Identification Credentials: Mandatory or Voluntary?

By Steven D. Miller

-- If you don’t understand the outrage over forced identification, then you will not recognize the government’s brutal plans for humanity.
-- In 1964 the U.S. Supreme Court said that identification credentials are “abhorrent in the United States.”
-- Most Americans have relinquished what traditional law books call "the rights of all mankind”.
-- In 1991 the U.S. Supreme Court quoted a 1983 Arizona case: "The thought that an American can be compelled to 'show his papers' before exercising his right to walk the streets, drive the highways or board the trains is repugnant to American institutions and ideals"
-- Humanity’s millennia old struggle against oppression is near an end. Your ID is proof of your contract. You consented to be governed. You waived most of your rights. You agreed to be collateral for the national debt. You shackled yourself to their chain-of-command. Compliance is an estoppel. You selected your lord / master / provider / protector. You have been assimilated.
George Orwell predicted a jackboot stomping on your face forever. Resistance is futile.
-- Applying for Identification papers is worship of a graven image.
-- A second beast that came up out of the earth, while exercising the authority of the scarlet first beast who raised up out of the sea, upon whose heads is the name of blasphemy, has deceived you into worshiping (with a perjury oath signature) a substitute Lord to get a graven Mark, issued by a final world government (your Novus Ordo Seclorum), symbolically in your right hand, that you use to buy or sell.
Let's take a closer look.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Steven D. Miller
• Release date: Jun 2, 2015
• ISBN: 9781311357120

Steven D. Miller

I was just like you, I was a natural born Citizen, and I was taught to believe that the Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of everyone else. Just like it says in the U.S. Constitution. Until I found out that I waived my rights by legalities that I did not understand.Then I spent thirty years researching how I waived my rights.It turned out that Ignorance of the law, which everyone is bound to know, excuses no man. Had American children learned of their heritage, we would have kept our rights.Join me in pondering the legalities that have ensnared us.I was fooled by government. Out of respect for what appeared to be law, I lost all my rights when I was tricked by legalities. I learned the hard lesson that it was my fault for being deceived. I came to realize that Bible prophecy predicted these tricks. Bible prophecy predicts deceptions in the end times. Insomuch that, if it were possible, shall deceive even the very elect. If they continue, no flesh shall be saved to judge angels.Those who receive not a love for the truth shall receive strong delusion that they should believe a lie. Had I followed the commands of Christ, I would not have been tricked out of my rights. I was later to understand that principalities and powers in high places twist the laws of God to trick us into mutiny against legitimate powers.My books focus on lordship, ethics, and consequences of mutiny.My books are intended for those who realize that they are enslaved like the Bible said you would be, and made merchandise and cursed just like Peter said you would be.I am not an attorney. I do not give legal advice.These United States were founded on the divine laws of nature and of nature's God. Then we exchanged these laws for the laws of men. Then, the U.S. government was surrendered to the same brutal Roman law that Christ delivered us from.First Samuel 8:18 You will cry out in that day because of the King you have chosen, and the LORD will not hear you in that day.

Book preview

Identification Credentials: Mandatory or Voluntary?

Second Edition

Copyright 2015, 2017 by Steven D. Miller

Published by A.C.E. Unlimited, distributed by Smashwords

This book will prove:

-- By applying for government credentials, Americans have submitted to legalities they did not understand.

-- Your government’s definition of the term motor vehicle is not what you have been told.

-- Your government’s definition of the term driver is not what you have been told.

-- Police checkpoints are not what you have been led to believe.

-- Your passport is not what you have been led to believe.

-- Your birth certificate is not what you have been led to believe.

-- Ex-Soviet KGB chiefs wrote the U.S. Real ID Laws.

-- Government was created to secure the blessings of Liberty. Not to deny it.

-- In 1803 the U.S. Supreme Court refused to allow government officers to be issued identification credentials.

-- In 1964 the U.S. Supreme Court said identification credentials are abhorrent in the United States.

-- IDs are only issued to those who have allegiances to the issuer. According to a Department of Homeland Security regulation, those swearing allegiances agree to perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law for the rest of your life. This allegiance is an agreement that your future labor is collateral for the national debt. Arbeit macht frei. Work will set you free. But only if your labor, at prison wages, can pay off your debt.

-- In 1991 the U.S. Supreme Court quoted a 1983 Arizona case: The thought that an American can be compelled to 'show his papers' before exercising his right to walk the streets, drive the highways or board the trains is repugnant to American institutions and ideals.

-- Most Americans have relinquished all three of the traditional rights of all mankind.

-- Humanity’s millennia old struggle against oppression is near an end. Your ID is proof of your contract. You consented to be governed. You waived most of your rights. You agreed to be collateral for the national debt. You swore an oath of allegiance to get an ID. You shackled yourself to their chain-of-command. You selected your lord / master / provider / protector. You have been assimilated.

