How God Sees the World

By Xlibris US

How God sees the world is a message of peace on Earth, an invitation to Christians and the world to become peaceful and meek like angels, an invitation to mankind to become compassionate and stand together to combat pollution and the global warming of the Earth.

How God sees the world is the Bible, Western philosophy, Mathematics, Literature, Science and Life. The book is unique and revolutionary in the history of humanity because the author uses mathematical reasoning to prove the truths in religion, philosophy, and life.

The author is an advocate of the renaissance civilization and zero growth as was recommended by the Club of Rome in the book entitled The Limits to growth. The author explains the mysteries of Satan and original sin by using Personnalism, Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Mathematics.

Mathematics is logic and the art of reasoning.

The author demonstrates mathematically and biblically that a Christian is a saint, a communist, or a neutral being. That is to say humanity must become communist or brotherly to hope to solve the problems of pollution, unemployment, violence, poverty, health, crime, wars, etc.This means humanity must become communist or brotherly if it wants to survive.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Xlibris US
• Release date: May 22, 2014
• ISBN: 9781499020915

Book preview

MY RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE

I got my Bac C (Science option Degree to enter university) in 1982 with Libermann High school after seven years of quite average studies. In the conscience that I have of my own existence, I have always liked kindness, tenderness, justice, ideal and love. I was in the second year of physics and chemistry studies at the university, in 1984, when I experienced throughout time the emanations of the Holy Spirit: joy, charity, kindness, compassion, peace, and purity in infinite proportion. It was really heaven! God is a full and happy being. The presence of God in his plenitude is joy, tenderness, love and kindness. God informed me of the economic collapse of Africa and that of the Third world in general as well as the End of the World getting closer. I will quote the American Deputy Secretary of State to the business of the Third world in those days, John Waynes the tragedy of the Third world unable to afford the rich, technician and scientific Western civilization, and which saw its ancestral and tribal structures as well as its lifestyle destroyed by the Westerners who had promised its people that they would enjoy material wellbeing as well as the progress brought by science. It is rather unemployment, poverty, rural migration for the young people who were born in the consumer society and who cannot go back towards the civilization of their parents and ancestors. The say author predicts the social conflicts, the explosion of delinquency and violence, and even the reconsideration of the principle of intangibility of the borders inherited after colonization and the blossoming of the regional conflicts. (Jeune Afrique. Year 1984).

God tells me: stick to God and Jesus-Christ, become saint and perfect in order to go to heaven. I stress that the emanations of the Holy Spirit gave me the power to like my fellow and be good. One can likes the Christian ideal and have a heart that likes kindness, but as for the power to practice justice and kindness effectively, it takes being regenerated by the Holy Spirit. In January 1985, I was then in the third year of my university studies when the Holy Spirit asked me to leave the university for farming at Nkondjock within the framework of a nationwide pioneer project. I did not take the partials exams and lost my 40000 FCFA monthly scholarship. I remained at the pioneer village named Didipé for 6 months. There, I was living in a house in Karabot" and perceived a 5000 FCFA monthly aid. On the insistence of my family and friends, and also according to the plan of God, I left this village for the eldest child of the family at Edéa. He was then the Head of the Financial Department of Cellucam. For a year, together with my cousin and other blue-collar workers, we worked on planting cocoa, plantain and exploiting the forest.

Every evening, after my student’s day, the Holy Spirit went down on me when I was alone in my room and told me: <> Satan, I say this compared to now, told me that as God loves me too much, this promise will be achieved on September 26, 1986 representing my birthday date. Then, I told my friends, my brothers and all the members of my family that God spoke to me and told me that I would go to heaven on September 26, 1986. Therefore, if they do not see me any more on earth, they must know that I left for heaven. Before September 26, I was not filled with the presence and the joy of God. I started then to have doubts about my departure to heaven that day. My doubts were confirmed when I did not go to heaven on September 26. Today, knowing the attributes of God and why the world is, it was too easy! God allowed this lie of Satan. I returned to the university with a huge problem of knowledge. I was also unfortunate because I had chronic malaria. Nevertheless, I got my third year degree in Physics that year. I was strongly disturbed. Satan, using subtlety, wickedness and a malice that is typically Satan, plunged me into a deep darkness. For me, God was henceforth the evil and the Word of God revealed in the Bible was lie.

Some examples of the many lies Satan used to tell me: <> At the time of the Gulf War, Satan told me: <> So I was no longer reading the Bible and although I read it, Satan was always leading me to the Old Testament. My elder sister consulted a catholic priest, Father Sebastian who exorcized me. I remember having left the first meeting, saying: ‘tell God and Jesus-Christ that they have killed me.’ One month later, I experienced the entire evil presence of Satan. That happened to me one morning, in February 1991 when I was at work. My body released and I felt all the supernatural evil presence of Satan. At that moment, I called upon God and Jesus-Christ. This is traditional: men make fun of God, insult Him or ignore Him but when they are in danger, this same God is He whom they call to rescue them. I was filled with panic and insane anguish. I was transported to the nearest hospital where I had Father Sebastian called. Clinically, I was not sick. The doctor at the hospital told me later that I was to be declared dead long before. He then asked me who I was. After these events and many others, Mary inspired me to write the book How God sees the World.

