Wake Up America

By Lee McGarr

The Sheriff of McCurtain County, Oklahoma, is to hire a hitman. Why, he doesn't like what the local News Paper is printing. His goal is to have both the Editor and the Reporter eliminated. They are father and son.

A district Judge in Garfield County falsely

• Language: English
• Publisher: Palmetto Publishing
• Release date: Jan 10, 2024
• ISBN: 9798822932760

Lee McGarr

Lee McGarr is a retired pilot with Degrees in Electrical Engineering and Biology

Book preview

CHAPTER I

Say Good-Bye to your Rights,

The First, at this Time

T

he 1st amendment in the Bill of Rights has apparently morphed into nothing more than a mild suggestion. Or so it seems when dealing with the Federal Government and some State Governments. Should they not like something someone says or states in writing, it is simply Not Allowed! God forbid that one should do something that they do not like, as I found out, it was nearly the death penalty for me. Has anyone ever heard of a Civil Contempt, that was proven false receiving a $25,000 Appearance Bond. Then later that same evening, after court hours the Judge ups it to $50,000 cash bond. Again, one last time in the coming few days, ups that bond again to a $100,000 cash bond. If this money mongering buffoon is ever put in charge of anything more serious than guarding an outhouse basement, we the people are in serious trouble. "Regardless of what this jury finds, I can throw you in jail." God save the citizens in Stephens County, Oklahoma, or anyone driving through.

Following the groundbreaking release of the Twitter Files, many Americans may have now realized the extent to which the Federal Government censor’s free speech. Regardless of online or in print, several leaks have indicated that the Department of Justice, and a number of other governmental and quasi-governmental organizations, are bound and determined to censor any speech. Any that could damage a little tyrant’s political future they try to silence. These actions could lead to the complete sacrifice of America. That includes any other politician they and/or the Feds like. Not only are these actions a direct violation of the amendment, but they violate the very concept of our democracy. Read the letter returned by the Merrit Garland Justice Department shortly after he took the oath of office. (I-1) Why would one write to him if the local Justice Department Organizations were doing their job. They had previously been contacted, found to be complicit in the crimes that he was writing about and determined that they were completely compromised.

I-1

In an interview with Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, he demonstrated how compromised AG Garland was and that he could not be trusted. He has violated his oath of office so many times that it could be a book all on its own.

Recently the House Armed Services Committee has approved a regulation that forbids the Pentagon from funding any organization that participates in the suppression of free speech or that kind of activity. This will apply to any organization that is directly or indirectly censoring free speech. The amendment was brought forward by Rep. Rich McCormick of Georgia who spoke to the press following the passage of his amendment. Representative McCormick stated that he was proud they passed his amendment that prohibits the Department of Defense from contracting with any one of a number of ‘misinformation’ or ‘disinformation’ monitors that rate news and information sources. While the media monitors claim to be nonpartisan, in reality, they are anything but. What this amendment does in action is prevent any entity that actively advises censorship or the blacklisting of news sources on grounds that may be potentially subjective in nature or contain some sort of political bias. This action has a long way to go in ending government censorship but should be a great start.

Ryan Samsel is a United States political prisoner! He has been subjected to horrific prison conditions in the past two years. In the event you have not followed his case you will find that Ryan was the January 6th defendant who was brutally beaten by guards at the DOC facility in Washington D.C. He was later transferred to a jail facility in Virginia where he was assaulted again. Ryan has permanent injuries that resulted from the abuse he endured.

According to a report by the Gateway Pundit, Samsel has been subject to vicious beatings, hogtied, tied to a chair for over 12 hours, and could not receive medical treatment for his injuries. He has been denied even the most basic rights guaranteed in our country.

Ryan Samsel Has Been Subjected to these Deplorable Prison Conditions for nothing more than standing up for our rights as citizens.

Mr. Samsel gained national notoriety on March 21, 2021, when correctional officers woke him up and zip-tied his hands. They then took him to an empty cell where officers proceeded to beat him. Mr. Samsel ended up losing an eye during that beating. The following day, the guards gave him another beating, which also resulted in him only having partial use of one arm. This is what is coming out of the Garland Attorney General’s Office and the new Gestapo entitled, The Department of Justice.

