Government’s Achilles Heel or How to Win Any Court Case (we the people & common sense)

By Dimitry Krasil

Right to Property & Association is the base of human rights

Reading this book will help you to come to a vital understanding of the setup of the legal system, enabling you to re-establish your existing rights in the court; using their own procedures and language, and thereby allowing you reach your desired outcome whenever you appear in court, either for yourself, or for someone else whom you have decided to help in any court.
Most of the practical applications presented in this book are based on a very simple logic, which is that we are all born free into this world, and so any agreement we make must come from our own free will and without any form of coercion.

Where does this logic come from? We ought to know that this logic isn’t based on the Constitution of 1787 surprisingly, but rather, it is derived from the Declaration of Independence of 1776, and why is this so? In fact, it was in the Declaration of Independence of 1776 where America’s Founders set forth the moral principles that would later be used in the creation of the Constitution.

Isn’t it rather astonishing to discover that those principles begin with the traditional natural law, or more precisely, with the natural rights strain of that tradition? Its roots go far back into antiquity, with its clearest manifestation being the English common law that had evolved at that time for over 500 years, and in John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, which set forth the theory of rights on which the American government rests and which formed the founders’ vision.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Dimitry Krasil
• Release date: May 7, 2018
• ISBN: 9780463648353

Dimitry Krasil

Cryptocurrency & Blockchain Consultant, Writer/Publisher at iNews Network, Author, Independent Contractor

Book preview

Government’s Achilles heel or How to Win Any Court Case (we the people & common sense)

Dimitry Krasil

PART I

THE REALITY

Table of Contents

Introduction (Right to Property & Association as a base of human rights)

Fundamental laws

Higher law

Terrorism, a government by intimidation

Preface (Government’s Achilles heel)

The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution: Two different documents

Property rights

Human rights are property rights

A question of ownership

Property rights are clear

Words

Democracy

Freedom

Rights vs. Privileges

Facts vs Opinions & distortion of reality

The thrill of political power

Introduction

Right to Property & Association is the base of human rights

You must be wondering what this book is all about, and what it entails. Well, if I’m to talk about the purpose of this book, I’d call it a practical guide to the law for the masses, a book that is written to help the general public understand the law, government, and history of this country better.

Reading this book will help you to come to a vital understanding of the setup of the legal system, enabling you to re-establish your existing rights in the court; using their own procedures and language, and thereby allowing you reach your desired outcome whenever you appear in court, either for yourself, or for someone else whom you have decided to help in any court.

Most of the practical applications presented in this book are based on a very simple logic, which is that we are all born free into this world, and so any agreement we make must come from our own free will and without any form of coercion.

Where does this logic come from? We ought to know that this logic isn’t based on the Constitution of 1787 surprisingly, but rather, it is derived from the Declaration of Independence of 1776, and why is this so? As a matter of fact, it was in the Declaration of Independence of 1776 where America’s Founders set forth the moral principles that would later be used in the creation of the Constitution. Abraham Lincoln said, Let us revere the Declaration of Independence while stating that the Declaration of Independence is the foundation of an American Constitution. Therefore, the Declaration's principles, We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness are the principles through which the United States Constitution should be interpreted.

Isn’t it rather astonishing to discover that those principles begin with the traditional natural law, or more precisely, with the natural rights strain of that tradition? Its roots go far back into antiquity, with its clearest manifestation being the English common law that had evolved at that time for over 500 years, and in John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, which set forth the theory of rights on which the American government rests and which formed the founders’ vision.

In simplest terms, America was founded on the belief that there is a higher law than any law established by any human being. Most founders, when referring to this law, called it either nature or god. In the Declaration of Independence, they even used both …the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God… So, in the old American tradition, it was assumed that there was a higher power than any human law or power as stated by Thomas Paine in his book, "The Age of Reason:"

"To follow God and obey reason is the same thing."

Now, doesn’t this assertion sound rather logical, especially when considering what it would be like if there was no higher law than the government? Especially when you think in these terms: that the government is just a collection of politicians and bureaucrats. What if those people were the top of the line final answer? That would be some terrifyingly scary picture, and it is. Just consider the following:

"If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good? Do not the legislators and their appointed agents also belong to the human race? Or do they believe that they themselves are made of a finer clay than the rest of mankind?"

- Frédéric Bastiat

So, the question is, if you can't trust people with freedom, how can you trust people with power?

That is why we have a situation where

"The most improper job of any man, even saints, is bossing other men. Not one in a million is fit for it, and least of all those who seek the opportunity."

- J. R. R. Tolkien

He who is unfit to serve his fellow citizen seeks to rule them.

- Ludwig Von Mises

Therefore, it is strange that as H. L. Mencken would say,

People do not expect to find chastity in a whorehouse. Why, then, do they expect to find honesty and humanity in government, a congeries of institutions whose modus operandi consists of lying, cheating, stealing, and if need be, murdering those who resist?

That’s why it’s so terrifying to realize that we ended up living in a Twilight Zone

So, America’s founders assumed that this higher power declared a higher law that everyone had to both know and obey. Some examples are from the Declaration of Independence, and one which readily comes to mind is the declaration that all men are created equal. No exception and that’s very important. The higher law applies to every human being equal. No one gets any special privileges or exemptions from the law. If something is prohibited or permitted for me or you, it is also prohibited or permitted for kings, dukes, presidents, majorities, minorities, and everyone else. There are no exemptions. That’s why the opposite is defined as tyranny.

Tyranny is that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.

For example, Thomas Jefferson said:

The majority, oppressing an individual, is guilty of a crime, abuses its strength, and by acting on the law of the strongest breaks up the foundations of society.

And;

I never believed there was one code of morality for a public and another for a private man.

In another example, one of the Ten Commandments says, Thou shalt not steal. No exceptions. It doesn’t say, Thou shalt not steal unless the majority votes for it, and it doesn’t say, Thou shalt not steal unless you believe it is necessary. It applies to you, to me, to the president, to the majority and minority, to government and corporation, and any other organizations. In effect, no one individual or group is permitted by the law to steal. Period. There is no exception. Not even one. Because of the basis of their belief

Reviews for Government’s Achilles Heel or How to Win Any Court Case (we the people & common sense)

[Garrett Herschleb · Rating: 1 out of 5 stars]

This book contains a lot of entertaining memes, but it presents no tested method of overcoming prosecution. "You don't have jurisdiction over me" is not any more powerful than "I don't recognize your authority."

This book does not live up to the promise of its title.