Republican, while a blue state tends to vote Democrat. You can remember the difference by both red and Republican beginning with re.

A swing state or area, which is to say, one that sometimes votes Republican and sometimes Democrat, is called a purple state. That of course comes from the fact that mixing blue and red produces purple.

By Mainstream Media (MSM) is meant traditional and generally liberal news outlets like ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times (NYT), and The Washington Post (WaPo).

Conservative news outlets are generally newer news agencies, like Fox News Channel (FNC), Fox Business Network (FBN), Breitbart, and The Daily Caller, plus The Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

By Dems is meant elected and non-elected Democrat officials in Washington D.C. Specifically, the Democrat members of the US House of Representatives and Democrat Senators in the Senate, along with their staff and other support personal, and all of the other non-elected Democrat bureaucrats in the nation’s capital.  It must be noted, the term Dems does not refer to the average registered Democrat US voter.

Similarly, by Repubs is meant the same, except to substitute Republican for Democrat in the preceding paragraph.

Abbreviations Used in this Book

These pages list the abbreviations used in this book.

2A – Second Amendment to the US Constitution (gun rights). A similar abbreviation is used for other Amendments (i.e., 1A), but the most common is 2A.

AG – Attorney General

ALT – Analytical Literal Translation of the Bible (authors’ translation)

Antifa – Anti-Fascist, though Antifa is in fact a fascist group, so Profa would be a better nickname.

AOC – Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (a NYC US House Representative)

BCP – Biblical and Constitutional Politics (author’s politics website)

BLM – Black Lives Matter (the left-wing group, not the slogan)

CB – Capitol Building (in Washington DC)

CCP – Chinese Communist Party

CPAC – Conservative Political Action Conference (usually held in late February or early March)

CPD – Commission on Presidential Debates

CV – Coronavirus

Dem – Democrat, referring to government officials, not voters

DHS – Department of Homeland Security

DNC – Democratic National Committee/ Convention

DOD – Department of Defense

DOJ – Department of Justice

DTL – Darkness to Light (author’s Christian website)

DOJ – Department of Justice

ECA – Electoral College Act of 1887

FB – Facebook

FBI – Federal Bureau of Investigation

FBN – Fox Business Network

FISA – Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

FLOTUS – First Lady of the United States

FNC – Fox News Channel

FOA – Fitness for One and All (author’s fitness and health website)

GOP – Grand Old Party (another name for the Republican Party)

HBCUs – Historically Black Colleges and Universities

ICE – Immigration and Customs Enforcement

ISIS – Islamic State in Iraq and Syria

KAG – Keep America Great

MAGA – Make America Great Again

MSM – Mainstream Media (outlets like CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo)

NAFTA – North American Free Trade Agreement (old trade deal)

NATO – North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

NDAA – National Defense Authorization Act

NSA – National Security Advisor

NSC – National Security Council

NYC – New York City

NYP – New York Post

NYT – New York Times

OLC – Office of Legal Counsel (for the US Executive Branch)

PPE – Personal Protective Equipment (masks, gloves, goggles, gowns)

POTUS – President of the United States

Rep – Representative in the US House, unless indicated as in a particular state House

Repub – Republican, referring to government officials, not voters

RINO – Republican in Name Only (i.e., a fake conservative)

RNC – Republican National Committee/ Convention

SCOPA – Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

SCOTUS – Supreme Court of the United States

SOTU – State of the Union (Address)

USMCA – United States, Mexico, Canada Agreement (new trade deal)

USPS – United States Postal Service

WaPo – Washington Post

WB - Whistleblower

WSJ – Wall Street Journal

Section One: Pre-Election and Election Week

Ch. 1: Lead up to the 2020 Election/ Joe Biden’s Corruption

This first chapter of this book will look at events that occurred during the lead up to the 2020 election. It will also provide details on the alleged corruption of Joe Biden. These details update what was previously presented in my three volume set Dems Cannot Beat Trump, So They Impeach Trump, hereafter referred to as my Impeach trilogy.

Lead Up To the 2020 Election

Joe Biden became the Democrat presidential nominee in the spring of 2020. On August 11, 2020, he chose Senator Kamala Harris (D. CA) as his running mate. From early July 2020 on, Biden was leading Republican incumbent President Donald J. Trump in the polls by a significant margin.