The force of Satan lies in the enormous difficulty for the human spirit to explain his existence rationally from the good God. How to explain that God creates a being that spends his time driving men to killing and cruelty? When faced with such a quite difficult philosophical problem of the being, man starts imagining Satan as a clown, a man with horns, a myth of Christian religion or that of the imagination of Christ, or simply denying his existence. Through personal experience, and I relate the anguish and fear of Jesus at Gethsemane in my book, Satan in his current configuration, is the evil in the highest sense of the word. I hope that those who believe in Jesus-Christ as God will take this very seriously. Jesus says that he came on earth to give testimony to the truth. Jesus came to fight against Satan. I hope that your doubts as for his existence will disappear with the demonstration made in this book. Thus, sanctify and aspire to kindness and the celestial goods before Satan makes you sin in situation!

Grace be to Jesus-Christ, God our Savior who brought grace and truth to us because Moses brought the law and the prophets but Jesus brought love, kindness and forgiveness. Amen!

INTRODUCTION

The problematic of the problem related to philosophy, science, religion, and the End of the World.

What are the origin, the nature and the value of all the religions and philosophical currents which have existed hitherto and those of scientific knowledge? Let me recall these terms to the reader: knowledge is the act of the thought that poses and defines an object as independent of the mind. The problem of knowledge is the set of speculations whose goal is to determine the origin and the value of common, scientific or philosophical knowledge. Epistemology is the critical study of sciences, of the formation and the conditions of scientific knowledge. Metaphysics is the rational research of the deep knowledge of things, beyond their sensitive appearance and the knowledge one has of them thanks to positive sciences. Methodology is the part of logic which studies the methods of various sciences. In theory of knowledge, agnosticism is the doctrine according to which the truth is unknowable to human spirit. Only experimental reality is knowable. Positivism is the doctrine for which the verification of our knowledge by experience is the only criterion of truth. Pragmatism is the doctrine which regards the practical utility of an idea as the criterion of its truth. Relativism is the doctrine according to which human knowledge can be but relative. The subjective relativism is the doctrine which affirms that the concepts of good and evil are functions of the circumstances and thus have nothing absolute. Existentialism is the set of doctrines having in common the fact of placing at the starting point of their thought, the existence experienced by the individual, man in the world, and the primacy of existence over essence. Materialism is the doctrine teaching that the only fundamental reality is matter and that any other reality is, somehow, reducible. It is the attitude of he who seeks only material satisfactions. Dogmatism is the intellectual attitude consisting in asserting ideas without discussing them; the dogma of trinity, sin, and Satan.

When I build a theory or affirm a proposition, to judge its value of truth (true or false), it must explain all current, former and future reality. It is the epistemological problem in sciences. In the universal gravitation of Newton, when a body is released, it falls. Why? Because it is attracted by the earth. And why does the earth not push it back? I state the law of gravitation. All material bodies attract one another with a force

F = G * (M1*M2)/R²

PropORTIONAL TO THE PRODUCT OF THEIR MASSES, INVERSELY proportional to the square of the distance which separates them: the constant of proportionality G = 6.67 10¹¹ U. IF. With my daily experience, studying the movement of bodies, I establish the coherence of this law with the whole reality. So, this law is true now but will it be valid in a billion years? Will it not be possible to observe facts that are in contradiction with this law? That is the problem of value or epistemological problem. To quote Gaston Bachelard << epistemology must give an account of the more or less mobile synthesis of reason and experience, although this synthesis might arise philosophically as a desperate problem… It was in this new and evolutionary scientific spirit that appeared the non-Newtonian mechanics and the following dilemmatic problems: Matter and radiation—Corpuscles and waves—Determinism and Indeterminism. Will the Cartesian epistemology, totally based on the reference to simple ideas, be enough to characterize the current scientific thought? >> As a Christian, and by personal experience, I assert that God is the foundation of any true knowledge. God gives knowledge according to the times, His prescience and His providence. Will the universe expand indefinitely? Is the universe a balloon universe: would a phase of contraction come after a phase of expansion?

