The Doubles Game in Badminton - With Chapters on Tactics and the Skills Needed

By Read Books Ltd.

“The Double Game in Badminton” is a comprehensive guide to playing badminton “doubles”. Badminton is a racket sport whereby a shuttlecock is hit back and forth across a net. Although larger teams are possible, it is most commonly played in "singles" (with one player per side) and "doubles" (with two players per side). This volume contains all the information needed to learn how to play badminton in pairs, and as such it is highly recommended for new doubles players. Contents include: “Side by Side Formation”, “Back and Front Formation”, “Doubles, or the Four Handed Game”, “Combination”, “Double Teamwork”, and “Badminton”. Many vintage books such as this are increasingly scarce and expensive. It is with this in mind that we are republishing this volume now in an affordable, modern, high-quality edition complete with a specially commissioned new introduction on the history of rugby.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Read Books Ltd.
• Release date: Sep 14, 2016
• ISBN: 9781473357310

Book preview

Doubles: I. Side-by-side Formation

THE side-by-side formation is usually adopted in men’s and ladies’ doubles, although the present Ladies Doubles Champions, Mrs Tragett and Miss Hogarth, are an eminent exception to this rule. As regards mixed doubles a war of controversy will always be waged whether this or the back-and-front formation is the better method to follow. I do not propose to say anything on that head in the present instance as I shall express my views in the next chapter. A men’s double is perhaps the game that appeals most to the onlookers. These for the most part know very little about the game which they happen to be watching, whether it be Badminton or some other form of sport. The finer points lie outside the scope of their perception, and what tickles their appreciative fancy most is a hard-hit smash or a series of close drop-shots. But what leads up to the winning stroke often passes unnoticed, although in the making of good openings lies the art of Badminton. When you are watching a double, do not pay so much attention to the actual winning shot as to the strokes that have made it possible. There is a great deal to be learned from intelligent observation—you can see what should be done and what should not be done. Also by watching carefully what methods are employed, you can increase your knowledge of tactics. There is perhaps more scope for variety of shots than in a single, because you have two opponents to counter instead of one. The more varied and unexpected your strokes are, the more chance you have of ‘rattling’ them. But there are many shots of medium pace which in a single, owing to the fact that there is more space at your disposal, have a certain value as attacking shots, yet in a double have no such value. They depend for their success on the fact that your opponent happens to be out of position for the moment. This will rarely be the case in a double, where there are two players guarding the court. The fast shot is usually the one that scores.

The first necessity, of course, is a partner, and let me impress on you the necessity of getting a congenial partner. The best type is the one with whom you can establish a bond of sympathy, as it were, one who likes to play with you and with whom you yourself like to play. Playing with a partner that you are not in sympathy with or whom you do not like yields bad results. You do not get the best out of yourself and it is the same with your partner. The great secret of doubles is good combination and this will not be within your reach at all. A bad combination is always a failure, so if you start playing doubles with anyone with whom you do not fit in properly after practice, get somebody else. It will be better for both of you in the long run. It will be obvious soon whether your partner suits you in this respect or not. Spaces left open unnecessarily; collisions on the court; each going for the shuttle and then letting it fall lamely to the ground without either making an effort to hit—all these tell their own tale. This may, and probably will, happen at first, but if conditions do not improve with practice, make a change. As far as tournaments are concerned, I think it is better not to play with anyone much better than you are yourself, at any rate in the beginning. You are liable to become nervous through the fear of letting your partner down, that is, if you are addicted to nerves. If you are afraid of letting him down, you are likely to do so, because your confidence will have been somewhat sapped. Play with somebody about your own standard, one with whom you can claim equality in the matter of ability to play, until you have acquired some experience and knowledge of tactics. This will prepare you for higher tests in the future. Try to learn something from every match in which you play, especially from those in which you suffer defeat. The one who is going to do well is he who does not mind being defeated, but tries to learn how to turn defeat into victory at the next meeting.

In practice matches, needless to say, the best way to improve is to play against players better than you are. This improves your combination immensely. It is also a good plan to play sometimes with a better player as your partner. It not only will train you not to be nervous in tournaments, but you will learn many things from closely examining his play—what tactics he employs, what shots he uses most, how he covers up openings. After each match ask him to tell you what you have been doing wrong and how he thinks you can improve. This ought to be of the highest value—always be on the watch for useful information if it is given by some one who knows what he is talking about. Do not mind what unauthorized critics say—they will certainly confuse you and probably put you wrong. Above all, do not be annoyed at being told where you are weak—nobody is absolutely above criticism. Those who are annoyed at this, are usually vexed because they do happen to be inaccurate in that particular point. The worst kind are those who refuse to see their own faults. Perfection is perhaps beyond the reach of anyone, but he will approximate in time most closely to that state who, on being informed that he could improve in a certain respect, realizes the truth of the criticisms and does his best to make the repetition of the fault impossible.

Although you should always try to play with a congenial partner, he must not necessarily be of a similar type of play. In fact in some cases this will be entirely wrong. The great attacking power is the smash. So in a good pair one player at least must have a good smash. The kill wins far more aces and makes far more openings in a double than in a single. If you are good at drop-shots, but do not possess a very severe kill, your proper type of partner is one who can smash well. With a good smash yourself, it is not so important that he should be gifted in a like manner, provided that he be up to the required standard in the other departments of the game.