The Soul of the Earth: Condensed Version of Everybody for Everybody

By Samuel A. Nigro MD

SOUL OF THE EARTHby Samuel A. Nigro, MD

SOUL OF THE EARTH--by Samuel A. Nigro, MD is the accumulation of what was learned over 70 plus years of life, over 45 years of marriage, over 40 years as a psychiatrist, 3 years in the U.S. Navy Submarine Service, and as a first generation American with five children and ten grandchildren.

The planet and mankind are amazing. To limit ourselves to behaviors as if there is nothing more, is contradicted by an accurate comprehensive understanding of the planet and the universe. Basically, love is superior to all and the universe is the entropy necessary for the expression of love. Love itself requires there to be more. Nothing more is a cruel joke that life and love are meaningless. All logic and reason demand there be more, and we should act as if there is even much more love in anticipation. And if there isnt, then there ought to be! Regardless, the world would be better by believing in such and acting as such.

The book provides some articles but most of it is the way to live a transcendental life: organized matter sanctified and given a soul by identity, truth, oneness, good and beauty for everyones life, liberty, and pursuit of happinesspartially the subtitle of the book. You get substance and the transcendental principles for living that save by actuality for a change. This is in contrast to the virtual reality culture of the unreliable manipulating self-discrediting noisy glitzy press&media imposed substanceless non-being which, by suggestibility, turns us into choiceless aliens instead of free persons for the planet. By the self-worshiping self-discrediting press&media, we are on the madman road-rage race to the bottom culture of pollution, disgust, death, and decline. Not by this book.

Against vulgar suggestibility and glitz caused gullibility, this book gives real being by teaching six analogous ways of living the wisdom-filled eight categories of metaphors of love in the cone of space-time:

As a human particle by elementary physicsevent, spectrum, field, quantum, singularity, dimension, uncertainty, and force.

As a human being by community universalsdignity, unity, integrity, identity, spirituality, life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

As a C/catholic, Roman or otherwise, by the sacramentsBaptism, Penance, Holy Communion, Extreme Unction, Holy Orders, Matrimony, and Grace.

As a Christian by the virtuesfaith, hope, charity, prudence, justice, courage, temperance, and holiness.

As a patient by the universal variables of all therapyliving things are precious, selective ignoring, subdued spontaneity non-self excluded, affect assistance, detached warmth & gentleness, non-reactive listening, C2CC centered candidness, and peace & mercy.

And as sanctified by the last words of the crucified Christ.

Take your pick or combine them all.

Except for the quantity, it is simple. Thousands of aphorisms and concepts about every imaginable topic are offered to teach ancient secrets from nature and natures God (to quote the Founding Fathers of America). The book SPIRITUALIZES our contemporary materialist culture by an audacious free-spirited sacramentalization of everything.

Read it through once; then a few pages or a chapter daily; and problem-solve as needed by index and perusal. You will be better. The world will be better. You will learn to be a real human being for everyone. And you will have your soul back by embracing the universal Mass mantra: life-sacrifice-virtue-lovehumanity-peace-freedom-death.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Xlibris US
• Release date: Jan 31, 2013
• ISBN: 9781479730063