What is the value of monotheist religions? All of them affirm that the universe was created by a God that is good, righteous and holy; they use the existence of the original sin to explain the suffering in the world and Satan as the instigator of evil. Let’s discuss the reality and the value of these concepts. If God is good, why is there evil in the world? Don’t we all speak about bad luck and good luck? How to conciliate that with divine providence? There are children born in war situations, others, in very good conditions, intelligent, sick or healthy. Where is thus the reality of the good God? More, are kindness, justice, simplicity, gentleness, purity and pity values? Nietzsche said in The death of God: Be it the pity of God or the pity of men, pity is an offence to decency. And willing not to help can be nobler than some virtue too hastened to help. But, this is the virtue small people regard nowadays as the virtue par excellence, compassion: They do not have the respect of the great misfortune, the great ugliness, the deformity. To quote Pascal in the two orders of greatness << There are two orders of greatness in the world; for, there are establishment sizes and natural sizes. Establishment sizes depend on the will of the men, who believed, with motive, that they had to honor some states and attach some regards to it. Dignities and nobleness are of this kind. In a country one honors the noble ones, in the other, the commoners; in another, the seniors and in the other one, the juniors. Why that? Because that is how people liked it. The thing is indifferent before the establishment: after the establishment, it becomes right because it is not right to disturb it. Natural sizes are those that do not depend on the imagination of men, because they consist in real and effective qualities of the soul and the body, which make, the one or the other estimable, like sciences, the light of the spirit, virtue, health, strength. We owe something to the one and the other of these sizes; but as they are of different nature, we owe them also different regards. >>

According to the Bible, only one man sinned and condemned all the other men to suffering. Where did sin come from? Man did not create himself. Could God not prevent man from sinning? How to conceive the transmission of sin the way we explain the transmission of genes in genetics? Why does the innocent child have to undergo the injustice of his alcoholic, violent, and carefree father? Does the animal sin? Then, what is sin? What is the reality of sin? What actual wrong did man do to God by eating the forbidden fruit? And where is sin in the men we see every day? Is it in our body, our conscience, or our heart? What about Satan? How to conceive an existence that spends its time driving men to do evil? What profit does he make from it? What joy does he have, and who gives him joy to do evil because he did not create himself? Men wage war on one another for interests and are responsible for their acts in general. What is then the reality of Satan? Finally, these religions promise eternal life to the goods and hell or eternal death to the wicked. Couldn’t God create all men like angels? Why does God damn sinners without giving them a second or a third chance of repentance? I have never killed, stolen, or committed any crime. Why will God send me into hell if I do not believe in Jesus-Christ as say priests, pastors, theologians and evangelists? Is that justice? Why do some suffer from demons and are others not? In what did they sin more than the others? Those who really do evil are happy and enjoy a long life! To crown it all, it is religious dogmatism. It apparently does not have more value and reality than the other philosophical currents. And, aren’t the atheists right? We stumble on an issueless problem: That of dogmatic, sensitive, abstract, theoretical and experimental knowledge. What is the value of our knowledge and its reality?

The goal that I propose in this book is to blow all religious dogmatism, validate Christian religion, validate general relativity and solve the problem of the knowledge that encompass epistemology and cosmology, the theory of knowledge, the philosophy of the being, the philosophy of mathematics, phenomenology, the final fate of man after his death and the ultimate transformation of the world.

Since the beginning of times, men always wondered what sense they should give to life and why there is evil in the world. Several solutions were suggested to us: religious, mythological, philosophical, Marxist, pantheist, Hegelianism explanation, etc. As far as I am concerned, I put the problematic of evil under that of happiness. Men come to life imperfect, live in the society and legitimately aspire all to happiness because the epicureans affirm that the sovereign good of life is happiness. But unfortunately, their happiness is different according to their beings. The problematic of evil leads me to the metaphysical search of the being in general that I address here in Christian optics. In the Christian and religious sense in general, man comes to life as a sinner and has as destiny, moral and spiritual perfection. Man also has hope to live eternal life with God. On the basis of experience, a question comes at once to our mind: are all men perfectible? Can all men become holy? That is the major philosophical question. As far as the popular religious understanding is concerned, men separate life here on earth from life with God after death. I will show that life with God must be experienced here on earth and then will reach a greater plenitude in eternal life. My answer to the question asked is that all men cannot become holy just because they have different lives or existences. I, therefore, affirm that only a few beings are perfectible. God is the perfect God. All men cannot become gods. God created different animal and plant species. No star resembles the other. The same way, God created different beings. As fish cannot become bird, snake or cow, only a certain category of beings are perfectible. It is a problem of creation which is in agreement with experience. Why do the wicked one, the robber, the murderer not change? Men know the law and why don’t they keep it? I conclude that it is necessary to recreate the being according to the Gospel of John: << In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men… He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.>> (John 1. 1-3; John 1. 10-13). In his night interview with Nicodemus, Jesus answered: << Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. Nicodemus saith unto him, how can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. >> (John 3.3-6).

The message of this book is that God is ready to recreate all those who want or aspire to become perfect. I show in this book that matter is for us a sensitive reality because we live in the space-time geometry and that it is in God only like a pure design of his spirit or a total understanding of his thought. In this book, I explain how God created all the possible beings, I solve the problem of Satan, the problem of original sin and I define Christian existentialism. Man is a sinner by his way of existing i.e. he cannot obey the holy law of God. Since existing means loving; this means that man can change.

