Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA: THE US ELECTRONICS CONSUMER ATTITUDE TOWARD CIRCULAR ECONOMY ADOPTION
CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA: THE US ELECTRONICS CONSUMER ATTITUDE TOWARD CIRCULAR ECONOMY ADOPTION
CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA: THE US ELECTRONICS CONSUMER ATTITUDE TOWARD CIRCULAR ECONOMY ADOPTION
Ebook196 pages2 hours

CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA: THE US ELECTRONICS CONSUMER ATTITUDE TOWARD CIRCULAR ECONOMY ADOPTION

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Consumer hesitancy is the main barrier to normalizing circular consumption. While numerous books and articles are written on how companies should pivot to the circular business model, there are limited works of literature available on changing the consumer mindset toward circularity. This study "measures" the consumer re

LanguageEnglish
PublisherJB Suaverdez
Release dateOct 22, 2022
ISBN9789464376937
CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA: THE US ELECTRONICS CONSUMER ATTITUDE TOWARD CIRCULAR ECONOMY ADOPTION
Author

Jacqueline B Suaverdez

Doctorate in Business Administration with focus on Circular Economy and Sustainability. 23+ years of work experience in engineering, program management, and new product development in the semiconductor, OEM, and solar industries. Areas of expertise are in both traditional and Agile project management, manufacturing process improvement, problem-solving, and research and development/ innovation management. Proficient in MS Office, MS Project, Slack, Atlassian Confluence, and JIRA. A certified Agile Scrum Master. Knowledgeable in statistical research methods, data mining, and analysis using excel add-ins, JMP and Tableau.

Related to CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA

Related ebooks

Business Development For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA - Jacqueline B Suaverdez

    CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA

    CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA

    CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA

    THE US ELECTRONICS CONSUMER ATTITUDE TOWARD CIRCULAR ECONOMY ADOPTION

    Jacqueline B. Suaverdez, DBA

    Jacqueline Belandres Suaverdez

    CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA: THE US ELECTRONICS CONSUMER ATTITUDE TOWARD CIRCULAR ECONOMY ADOPTION

    DISSERTATION

    Presented to the Swiss School of Business and Management Geneva

    In Partial Fulfillment

    Of the Requirements

    For the Degree

    DOCTOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

    SWISS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT GENEVA

    September 2022

    ISBN: 9789464376937

    Contents

    CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN AMERICA: THE US ELECTRONICS CONSUMER ATTITUDE TOWARD CIRCULAR ECONOMY ADOPTION

    1 Dedication

    2 Acknowledgments

    3 Abbreviations

    4 ABSTRACT

    5 Introduction

    6 Review of Literature

    7 Methodology

    8 Results

    9 Discussion

    10 Summary, Implications, and Recommendations

    11 Appendix A

    12 Appendix B

    13 Appendix C

    References

    1

    Dedication

    This dissertation is dedicated to our loving God, family, and friends. Thank you, our dear Lord, for guiding and blessing me in all my endeavours. To my husband, who not only inspires me but is my rock and my partner in everything, I owe you my heartfelt gratitude. Your encouragement and confidence in me made me a better person. To my son, who never fails to cheer me when I'm down, know that I chose sustainability for this dissertation because I want to help preserve our planet for my son and future generations. Our discussions about how the older generations have managed to exploit and mess up the world triggered my interest in finding ways to help rectify the problem. I hope that, in my own little way, this dissertation helps. Special appreciation goes to my Mom and Dad, who gave me a solid educational foundation, structure, and discipline early in my life. Without them, I will not be here. They are the reason why my passion is research and why I seek knowledge. To my brothers and their families, I will always treasure how you relieve my stress while working on my dissertation. I want my nephews to grow up in a better world where there is less waste, more trees, and nicer human beings. I thank my friends, especially my best friends, A.S.M and N.A.B., with whom I share my small victories and vent my frustrations regularly.

    To God be the glory!