Samuel A. Nigro MD

"A BOOK WHICH TELLS HOW TO HAVE THE GOOD LIFE!" PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR SAMUEL A. NIGRO, MD...full bibliography is available from [e-mail]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY 3 (5) 2015 & 3 (6) 2015 Special Issue III: 3(5): 00150. Review of 2 Contradictory Books, Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, by Daniel C. Dennett, 2006, pp 448; and Who Really Cares: America Charity Divide, Who Gives, Who Doesn't, and Why It Matters, by Arthur C. Brooks, 2006, Basic Books, New York, USA, pp 250. 3(5): 00151. Reveiw of Atheist Manifesto: the Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, by Michael Onfray (2007), Arcade Publishing, New York, USA. 3(5): 00152. Review of Irreligion: a mathematician explains why the arguments for God just do not add up, by John Allen Paulos, Hill and Wang, New York, USA, pp 158. 3(5): 00153. Review of The Truth About Mohammed Founder of the World's Most Intolerant Religion by Robert Spencer (2006) Regnery, Washington D.C. USA, pp 224. 3(5): 00154. Review of Lepanto, with Explanatory Notes and Commentary, edited by Dale Ahlquist (2003), Ignatius Press, San Francisco, USA, pp 124. 3(5): 00155. Review of A Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn't by Robert Spencer (2007), Regnery, Washington, D.C., USA, pp 264. Special Issue IV: 3(5): 00156. Review of God is No Delusion: A Refutation of Richard Dawkins by Thomas Crean OP (2007), Ignatius Press, San Francisco, USA, pp 160. 3(6): 00157. Review of Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali (2007), Free Press, New York, USA, pp 353. 3(6): 00158. Review of Bioethics and Population: The Choice of Life by Michel Schooyans; translated by John H. Miller (1997), pp xiv + 112. 3(6): 00159. Review of The God Gene: How Faith is Hardwired into our Genes by Dean Hammer (2004), Doubleday, New York, USA, pp241. 3(6): 00160. Review of The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins (2006), Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, pp 406. 3(6): 00161. Review of Creators by Paul Johnson (2006) Harper Collins, USA, pp 320. 3(6): 00162. Review of The Failure of Modernism: The Cartesian Legacy and Contemporary Pluralism by Brendan Sweetman for the American Maritain Society, (1999), The Catholic University Press, pp 262. 3(5): 00163 Review of Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions, by David Berlinski (2008), Crown Forum, New York, USA, pp 237.

Book preview

The Soul of the Earth

Condensed version of Everybody for Everybody

AN AUDACIOUS FREE SPIRITED DISSENT FROM

CONTEMPORARY DESPIRITUALIZED CULTURE

FLY THE FLAG

LIVE THE MOTTO

(reject all incompatible metaphors)

and PRAY THE MANTRA over and over:

LIFE SACRIFICE VIRTUE LOVE HUMANITY PEACE FREEDOM DEATH

Samuel A. Nigro, MD

Condensed and revised Everybody for Everybody

Copyright © 2012 by Samuel A. Nigro, MD.

Revised Edition

Originally Published as Happy Ending by

Central Bureau, CCVA

3835 Westminster Place

St. Louis, MO 63108

Originally Printed by St. Martin de Porres Lay Dominican Community

New Hope, KY 40052

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner.

Rev. date: 3/22/2013

To order additional copies of this book, contact:

Xlibris Corporation

1-888-795-4274

www.Xlibris.com

[e-mail]

110675

Table of Contents

Chapter 1 Atheism, Secularism, And Satanism…

Chapter 2 The Anthropic Principle And The Physics Of Human Behavior

Chapter 3 Baptism

Chapter 4 Penance

Chapter 5 Holy Eucharist

Chapter 6 Confirmation

Chapter 7 Extreme Unction

Chapter 8 Holy Orders

Chapter 9 Matrimony

Chapter 10 Grace

Chapter 11 Gifts Of The Holy Spirit, Virtues, And Sin

Dedicated to:

All those in solidarity with life, liberty,

and the peaceful pursuit of happiness

CHAPTER 1

Atheism, Secularism, and Satanism…

Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing (Macbeth)

Abstract: Atheistic beliefs are reviewed and criticized by offering contrasting metaphors for sane living and tendering wrongdoing as entropy to be corrected. Evolution on which atheism totally depends is psychosocialized out of biological improbability. An absolute fabrication from a prominent atheist, Richard Dawkins, is detailed as an occasional paradigm which emotional atheists unscientifically offer. Entropy is defined at a personal level and sacramentalized. The anti-Catholic irrationalities of atheists, humanists and contemporary press and media are listed and critiqued. In depth contemporary explanations and interpretations of Catholicism are scattered throughout, and a Theory of General Sacramentality is tendered for atheists everywhere unaccustomed to criticism as they usually provide.

Introduction: Atheism (which includes throughout this article secularism and satanism), can only be believed by solipsistic extremists incredibly internalized and self-impressed with their absolutes of science, materialism and self. No problem with that…they can have their conceit, which is usually monumental by using the Church as a straw man in order to beat up all religion. Nevertheless, most atheists reveal themselves in timely fashion as did Stanislaw Kania, First Secretary of the totally atheistic Polish Community Party, who, in 1978, upon hearing that Karol Wojtyla was elected as the first Polish Pope, could not stop exclaiming Holy Mother of God!¹ over and over. But if true in their infallibility, atheists et al. should not deny what religion and the Church are all about, even if there were no God. Again, atheists can have it their way if they do not want to believe or even respect religion, but they have no right to thuggishly confabulate about the Church or deform transcendental religion.