What has God been doing before He creates the world? Where did He have the idea of creating the world? And why did He create the world? The mistake commonly made by men is to see God as if His existence depended on the world or to see only His providence. One could say God created the world because of his love for men. How to conceive nothingness? The cause of the existence of Satan can thus be found only by locating God in a time preceding the creation of the angels. Nevertheless, Satan exists because the wicked exist. I prove that God created Satan, the angels, the demons and the humanity by a mere chance. But if the wicked exist, it means then that there is a human nature. I reaffirm that the act is not free. Man in his externalization, expresses his existence or what he likes. And through this existence which is also being in a situation that God makes transcend, he reveals an essence that is contrary to that of God. This essence is variable for someone else who as conscience put him it as an object of knowledge. Lastly, I show that God has already written all the history of humanity. God is the Lord of History. To quote Lv. Thomas, anthropologist who worked on Dola in Senegal << God is the Master of the world and the history. Creation is now only an exchange of forces wanted by God, planned by God. >>

It is God who gives us life, being and movement (Acts 17-28). God has already calculated and simulated our behavior. God does not consider our current acts to make calculation and determine the future. God created our beings and simulated the situations where He had to place us to study our behavior in front of good and evil. God is opaque before our material and social situations. God sees only human existence as aspiration to holiness, and we all experience that we are free to choose between good and evil. God is the necessary cause of our being and He is free to put an end to our existence if we do not achieve His will. The existence of man, seen of God, is not contingent but was desired by God. God is He who creates the being in the world.

I conclude this book by drawing the attention of men on the serious economic, social, political and ecological situation of humanity. The God of love and kindness cannot tolerate such a situation indefinitely. God does not make a consideration of people. The egoistic man and the sinner do not have more reason to live than the soldier or the civilian who die during wars and violence. God invites humanity to become communist. Does God exist? Is He the God of Christians? The world could indeed be eternal. Any rational proof of God is not enough to convince human spirit because we experience an existence. The problem of God is the problem of the aspiration of man to purity, love, justice, and perfect kindness. Nevertheless, I arise these striking facts: the analogy between the (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit), with the Euclidean space (x, y, z), (spirit, soul, body), (head, trunk, member), (second, minute, hour), (day, month, year). I prove in chapter 7 that the Christian God is necessarily true, i.e. God is necessarily a family of 3 identical people. Finally, I prove the existence of God in chapter 20.

CHAPTER 1

Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics

It is noted that (p Λ ┐p) is a false or inconsistent proposition. This is the proposition that I am going to use to prove that priests, pastors, theologians, and evangelists contradict themselves when they speak. We also see that if p → q is false, then ┐q → ┐p is false. If p → q is true, then ┐q → ┐p is true. In conclusion, p →q and ┐q → ┐p have the same truth value. Lastly, p ↔ q has the same truth value as (p → q) Λ (q → p).

Application

Priests, pastors, theologians and evangelists say that hell exists, i.e. God is wicked, which is in contradiction with the Bible which says that God is good. Let us prove that the proposition hell exists is a false proposition. Let us also note that the opposite of hell is paradise.

Proof 1

They say that (hell and paradise) exist. We know that (p Λ ┐p) is a false or inconsistent proposition. Either you affirm one, or you affirm the other. As the proposition paradise exists is a true proposition, the proposition hell exists is a false proposition.

Proof 2

They say that God is good and hell exists. Let us put that God is good is proposition p, and hell exists is proposition q. ┐ (p Λ q) gives me:

God is wicked or paradise exists. This proposition is true because paradise exists is a true proposition. Therefore, if ┐ (p Λ q) is true, then (p Λ q) is false. As the proposition p is true, therefore q is false. Thus, hell does not exist.

Proof 3

God is good and paradise exists is a true proposition, i.e. (p Λ q) is true → ┐ (p Λ q) is false, i.e. (God is wicked or hell exists) is a false proposition. For this proposition to be false, it is necessary that the proposition hell exists be false. Lastly, as (p Λ q) is true, then, (p Λ ┐p) is false.

Proof 4

If God is good, therefore, paradise exists is a true proposition, because God is good is a true proposition, and paradise exists is a true proposition.

┐q → ┐p gives me:

If hell exists, then, God is wicked is a true proposition because ┐q → ┐p and p →q have the same truth value. Finally, if paradise exists, therefore God is good is a true proposition. From this, we have p → q Λ q → p, i.e. God is good ↔ Paradise exists. All the same, if God is wicked, then hell exists is a true proposition. God is wicked ↔ Hell exists.

I have just proved through mathematics that hell doesn’t exist. I will further prove that Christian theology is also in contradiction with the Bible, philosophy, art, science, elementary justice, the laws of modern justice and the universal declaration of human rights, and it contradicts itself. This means that Christian theology is 9 times false.

If priests, pastors, theologians and evangelists don’t agree that mathematics are true, I will do philosophy of mathematics and prove that mathematics was created by God, and that mathematics is logic, and that logic is true.

