Your Day in Court: Using Common Law with Common Sense
5/5
()
About this ebook
Bradley J. Franks
Robert Charles Simpson was born in 1944. Where he became the youngest General Contractor in the States of North and South Carolina. He has recently passed away However, his adopted son keeps the candle lit and moves the TRUTH forward to expose those who did him harm. These books are biographies/autobiographies, political harassment, and Criminal activities.
Read more from Bradley J. Franks
Breach of Contract: What the Government Doesn't Want You to Know Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Death of America: The Insidious Takeover Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Your Day in Court
Related ebooks
Consent of the Conquered Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCourts and Procedure in England and in New Jersey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Citizen Cannot Complain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Identification Credentials: Mandatory or Voluntary? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Understanding Your Right to Due Process Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom from Tyranny Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Artificial Person and the Color of Law: How to Take Back the "Consent"! Social Geometry of Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Is The Truth: Authority and Jurisdiction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGovernment’s Achilles Heel or How to Win Any Court Case (we the people & common sense) Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Federal Tax Returns Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIs Administrative Law Unlawful? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Understand Your Rights Because You're About to Lose Them! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Common Sense About the Roberts' Court Monster Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Constitution and What It Means Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommercial Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Self-Help Guide to the Law: Know Your Constitutional Rights: Guide for Non-Lawyers, #7 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWas Frankenstein Really Uncle Sam? Vol Ix: Notes on the State of the Declaration of Independence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGorilla Lawfair: A Pro Se Litigation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWin In Court Every Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/57 Things The Police Don't Want You To Know Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroduction to Negotiable Instruments: As per Indian Laws Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Poverty - Its Illegal Causes and Legal Cure Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Big Show: Montana Law on Stage Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTo Hell, with the Irs!: To the Kingdom of Christ, It Cannot Come! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMotions, Affidavits, Answers, and Commercial Liens - The Book of Effective Sample Documents Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Recusing a Judge - With Ultimate Loopholes and a Sample Motion to Recuse Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to be Your Own Lawyer in a Non-Criminal Case in the United States of America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Courts For You
The Handy Supreme Court Answer Book: The History and Issues Explained Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Absolute Beginner's Guide to Cross-Examination Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFederal Rules of Civil Procedure: Hyperlinked, #2 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Neighbor Law: Fences, Trees, Boundaries & Noise Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5New York Notary Public Exam Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Police Interactions 101: How To Interact With the Police in Your Car, On the Streets, In Your Home Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Representing Yourself In Court (US): How to Win Your Case on Your Own Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Marc Stevens' Adventures in Legal Land Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Filing and Winning Small Claims For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy the Innocent Plead Guilty and the Guilty Go Free: And Other Paradoxes of Our Broken Legal System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nolo's Deposition Handbook: The Essential Guide for Anyone Facing or Conducting a Deposition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Win Your Case In Traffic Court Without a Lawyer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everybody's Guide to Small Claims Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Justices Behind Roe V. Wade: The Inside Story, Adapted from The Brethren Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDisOrder in the Court: 31 Funny, Frivolous & Outrageous Lawsuits that Will Make You Laugh Out Loud Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5See You In Court! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJustice vs. Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Represent Yourself in Court: Prepare & Try a Winning Civil Case Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrdinary Injustice: How America Holds Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManual for Beginning Interpreters: A Comprehensive Guide to Interpreting in Immigration Courts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuardians of the Record: The Origins of Official Court Reporting and the Shorthand Writers Who Made It Possible Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Win Your Case in Small Claims Court Without a Lawyer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Representing Yourself In Court (CAN): How to Win Your Case on Your Own Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsN*gga Theory: Race, Language, Unequal Justice, and the Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The American Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Scheme: How the Right Wing Used Dark Money to Capture the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Your Day in Court
2 ratings2 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Very informative.The fact that case documentation added to the E-book made the reading exceptional
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A great book which I needed to read to better understand the environment in California. I had 5 homes illegal seized in California by attorneys hungry for debt aka money. Riverside County was the worst - a judge telling attorneys to file a MSJ against me; a judge removing a PAID FOR Trial by Jury hearing to accommodate the MSJ. I reversed two illegal eviction judgments - yet these court administrators refuse to clean up the harm caused to me. I actually corrected the TRUST where I was assumed to be their SURETY; I also deposited the properties into new trust. The attorneys are clueless...and just violate their own rules for the love of debt. The Current Justice of the Peace of Denton County Blanca Oliver committed perjury to obtain illegal judgments against me...Oliver lied about being a so called Treasurer for Freddie Mac. Who was the original issuer to the original Financial Asset? I was and certainly not Blanca Oliver. Thank you for disclosing that I am not alone.
Book preview
Your Day in Court - Bradley J. Franks
© 2023 Bradley J. Franks & Robert C. Simpson. All rights reserved.
No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means without the written permission of the author.
Published by AuthorHouse 01/16/2023
ISBN: 978-1-7283-7724-7 (sc)
ISBN: 978-1-7283-7725-4 (e)
Library of Congress Control Number: 2023900637
Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Getty Images are models,
and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.
