The Concept of Service Quality in Commercial Practice

By Amelikeh Confidence E. N.

Commercial Practice is the work done for the earning, acquisition, and ownership of existence and within existence! What one acquires, the one is said to own, resulting in the application of ownership to anything at all acquirable, including the slave; however, the slave is held in possession disowned and hence cannot be said to be owned! We cannot accurately say that one owns a slave nor that a slave has owner, when the slave is held disowned! The disowned thing has no owner. The application of ownership to the slave has brought difficulty in telling the relationship between parent and child, husband and wife, employer and employee, and citizen and state, for instance, as a person being owned sounds as the person being a slave. We have redeemed the reality of ownership. There are things one can own and things one cannot own although acquirable: therefore, there are things one has the Right to acquire and things one has no Right to acquire. If you cannot own it and you acquire it then you have stolen it, rendering you a criminal, as theft is a crime! Learn Commercial Practice: it is the legitimate method of acquiring and possessing, and ownership.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Partridge Publishing Singapore
• Release date: Jul 30, 2020
• ISBN: 9781543758771

Amelikeh Confidence E. N.

The author of this book is the author of the book “Ceasefire! Religions and the Way to God Controversy” that tackled misplaced and misunderstood central religious dogmas. Worldwide difficulty in understanding the concepts of Quality, Ownership, Service, and Trading of possessions, prompted him to write this book to clarify them.

Book preview

Copyright © 2020 by Amelikeh Confidence E. N.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or by any information storage retrieval system without the written permission of the author except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews.

Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.

www.partridgepublishing.com/singapore

CONTENTS

Dedication

Acknowledgement

Prefatory Note

The Introduction

The Matter of Commercial Practice

The Matter of Service

The Matter of Service Quality

The Commercial Practice Process

Dedication

I dedicate this work to God Jesus, the Lord God of the Christians, the same that is the God of Abraham, God of Isaac, and God of Jacob. And my God my Glory.

Acknowledgement

I am profoundly grateful to my God the God Almighty, The Jesus of Nazareth, for this work.

Prefatory Note

You are about to enter into arena of principles for legitimate trading and related and linked business practices in line with the fact that trading exist to spare the human species the incur of illegitimacy in attempting acquisition and discharge. Even as trading activity is not in isolation and rather in link with other businesses, the other businesses as well must be such that they spare the human species incur of illegitimacy: because, illegitimacy is registration of defeat of existence. The illegitimate is the defeated. Yet, we make acquisition to exist; therefore, acquisition should not deprive nor deny the acquirer existence: however, without observing principles of legitimacy, acquisition will not fail to deny and deprive the acquirer existence! For this cause, I write this book, to aid us in ensuring that we exist in attempting to exist. It is disaster failing to exist by the attempt to exist. If by the attempt to exist you will fail to exist, then it is better for you not to attempt existence at all! If you attempt to exist, it is fitting that you succeed thereby. This book, The Concept of Service quality in Commercial Practice, presents in good detail principles for legitimate business and trading! This book exist to lead the humankind to retrieve lost existence and to acquire imminent existence: there is the imminent existence; however, until we retrieve the lost existence, we cannot access the human existence imminent: hitherto this year, the year AD2020, the human species is ‘neither here nor there’ in description. I, Amelikeh Confidence E.N., present for learning and practice rules for unindicted trading or transaction and business: this book will equip you with empowerment to carry out all business activities and trading or transaction innocently, as an innocent person, and with innocent persons. You are not to be guilty, and it is not enough for you to be Not guilty: you need to be innocent; you will acquire the knowledge of innocence from this book.

Legitimate trade and business are not always legal though; nevertheless, where legitimate trade is illegal, even there is legality in deficit and government should look at the situation, design and set the right. Only the legitimate has the Right to be legal; we do not grant illegitimacy eligibility for legalization: we do not legalize illegitimacy, and we cannot possibly legitimize illegitimacy by legalization. That, legalization does not legitimize because legalization has not the power to legitimize; legalization lacks the ability to wield the power for legitimization: legalization can only legitimize the legitimate, which is to declare the legitimate as accepted and included of legitimate society. The whole work of legalization boils down to the announcement such as This government has endorsed this legitimacy to the people of the land for observance. It is antilegal of any legal system to endorse an illegitimacy for observance as if it were legitimacy! The antilegal should be illegal: government should check well to ensure that the antilegal is not legalized! We can only legitimize what is legitimate; otherwise, the only way of legitimizing what is illegitimate is to remove it as the illegitimacy it happens to be. The removal of the illegitimate makes possible arrival at the legitimate. The legally adorned illegitimacy remains illegitimate and antilegal as how the lion remains the carnivore it is even if called by a new name. The sphere of trade and business must respect the law of the land, and what the law of the land endorses is it that is legal: thus, the operations of business and trading must observe legitimacy even as legitimacy is the foundation for the law and legality! Government should know that if it is crime, it cannot be business and must not be certified to operate as a business; if it is crime, it cannot be a transaction except in the domicile of criminals! I welcome you officially to commercial practice, my friend!

Amelikeh Confidence E. N.

AD2020, May 20, Wednesday.