Mathematics is the art of reasoning. It is in fact the true language, i.e. whenever you reason or affirm things, using the mathematical language that is logic, you keep yourself in the truth. Priests, pastors, theologians and evangelists do not reason like mathematicians. They reason according to their stupid language of theologians. That is why I will show in my book How God sees the World that all the teachings on God of priests, pastors, theologians and evangelists is completely wrong.

Mathematics that is logic can be applied everywhere, that is to say, even on sentences when you can allot them a value of truth. I can use mathematics in linguistics to prove if a language is true or false. Mathematics is definition, you use logic and intuition to prove theorems and propositions.

Let me recall that Philosophy of mathematics is the branch of Philosophy which tries to answer the following questions: Why is Mathematics useful to describe nature? In which sense, if there is one, mathematics entities such as numbers exist and why and how mathematics assertions or propositions are true? I will briefly present the main schools of thought that try to give an answer to these questions.

Mathematical realism holds that mathematical entities exist independently of the human mind. Thus humans do not invent mathematics, but rather discover it, and any other intelligent beings in the universe would presumably do the same. The term Platonism is used because such a view is seen to parallel Plato’s belief in a World of Ideas, an unchanging ultimate reality that the everyday world can only imperfectly approximate. Plato’s view probably derives from Pythagoras and his followers the Pythagoreans, who believed that the world was, quite literally, built up by the numbers. This idea may have even older origins that are unknown to us.

Formalism holds that mathematical statements may be thought of as statements about the consequences of certain string manipulation rules. For example, in the game of Euclidian geometry (which is seen as consisting of some strings called axioms, and some rules of inference to generate new strings from given ones), one can prove that the Pythagorean Theorem holds (that is, you can generate the string corresponding to the Pythagorean theorem).

According to some versions of formalism, the subject matter of mathematics is then literally the written symbols themselves. Then any game is equally good, and one can only play the games, not prove things about them. Unfortunately, this does not solve the epistemic problems (What are symbols? Do they exist in an eternal, unchanging realm?) and does not explain the usefulness of mathematics. This version of formalism is not widely accepted.

A second version of formalism is often known as deductivism. In deductivism, the Pythagorean Theorem is not an absolute truth, but a relative one: if you assign meaning to the strings in such a way that the rules of the game become true (ie, true statements are assigned to the axioms and the rules of inference are truth-preserving), then you have to accept the theorem, or, rather, the interpretation you have given it must be a true statement. The same is held to be true for all other mathematical statements. Thus, formalism need not mean that mathematics is nothing more than a meaningless symbolic game. It is usually hoped that there exists some interpretation in which the rules of the game hold. But it does allow the working mathematician to continue in his work and leave such problems to a philosopher or scientist. Many formalists would say that in practice the axiom systems to be studied will be suggested by the demands of science or other areas of mathematics.

Logicism holds that logic is the proper foundation of mathematics, and that all mathematical statements are necessary logical truths. For instance, the statement If Socrates is a human, and every human is mortal, then Socrates is mortal is a necessary logical truth. To the logicist, all mathematical statements are precisely of the same type; they are analytic truths, or tautologies.

Constructivism and Intuitionism

These schools maintain that only mathematical entities which can be explicitly constructed have a claim to existence and should be admitted in mathematical discourse.

A typical quote comes from Leopard Kronecker: The natural numbers come from God, and everything else is man’s work. A major force behind intuitionism was L.E.J. Brouwer, who postulated a new logic different from the classical Aristotelian logic; this is intuitionism logic does not contain the law of the excluded middle and therefore frowns upon proofs by contradiction. The axiom of choice is also rejected. Important work was later done by Errett Bishop, who managed to prove versions of the most important theorems in real analysis within this framework.

In intuitionism, the term explicit construction is not cleanly defined, and that has led to criticisms. Attempts have been made to use the concepts of Turing machine or recursive function to fill this gap, leading to the claim that only questions regarding the behavior of finite algorithms are meaningful and should be investigated in mathematics. This has led to the study of the computable numbers, first introduced by Alan Turing.

Embodied Mind Theories

These theories hold that mathematical thought is a natural outgrowth of the human cognitive apparatus which finds itself in our physical universe. For example, the abstract concept of number springs from the experience of counting discrete objects. It is held that mathematics is not universal and does not exist in any real sense, other than in human brains. Humans construct, but do not discover, mathematics.

The physical universe can thus be seen as the ultimate foundation of mathematics: it guided the evolution of the brain and later determined which questions this brain would find worthy of investigation. However, the human mind has no special claim on reality or approaches to it built out of math; If such constructs as Euler’s Identity are true then they are as true as a map of the human mind and cognition, not as a map of anything it sees.

The effectiveness of mathematics is thus easily explained: mathematics was constructed by the brain in order to be effective in this universe.

The most accessible, famous, and infamous treatment of this perspective is Where Mathematics Comes From, by George Lakoff and Rafael E Nunez. (Since this book was first published in the year 2000, it may still be one of the only treatments of this perspective.) For more on the science that inspired this perspective, see cognitive science of mathematics.