Certain stock imagery © Getty Images.
Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.
DEDICATION
This book is dedicated for the Americans who know the difference between the illusion of freedom
that is offered by a government that uses trickery and deceit to obtain what it considers value
and the real Freedom that our Fore-Fathers signed into law
– The Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
It is also dedicated for those who have gone through the court system and thought they were getting a fair
hearing or trial. The information in this book will educate you on the reality of just how crooked our court system is and for the people that have died due to the thoughtless electric companies that turned off their electricity just because they could not afford to pay a month’s payment and for the people who were afraid to turn on a fan just to keep cool
because of the fear of receiving a high power bill.
Also, for those Americans who know the difference between a U.S. Citizen and a true American. Remember, U. S. Policies (Statutes, Codes, or Ordinances) do not apply to Americans that exercise their rights set forth by the U. S. Constitution. Those who come from a different Country apply for Citizenship become U.S. citizens. The government has forgotten these facts and will be held accountable for their crimes against Americans.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank all the concerned people that witnessed the crimes that were committed against us and motivated us to write this book for the education for all Americans and the International Community.
It does not take a person with a PhD
or a Degree
to figure out that there is something terribly wrong with our system, when a County or State bureaucracy can make accusations
and find us guilty
without the benefit of our trying to prove our innocence.
We the People are the rightful master of both congress and the courts – not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution
. Abraham Lincoln
CONTENTS
Chapter 1 UCC Connection
Chapter 2 The Remedy
Chapter 3 ‘Tricks and Traps’ Used by the Courts
Chapter 4 Our Story
Chapter 5 Summary
Chapter 6 Exhibits and Evidence
Chapter 7 Final Thoughts
1
UCC CONNECTION
Free yourself from Legal Tyranny.
The following is for the accessible and understandable explanation of the confusing state of the government and the courts.
The frustration many Americans feel about our judicial system can be overwhelming and frightening; and, like most, fear is based on the lack of understanding of knowledge. Those of us who have chosen a path out of bondage and into liberty are facing, eventually, with the seemingly tyrannical power of the courts. We have been taught that we must get a good lawyer
, but that is becoming increasingly difficult, if not impossible. If we are to defend ourselves from the government, we find that the lawyers quickly take our money and tell us the ship is sinking and
I can’t help you with that -- I’m an officer of the court
.
The only way for us to have a chance is for us to understand the Rules of the game
and to understand the true-nature of the Law
. Lawyers have established and secured a virtual monopoly over this area of human knowledge by implying that the subject is just too difficult for the average person to understand, by creating a separate vocabulary out of Latin, French, German and English words of otherwise common usage. While at times it seems hopelessly complicated, it is not difficult to grasp -- lawyers are not as smart as they would leave us to believe. Besides, anyone who has been through a legal battle against the government with the aid of a lawyer has come to realize that lawyers learn about procedure, not law.
We must take the responsibility for finding and putting to good use the TRUTH. It is WE the People who must claim and defend our God-given Rights and our freedom from those who would take them from us. It is WE who must protect ourselves, our families and our posterity from the inevitable intrusion into our lives by those who live as a parasite off the labor, skill and talents of others.
There are bureaucrats who are writing letters, bills, laws, contracts and other such documents at the behest or not at the behest of the elected politicians that contradict decisions of the supreme Court of the United States. Note: Observe the small s
in supreme Court. Supreme is an adjective describing the court, and not part of the title of that court. The small u
in united States is used in the same manner. United is an adjective, and cannot be considered part of the title of our Constitutional Republic. United States, capital U
, is an entirely different, illegal and unconstitutional entity when its power extends beyond Washington, D. C. and the territories.
The judges will not honor any decisions of the Supreme Court after 1938. Prior to 1938, the Supreme Court was dealing with Public law; since 1938, the Supreme Court has dealt with Public Policy Statute, not Public Law, and those Supreme Court Cases do not apply to Public Policy. This is how disgusting the judicial system is in America. The common-man is NOT PERMITTED to know what is going on and the reasons for the decisions, which go against him or her. Because what the so-called judges [actually, they are magistrates not judges] are doing is actually illegal by the law, which is suspended in these so-called courtrooms. If the people that inhabit America were made aware of this situation, and the full implications of it, the system would collapse. The judges and the lawyers will not permit this to occur, as the system seems to benefit them, and they do not care about anything else. What is amazing is when you ask someone what is your opinion about lawyers?
Most everyone’s answer generally is that lawyers are the scum of the earth and they dislike them intensely.
Occasionally someone will mention one or two good lawyers. However, ask the same question about judges, What is your opinion about judges?
