Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

“Scientific” Theories That Are Offal
“Scientific” Theories That Are Offal
“Scientific” Theories That Are Offal
Ebook75 pages33 minutes

“Scientific” Theories That Are Offal

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

How can someone say, “At the beginning of time, this or that happened...”? and even be relatively certain it’s accurate?

They can’t.

When did time “begin”?

Unless you were there - at the beginning of time - you don’t know, you can’t know and, the possibility, the probability, is, that you never will know.

So we make up theories, reasons, possibilities or probabilities of the theory - at times contriving data - so our “proof” holds water.

You can do the same thing with Depends.

All too often theories are offal, no logic involved, just visceral strain.

And what difference does it make today?

Are we living happily ever after?

LanguageEnglish
Release dateAug 23, 2021
ISBN9781005573867
“Scientific” Theories That Are Offal
Author

Carolyn Franklin M.A.

M. A. Communication StudiesM. A. EducationB. A. Psychology30 years voice training (San Francisco Opera)Voice/Speech improvement CoachContact Carolyn - voicedynamicscf@yahoo.com

Read more from Carolyn Franklin M.A.

Related to “Scientific” Theories That Are Offal

Related ebooks

Religion & Science For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for “Scientific” Theories That Are Offal

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    “Scientific” Theories That Are Offal - Carolyn Franklin M.A.

    Scientific Theories That Are Offal

    Carolyn Franklin M. A.

    voicedynamicscf@yahoo.com

    All Rights Reserved 2021

    No Duplication Without Written Permission

    Table of Contents

    SCIENTIFIC THEORIES THAT ARE OFFAL

    SCIENTIFIC THEORIES

    VARIOUS OFFAL THEORIES

    AQUATIC SEA MAMMAL THEORY

    HOMO SAPIENS STUDY OF THROWING

    WE ARE DESCENDANTS FROM ONE MAN THEORY

    THE EVOLVING BRAIN THEORY

    OUT OF AFRICA THEORY

    INTO CHINA THEORY

    PANGAEA - THE EARTH IS ONE UNIT

    BIG BANG THEORY

    THE WORLD IS FLAT THEORY

    THE HORSE-INTELLIGENCE THEORY

    THE BIBLE STORY

    WHY SO MUCH VARIETY IN HUMANS?

    GIANTS AMONG US

    THE END TIMES THEORY

    ADAM THEORY - FIRST MAN

    THE FIRST RULE OF SHOW BUSINESS THEORY

    GOOD VS EVIL THEORY

    HUMANS ARE BORN EVIL THEORY

    THEORY OF RELIGION

    THE FIRST MAN

    THEORIES VS FACTS - MIRACLES

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    PUBLICATIONS BY CAROLYN FRANKLIN M. A.

    How can someone say something like, Since the beginning of time, this or that happened and…? and be certain it’s accurate?

    They can’t.

    When did time begin?

    Unless you were there - at the beginning of time - you don’t know, you can’t know and, the possibility, the probability, is, that you never will know.

    And what difference does it make today?

    SCIENTIFIC THEORIES

    Scientific theories go something like,

    "It is possible, perhaps it’s possible, the probability is…, we theorize that…, according to data, the possibility, probability is ….

    According to research by Drs. Emehnschultz, Feldenstern, Wickenfield, et al, there is a probability of the earth being in existence 300 macronic zecrons and 20 minutes ago…"

    And, they’re serious.

    I understand curiosity, but there’s a limit to credibility.

    We cannot disprove theories nor attempt to always explain nor clarify them. I am questioning the theories’ common senselessness, their improbable results, the impractical conclusions, the dances that step on their own toes…

    I hope to show the improbability of theories that attempt to explain complex events that probably never occurred. They are impossible.

    VARIOUS OFFAL THEORIES

    One persistent theory, to date, probably the most popular, is that humans evolved from primates, apes, gorillas, and monkeys.

    And, the reason for this theory is that we all walk on our hind legs and have hands and a thumb. Humans also have a tail bone which is residue from our (re)prehensile tails.

    But, there is one snag that precludes, perhaps - totally - invalidates, the ape theory.

    This snag obliterates all further scientific pursuits. It already invalidates a study before the aha! can be formed.

    Humans have a subcutaneous layer of fat and primates do not.

    Why?

    Why do humans have a layer of fat and primates do not?

    Obviously, humans need it and primates do not.

    Mother Nature does not waste a thing. Every thing in every thing has a purpose.

    Let’s examine why we

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1