Commercial practice is in common parlance Money-making venture; but the same called Money-making is actually Money-earning in meaning, and Money-making sounds like Money-manufacturing which is process of forming or producing banknote/coin or cash, or Legal Tender: manufacturing or producing money is different from earning money. I have earned money is different from I have manufactured money! To earn, and To make or To produce or To manufacture; they are different although what is to be earned has to be what is formed or manufactured or produced or what exists. It must exist if it is to be earned: and To earn it is not the same as To form or produce or manufacture it as what it originally is. What does not exist is not earned: It is earned is It exists.

If it is to be earned, it must exist; if it is not to be earned, then it may not exist: if it is not to be earned, its existence does not matter much. Even as its existence does not matter much, so also it is that its nonexistence does not matter much. It is the existence of what is to be earned that matters; thus, it is the nonexistence of what is to be earned that is of much concern: the nonexistence of what is to be earned calls for remedy and to it is remedy provided, because it is to be earned. It is to be earned is It is to be benefitted from. Therefore, what exists does exist to be beneficial to possession: that is, whatever that exists does exist as a benefit so that in the absence of benefit there is not existence. Existence is benefit; and existence is beneficial: whatever that exists does exist as benefit or else it does not exist. If therefore, there is an existing reference but that is not of benefit, although it exists, it exists not: whatever that exists but does not exist whilst existing, the same is the waste of its form. Waste is unbeneficial.

If it must be earned, then it cannot fail to exist, then it cannot fail existence! Existence is compulsory for what is to be earned, and that is for what is beneficial: to exist is to be beneficial and to the beneficial is existence compulsory. The beneficial reference cannot fail to exist: so, what cannot fail to exist also cannot fail to be beneficial. Beneficialness is compulsory for the existent. That is, once you exist you cannot fail to be beneficial as failure to be beneficial is declaration that you do not exist and you therefore cannot exist, since you do not exist: failure to be beneficial whilst existing is warrant to be discarded whilst existing. A reference can be discarded whilst existing, and a reference can be discarded in its existing form, which is analogously the situation of Living in the grave rather than in the grave as a corpse. To exist is to be beneficial; to be beneficial is to exist: without existence, there is not beneficialness; and without beneficialness, there is not existence. If it must exist, it must be beneficial.

What is to be earned is the same that matters; what is not to be earned, the same does not matter: if it matters, it matters to the earner of it. No earner: no mattering; no significance or no worth or no importance or no value. Because the matter is like this for existence, that by earning is mattering, possessable references freely placed in possession, rather than earned into possession by the possessor; their possessors do not value them. Only the earner values freely gotten possession because the earner values what the earner earns rather than the price paid towards earning it: what is valued is the same that is earned. You cannot earn it if you do not value it or if you cannot value it; and you cannot value it if you do not earn it or if you cannot earn it. If it is not valued, it is not earned; if it is earned, it exists: if it exists, then it is valued or of value because it is earned or is to be earned. The valueless reference does not exist!

Whatever that exists, exists with value; its value: value is it that exists. If it exist, it exist by its value. Existence is value: existence is worth. Therefore, it is only what is thought to be valueless or what is judged as valueless, or so perceived; it is only a reference in such form or of such label or tagging that is discarded or set aside to be discarded. If it is of value, or thought to be of value or perceived so to be, it is retained. The value it is that is accepted; and value it is that is taken or received. We accept value and we take delivery of value: we do not accept valuelessness and we do not take delivery of valuelessness. One can encounter valuelessness but one is not to accept valuelessness and also not to take delivery of what is valueless.

And the earner is the same that is justified to have possession of what the earner possesses so that only the earner is legitimate as one that has some reference in possession. The earner only is legitimate possessor: the legitimate possessor is owner! Not everyone having things in possession is owner of those things in his/her possession; earnership is required for ownership: one must earn what the one has in possession or has access to for the one to be owner of the same that the one has in possession or has access to. And the value or worth of a thing or a reference is with the earner of it! The earner values the earned!

The earner puts value on the earned; the earner determines or sets the value of the earned: thus, the earner is value to the earned. The valuable earner has valuable earning; and the earning that is of value has the earner that is of value: the valueless earner is imputation of valuelessness to the earned. However, the earner that is of value, the same has the capacity to put value even on valuelessness once such earner earns the reference that is of valuelessness. For instance, therefore, although gold is an earnable reference that is generally of great value, gold is of more value with the king than with the servant; and gold on the slave is simply an insult to both the gold and the slave. That is to say, that putting gold on the slave devalues the gold and yet the action does not increase the value of the slave as it does not render or declare the slave free of slavery. The valuable reference has valuable earner; if therefore it is your wish that a reference gets value, then you should get it earned or accepted by a valuable earner. Nevertheless, when it comes to the slave, we do not speak of a valuable earner; that is because the slave human does not have a valuable earner: the human has not value in slavery no matter how the slavemaster happens to be! Slavery is not original with the human organism!