    2

    Acknowledgments

    Some special people made this dissertation possible. First, I would like to acknowledge my mentor Dr Isaac Ahinsah-Wobil, for guiding and helping me in all aspects of my thesis and dissertation process. Thank you, Dr. Wobil, for pushing me to dig deeper and think harder to develop more comprehensive research. To the SSBM and Upgrad organizations, I appreciate all the academic and logistical help you have provided. To the movers and shakers of the electronics reuse industry who are instrumental in mainstreaming circularity in their own ways, I owe you my special thanks. After sending over 40 requests for an interview, you are the very few to are willing to help a student like me: Mr. Simo Elalj of Refurbme, who was the first one to reply to my interview request and opened my eyes to the nature of the resale business; Mr. Jack Wright of BuyBackBoss and Again, who explained the refurbishing business to me. Mr. Steve Athwal of The Big Phone Store / ECD Ltd., who I enjoyed learning about the electronic reuse industry; Mr. Steve Haskew of Circular Computing, who explained the remanufacturing business to me; and Mr. Brandon of the Big Phone Store / ECD Ltd., who had been very accommodating and helped me connect with Mr. Steve Athwal. May your businesses and other endeavours continue to flourish.

    I am also grateful to all survey takers who shared their opinion with no hesitations.

    Thank you all for your kindness.

    3

    Abbreviations

    4IR-Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0)

    4Rs-Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Remanufacture

    A-Attitude

    A/C-Air-conditioner

    AHI-Annual Household Income

    AI-Artificial Intelligence

    BAN-Basel Action Network

    BFR-Brominated Flame Retardants

    BI-Behavioural Intent

    BSI-British Standards Institution

    CE-Circular Economy

    CEC-China Environmental Label

    CFC-Chlorofluorocarbons

    CO2-Carbon Dioxide

    COP-Conference of Parties

    DIY-Do – It - Yourself

    DTU-Danmarks Tekniske Universitet (Technical University of Denmark)

    E-commerce-electronic commerce

    EEE-Electrical and Electronic Equipment

    EOL-End - of - life

    EPA-Environmental Protection Agency

    EPR-Extended Producer Responsibility

    EU-European Union

    FD-Functional Depreciation

    FTC-Federal Trade Commission

    GE-General Electric

    GHG-Greenhouse gas

    Ha-Alternate Hypothesis

    HCFC-Hydrochlorofluorocarbons

    HE-Highest Level of Education

    HL-Home Location

    Ho-Null Hypothesis

    HP-Hewlett - Packard Inc.

    IBM-International Business Machine

    ICT-Information and Communication Technology

    IoT-Internet of Things

    IQR-Inter - quartile range

    IT-Information Technology

    MLR-Multiple linear regression

    Mt-Mega Ton

    NGO-Non-government organization

    OEM-Original Equipment Manufacturer

    PACE-Platform for Accelerating Circular Economy

    PBC-Perceived Behavioural Control

    PSS-Product Service System

    R&D- Research and Development

    R2-Responsible Recycling

    RAD-Responsible Appliance Disposal

    SME-Small and medium enterprises

    SN-Social Norm

    SPSS-Statistical Package for the Social Science

    SWOT-Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats

    TCO-(Tjänstemännens Centralorganisation or Confederation of Professional Employees)

    TO-Technological Obsolescence

    TPB-Theory of Planned Behaviour

    TRA-Theory of Reasoned Action

    TV-Television

    UK-United Kingdom

    UN-United Nation

    UNEP-UN environment program

    US-United States

    USDUS dollar

    VCR-Videocassette Recorder

    WEEE-Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (a.k.a e-waste)

    WPP-Wire and Plastic Products

    WTP-Willingness to Participate

    4

    ABSTRACT

    Consumer hesitancy is the main barrier to normalizing circular consumption. While numerous books and articles are written on how companies should pivot to the circular business model, there are limited works of literature available on changing the consumer mindset toward circularity. This study measures the consumer response to various circular economy (CE) practices using the Theory of Perceived Behavior (TPB) framework. The qualitative part of the research identifies the government, the leading technology companies, and the electronic reuse industry's CE initiatives. The first part of the study shows how tech companies use their competencies to provide sustainability solutions to ecological problems and elevate themselves as environmentally responsible firms. The electronic reuse industry is expanding its customer reach by providing reliable products and a positive buying experience. The second part involves quantitative research, which uses a survey and statistical analysis to identify the demographic factors influencing consumers' behavioural intent. Demographic characteristics, like educational attainment, home locations, age, gender, and ethnicity, are shown to have affected consumers' attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioural controls, and behavioural intent pertaining to CE practices engagement. The results proved that different marketing activities must be targeted to different segments in exchange for more customer interest and participation.