Most people will say, Oh, we respect the judge
. What is wrong with us? Judges were lawyers first. All of whom are registered foreign agents for the United States by the bar association and have a foreign allegiance! Judges are much worse than lawyers, while some lawyers walking in and out of the so-called courtrooms may not really understand just what they are involved in, all of the judges understand very well. This is why they were PERMITTED and chosen to become so-called judges. Note: Public Policy means; the federal government is no longer bound by any restraint of law [Constitution] and may do whatever it pleases, more specifically, whatever the money kings who control the bankruptcy of America desire for the government to do!
Here are two cases to examine that will show you how the courts have stripped our rights away:
1. 1938 was the year of the Erie Railroad v. Tomkins case of the Supreme Court. It was also the year the courts claim they blended Law with Equity. A man sued the Erie Railroad for damages when he was struck by a board sticking out of a boxcar as he walked along beside the tracks. The district court had decided on the basis of Commercial (Negotiable Instruments) Law: that this man is not under any contract with the Erie Railroad, and therefore he had no standing to sue the company. By the Common Law, he was damaged and he would have had the right to sue.
2. This overturned a standing decision of over one-hundred years. Swift v. Tyson in 1840 which was a similar case, and the decision of the supreme Court was that in any case of this type, the court would judge the case on the Common Law of the state where the incident occurred -- in this case Pennsylvania. However, in the Erie Railroad case, the supreme Court ruled that all federal cases would be judged under the Negotiable Instruments Law. There would be no more decisions based on the Common Law at the federal level. We now begin to see a blending of Law and Equity. All our courts since 1938 were Merchant Law courts and not Common Law courts.
We know, today, that the reason that the supreme Court did in 1938 was because Roosevelt suspended the Constitution in 1933. The Constitution IS the Common Law. This situation could not exist if the Constitution was in full force and effect. The so-called judges understand this very well; this is why they refuse to permit anyone to introduce evidence about the suspension of the Constitution or the imposition of Emergency Rule into the court’s records.
In 1938, all the higher judges, the top attorneys and the U.S. attorneys were called into a secret meeting and this is what they were told: America is a bankrupt nation--it is owned completely by its creditors. The creditors own the Congress, they own the Executive, they own the Judiciary and they own all the state governments. Take silent judicial notice of this fact, but never reveal it openly. Your court is operating in an Admiralty Jurisdiction--call it anything you want, but do not call it Admiralty
. Note: If what they were doing was legal and above suspicion, they could openly reveal the facts. Since they hid their actions, we know and understand that what they were doing was illegal, and they knew it!
The reason they cannot call it Admiralty Jurisdiction is that your defense would be quite different in Admiralty Jurisdiction from your defense by the Common Law. In Admiralty, there is no court, which has jurisdiction unless there is a valid international contract in dispute. If you know it is Admiralty Jurisdiction, and they have admitted on the record that you are in an Admiralty Court, you can demand that the international maritime contract, to which you are supposedly a party, and which you supposedly have breached, be placed into evidence.
No court has Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction unless there is a valid international contract that has been breached. If the Court is under Admiralty Jurisdiction, they must place the contract in evidence, so that one can challenge the validity of the contract. What they would have to do is place the national debt into evidence. They would have to admit that the international bankers own the whole nation, and that we are their slaves.
The bankers said it would not be expedient at this time to admit that they own everything and could foreclose on every nation of the world. The reason they do not want to tell everyone that they own everything is that there are still too many privately owned guns. There are uncooperative armies and other military forces. Therefore, until they can gradually consolidate all armies into a WORLD ARMY and all courts into a single WORLD COURT, it is not expedient to admit the jurisdiction the courts are operating under. When we understand these things, we realize that there are certain secrets they do not want to admit, and we can use this to our benefit.
The Constitution of the united States mentions three areas of jurisdiction in which the courts may operate:
1. Common Law: Common Law is based on God’s Law. Anytime someone is charged under the Common Law, there must be a damaged party. We are free under the Common Law to do anything we please, as long as you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. The Common Law does not allow for any government action that prevents a man or woman from making a fool of themselves. For example: I went to the County of Riverside and asked the Riverside County Board of Supervisors what laws (Codes, Statutes or Ordinances) would I be breaking if I staged a Peaceful Protest. I also asked if I would have to obtain a Permit for the peaceful Protest. Their reply was a laugh and stated
None and
It’s your right to stage a Peaceful Protest. There was no Common Law broken according to The Riverside County’s Board of Supervisor. However, we can simplify the Common Law even better for your understanding. When you cross over a state-line, most states have signs that read,
BUCKLE YOUR SEAT BELTS – its THE LAW". This cannot be a Common Law, because who would you injure if you did not buckle - up? No one, but yourself. This would be compelled performance. However, Common Law cannot compel performance without infringing upon your liberty of choice. Any violation of Common Law is a CRIMINAL ACT, and is punishable.
2. Equity Law: Equity Law is law that compels performance. It compels you to perform to the exact letter of any contract that you are under. If you have compelled performance, there must be a contract somewhere, and you are being compelled to perform under the obligation