Value is in originality and the earned has an earner of originality to it: the earner is of originality to the earned. What is to be earned is to be earned by what is of originality to it, which is what is of the capacity to set what is to be earned in the form or status of its originality. The earner earns what is to be earned to set what is to be earned in the form or status that is of originality to the earned. Earning is a process of bringing into status or/and form of originality; earning is restorative a process, a process restoring originality to what is earned. If therefore a reference that is to be earned is earned only to be ushered into its unoriginal form or status, that reference is not earned; then that reference that is to be earned is lost: loss of originality is loss of value. And we do not earn into status or form that is out of status or form of originality. For example, shoe is for the foot so that the foot is earner of shoe; one who earns shoe earns shoe because of his/her foot; if therefore shoe is earned only to be ushered into application by the hand, that shoe is not earned but rather lost as it is stolen from the foot. That is to declare that, only a footed thing can earn shoe; shoe is not earnable to the footless thing: however, the footless thing can purchase shoe.

Purchasing is not exactly earning; there is more to earning than act of purchase. Foot’s use of shoe is of the originality of shoe; shoe is fabricated purposely for the foot: originality is about what it is for. That is, your originality is about what you are for; what you are formed purposely for: your value therefore is of what you are formed purposely for. Shoe therefore is brought into originality by foot’s use of shoe: however, bringing shoe to use by foot is the same as the consumption of shoe.

The act of bringing a reference into status or/and form that is of originality to it is the act of consumption, the act of consuming it. That reference that can bring the reference that is to be earned into status or/and form of originality to the reference to be earned, the same is the consumer of the reference that is to be earned. Thus, earning is consumption; the act of earning is effectively the act of consumption, and the earner is consumer: without consumption, there is not earning. Without earning, there is no consumption; merely possessing it is not exactly consuming it. And as there is self-earning so that there is self-originalization, there is the act of self-consumption. What can self-exist, the same can self-originalize, bringing itself to form or/and status that is of originality to it, and the same can self-earn; the same is the reference that can self-consume. And consumption is act of incorporating into originalizer form or status. The consumer is like a framework, providing place for the hanging of what is consumed; like bookshelf providing place for the holding of book; and like tree branch providing place for bird to perch or nest. In the shoe example, the shoe is formed drawing from the foot; and not the foot formed drawing from the shoe: thus, the foot is of origin to the shoe. And of course, the foot has facet for the hanging on of shoe; it is the foot that carries the shoe about and not the shoe carrying the foot about, and it behooves the shoe to hold on to the foot so that the foot can carry it.

Loss of value is valuelessness; and valuelessness is nonexistence: what exists, and yet rendered the unoriginal of its form or status, such a reference is that reference that is lost, and that is to declare that it is lost to the originality of its form or status. If it is lost, it has lost its value; if it is lost, it has not value: what is nonexistent is lost; and what exists but without its value is lost. For a reference to be lost is for the reference to be lost to its form or status of originality, its form or status of value; and that is to be lost to the earner of it because the earner of it is value of it and determines and sets its value! If it is lost, it is lost to the earner of it; and not to the unearner or nonearner of it.

And, its status or form of originality includes its place of originality, and other factors such as race, age, stature, outlook such as beauty or handsomeness and skin complexion, language, and tribe and other factor, in referring to human persons. Place of originality is place of value like how form or status of originality is form or status of value: the earner is therefore the place, the form, and/or status of value of what is to be earned or what is earned. The nonearner or the unearner is not value of the earned or of what is to be earned; and such is not to take into possession to attempt owning or accessing the reference that is to be earned. Ownership is of earnership; and earner is owner, legitimate owner and to the same is warranted the possession of what is earned or of what is to be earned: and consumership is of earnership.

The earner brings it in; the owner takes possession of it; and the consumer benefits from it: the consumer it is that should bring it in and the consumer it is that should take possession of it so that there may be consumption or the obtaining of benefit from it by the consumer. If the consumer must consume it, then the consumer must have possession of it; and if the consumer must have possession of it, then the consumer must bring it in. The consumer it is that must earn it and possess it. Of course, the consumer it is that must value it: the consumer is reception and the consumer is recipient. With the consumer is reception.

If it matters, then it matters to some recipient; it cannot matter to none and still matter: if it matters, it matters because it matters to some recipient; and that recipient can be the same reference that is mattering. If therefore it matters, it matters at least to self; thus, self can be recipient of a reference: there is self-reception. As there is self-reception, even so is there self-earning, and self-valuing, and self-acceptance; and there is self-originalization: thus, there is self-existence. If it is earned, it exists; if it is self-earned, it self-exists!

If therefore it matters, then it matters at least to self; however, this At least mattering to self is the foundation for mattering without which all mattering is unmattering!

There can be self-valuing, self-mattering in which case the reference matters to the self of it; the reference exists to itself: in fact, the reference that must matter to another must first matter to the self of it or else it cannot matter to another that it can or should matter. If it matters, it matters because it exists; if it matters to self, it matters to self because it exists to self so that self of it sees and has it as existing: if it exists to self so that it matters to self as valuable to self, then it is accepted and received by the self of it, earned and owned by the self of it and thereby consumed by the self of it to the end that it is incorporated in the self of it so that it is held together in one piece as what it originally is. If it matters to the self of it, one component of it accepts and receives another component of it and by that is it held together in one piece. If it does not matter to the self of it, one component of it also does not matter to another component of it and there is falling apart of it component from component: if it falls apart component from component, it loses mattering component apart from component and thus can lose all mattering possible to it. If it matters to self, then it can matter to another that it should matter; if therefore it is of zero self-value, it can only effectively be of zero value to another that it can or should be value. Thus, another that must value the reference that is of zero self-value has to work it into obtaining or attaining positive self-value first or else that another cannot ever effectively value it any more than zero value! The valuer of it must give it value which when accepted by it, it is valued to the self of it and valued to the valuer of it! The valuer and the valued reference share the valued reference’s value.