However, he was only doing so by hiding in his basement for the previous three months. He said that was due to Coronavirus (CV) restrictions, but more likely, he was hiding from having to comment on the ongoing CV crisis and then the growing racial unrest in the country.

Those two crises, the CV and racial unrest, seemed to erase any memory of the impeachment fiasco. But in fact, if it were not for the impeachment, neither of them might have happened.

As I indicated many times in my Impeach trilogy, all of Washington and the media were so obsessed with the impeachment from September 2019 to February 2020, nobody noticed what was brewing in China.

And when someone took notice, most notably Repub Senator John Cotton, nothing was done to prepare for a possible pandemic. Only President Trump listened to him and instituted his travel ban from China on January 31, 2020. But otherwise, neither the President nor Congress took steps to prepare for a pandemic by stockpiling needed supplies.

As for racial unrest, the impeachment was a showcase for a lack of due process and a loss of the presumption of innocence. Such injustices were then seen in the racial unrest. Police officers were all declared guilty of police brutality and of racial targeting of unarmed black men, even though the statistics show such constitutes a miniscule percentage of police encounters with the public.

Even worse, when there was a questionable incident, the officers involved were immediately fired from their jobs and declared to be guilty by the public.

The loss of the presumption of innocence began with the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation proceedings. I detail that fact in my book Tearing the USA Apart: From Kavanaugh, to Incivility, to Caravans, to Violence, to the 2018 Midterm Elections, and Beyond, hereafter referred to as my Tearing Apart book. And it will probably the worst legacy of the impeachment.

I will be covering this racial unrest and several high-profile cases of alleged police brutality and unjustified killings of black men by police in my forthcoming book Breakdown of American Society: Jesus and the Bible are the Ultimate Answers to the Crises Facing the USA, hereafter referred to as my Breakdown book.

But for now, I was sure the impeachment would come up in the presidential debates and other public appearances by both Trump and Biden before the election. But that did not happen when Biden finally emerged from his bunker and held his first press conference in 89 days.

That was on Tuesday, June 30, 2020. I only saw part of it, but from what I saw, it was a lovefest, with the reporters throwing mostly softballs to the former Vice President. That is why some conservative commentators called it a lollipop press conference. There were no questions about any of the issues raised in my Impeach trilogy in regard to Joe Biden’s alleged corruption related to his son Hunter.

No one asked Joe about his quid pro quo with Ukraine to get the prosecutor fired who was investigating the energy company (Burisma) his son worked for. There were no questions about his son’s activities in Ukraine and China and why his son received such cushy jobs and financial deals in the very countries he was point man for in the Obama administration. But then, all along, the media has been protecting the Bidens’ involvement in these potentially corrupt activities.

There were no questions about Biden’s opinion on the killings of the terrorists Soleimani and Al Baghdadi that were address in my Impeach trilogy. There were no questions about why Biden called Trump’s travel ban from China hysterical xenophobia. No questions as to what steps he would have done differently in regard to the Coronavirus.

There were questions on the ongoing racial unrest. But Biden was not pressed on specifics on what he would do. The media always let Biden get away with general mumbo-jumbo like I will work to bring the country together. But there were no questions on how he would restore law and order to our streets. And they let Biden get away with saying he was opposed to efforts to defund the police, even though his base will clearly push him in that direction.

This lack of probing questions remained the case in every press conference Biden held after that on through to September of 2020. But then, Biden only rarely spoke publicly and even more rarely took questions. And when he did, they were obviously prepared questions that he knew were coming. That was exposed when he was clearly reading from a teleprompter when responding to a question.

In all of these pressers, there also were no questions on the impeachment and Biden’s quid pro quo that led to it. But it was sure to come up during the debates that were set to begin on September 29, 2020. The Biden campaign will probably point back to Trump being impeached as a reason for why he is unfit for office. That of course is why the impeachment occurred in the first place. Dems knew they could not beat Trump, so they impeached Trump, just to give him the black eye of impeachment.

Then after the election, no matter who wins, impeachment will once again be on the table.

If Trump wins, and Dems retain control of the House, there will most certainly be an Impeachment 2.0. If or when that happens, it will be good to remember what happened with the first impeachment.