-- Compliance is estoppel. Resistance is futile.

-- Applying for identification credentials requires worship of a graven image.

-- The Bible predicts that identification marks will be used by the final world government’s brutal plans for humanity. These marks are only issued to those who have allegiance to the issuer.

-- A second beast that came up out of the earth, while exercising the authority of the scarlet first beast who raised up out of the sea, upon whose heads is the name of blasphemy, has deceived you into worshiping (with a perjury oath signature) a substitute Lord to get a graven Mark, issued by a secular final world government (your Novus Ordo Seclorum), symbolically in your right hand, that you use to buy or sell. Let's take a closer look.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Privacy fundamentals

Travel documents

Personal Liberty

The Common Law Right To Travel

Right To Travel

Driving

Government Restrictions On Commercial Driving

Commerce

Definition Of The Term Motor Vehicle

Right to travel by automobile

Definition of the word driver

The changing definition of the word license

Who owns your car?

License fees

Sidewalk laws

What about international travel?

Travel for 14th Amendment citizens

Passports

Martial Law

Checkpoints

Identification credentials to vote?

SSN on credential applications

Forced worship

Supreme Court: credentials are abhorrent

Detain for identification?

Detain is arrest

The rights of all mankind

Legal references

Biblical Prophecy

Biblical references

Photo and fingerprints

History of fingerprinting

Proper noun names

Surnames

Birth certificates

Damages to your liberty

Notes

Links

Appendix A: Government is a graven image.

Appendix B: Must means May

Appendix C: Cooperation is estoppel

* ~ ~ ~ *

INTRODUCTION

This book reveals the rights that we lost.

Every dictionary and encyclopedia will tell you that an oath is always a religious ritual. You have been deceived into worshiping (with a perjury oath signature) a substitute Lord to get a graven Mark of allegiance. Once you assimilate, you cannot complain about the consequences*. Let's take a closer look at these consequences.

In Biblical prophecy in Daniel chapter 7 foretells the brutal final beast kingdom trampling down the whole earth and prevailing against the Saints.

There are serious consequences to resisting a brutal government. It has always been so. Two millennia ago, all of Christ’s disciples were executed or imprisoned. They considered it joyous. (Second Corinthians 7:4). The same routine government processing still exists today. For example: Rodney King, who was a speeding motorist who had harmed nobody, suffered routine government processing. Get used to it.

Obedience to a counterfeit government has serious consequences. Obedience to a counterfeit government is mutiny against lawful government.

Legitimate government secures the blessings of liberty. Therefore it cannot allow socialism because socialism cannot recognize individual rights. The book cover is a sketch of a photo showing a National Socialist demanding identification papers. Today’s socialists are no different. Forced IDs are hallmarks of totalitarian regimes. ID credentials have been used throughout history as a means of controlling civilian populations. Legitimate government holds the truth that all Americans are created equal and endowed with unalienable God-given rights. Nobody who is equal would ever need to show proof to another equal that he is entitled to God-given rights.

Today’s socialists keep demanding ID, but IDs are not yet mandatory. You volunteer to be identified by the government you chose. The U.S. Supreme Court has confirmed: The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government.*

The God of the Bible wants you to be a free soul under His authority, and not bound to any Babylon, Pharaoh, or Caesar from which we were delivered.

• Exodus 23:32 Thou shalt make no covenant with them nor with their gods.

• Revelation 18:4 Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

• Second Corinthians 6:17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.

• First Samuel 8:18 You will cry out in that day because of the King you have chosen, and the LORD will not hear you in that day.

* Many more details are in my book The Citizen Cannot Complain.

* ~ ~ ~ *

Disclaimer:

Nothing in this book is legal advice except for this: obey your lawgiver then suffer the consequences.

Fair use statement: The fair use of copyrighted work has been a longstanding and vital aspect of American copyright law for 176 years. Quotes are attributed to the original source. Some images were taken from the internet as examples of symbolism. Their use here is a transformative use for the education of the reader, and not a substitute for the original use of the work. There is no intent to harm the value of the original work. Original definitions are used because they reveal the true meaning before they were substituted with counterfeit meanings. Dictionary definitions and images are from out-of-print editions. You will appreciate that the older definitions are closer to the original definitions.

Do not rely on any information in this book until you confirm for yourself that it applies to your situation and it is correctly quoted in context.

* ~ ~ ~ *

PRIVACY FUNDAMENTALS

The right to privacy is a God-given right, not a government granted privilege. It is a limitation on government. Government is prohibited from snooping into your life unless you have waived your right to privacy or committed a crime. For example, search warrants must particularly describe the items to be seized.