The value is first owned by the valuer, and the valuer gives it to the reference that is to be valued; the reference that is to be valued accepts and receives the value given to it by the valuer of it, and the valuer shares the same value that the valued reference has accepted and received of the valuer with the valued reference!

Thus, value is instructable; value can be given in the form of instruction, so that value can be taught to what is to be valued: in fact, instruction should be of value; it is value that should be instructed if there must be instruction at all, as nonvalue cannot be said to be an instruction. The instruction itself must exist in form or/and status of its originality; like this, it is of value: if not like this so that it is of nonvalue, then it does not exist. If it does not exist, it cannot be given out as instruction.

The self of it is the components of it together. The earner is incorporator of the earned, and the earned is it that matters to the earner of it and by that does the earned reference matter. Therefore, it mattering to the self of it allows it to exist in the form that it can matter to another that it should matter: if it fails to matter to the self of it, it is scattered, and in the scattered or fragmented form cannot matter to another as what it originally is. Originality it is that matters; it is the originality of form or/and status that matters: what is original is the same that matters to the self of it, and the same it is that is of matter to another that it should matter.

If therefore it does not matter, then it is because it has not a recipient at least at the instant or duration it matters not. Where it does not matter, there it has not a recipient; not even the self of it. When it does not matter, even then has it not a recipient; not even the self of it. If therefore it is rejected, or viewed or perceived as rejected, it does not and cannot matter: the Reject does not matter. And there is not a reference that is of mattering to its rejecter! Whatever it is that you reject, the same cannot possibly matter to you: if it must matter to you, then you must accept it and go on to receive it. What you have not accepted, the same you must not receive or take delivery of; do not be reception to what you have not accepted and especially to what you cannot accept: there are references in existence that you cannot possibly accept as a human being, and such you must neither attempt to accept nor receive. Punishment, for instance, is not acceptable to you as a human being; so, you do not accept it and you do not receive it; you act to reject it and to avoid it: that is how you are to treat punishment. Therefore, punishment for instance is a reference that you are not supposed to earn, and you are not supposed to yearn to earn it so that punishment is not an aim you should set. However, if you earn punishment, it shall be delivered to you well packaged, simply because you are the one that has decided to earn it rather than earning the otherwise that is health and safety. Earn what is of health and safety to you, if you must earn anything at all.

And the recipient owns; so that to matter is a matter of mattering to owner: and the owner is legitimate earner, and unless the earner is legitimate the earner is not earner. The illegitimate earner is not an earner: earning is legitimate only. Purchase is purchase whether legitimate or otherwise illegitimate; but earning is not earning if illegitimate: earning is only legitimate earning. You can illegitimately purchase, but you cannot illegitimately earn! If you earn illegitimately or if you earn what is illegitimate, you have not earned at all so that you only attempt earning. If it is illegitimate to you, then it is against you; the situation is just like you acquiring or attempting to welcome your eater at breakfast time: such situation is not situation of earning but rather of self-unearning which is self-rejection. In earning, you cannot reject you and say that you have earned something else: your earning must be to the acceptance and establishment of yourself and that is why self-earning is important. All earning depends upon self-earning and do function to support the act of self-earning and status and/or form of earned-self.

And if you earn illegitimately, you earn against legitimate means of earning so that you earn to the loss of legitimate means of earning and by that you earn against the earnable reference; thus, the earnable reference is unearned. If unearned, it is unvalued so that it is rendered unexisting whilst existing, and that is to render it the dead or waste of its form or status. We do not earn it against it like how we do not earn it against us that earn it: if you wish to earn it against it, it is more prudent to let it alone or even discard it. Earning it against it is the same as discarding it whilst not discarding it; earning it is earning it for it and for you the earner: that is, what is to be earned is not to be earned into destruction. What is to be earned is not earned to destroy the earner; and it is not earned to be destroyed: destruction is not of earning. Take it or purchase it to destroy it is not the same as Earn it; if it is destroyed by it being taken delivery of, then it is not earned by it being taken delivery of: and if it is taken delivery of as destroyed, then it is not earned even if purchased so that its earning is only attempted. Purchase is simply an attempt at earning what is purchased; act of purchase is not exactly act of earning: act of purchase may or may not ever lead to act of earning. The fact that you have purchased is not the same as you have earned!

Purchase is only basic legitimate method of acquisition, or the act of one tagging it as one’s own. One may barely be justified for making acquisition of a reference if the one purchases the reference; thus, the act of purchase is not enough for act of earning: nevertheless, act of purchase must always occur if there must be earning or else theft is committed.