He is set for trial in October and is one of multiple January 6 demonstrators who have been imprisoned for two years, without receiving any criminal conviction.

According to video footage, Samsel was standing next to Ray Epps, a member of the Oath Keeper accused of inciting the violent storming of the US Capitol. This happened prior to the first group of barriers being breached at the US Capitol.

Furthermore, Ray Epps was at the second group of barriers when the demonstrators breached them right outside of the US Capitol.

Considering these developments, Samsel is currently urging members of Congress to summon him to testify about January 6, so he can give his account of the brutal prison conditions he was subjected to.

Recently, Chief U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty for the Western District of Lousiana granted an injunction barring the Biden Administration from telling social media platforms to "shut up users. The injunction in Missouri v. Biden was issued in a lawsuit by the GOP attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri, who argued Bidens cabinet cracked down on Americans’ free speech and First Amendment rights by pressuring Twitter and other platforms to censor users and posts. At the time this first attempt occurred by the Biden Administration it was targeting vaccine hesitancy or the potential to disrupt elections", and the Hunter Biden laptop story. This was reported by Newsmax reports who cited The Washington Post.

Finally, this Historic Ruling Exposes Government Censorship and Highlights Suppression of Free Speech. In a groundbreaking court ruling issued on Independence Day, Chief U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty revealed alarming government censorship, particularly on social media platforms.

"[The plaintiffs] have produced evidence of a massive effort by Defendants, from the White House to other federal agencies, to suppress speech based on its content, Judge Doughty’s injunction declared.

After examining extensive evidence, including 1,432 facts presented by attorneys general from Louisiana and Missouri, Judge Doughty uncovered a disturbing collaboration between government officials and social media companies to suppress viewpoints deemed unfavorable. The court discovered emails and messages proving their concerted efforts.

Judge Doughty shared concerning excerpts from these communications in the ruling. They revealed instances where a former government official pressured Twitter to remove a post by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. when expressing concerns about the "C-19 juice"(COVID-19).

Another high-ranking official expressed frustration with Facebook for allowing certain C-19 juice discussions to persist. Troublingly, the government’s cybersecurity agency collaborated with external groups to circumvent our freedom of speech protections under the First Amendment.

The above are direct proof of what is occurring in our new dictatorship. We have further found that the COVID-19 did not come from Wuhan, China, but rather the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. How many days did Anthony Fauci stand in front of the camera’s and lie to the American citizens? Does anyone actually think that he and one other really declined the $300 plus million he was paid for this breach of America.

This evidence exposes what Judge Doughty described as a governmental Ministry of Truth,. This is reminiscent of a well-known literary reference to Orwell’s 1984; "this case shows us one of the most significant attacks on free speech in American history." Compare this to the Nazi Regime in the 1930’s and 40’s.

This ruling highlighted that millions of everyday citizens’ constitutionally protected posts were suppressed. To prevent further harm, this judge issued a preliminary injunction, prohibiting government employees from pressuring social media companies to censor protected speech.

The legal proceedings will continue. It is necessary to address the concerns raised by this ruling. The mainstream media outlets are purposefully downplaying and even attempting concealment of this information. They are attempting to keep the public uninformed and in the dark. When the media does mention this ruling, their true agenda comes to light as they defend the government censorship and collusion as a means to prevent the correct thinking by the public.

It is imperative that the citizens of the United States and the world stay vigilant and well-informed. This ruling demonstrates the importance of defending our rights and to freely express ourselves, always engaging in open dialogue.

This book deals with not only national levels but also City, County and State issues that they, local government entities, decide who and when our Rights may apply. As with each chapter, one will see issues that they have witnessed first-hand. Change the names and you will see friends and relatives that have received the same or similar treatments.

Most people know who Mark Levin is and how Target Department Stores refuse to sell his book as they are concerned "…it may offend some people."

Let me take a moment to reiterate the First Amendment of the Constitution.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or

prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of

the press, or the right of the people

peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nowhere does it reference that if something stated or written offends someone, that all bets are off and this amendment no longer applies.

"I will not be silent about what I see

as wrong, anti-human and just plain

evil - will you?"