    5

    Introduction

    Chapter I

    1.1 Introduction

    Modern lifestyles and advanced economies afforded many households the means to buy the latest Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) devices. Modern electronics and electrical appliances make our daily lives convenient and socially interconnected. With the fast-paced technology upgrades, electronic consumers accumulate numerous EEEs rapidly. Consequently, the perceived product obsolescence and the throwaway culture are causing the skyrocketing amount of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE or e-waste) in landfills from discarded mobile phones, tablets, printers, computers, electrical appliances, etc. PACE and UN E-Waste Coalition (2019, p.6) reported that 50 million tons of e-waste are generated per year. While many grew to know that recycling helps the environment, only 20% of e-waste generated per year globally was known to be recycled (PACE and UN E-Waste Coalition, 2019). The rest of the e-waste disposal process and destinations are uncertain, but what is certain is that the value, materials, and energy used in the manufacturing and transport of these units were scrapped, along with the disposal of these outdated devices.

    Contemporary electrical and electronics products contain precious and rare earth metals that can be reclaimed to reduce procurement burden and shortages (Gollakota et al., 2020). The EEE's integrated circuits, plastic circuit boards, and chassis contain gold, silver, copper, and other non-renewable metals. Discarded EEEs collected through proper channels can be disassembled and processed safely to extract valuable metals or functional components for reuse. These processes lessen the need to mine more virgin materials. However, if these old EEEs were not recovered, these metals would be in landfills. With only 20 % being recycled annually, as aforementioned, we have 40 million tons of scrapped EEEs containing precious and rare metals wasting away.

    Recently, the United Nations (UN) emission gap report 2021 and the UN Climate Change Conference (Conference of Parties, COP 26) published the goals of securing global net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050 and limiting the climate temperature to a 1.5oC increase (UNEP & UNEP DTU Partnership, 2021). The GHG emission reduction pledges from more than 121 countries were vital to avert the projected 2.7 oC temperature increase by the end of the century (UNEP & UNEP DTU Partnership, 2021). The UN is not just asking for commitments from participating governments in the form of policy changes but also invoking an urgent call to action to the populace to do their part to achieve the net zero goals. Relying on government efforts alone will not accelerate the realization of the net zero emission goal. Ordinary people may help drive results by boosting demand for more environmental-friendly products and practices. Businesses are likely to use a customer-centred strategy to provide the right products to their customers (Kotler & Keller, 2016); what the market demands and the firms supply.

    It is estimated that, in general, the human population is consuming 1.75 times the earth's endowing capacity, which means that our consumption is 75 % more than what the planet can replenish (Lacy et al., 2020). Needless to say, the resource constraints will continue to inflict supply chain problems if everything is business as usual.

    In search of a solution to the mounting e-waste, climate change, and the depletion and supply shortage of precious and rare metals, the Circular Economy (CE) concept has gained traction as potential mitigation. It presents an alternative to the traditional linear consumption, wherein the take, make, waste mindset is prevalent (Lacy et al., 2020, p.5). Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013, p.7) described CE as an industrial system that is restorative or regenerative by intention and design. It is a design and manufacturing concept that minimizes waste using the 4Rs framework (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Remanufacture) (Bressanelli et al., 2020). It aims to keep the existing resources in efficacious usage within the economy for the longest viable time (Lacy & Rutqvist, 2015). The CE concept offers a reprieve to the EEE industry from the virgin materials supply burden. Companies will benefit from the secondary source of functional components and precious and rare metals instead of extracting them from their natural source. The value captured from the restored and recycled materials will not only bridge the gap in current resource constraints but will also eventually decouple economic growth from natural resource extraction and usage (Lacy & Rutqvist, 2015) once the businesses convert to circular business models. Transitioning to CE will help save the technology (tech) companies from the escalating materials costs and volatile supply availability and pricing.

    Optimizing the life of devices and components preserves the materials used and the energy needed to produce brand-new products and parts, resulting in avoiding carbon emissions from the brand-new production operation. Therefore, CE activities eventually deliver economic and environmental benefits: cost savings, material supply sustainability, and carbon emission avoidance from NOT mining virgin minerals and producing more new devices.

    1.2 Research Problem

    The consequences of the status quo and staying in the linear economy consumption model are detrimental to the earth and human survival. Improper processing of e-waste pollutes the neighbouring air, land, and water and endangers human health and biodiversity from its hazardous content. Continued natural resource depletion from mining precious and rare earth metals

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1