It is earned to make the earner, and it is earned to be incorporated by the earner of it and by that establish it in the form and/or status of originality to it: it is earned to make the earner, and it is earned to make it that is earned. It is not earned to unmake the earner; and it is not earned to unmake it that is earned. Referring to the shoe example; the shoe purchased is to be foot-used without which it is unearned even if purchased: but if foot-used, it gets worn out and by that destroyed over time as used and that appears to defeat the idea of It is not earned into destruction. However, the shoe has its longevity which is also determined by a number of factors aside sheer longevity in terms of time; whether foot-used or not, the shoe will surely come to ruins. The shoe coming to ruins unused is the service of the shoe wasting, depleting without being beneficial to the earner of it, and that is what it being earned into destruction really refers. If it is earned into no service or disservice, it is not earned. If it is obtained or acquired into uselessness or into nonbeneficialness so that it is gotten into nonmattering and nonvaluing and thus into nonreception or unreception, it is not obtained or acquired to be said to be earned. If it must expire then it must expire used, it must expire valued, it must expire mattered, or else it is not earned but rather lost or wasted.

Those references that are not forever in longevity, they expire; but they must expire only as used or benefitted from as they must be used and benefitted from by the earner thereof therefor. The earner/owner is there for the earned/owned as the earned/owned is there for the earner/owner of it. And speaking of earner, we need to get it that there is what must earn what; and that is the earner: but there is also what must not earn what, and that is nonearner even if that makes acquisition legitimately or otherwise illegitimately. All nonearner references or nonearner factors are thief references or thief factors and see to theft effect only; they can never earn and they can never own although they can make acquirement: such can only steal, and so we endeavor to prevent such from acquiring and benefitting from what they cannot earn.

The thief acquires, and the thief can carry out act of purchase in making acquirement just like how the owner carries out act of purchase in making acquirement; but the thief does not earn, and the thief does not own a reference: the thief is in direct opposition to owner/earner.

Purchase is not exactly what earning is; and acquiring is not exactly what earning is: there is more to earning than sheer act of purchase and sheer act of acquirement. The earner is of status or/and form of originality to the earned reference! Earning is into form or status that is of originality to form or/and status of what is earned; otherwise, there is theft. If you do not earn, then you steal; if you do not own, then you steal. You are either owner/earner or thief!

If you do not have, you are a thief; if you do not have what you should have, you are a thief; and if you possess what is not your earning, what you have not earned, or what you are not supposed to earn, you are also a thief thereby! You are not supposed to earn it, if you attempt to earn it you are a thief of it; you are supposed to earn it, if you fail to earn it you are thief to it! If you leave it to the thief or to theft, you are thief to it: to steal is to let the thief take it and that thief can be you yourself, and to steal is to prevent the owner from taking it and that owner can be you yourself! If it is lost, it is stolen; if it is stolen, it is lost: sending it into lost status or lost form or lost place or the place for it if lost or otherwise bringing it into lost place or lost status or lost form is act of stealing it! Where the lost reference is held, that place is lost place; it is place for the lost, and it is place for loss, as whatever that enters there is lost and by that shut off to the earner/owner of it. The lost thing is held in lost place: we do not put the found thing in lost place except if we simply wish to pass the found thing through the lost place and out of it into the found place for it. Sometimes, the found thing must pass through lost place to get to found place for it, and we do not put lost thing in found place. Such lost place is like wall of doom, like shackle of captivity; such must be broken, and that is why the found thing might need pass through lost place. It is incongruent to attempt settling lost reference in found place; it is also incongruent to attempt settling found reference in lost place: the congruity is that lost reference is put in lost place whilst found reference is put in found place. If lost reference is not located in lost place, found reference cannot be located in found place: the finder must have the found, and the loser must have the lost! Incongruity is error, it is declaration of registered gap that is loss or absence of continuity and thus presence of demise; presence of demise is absence of commencement, which is absence of existence: existence is a matter of congruity. Existence does not operate with error! Error is nonexistence located! And there are levels of nonexistence; we can speak of absolute nonexistence, and we can also speak of the otherwise form or status of nonexistence which is nonexistence that is not absolute.

Therefore, you do not have the Right to fail to earn what you must earn; and you do not have the Right to succeed in earning what you are not supposed to earn. We are speaking of thief and theft action. You do not discard yours; because that act of discarding yours grants you room to take another’s, albeit illegitimately as you cannot possibly take another’s legitimately: thus, discarding yours gives you the opportunity to steal. There is no legitimate way of taking what is not yours! In earning, you earn only yours; minus this, you steal: if you earn another’s, you commit the crime of theft by that! If you must earn, you must earn only yours! Whosoever therefore that must bring you some reference to earn, the same must bring to you what is yours only, and you pay him/her for bringing it to you. Such a one deserves his/her pay because he/she has not left you in thief-condition which is the situation of lack or loss of yours, he/she has delivered you from thiefhood and you pay him/her towards delivering him/her also from his/her particular form or status of thiefhood: it is of mutual deliverance. To pay for is not exactly To earn; Earning is towards Paying for, and Paying for is also towards Earning: we Earn to Pay for, and we Pay for to Earn.