Religion as used in the rest of this article, means a social organization promoting a belief system and a theory of the universe—this definition includes atheism. Also included is Roman Catholicism and The Church, i.e., a religion committed to the God of Transcendental Love—to contrast, for examples, against the calculating atheologies of The Universe is Really Made of Numbers;² We now know that the moon is definitely not there when nobody looks;¹² There is no life force;²³ There is no essential difference between me and not-me;³⁴ All believers are gullible yokels,⁴⁵ and god, this one word: ‘I’.⁶

Books and reviews which promote and rebut atheists are readily available as references⁸-⁴² and provide the basis for much of this article (Reviews of all these references can be requested from me at [e-mail]).

This article is an effort to identify pathology and re-acquaint others, especially atheists and like believers-in-nothing, with facts about most religion as a phenomenon. In this process, atheism, may be identified as psychopathological nihilistic imagery promoting despair and antisocial behavior. To clarify religion, I will focus on the Roman Catholic Church because I am most familiar with it, and I believe it offers a therapeutic paradigm of inspirational imagery for all religion including even the psychopathological imperialism of atheists.

Metaphors for Sane Living

In Life After Death the Evidence by Dinesh D’Sousa²⁸, the positive significance of religion is irrefutably made clear:

In my New York debate on Is Christianity the Problem? with Christopher Hitchens, a lively affair, against a resourceful opponent—one of the most interesting questions came from a man from the island nation on Tonga. For centuries, the man said, Tonga suffered terrible vendettas, tribal wars, and even cannibalism. Then the missionaries came with their doctrines of God, universal brotherhood and the afterlife. Today, the man said, Tonga is a much more peaceful and happy place. Then turning to Hitchens he said, You have given us some interesting theories, but what do you have to offer us? Hitchens was momentarily speechless (page 185).

As the Tonga people found, religion from the Roman Catholic Church offers transcendental metaphors for sane and prosocial living. These metaphors are most succinctly presented by the Catholic Mass Mantra of Life, Sacrifice, Virtue, Love, Humanity, Peace, Freedom, Death to be said over and over when not reciting or paying attention to the words of the priest, choir, readers and the rest of the liturgy when at Mass. Witnessed and experienced in Church liturgies are meditations for LOVE trying to promote Everybody for Everybody! by a rational promotion of the transcendentals of matter, identity, truth, oneness, good and beauty for everyone’s life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. The Mass Mantra and reflections for all in the Mantra are presented in the Mass, at least metaphorically, from start to finish. If one attends Mass with full embracing of all the words in the Mass, it is really quite inspiring beyond even mathematics. A case can be made that the Mass Mantra is attempted to be promoted for everyone and everything in every effort made by the official Church and all transcendental religion. The Church does not do it very well because the task is overwelming and the audience is hostile, but ecological soundness by Natural Law and psychophysiological benefit by Transcendental Love are what true religion and the Church are all about. As in the prayer (think metaphorically):

Break the bread and bless the wine and join Jesus with all others so sanctified in a Statimuum of all with all and for all Incarnated by Life, Sacrifice, Virtue, Love, Humanity, Peace, Freedom and Death in the universe received and receiving one time for all time praising God in unlimited spirituality of Consubstantiation Transubstantiation.

It is no place for cowards, the thoughtless or narcissists proclaiming lies. The metaphors are tangible and promote life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all, perhaps best known as the common good. In fact, at Mass, family, neighbors, and even strangers will be looked at in the eye and wished peace.⁴² The Church essentially promotes the transcendentals whenever possible. That the Church does it in the name of God does not alter the fact that it is doing it as the only rational Natural Law-Freedom-Love promoting organization in the world—the Phylum of Love, Freedom and Being against the non-being increasing entropy promoting phylum of evil. To deny this operational description of the Church is un-factual. And mentioning God, Jesus, the Trinity or any saint or religious hero, does not diminish the effort any more than do atheistic shouting, heckling, rejections, fabrications, chemical analyses, mathematical formulae or other unjustifiable maneuvers which Kierkegaard identified as obnoxious inappropriate unjustified defiance camouflaging simplistic doubt.⁴³

Indeed, the pro-social multiple personality God metaphor of Three Persons, one of whom became human with us and sacrificed Himself so all could achieve a next level of existence (being), also gives a metaphorical understanding that entropy can have value; and, thusly the Universe itself is allegorically the material entropy necessary for the phenomenon of Love. At least metaphorically, entropic life, even when difficult, does not have to be meaningless or empty, as atheists believe and demand. In fact, it is uplifting to realize that entropy can have value when it is transcendental sacrifice.