Social Constructivism or Social Realism

This theory sees mathematics primarily as a social construct, as a product of culture, subject to correction and change. Like the other sciences, mathematics is viewed as an empirical endeavor whose results is constantly compared to ‘reality’ and may be discarded if they don’t agree with observation or prove pointless. The direction of mathematical research is dictated by the fashions of the social group performing it or by the needs of society financing it. However, although such external forces may change the direction of some mathematical research, there are strong internal constraints (the mathematical traditions, methods, problems, meanings and values into which mathematicians are enculturated) that work to conserve the historically defined discipline.

Beyond the Schools

Rather than focus on narrow debates about the true nature of mathematical truth, or even on practices unique to the mathematicians such as the proof, a growing movement from the 1960s to the 1990s began to question the idea of seeking foundations or finding any one right answer to why mathematics works. The starting point for this was Eugene Wigner’s famous 1960 paper The Unreasonable Effectiveness of mathematics in the Natural Sciences, in which he argued the happy coincidence that mathematics and physics were so well matched, seemed to be unreasonable and hard to explain.

Quasi-Empiricism

One parallel concern that does not actually challenge the schools directly but questions their focus is the notion of quasi-empiricism in mathematics. This grew from the increasingly popular assertion in the late 20th century that no one foundation of mathematics could ever be proven to exist. It is also sometimes called ‘postmodernism in mathematics’ although that term is considered overloaded by some and insulting by others. It is very minimal form of social realism/constructivism that accepts that quasi-empirical methods and even sometimes empirical methods can be part of modern mathematical practice.

Ethics

As well, there is little or no consideration given to the ethics of doing mathematics. In a technological culture, mathematics is seen as an absolute necessity whose value cannot be questioned and whose implications cannot be avoided.

Language

Finally, although many or most mathematicians or philosophers would accept the statement mathematics is a language, there is little attention paid to the implications of that statement. Linguistics is not applied to discourses or symbol systems of mathematics, that is, mathematics is studied in a markedly different way than other languages. The capacity to acquire mathematics, and competence in it, called numeracy, is seen as separate from literacy and the acquisition of language.

Some argue that this is due to failures not of the philosophy of mathematics, but of linguistics and the study of natural grammar. These fields, they say, are not rigorous enough, and that linguistic needs to catch up. But this implies that mathematics is inherently superior to all other knowledge, e.g. ecological wisdom is accrued by a culture of people living on the land. Standards of rigor vary in language, but more may not be better. (From Wikipedia)

Corollary 1.1: (Create and always create) is a true proposition.

Proof

The truth table of conjunction gives me the following possibilities: (create and always create), (create and never create), (not create and suddenly create), (not create and never create). Thus (create and always create) is a true proposition.

Corollary 1.2: Man does not think by himself.

Proof

The truth table in mathematics says that (Be created and not think by oneself) is a true proposition.

Proposition 1.1: Man does not create anything.

Proof

If man creates, therefore, his existence is to create indefinitely by corollary 1.1, which is false because man does not create indefinitely. Thus, my assumption that man creates is false. Consequently, man does not create anything.

Proposition 1.2: Predestination exists.

Proof

Paul the Apostle says: << God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; Neither is worshipped with men’s hands, as though he needed anything, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring>> (Acts 17.24-28). Paul the Apostle also says: << O man, you rather, which are you to dispute with God? The clay vase will say it to that which formed it: Why did you do me thus? Isn’t the potter main of clay, to make with the same mass a vase of honor and a vase of a cheap use? >> (Roman 9.10-11).

Jesus says in the judgment of the nations by the Son of man: << Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world>> (Matthew 25.34).

These passages prove that predestination exists, i.e. God has already determined our existences, i.e. He has already determined what we will think and do; it also means man discovers what God had already prepared for him; in other words, it is not Einstein who created the general theory of relativity, i.e. God had already determined that it is Einstein who will discover the general theory of relativity, which is true because Einstein could not interpret his equations. Physicists are not unanimous on the interpretation of the Einstein’s field’s equations.

I prove again in chapter 8 about the problem of the original sin that predestination exists. However, man is free, i.e. God has already determined our existences, and that God studies only our transcendence towards good, i.e. our transcendence towards him. This is in agreement with the preceding passage of (Acts 17.24-28).

Proposition 1.3: If God created man, therefore man does not create anything.

Proof 1

If God created man, therefore man does not think by himself by corollary 1.2. Thus man does not create anything.

Proof 2

If God created man, therefore man is a created being. To affirm that man is a created being means to affirm that he is under the control of his creator as a machine is under the control of the engineer who conceived it; it is to affirm that he thinks what his creator wants him to think; it is also to affirm that he does what his creator wants him to do; it is to affirm that all that he makes, thinks or wants is already known to his creator; it is to affirm that man discovers only what his creator wants him to discover or know; it is to affirm that man does not create anything.