You cannot take or possess another’s legitimately; what another has earned or what another is to earn, you cannot legitimately obtain it to say that you have earned it: you cannot plunge another into thief condition and claim that you have earned. As the thief has not earned, even so the one that renders one thief has not earned; it is like in slavery, because in slavery you cannot render a person a slave only for you to be free: if you make one a thief, you are thief too and not an earner to be owner. In earning, we do not plunge into lack or loss the one what is earned is obtained from; such a one is not a thief and that is why he/she is bringing to you yours. When the thief repents and that is when the person that is thief eschews theft and becomes of earner sort, the thief gives back to whom the thief has stolen from and that gives room for the thief to obtain his/her own into his/her possession! Of course, if you fail to let go of what is in your possession that is not yours, you cannot obtain into your place what is yours. You do not mix what is yours with what is not yours together in your possession because the result is that you are in lack and loss so that you are a thief. If you plunge the one you obtain your earning from into situation of lack, you have not earned; rather, you have stolen even if you made purchase! The thief it is that obtains or acquires to lack or loss to the source of the obtained reference! If you are not a thief, where you obtain your earning from; that place makes profit: but if you are thief, where you obtain a reference; that place makes loss.

When you have yours, you cannot steal: stealing is simply a matter of possessing another’s, or possessing what is not yours including No possession. Zero possession is not yours; you cannot exist in lack or loss: only the positive possession, and the positive possession that is for you, is yours. The positive possession that is against you is not yours, and such is negative to you in effect; the negative possession or debt is not yours; the zero possession, which is sheer lack, is not yours: only what is positive and for you is yours and only such you are to earn and to purchase and to possess and own! If it is positive and yet indicts you, it is against you and by that does it work out negativity against you and against what is for you: what is for you, it exonerates you and justifies you. Indictment is not owned, it is not an owned reference; it is not an earning and it is not to be earned: exoneration and justification are earnings and they can be owned. There is not a reference that exists unjustified; and there is not a reference that survives indicted: existence is justified; and the justified exists. Where or when a reference is justified, there or then does the reference exist: if unjustified, it does not exist.

Even as existence is justified and existence is valued, and that existence is earned and owned; so also it is that the justified is valued or valuable and the valued or valuable is justified. Because the justified is valued or valuable so that if it is valued or valuable then it is because it is justified; if it is unjustified and yet valued as unjustified as it is, it appears as if it is justified and can easily be included in justified catalog: thus, we endeavor to value only the justified reference. We value only the justified; we do not value the unjustified: it is of theft act to value the unjustified, and that also steals value from the justified and yet value belongs to the justified. The justified and the unjustified do not share value; and they do not divide value: they are reciprocally excluding, the justified and the unjustified! There is not a place in-between justification and the otherwise.

Value is to the justified, and to the justified it is that we do put value: the valuer has to be justified, and only one that is justified may value a valuable reference. The recipient therefore must be justified: the earner must be justified, and the owner must be justified; even the purchaser must be justified. It is necessary that only the earner carries out act of purchase; act of purchase by the nonearner is act of theft by act of purchase. The fact that you carry out act of purchase does not mean that you are not a thief; and it does not mean that you have not stolen the same that you have purchased. One can carry out act of theft by means of act of purchase: in fact, act of purchase is a very effective method of stealing as it easily defeats prying eyes of shallow legality.

Value is justified and value justifies, earning is justified and earning justifies, and ownership is justified and ownership justifies. Justification it is that earns and owns; and justification it is that is earned and owned.

Losing is unjustified and unvalued and does not value; stealing is unjustified and unvalued and it does not value one that steals and the one that is stolen from: condemnation is without value, and condemnation steals. The condemned or unjustified is a thief, the condemned or the unjustified steals: the thief or one that steals is condemned or unjustified. Only the thief therefore is to be condemned, commercially speaking. If you condemn the nonthief, you justify the nonthief to steal without the nonthief necessarily becoming a thief: such is empowered to rob or take by force references of his/her earning sort at will!

There is earning sort; the sort of references one is justified to earn: then, amongst the earning sort is the particular earned reference regarding the particular earner. Theft concerns earning sort and theft also concerns particularly earned reference amongst earning sort regarding particular earner. However, the particular earner cum the particularly earned reference amongst the earning sort makes one defined reference, which is a couple; the same reference earned by another makes a different reference that is a different couple: there are several factors that define the earned reference, including factors such as the reference to be earned, the earner as a reference plus social stand or other such recognition, the place it is earned from, the place to which it is earned which is the abode of the earner, purchase price, the time it is earned, and how long it is to be owned by the earner, and others such as the benefit or service it is to the earner/owner of it which goes on to impute to it value.

Earning matters, existence matters, and justification matters; but stealing does not matter, the thief does not matter, and condemnation does not matter: if it does not matter, then there is no recipient for it so that the thief has not a recipient for it, and act of stealing has not a recipient for it, and condemnation has not a recipient for it. They are not earned: theft, thief, and condemnation. There is no natural or original recipient for theft and thief, and there is no natural or original recipient for condemnation and the condemned; no reference exists by condemnation and not a reference exists as condemned, and not a reference exists by theft and not a reference exists as thief or as stolen: existence is by justification, and existence is by being earned and existence is by being earner.

The earned reference and earner reference are they that exist; nonearned and nonearner references do not exist even if they are in existence: existence has its version of nonexistence and this version of nonexistence is nonexistence that exists! We can speak of absolute nonexistence; we can also speak of existing nonexistence, which is nonexistence located within the bounds of existence: absolute nonexistence is without the bounds of existence.