CHAPTER II

No Protection Under No Law,

Select Justice

O

n September, 14th, 2021, I received a phone call from my recentlly hired attorney, Jeffery S. Coe who lives in Edmond, Oklahoma. To that end, I had no real opinions of him, but all of that would change shortly. To paraphrase his question, it went something like this; Judge G. Brent Russell contacted me and wanted to know if you could afford $2500 for a court reporter in our trial this coming week, September 20th and 21st. According to Jeffery S. Coe, the Judge said that they would need to contract one and he wanted to know if I could afford it. I stated to him that I could not. He allegedly passed that information on to the very questionable and unethical Judge. So, the trial was still on even though I stated that I could not afford such. Note, I was the defendant in this civil trial. I had heard from several people if you wanted to hide something from Judge Russell, put it in a law book, he would never look there.

I was born at night, but not the night before that phone call, and I knew that court reporters are not making $1250 per day especially in a county district court.

After the call I contacted Chris Poindexter, whom I have written about in some of my previous books and informed him of the conversation.

I soon learned that he contacted Mr. Jeffery S. Coe of Edmond, Oklahoma, and the first words out of his mouth was, "Are you nuts? You know very well that no court reporter costs that kind of money. What is going on?"

Apparently Mr. Jeffery S. Coe, of Edmond, Oklahoma, was short on answers and long on regret. But not enough to refund the $5,000 yet, that I had paid him to represent me, not attack me. Not to worry though, so long as his Errors and Omissions (E&O) policy is paid up, I have good reason to believe that he will be needing it soon and for more than just me!

The weekend rolled around to the 18th and 19th of September and come Monday morning, September 20th, 2021, I had a grave suspicion that somethng was awry. To begin, Judge Russell came in after the court reporter from Pauls Valley, Oklahoma, employed by Word for Word Reporting, was already seated and at work. The Judge proceeded to tell those in the courtroom that he had been a District Judge now for eighteen years. Well, no reason not to get started off on a lie. The truth is that he was not a District Judge, only an Associate District Judge and had been that for barely over sixteen years. Next, as he walked to his throne, as he would like to believe it to be, and seated himself. I would really have to ask if sitting back on the pistol he carries under his black robe, stuck in the back of his pants isn’t a bit uncomfortable. Perhaps that’s just me?

G. Brent Russell

When all were seated and the Jury was in place, the trial was to begin. I suppose that for the majority of that day, all went well and as planned. (Just not my plan.) That came to a screeching halt at 1655 (4:55PM Central time) when he dismissed the jury. Note, just the jury, not anyone else including the Court Reporter. What he stated next was to say the least out of any character for a court in the United States of America. In one short sentence, he systematically attempted to remove my 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 14th amendment protections. His statement: Regardless of what this jury finds, I can throw you in jail! Did I miss something, are we now in a third world country, banana republic, or other place of tyranical leadership?

Apparently, he was educated in some law school in a third world country that couldn’t spell "Bill of Rights".

As I am now finding out, there was a Master Plan and it involved producing all documents, Appearance Bonds, Arrest Warrants etc, even sheets instructing the six person jury on how to vote. Perhaps they were hand selected by this little tyrant which would now include them in his plot. Wait a minute, a jury is to have twelve jurors with one alternate. That would be thirteen, not six with an alternate making it seven. Read instruction #2 below. There is reallly no decision to be made. Disgard the photo’s showing all that was awarded my ex-wife, waiting for her to pick up and the eye witness who was there for all four days waiting and available for her to pickup and his statements describing all. According to this, I was guilty. I wonder if that is why Judge Russell was seen coming out of the Jury Deliberation Room on his way to tell us that the Jury had reached a verdict. I wonder if that is why the Court Clerk told Chris Poindexter that this was really odd that she was being paid overtime to stay late on the 21st? An interesting fact is that the bond that Judge Russell set was a $25,000 Appearance Bond requiring $2500 cash to be put up before I could leave that night? There seems to be some serious, let’s call them infractions, in the judicial process in this court with this "alleged" judge. Not to mention Jeffery S. Coe of Edmond, Oklahoma, who not only attempted to not stop this illegal court, but actually promoted it. Isn’t there some law about taking money under false pretenses?

If you look closely at Russell’s statement of "Regardless …" above, he must have been trying to hopefully get me to not show up on the morning of the 21st. Then he was allready set with documents and paperwork in hand to send me to jail. We still need to find out what the overtime rate of