If Biden wins, if history holds true, Repubs will probably take back control of the House in 2022. In that case, the Republican-controlled House will probably find something to impeach Biden over.

And on it will go, as predicted by Repubs throughout the impeachment fiasco. Anytime the Presidency and House are controlled by different parties, impeachment will be on the table.

It will not matter if the case against the then President is a flimsy as the case was this time against President Trump. This impeachment set the precedent of such a low bar for impeachment, something will always be able to be found to justify this once rare act. That will lead to a weakening of the Presidency and of our Republic. And that will be another sad legacy of the impeachment fiasco.

Updates on the Bidens and Burisma

Democratic presidential nominee Joseph R. Biden flatly denied at Tuesday [9/29/20] night’s debate that his lawyer son took huge sums of money from corrupt oligarchs and Chinese communists during his vice presidency, but Treasury Department reports show that Hunter Biden did receive the money (Washington Times).

Critics have long alleged that Hunter Biden leveraged his father’s position in the Obama administration to enrich himself in his personal business dealings. The Trump campaign has repeatedly attacked Biden on the campaign trail regarding his son’s conduct.

When pressed on the matter by Trump during the first presidential debate last month [9/29/20], Joe Biden again denied Hunter had engaged in any wrongdoing.

My son did nothing wrong at Burisma. He doesn’t want to let me answer because he knows I have the truth, Joe Biden said. His position has been totally, thoroughly discredited -- by the media, by our allies, by the World Bank, by everyone (Fox News. Hunter).

This exchange occurred in the first presidential debate on September 29, 2020. Trump confronted Joe Biden about his son being a crack addict and getting dishonorably discharged from the military as a result. He then tried to expose Joe’s alleged corruption in enriching his son Hunter via him being on the Board of Burisma and getting investment money from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

A new point was that Hunter also got investment money from the wife of a former mayor of Moscow to the tune of $3.5 million. That point came out in a Senate report authored by Repub Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson issued on September 22, 2020.

Biden deflected the question on Hunter’s drug use, saying lots of people have drug problems, and that he had worked through it. That point is true. And I would not have brought that point up myself, as it did not concern Joe Biden himself. He’s not responsible for his son becoming an addict.

However, it was only because of Joe’s influence as first a Senator then as Vice President that Hunter was able to get this cushy jobs on various US corporate boards then his very lucrative job on the board of Burisma and the investment money from the CCP. It was while Joe was the point man for the Obama administration in Ukraine and China that Hunter was able to so enrich himself.

The background to the Moscow mayor’s wife and that investment could also be due to Joe’s influence, as he was also involved in dealings with Russia for the Obama administration. In fact, Hunter accompanied him on a trip to Moscow.

It was also revealed by the Grassley/ Johnson report that Hunter was paid more money for his position on the board of Burisma than was reported in my Impeach trilogy. The figures of $50,000 and $83,333 per month were cited there. But this report says he got paid as much as $133,000/ month.

Whatever the exact figure, there is no doubt Hunter was paid boatloads for a job he had no qualifications for and for which he did little or nothing. He attended a couple of board meetings and went on a trip with the owner of the company, and that was about it. Hunter freely admitted in a Good Morning America interview that he would not have gotten that job if his last name was not Biden.

In any case, at the debate, Joe repeated the line that all of this was looked into and it was found there was nothing to it. And that is how the mainstream media (MSM) tried to spin the Grassley/ Johnson report. But in fact, it found:

Former President Barack Obama’s administration ignored glaring warning signs when then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son joined the board of a Ukrainian energy company owned by a corrupt oligarch, according to a report released by Republican senators on Wednesday….

The report, released by Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), also says the younger Biden’s job was problematic and did interfere in the efficient execution of policy with respect to Ukraine.

Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board negatively impacted the efforts of dedicated career service individuals who were fighting to push for anticorruption measures in Ukraine, the report says (New York Post).