The earned reference it is that exists; the earner reference also is it that exists: it exists only if it is earner or if it is earned. If stolen, it does not exist and it does not exist if thief so that it does not exist if it steals. If condemned, it does not exist and it does not exist if condemner or if condemnation so that it does not exist if it is condemning. Where stolen, there it does not exist, and there it does not exist if thief and/or theft; where condemned, there it does not exist and there it does not exist if condemner or condemnation or if condemning.

If it is condemned here, it cannot exist here; and if it is condemned there, it cannot exist there: where or when it is condemned, there or then is it nonexistent. Condemning it casts it out: it condemning it, it casts out it. The reference that condemns casts out the reference it condemns, and it by that removes it from where it is or that it removes it from where it is noticed by it, and the worse form of that act of removal of it is to remove it from where it must not be removed! Condemnation is not applicable just anywhere: there is where there may be condemnation; there is also, where condemnation must not be attempted at all! There is where a reference must not be removed!

Condemn it is Lose it, and that is Give it to the thief or Allow the thief to take it or Grant the thief access to it, and that is Allow the loser to have it or Give it to the loser or Grant to the loser of it access to it. And that is also Make it available in the lost place or Locate it in the place of lost references, and that is Locate it in the loser’s place and that is Locate it in the thief’s abode or Locate it in the place of theft or Locate it in the place of stolen references.

We do not grant to the loser of it access to it; that is act of condemning it, and if it is condemned then it cannot matter and then it cannot be received because it has not recipient, then it is not accepted so that it is not owned even if taken into custody! Therefore, there is expanse between, which is a reference registering distance, between the earner and what is to be earned by the earner: it functions to ensure that the earner that is yet to earn it, which is the earner that is in the situation same as that of the earner that has lost it, does not access it unearned or yet to be earned. If it is accessed yet to be earned it is accessed unearned. It should be accessed only if earned. If yet to be earned, it is yet to be accessed, and if lost it is lost to access and that is why it is lost; and if unearned then it is not accessed or is inaccessible and should not be accessed. Accessing it in such condition of yet to be earned or unearned is accessing it distant so that it is accessed not accessed, it is had unhad. In analogy, it is having it as its corpse or as its skeletal remains or as its fossil or as its statuette; it is like having it in dung form, dead; it is also like having it in form Yet to be birthed or born, Yet to be brought forth, or Yet to be. You may only be able to access it in condition of Yet to be brought forth if you yourself you are Yet to be brought forth! If you are Brought forth already, you can only access it if it is also Brought forth already. If therefore you access it in condition of Yet to be, you yourself are Yet to be but if you are not Yet to be but rather that You are, then you must wait until It is if you may access it.

You cannot lose it and have it at the same instant: have it and have it because you have it or otherwise lose it and lose it because you have lost it. Lose it whilst you lose it or otherwise have it whilst you have it: we lose only what is lost or only what loses; and we have only what has, only what is not lost or only what has not lost. It is legitimate to have what has; and it is legitimate to lose the lost and to lose the loser: it is illegitimate to have the loser, and it is illegitimate to have the lost. The loser is lost; and the lost is loser: the loser loses, the lost loses, the loser has loss, the lost has loss, and the loser has the lost and the lost has the loser. The earner has the earned and the earned has the earner; and the earner earns, and the earned earns in it being earned by the earner of it: earning it empowers it to earn whilst stealing it empowers it to steal. We earn to own; we do not steal to own: ownership is never by theft. If you steal it, you cannot own it even if it is your earnable reference or even if it once was yours.

If it is lost whilst lost, then it can be had whilst had or found whilst found, then it can be redeemed from form and/or status of lost. However, if it is had whilst lost, then it cannot be had whilst had because it will be lost whilst had: therefore, a reference and its situation has to be in congruence. Whilst it is lost, it must be lost; or otherwise whilst it is not lost it must not be lost: you cannot mix it lost with it found and have it. If you eat nutrientless food, you have not eaten any food at all; you have only deceived yourself that you have eaten food simply because your stomach is filled thereby: the nutrientless food fits the description of Foodless food or Foodless ingestible. Lost and found together: it is not found, it is lost still.

Do not give it to the loser of it; rather, give it to the earner of it, and give it to the earner that has it: if the earner loses it, the earner should earn and purchase it back! So, the earner must necessarily protect the earned reference so as to prevent it from getting lost; because if it gets lost, the earner shall have to pay again to get it back or else the earner/owner which is the legitimate possessor and beneficiary of it will lose it forever. Thus, the earner that loses the earned reference or the reference that should be earned by the earner, such a one must seek out, locate the one that has the lost earnable reference in custody, and pay such a one to deliver the earnable reference to the earner of it. The earner cannot locate the earnable reference directly to take it back without settling the possessor of it although that possessor of it is consequently thief of the earnable reference. That nonearner possessor of it is also expanse between the earner and the earnable reference; and the same expanse, the same distance, the earner must remove to access the earnable reference earned [earned back].