Proof 3

(Be created and create) is a false proposition. (Be created and not to create) is a true proposition. (Not to create and suddenly create is a false proposition. (Not create and never create) is a true proposition. Man did not create himself, therefore he will never create.

Proposition 1.4: God creates to infinity

Proof

God is an uncreated being. Thus God created himself. Thus, God creates ad infinitum by corollary 1.1.

Proposition 1.5: God created all things

Proof

The Bible says : <

Proposition 1.6: God created logic.

Proof

God is Esprit, soul and body. Thus God is not logic. Logic is a thing like science, games, music, etc. So, it is God who created logic by proposition 1.5.

Proposition 1.7: Mathematics is logic.

Proof 1

Logic is true. Mathematics is true. Thus, to affirm mathematics and logic is a true proposition. It is the tautology mathematics = logic.

Proposition 1.8: God is a logical being.

God is true. Logic is true because all that God creates is true. Thus, to affirm God and logic is a true proposition. It is the tautology God = logic. But God is not logic. So, God is a logical being.

Proposition 1.9: God created mathematics and science.

Proof

We know in quantum mechanics, starting from the duality wave-particle, that any particle can be represented by a wave function Ψ which is the wave function associated with the particle. A wave function is a mathematical object or a mathematical entity. Indeed, wave function in quantum mechanics is the representation of the quantum state in the dimensional basis of infinite positions. The probability of presence of the particles represented by this quantum state is then directly proportional to the square of the magnitude of this wave function | Ψ (T) > which is an element of the complex Hilbert space. | Ψ (T) > represents the probabilities of results of all possible measurements of a system. Temporal evolution of | Ψ (T) > is described by the equation of Schrödinger.

H | Ψ (T) > = i * ħ (d/dt) | Ψ (T) >

Where

•   i is the imaginary number

•   ћ is the reduced constant of Planck’s

•   H is the Hamiltonian, the observable one corresponding to the total energy of the system.

•   R is the observable position

•   P is the observable impulse

This equation is an equation with partial derivatives utilizing linear operators, which makes it possible to write the generic solution as particular solutions. Thus, a particle or matter is a mathematical and physical entity. God is he who created the universe and all things. Thus, it is He who created particles physics. Therefore, God is the one who created mathematics and science.

In conclusion, if God is true, therefore God is logical, and if God is logical, therefore God is true. So, God is true ↔ God is logical. That is to say any assertion or any reasoning in contradiction with logic is false. That’s why mathematical assertions or proposition are true. This is the answer to the third question of philosophy of mathematics.

I showed that God is He who created mathematics, and that man creates nothing. This is in agreement with what mathematical realism or Platonism affirms saying that the existence of mathematical entities does not depend on human spirit. Consequently, men do not invent mathematics but discover mathematics. The term Platonism is used because this way of seeing things is in parallel with the belief of Plato on the world of ideas. Plato’s view probably derives from Pythagore and his disciples, the Pythagoreans, who believe that the world was 100 % literally built starting from numbers. I will further show that God used numbers to create the universe i.e. the Pythagoreans are right.

Logic is true, i.e. the right way of reasoning is according to logic or truth table. And, I can apply the logical operator to all the entities which can be assertions in religion, philosophy, politics, etc. Whenever I can allot a value of truth to an assertion, I can thus use logic which is a logical operator on propositions. Numbers and geometry derive from set theory which is the mathematical theory that God created in the beginning. Euclide’s assumptions were based on the empirical observation of the geometrical properties of our physical world which is in fact the materialization of set theory which gave rise to mathematical structures that are vector and affine spaces. I show in the following chapter that what physicists call a particle is rather seen by God as points. A point is an element of the affine space defined as follows.

Let’s consider Є as a non-empty set and E a vector space on a commutative body K. Є is an affine space associated with the vector space E if and only if there exists an application φ of (Є X Є) in E satisfying the two following properties:

A є Є; x є E; B є Є such as φ (A, B) = x

(A, B, C) є (Є x Є x Є); φ (A, B) + φ (B, C) = φ (A, C).

It is said that φ provides Є with a structure of affine space associated with E. the elements of Є are points. Dim Є = Dim E.

Why did God create numbers?

Image49487.jpg

Let us consider two points in our physical space we live in. Let us start by the simple case where these 2 points are located on a straight line or an affine line.

O is the origin and A is the point with x-coordinate 1. (OA) is the infinite and imaginary affine half-line. How many points can I fill segment OA with? A point has no dimension. We know that to any affine line, it is associated a vector line. (R, +, x), which is the set of real numbers provided with addition and multiplication that has the structure of vector space. Moreover, (R, +, x) operates on the commutative field R which is the set of real numbers. Thus, to the real number 0.0000000125, I will associate the vector 0.0000000125î with î as a unit vector. Then, to this vector, I will associate the corresponding point. So, segment OA can contain a limitless number of points. All depends on the λ real number that I choose. Indeed, I can define my vector line by the relation: D = (λ*n) * î where λ is a constant real number and n, a natural number. In the definition of D, I can also use the irrational numbers which have an infinite expansion, i.e. I can put in segment OA an infinite number of points. This is true because no segment in R is bounded.