The report concludes that Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board was problematic and did interfere in the efficient execution of policy with respect to Ukraine, while charging that he and other Biden relatives cashed in on Joe Biden’s vice presidency …

The Republicans’ report details how at least two administration officials, current deputy assistant secretary of state George Kent and former international energy envoy Amos Hochstein, raised concerns that Russian actors might try to undermine Joe Biden’s anti-corruption message in Ukraine by highlighting his son’s affiliation with Burisma. In 2015, Hochstein raised those concerns directly with the vice president and his son (WaPo. GOP).

Moreover, this investigation has illustrated the extent to which officials within the Obama administration ignored the glaring warning signs when the vice president’s son joined the board of a company owned by a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch.

The GOP chairmen said Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Burisma was awkward and created an immediate potential conflict of interest. The senators claim Hunter Biden was not the only Biden who cashed in on Joe Biden’s vice presidency (CBS).

Former Vice President Joe Biden claimed in December [2019] that he was never told his son’s business dealings in Ukraine posed a conflict of interest. He also said last September that he had never spoken to his son about his business dealings.

A new report suggests both of those claims may be false.

The report, released Wednesday by two Senate committees, suggests that Biden was briefed about the fact that his son’s dealings with Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian natural gas conglomerate, suggested a conflict of interest for the Obama administration.

The report, which was made public on Wednesday [9/23/20], indicates that at least two individuals raised concerns about Hunter Biden’s service on Burisma’s board of directors during the former vice president’s tenure in office….

Hunter Biden later told the New Yorker that he had, in fact, discussed his business dealings with his father….

As Breitbart News has previously reported, Biden joined Burisma’s board of directors around the same time his father was tapped to be the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine. Despite having no background in either eastern Europe or the energy industry, Biden was paid as much $83,000-per-month for his services (Breitbart).

However, the MSM still clings to the idea that Joe Biden did nothing wrong. Legally they might be right, but ethically, it all smells to high heaven.

The investigation found that Hunter Biden had cashed in on his father’s name to close lucrative business deals around the world. It also concluded that his work for Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company then mired in a corruption scandal, while the former vice president was directing American policy toward Kyiv had given the appearance of a conflict of interest and alarmed some State Department officials.

But an 87-page report summing up the findings, released jointly on Wednesday by the Senate Homeland Security and Finance Committees, contained no evidence that the elder Mr. Biden improperly manipulated American policy toward Ukraine or committed any other misdeed. In fact, investigators heard witness testimony that rebutted those charges (NYT. Republicans).

Joe Biden also continues to deny he and his son did anything wrong, amidst attacks by President Trump.

The Trumps Contract the Coronavirus

In the wee morning hours on Friday, October 2, 2020, President Trump tweeted the following:

Tonight, @FLOTUS and I tested positive for COVID-19. We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately. We will get through this TOGETHER! 12:54 AM · Oct 2, 2020

I discuss what happened with the Trumps and their infections in a three-part article posted on the CV section of my politics website titled, Does a Mask Protect the Wearer from the Coronavirus? Here, I just want to highlight a few points about this situation related to a major theme of this book and my other political writings, that of the non-stop criticism of President Trump in the MSM and on social media.

When Present Trump first announced he was infected, the MSM seemed almost gleeful, as they reported he was at high risk of serious consequences due to him being 74 years old and being obese. And social media exploded with hopes the President would die.

The first such post I saw read, I hope he dies a painful, slow death. It got so bad, Facebook, Twitter, and the comments section at the end of news articles began to remove all such posts.

There were also calls for Trump to be removed from the ballot due to his infection, before it was seen how his infection would turn out.

Now, it is true being elderly and being overweight puts a person at increased risk of a serious consequence from a CV infection. However, the MSM has rarely mentioned that only the elderly and those with comorbidities like being overweight are truly at serious risk of serious CV consequences. They instead have been fearmongering, making it sound like everyone is at equal risk.

Moreover, I have never heard anyone in the MSM say those who are overweight or obese are at high risk and should lose weight. However, I have been saying such since the start of the pandemic.

The MSM also ignored that Trump does not have even more important risk factors, such as diabetes and hypertension. In fact, the main reason being overweight is a risk factor is those who are overweight tend to have one or both of those conditions. But Trump having neither nor of any other comorbidities greatly reduced his risk of serious consequences. And in fact, three days after he was admitted to Walter Reed Medical Center, he was released. Apparently, he did get sicker than was originally reported. But due to his relatively good health and the treatments he received, he recovered quickly.