Distance is removed, we act to remove distance; distance is not covered: distance is deleted between the earner and the earned for the earner to access the earned. Until distance is removed between them, the earner has not earned the earnable reference and the earner cannot access the earnable reference although the earner may be able to take hold on the earnable reference from afar. If you stretch forth to take hold on something, you must draw it to you or otherwise draw you to it if you may access it: that drawing it to you or otherwise drawing you to it removes distance between you and it. Thus, simply taking hold on it is not enough for access of it: distance must be removed between you and it if it is to be accessed by you. Until the distance is removed between you and it, you take hold on it as a captor takes hold on the captive; as how the jailor is to the prisoner, and as how the slavemaster is to the slave. The removal of the distance between is act of journeying of the earner from earner’s place to the place where the earnable reference can be located; and it is also journeying of the one having custody of the earnable reference from that place of his/hers to the place of the earner of it.

There must be journeying if there must be earning: without journeying there is no earning and there is not access, so that access without completing stipulated journey is not access but mere attempt to access and such attempt renders captive. So, the whole business of commercial practice is about journeying: all other activity and skill and knowledge applied in commercial practice, it is to aid to make effectual the stipulated journey. In commercial practice therefore, there must be a stipulated journey for an earning; it is when this is done that peripheral processes may be designed to see to it that the earning journey succeeds. The stipulated journey is central or core to commercial practice: the stipulated journey is from earner’s point to the point of the earnable reference, and from the point of the earnable reference to the earner’s point. The commercial journey is not carried out without stipulated earning in view; what is to be earned functions as a lead to the earner: without the lead therefore, commercial journey is not carried out. And the lead leads the earner to where the lead is. The earned reference is the lead: the lead is it that is earned. That is, one earns what leads him/her! Therefore, the lead matters; the lead is valuable and valued; the lead has a recipient, an earner and owner: the lead exists.

The led earns the lead! The lead is like leader in some function, the function of drawing attention of the earner to it; but not all leads are leaders: actually, it is the lead that is supposed to be led so that the earner is actually the leader of the lead! That is, the leader seeks the lead so as to lead it: to lead it to form or/and status that is of originality to the lead, the led lead. We can confidently call the earnable reference by the name Lead or The Lead whilst the earner of it can be called by the name Leader or The Leader.

The Lead is located by The Leader and led by the Leader to status including place or/and form of originality to The Lead. And The Lead and the nonearner of it that has it in custody, the same that is consequently thief of The Lead; they are led by The Leader as one piece so that they are together a Lead to the earner of The Lead, The Leader. That consequent thief of the earnable reference is dispatched after making complete journey to the earner’s place; such a one is dispatched whilst The Lead is taken delivery of by The Leader: such a one is dispatched as one who also has earned congruent legitimacy. Legitimacy is congruent; legitimacy is of congruence: incongruity denies legitimacy of legitimacy so that the existence of incongruity is registration of illegitimacy even if legitimacy is involved. Legitimacy must be congruent with legitimacy if there must be legitimacy; incongruence of legitimacy is illegitimacy overall. It is like the situation of the living residing in the place of the dead; such a person does not count in the place of the living because he/she is not in the place of the living although alive: such a one is dead, viewing from the place of the living. The event of death is not only organism viewed; death is also place viewed, and death can be status viewed, and position viewed: there is the place of the dead, there is the station of the dead, there is the condition of the dead, and there is the form of the dead. The dead is simply Not: the dead here is one that is Not here at all or Not here as should. For example, the corpse is the dead at living organism level whilst the slave is dead at freedom level so that in viewing from freedom standpoint the slave is dead. In viewing from the level of living as organism, the corpse is dead but in viewing from the level of living as tissue/organ, the corpse is not dead if fresh. Death event is sheer absence; but death event is also Present as should not or present in incongruity or present in form or/and status illegitimate.

Congruity is actually of legitimacy only; we do not really have congruous illegitimacy although such may seem to be: only the legitimate can be congruous. Illegitimacy is incongruity! Uniform or continuous error is not congruity; uniformity of error is incongruity, it is uniformity of incongruity: we can only speak correctly of uniform accuracy as congruity. The uniformity of absences does not amount to a presence: but congruity is about present things only!

You would not have to earn it if it is not lost to you, if it is not separated from you; if it has never been yours, if it has never been part of you. That is, we earn what is lost to us, and that is the same as what has been stolen from us by some reference or means, event, organism, person or population, or other. You had it and you have it back; it was yours and it is yours again; you have it, and then it is taken away from you and lost thus to you, and you do the works of earning and purchasing it and have it again: it is a cycle completed and it should not be lost from you anymore. It is legitimate of you to protect what you have earned to prevent it from being stolen from you again. The earning is protected; what is earned is protected, it has to be protected: it is the legitimate thing to do. What is stolen is not protected, it is not to be protected because protecting it prevents it from being found; protecting it from being found is the same as stealing it and stealing it is destroying it and wasting it: the thief does not, because the thief cannot, protect the stolen reference. Shutting the reference into the place of its loss is not the way of protecting the same reference; the place of its loss is the place where it is of zero value: keeping it there is not the same as protecting it but rather an act of fixing it in jeopardy. And this is also why you cannot protect what is not yours or else you commit the crime of theft: you can only protect what is yours. Therefore, do not attempt protecting what is not yours. Thus, what is not yours should not enter into the place for the protection of your own, and that is why there must also be Privacy: if such event occurs, you commit the act of theft, which is a crime, warranting punishments to you no matter how kind your intentions might be. Intention, no matter how good or kind, is not enough for kindness; your intention must also be legitimate if it must be kind: illegitimate kindness is kindness astray!

What causes the