Don’t confuse a right to privacy with a right to remain silent. You have no right to remain silent unless you are a criminal. In a civil court, you can be forced to reveal your private assets that can be seized*.

U.S. Supreme Court, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson, 154 U.S. 447, 479 (May 26, 1894):

Neither branch of the legislative department, still less any merely administrative body established by congress, possesses, or can be invested with, a general power of making inquiry into the private affairs of the citizen.

U.S. Supreme Court, Boyd v. U.S., 116 U. S. 616, 630

The principles laid down … apply to all invasions on the part of government and its employees of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of his life.

U.S. Supreme Court unanimous decision, Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979):

The application of the Texas statute to detain appellant and require him to identify himself violated the Fourth Amendment because the officers lacked any reasonable suspicion to believe that appellant was engaged or had engaged in criminal conduct. Detaining appellant to require him to identify himself constituted a seizure of his person subject to the requirement of the Fourth Amendment that the seizure be reasonable. Cf. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 ; United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 . The Fourth Amendment requires that such a seizure be based on specific, objective facts indicating that society's legitimate interests require such action, or that the seizure be carried out pursuant to a plan embodying explicit, neutral limitations on the conduct of individual officers. Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 . Here, the State does not contend that appellant was stopped pursuant to a practice embodying neutral criteria, and the officers' actions were not justified on the ground that they had a reasonable suspicion, based on objective facts, that he was involved in criminal activity. Absent any basis for suspecting appellant of misconduct, the balance between the public interest in crime prevention and appellant's right to personal [443 U.S. 47, 48] security and privacy tilts in favor of freedom from police interference.

U.S. Supreme Court, Marchetti v. United States, 390 US 39 at 57 (1968):

The Government's anxiety to obtain information known to a private individual does not without more render that information public; if it did, no room would remain for the application of the constitutional privilege. Nor does it stamp information with a public character that the Government has formalized its demands in the attire of a statute; if this alone were sufficient, the constitutional privilege could be entirely abrogated by any Act of Congress. Third, the requirements at issue in Shapiro were imposed in an essentially non-criminal and regulatory area of inquiry while those here are directed to a selective group inherently suspect of criminal activities."

US Supreme Court, Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1, page 28:

"This case involves a cancer in our body politic. It is a measure of the disease which afflicts us. ... Those who already walk submissively will say there is no cause for alarm. But submissiveness is not our heritage. The First Amendment was designed to allow rebellion to remain as our heritage. The Constitution was designed to keep the government off the backs of the people. ... The Bill of Rights was designed to keep agents of government and official eavesdroppers away from assemblies of people. The aim was to allow men to be free and independent and to assert their rights against government. ... When an intelligence officer looks over every nonconformist's shoulder... the America once extolled as the voice of liberty heard around the world no longer is cast in the image which Jefferson and Madison designed, but more in the Russian image,..."

The Legislative History of the Privacy Act, Public Law 93-579 page 6971:

preventing collection of protected information not immediately needed, about law-abiding Americans, on the off-chance that Government or the particular agency might possibly have to deal with them in the future. This, of course, applies not only to the agency's own programs, but also to its participation in such programs undertaken by other agencies.

In Re Pacific Railway Commission, 32 Fed. 241, 250, of all the rights of the citizen, few are of greater importance or more essential to his peace and happiness than the right of personal security, and that involves, not merely protection of his person from assault, but exemption of his private affairs, books, and papers from inspection and scrutiny of others. Without the enjoyment of this right, all others would lose half their value.

But once you get involved with government, you waive your right to privacy. In the year 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the misnamed Driver Privacy Protection Act. The Supreme Court said (528 US 141):

The DPPA regulates the disclosure and resale of personal information contained in the records of state DMVs. State DMV s require drivers and automobile owners to provide personal information, which may include a person's name, address, telephone number, vehicle description, Social Security number, medical information, and photograph, as a condition of obtaining a driver's license or registering an automobile. Congress found that many States, in turn, sell this personal information to individuals and businesses. See, e. g., 139 Congo Rec. 29466, 29468, 29469 (1993); 140 Congo Rec. 7929

A MAN'S HOME IS HIS CASTLE. This common phrase came from a long history of privacy rights prevailing over conflicting government excuses to intrude. The original source for this legal maxim is found in English law. It is his castle to protect him from government snooping to determine how much taxable cider he was making. Here is the original quote:

The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail -- its roof may shake-the wind may blow through it -- the storm may enter -- the rain may enter -- but the King of England cannot enter!- All his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! -- William Pitt, Earl of Chatham, speech in the House of Lords in 1763 in opposition to an excise tax on cider.

This protection extends throughout the ages to Americans today. US v.