In this episode, I have a fascinating 3-hour conversation with Dr. Jessica Rose about all things related to C-word juices, ranging from interpreting the adverse event reporting system to the future of mandatory prophylactic gene therapy.  If you follow Dr. Rose on her web site or YouTube channel, she is first and foremost an analyst of the adverse event reporting system.  If you follow her substack, her bio is simple: "I am a dissident." Her academic bio emphasizes her expertise in biology and immunology: Dr. Jessica Rose is a Canadian researcher with a Bachelor’s degree in Applied Mathematics and a Master’s degree in Immunology from Memorial University of Newfoundland. She also holds a PhD in Computational Biology from Bar Ilan University and 2 post-doctoral degrees: one in Molecular Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and one in Biochemistry from the Technion Institute of Technology. She was also accepted for a 2-month program as a senior researcher at the Weizmann Institute prior to completion of her latest post doctoral degree at the Technion.   Important Links Her CV is rich in published work on infectious diseases: https://i-do-not-consent.netlify.app/media/Curriculum%20Vitae%20June%202021.pdf She plays advisory roles in the Canadian organization Take Back Our Freedoms: https://takingbackourfreedoms.ca/about-us/ She is also involved with Geert Vanden Bossche's Voice for Science and Solidarity: https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/authors/jessica-rose The three most important ways to keep up with her work are her web site, substack, and YouTube channel: https://i-do-not-consent.netlify.app/ https://jessicar.substack.com/ https://www.youtube.com/user/74jessicarose This is her currently withdrawn paper on myocarditis: https://61b87bfde22db9000824d656--i-do-not-consent.netlify.app/media/A%20Report%20on%20Myocarditis%20Adverse%20Events%20in%20the%20U.S.%20Vaccine%20AdverseEvents%20Reporting%20System%20%28VAERS%29%20in%20Association%20with%20COVID19%20Injectable%20Biological%20Products.pdf This is her critical appraisal of the adverse event reporting system as a pharmacovigilence tool: https://i-do-not-consent.netlify.app/media/Pharmacovigilance%20VAERS%20paper%20FINAL_OCT_1_2021.pdf Time Stamps 07:25 The interview starts 08:27 Her academic background 25:09 How she started analyzing adverse effect reporting system data 31:14 Were the mandates a surprise or expected? 31:34 Raw milk persecution, Rawsome raids, National Animal Identification System, swine flu microchips and forced quarantining laws 38:45 Interpreting the adverse event reporting system: how do we think about underreporting, overreporting, stimulated reporting, and causality? 52:08 Total adverse events are continuing to accumulate at the same rate even though the rollout is tapering, breakthrough infections, female reproduction issues 56:38 John Su misrepresents the data on 5-11-year-olds at CDC meeting 01:03:02 Hiding the children injected illegally 1:08:52 Severe adverse events in 5-11-year-olds 1:15:37 Back when 50 deaths would take a product off the market 1:18:04 We should be more cautious, not less cautious, when the data is poor quality 1:21:00 Hiding the all-cause mortality data 1:26:51 Can you get the C-word twice? And what does it mean, exactly, to get the C-word? 1:48:37 Widespread low-level inflammation throughout the population 1:53:14 Can the spike protein be written to the human genome? 1:57:31 Why is the risk/reward ratio so much worse for kids? 2:03:57 The effect of the juices on viral evolution in the era of omicron 2:12:18 Do we have an epidemic of hospitalizations for PCR-negative C-word-like illness in fully juiced people? 2:16:13 The saga of the retracted paper 2:20:14 Most myocarditis is severe by standard definition 2:27:13 Two approaches to language in peer-reviewed papers: raw honesty vs deference to the narrative. 2:32:58 What is a juice, and are these injections technically juices? 2:42:48 The importance of precision