If these 2 points are located in an affine plan P, I can associate to P {(x, y), +, x)}, which is the set of real number pairs provided with addition and multiplication which has a vector space structure. If these points are located in our physical space Q, I can associate to Q {(x, y, z), +, x)}, which is the set of the triplets provided with addition and multiplication which has a vector space structure. Therefore, to generate a set of points, it is enough for me to build the vector space which is associated to it. What is called a particle by physicists is seen by God as points, elements of an affine space, i.e., to create a particle, God creates initially the vector space associated with the particle and then generates the affine space or the points representing the particle.

Ratio of 2 segments

So, if I take 2 segments of the same length, the ratio of the density of points between these 2 segments depends on the ratio (λ/λ’) where λ and λ’ represent the real numbers associated with the affine lines defining the two segments. That is the origin of the density ρ. That’s why God created numbers. This is the answer to the second question of philosophy of mathematics.

A particle is a mathematical and physical entity. God is He who created Particle physics. Thus the universe is the materialization of mathematics and sciences. This is the reason why mathematics is essential to all experimental sciences and that is what realistic mathematicians call: the argument of indispensability (formulated by Quine and Putnam) which says: mathematics is essential to empirical sciences and if we want to accept the reality of the phenomena described by sciences, we should also accept the reality of these entities necessary for this description. This is the answer to the first question of philosophy of mathematics.

In mathematics, the set of real numbers provided with addition and multiplication has a vector space structure. The set of square matrices of order 2, provided with addition and multiplication has a vector space structure. We know in set theory that you can define a set by extension or comprehension. Thus a space is simply a set of elements related to one another by certain properties, and where you defined axioms and rules. Mathematics is definitions and axioms; you use logic and intuition to deduce propositions and theorems. We all know that it is not always easy in mathematics to prove propositions and theorems. In most of cases, one needs intuition or creativity. As God is the one who created mathematics, He is thus the author of mathematical intuition in man. Thus in short, mathematics can be defined as (axioms) and rules, proposition, theorems and intuition. Logic is the logical operator that allows me to make sure that I reason truly in a given space. The entities on which I reason can be numbers, stupid assertions of theologians. From which, logic is the language of mathematicians. That’s, besides, what is asserted by many mathematicians or philosophers saying mathematics is a language.

Philosophy of Logic

We already showed that God is good ↔ Paradise exists. God is wicked ↔ Hell exists. This can be checked starting from the truth table. The same way, we note that if God is good, therefore hell exists is a false proposition. And if paradise exists, therefore God is wicked is a false proposition.

On the other hand, if hell exists, thus, God is good is a true proposition. If God is wicked, therefore, paradise exists is a true proposition. We arrive at paradoxes. What does that mean in logic? What is logic? Here is the fundamental question of philosophy of logic. I will thus explain now to mathematicians and philosophers how God created logic.

How did God create logic?

A proposition is a sentence to which I can allot a true or false truth value. To affirm p is not to affirm ┐p; in other words, if you affirm p, therefore you deny ┐p. That is the inconsistency (p Λ ┐p). But theologians say that God loves men and concomitantly say that God will torture men who do not believe in Jesus Christ. They say paradise and hell exist, i.e. God is good and wicked. And they say it is a difficult theological problem whereas it is actually a logic problem, the same way as they say that God matter is a theological matter whereas it is a problem of knowledge. And they also say that Satan matter is an extremely difficult theological matter (Father Bouyer) whereas it is the philosophical problem of the being.

Conjunction

To continue, to affirm p and to affirm q is to affirm p and q. It is the proposition (p Λ q).

Example

God is good and paradise exists.

Inclusive or

To affirm p or to affirm q is to affirm p or q. This is the inclusive OR or the proposition (p V q)

Example

God is good or hell exists.

Exclusive Or

Either you affirm p or you affirm q. Either you deny p or you deny q. You cannot affirm p and q at the same time; neither can you deny p and q at the same time. Whenever you affirm p and deny q, or affirm q and deny p, p OR q is true. That is the exclusive OR or the proposition (p U q).

Example

I further show that to love a woman according to purity and sleeps with her are exclusive propositions. That is to say, if you love a woman according to purity, you will not want to sleep with her. If you sleep with her, you do not love her according to purity. I also further show that Bible and theology are exclusive propositions. If you affirm the Bible, therefore you deny theology. If you affirm theology, therefore you deny the Bible.

Tautology

If affirm p is to affirm q, and affirm q is to affirm p, therefore affirm p is to affirm q, and affirm q is to affirm p. So, p and q are equivalent propositions. It is the proposition (p ↔ q). If (p Λ q) is true, therefore p ↔ q is a tautology. p ↔