Sadly, the MSM truly seemed disappointed that he did not get sicker and stay sick longer or even die. They didn’t say such, but it was clear they were really upset he was up and about so quickly. That could be seen in that they criticized him for his every action.

They first criticized him for taking a quick limousine jaunt around Walter Reed to thank his supporters, who were outside in droves with signs of support. They said doing so endangered the Secret Service agents protecting him in the vehicle. Never mind those same Secret Service agents had been with him back at the White House, in Marine One when he flew to Walter Reed, and in the hospital. If they were going to get infected by the President, they would have already done so. The situation was similar to members of same family not socially distancing from each other when outside of their own house. There really is no need for it, since again, they would have infected each other already in their house.

Moreover, the President was wearing a mask, and the Secret Service agents were wearing full PPE (personal protective equipment). They were also in the official Presidential limousine, known as The Beast. Along with being bullet proof, it is hermetically sealed, with HEPA air filters, with the President in the backseat and the Secret Service agents in the front, and them separated by a partition. Simply put, the agents were in no danger of being infected.

Next, the MSM criticized Trump when he returned to the White House. He was wearing a mask when he got off of Marine One and as he went up the steps to the balcony outside of the private residence section of the White House. But then he took the mask off! The media went nuts. They said he was endangering everyone in the federal office building Yes, that is how they referred to the White House.

However, he was on that balcony alone, except for a photographer, who was well behind him and wearing a mask. Then he entered his private residence, where his lovely wife was at, who was already infected. Anyone else who would come in and out would be wearing full PPE. As such, the President was putting no one in danger.

I mention these two points, as they show how the MSM will criticize Trump for everything and everything, no matter how illogical. It was also clear that what they were really upset Trump was still alive. They probably truly thought this was their last chance to get rid of him before the 2020 election.

However, President Trump, on Friday, October 9, 2020, was interviewed by Rush Limbaugh on Rush’s radio show. The interview lasted two hours, with no commercial breaks. There was only a short break at the top and bottom of each hour for the news. The President’s voice sounded just as strong at the end of the two-hour interview as at the beginning, so I would say he is doing just fine. In fact, the next day, the following was reported by Trump’s doctor:

      In a memo, Navy Cmdr. Dr. Sean Conley says Trump meets the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for safely discontinuing isolation and that by currently recognized standards he is no longer considered a transmission risk (Fox News. Doctor).

However, despite this fact, the forthcoming second presidential debate had already been canceled, so we ended up with two unbalanced dueling townhalls. Those will be discussed shortly.

But first, on October 25, five aids to Vice President Mike Pence tested positive, including his Chief of staff Marc Short. But the VP himself and his wife tested negative. As a result, he continued to campaign, taking the precautions the CDC indicated for essential workers.

The MSM again went nuts, saying campaigning is not essential. But I would bet if it were Joe Biden’s aids who tested positive, but he continued to campaign, they would say it was essential.

Hunter Biden’s Notebook Computer

If the Grassley/ Johnson report about Joe and Hunter Biden was not explosive enough, the New York Post published a report on October 14, 2020 about emails found on Hunter Biden’s notebook computer. Apparently, he had taken the computer to a repair shop in April of 2019 but never paid for it and never picked it up, though he did sign a receipt.

That receipt indicated that if the computer was not picked up within 45 days after it was finished, the owner would forfeit possession of it to the shop owner. After several attempts to contact Hunter when it was finished to no avail, the shop owner, John Paul Mac Isaac, became suspicious when he saw what was on it.

The computer contained numerous emails from Hunter Biden about his dealings in Ukraine and China. It also contained pictures and videos of Hunter in not very flattering situations.

One picture is of Hunter in bed with a crack pipe. I know that sounds like an answer to a game of Clue, but it is important, as it is a recent picture, so it shows Joe Biden lied when he said his son had overcome his crack addiction. That is probably whey he never picked up the computer, as he was too stoned to remember about it.

There are other pics of him using drugs, such as him smoking something in a bathtub. There are also sex videos of him with women who are not his wife.

Donald Trump got hammered for saying he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose one supporter, and that was hypothetical! Here we have Joe Biden’s son smoking crack on film with naked hookers and no one can be bothered to even mention it on the network news. LOL (PJ Media. Did).

Other than the slight by the MSM, why Hunter’s drug problem is important is, if in fact Hunter was still addicted to drugs, why in the world would Burisma hire him to be on their board? And why would China give him $1.5 billion of investment equity?

If you had $1.5 billion, would you give it to a crackhead? If you were the CEO of a large business, would you hire a drug addict to be on the board and pay him millions for doing nothing? The only possible answer is those companies were paying for the influence he had with his VP father.

In any case, the shop owner contacted the FBI back in December of 2019, while the Ukraine impeachment was occurring. Apparently, he recognized those emails were relevant to the impeachment, which they were, and he was frustrated over how the impeachment was proceeding, being a Trump supporter.

The FBI subpoenaed the computer and took possession of it. It has been variously reported that their reason for doing so was because of investigating possible money laundering or child porn being indicated on the notebook. But none of that has been verified. But what does seem to be the case is that the FBI never did anything with the computer.

The emails were found amongst a massive trove of data recovered from a laptop computer that had been dropped off, possibly by Hunter Biden, at a repair shop in Delaware. The Post reports that other material extracted from the computer includes a raunchy, 12-minute video that appears to show Hunter […] smoking crack while engaged in a sex act with an unidentified woman, as well as numerous other sexually explicit images. The computer and its hard drive were seized by the FBI in December (PJ Media. Smoking).

Before he gave the computer to the FBI, the shop owner made a copy of the hard drive. When he saw that the FBI had done nothing with the computer, he gave a copy of the hard drive to Rudy Giuliani in October 2020, and Rudy released the contents to the New York Post.

Hunter and Ukraine

Following is an overview of the most relevant emails, as reported by the Post.

Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company, according to emails obtained by The Post…

An earlier email from May 2014 also shows [Vadym] Pozharskyi, reportedly Burisma’s No. 3 exec, asking Hunter for advice on how you could use your influence on the company’s behalf….

Hunter Biden responded by saying he was with Archer in Doha, Qatar, and asked for more information about the formal (if any) accusations being made against Burisma. …

Less than eight months after Pozharskyi thanked Hunter Biden for the introduction to his dad, the then-vice president admittedly pressured Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk into getting rid of Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin by threatening to withhold a $1 billion US loan guarantee during a December 2015 trip to Kiev [the capital of Ukraine] (Smoking).

Please understand what is being revealed here. Joe Biden lied when he said he was not aware of Hunter’s business activities with Burisma. He was in fact fully aware of what his son was doing, having met with one of the top executives of the company. Even the MSM has been forced to admit this fact.

The suggestion that Joe Biden might have met with a Burisma representative is consequential, because he has repeatedly insisted that he never discussed his son’s business with him. But the emails provide no details on whether Pozharskyi and Biden actually met and, if so, what they discussed (Trib/ AP. AP explains).

Despite the spin in the second sentence, this report shows Hunter was fully aware that the only reason he was hired was because of the influence he had with his father, the then Vice President. But then, these emails only confirm what we already knew, that Joe Biden lied when he said he was not aware of his son’s overseas business dealings:

Joe Biden has repeatedly claimed to have been unaware of his son’s business dealings.

I never discussed a single thing with my son about anything having to do with Ukraine. No one has indicated I have, Biden claimed last year. But his insistence that he was in the dark about Hunter’s Ukraine business dealings was contradicted by Hunter himself. According to an article in The New Yorker from July 2019 titled, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign? the former vice president did discuss overseas business dealings with his son.

A photo obtained by Tucker Carlson Tonight back in October 2019 also showed Joe Biden and his son Hunter golfing with Burisma Holdings board member Devon Archer. The photo was taken in August 2014, a few months after Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma (PJ Media. Smoking).

These lies indicate Joe Biden is covering something up. Yet, Trump got impeached because he recognized there was something fishy here that needed to be investigated. But it is Joe and Hunter Biden who needs investigated.

The only response of the Biden campaign to this allegation was to say the indicated meeting was not on his official schedule. But such a meeting would not be on an official schedule as it was not an official meeting of a VP. It was a private meeting for the benefit of his son,