My book, Everybody for Everybody⁴⁴ contains comparable metaphorical schema (Basic Being Realism) for:

– the eight major space-time variables of physics (event, spectrum, field, quantum, singularity, dimension, uncertainty, and force) corresponding to

– the transcendentals (the variables of all being),

– mental succor (the variables of healthy human interaction),

– the Sacraments and Grace (Divine variables of linkages to God),

– humanbeingness (the variables of community),

– virtue (the variables of will and Incarnating Acts), and

– the eight last words of Christ on the Cross (The earthquake is the eighth word).

Such religious-psychosocial concepts are allegories more than metaphors, but especially, they are rational promotions of love, humanity, peace and freedom whether one believes in God or not. Atheists cannot deny the space-time variables of physics but to deny personal-social analogues to physical space-time variables is to dehumanize oneself and deny reality, both psychopathological maneuvers.

Basic Being Realism is a template for sane living. With the Mass it offers a stress-less approach to infinity documented to be essential for health by improving neurochemistry and even immunologic integrity.⁴⁵

Wrongdoing

History is undeniable in Church efforts gone wrong, resisted and failed. Basically, the standards promoted by the Church are so great, that only saints can meet them. So what else is new and who/what has been perfect (except atheists et al, arrogantly omniscient in their grand fantasies and unfair distortions)? But the Church addresses wrongdoing too, even moreso than atheists and those hostile to transcendental religion. In fact, the historical Christian capital of morality lingers everywhere and can always be found in any decent civilization as the hidden strings of most all pro-social right and wrong formulations (In addressing right and wrong, atheists can deny all they want, but their final formulations of morality, or whatever they want to call it, will use the Mass Mantra rather than mathematics although they could readily use the eight basic physical space-time variables as metaphorically understood! (Excepted, of course, are satanists who are against any morality.⁴²). And, the traditional seven deadly sins—pride, covetousness, lust, anger, gluttony, envy, and sloth—offer undeniable templates for categorizing willful entropy and can be incorporated into Basic Being Realism as is done in Everybody for Everybody⁴⁴.

When addressing wrongdoing, the metaphor of sin as willful entropy expands to the need for corrective action/potential, i.e., sins must be forgiven! That is, entropy can be reconceived and corrections made—i.e., penance as entropy redirected to transcendental synthesis is an undeniable Christian metaphor.

Thus so, the Church welcomes and is filled with sinners; and thereby the Church contains all the offensive maddening imperfections of all, but by the Sacrament of Reconciliation, the Church offers a metaphorical reality which places a person back on the, at least pro-social, correct sane life pathway. Thereby, personal entropy is not fatal because personal transitions and a future change of state (evolution) are possible. Optimally, this inspires ideas and actions not only personally salutary but also at least for the common good—even the common good of getting atheists to open their chemistry-controlled (as they claim) illiberal minds.

Evolution

The Church’s metaphor of evolution as resurrection and eternal life has, without recognition, preceded and is more expansive than Darwin’s: However you act in this life is what will be done to you in an afterlife magnified by at least 1000. Your every sin will be massively received payback (entropy personalized) in return (natural selection) —eternally if a mortal sin or in Purgatory if venial. And if in hell, there will be a never-ending infernal unstringing self-created self-annihilation by one’s own sins now committed against oneself. And, if in Heaven, there will be a true, one, good, and beautiful ecstasy proportional to one’s own transcendental life. Now that is evolution or the Beautific Vision or the Statimuum⁴⁴.

There has always been evolution for the Church—an expectation of a change of state (advancement) and natural selection (transcendental choice) going beyond what is seen—to some extent comparable to the biological evolutionary progressions adamantly affirmed by scientists usually and atheists always (But, amazingly, biological evolutionists overlook the fact that the touted biological evolutionary progressions are unimaginable and unseen by the pre-human creatures involved and therefore such must naturally be beyond the imagination of and unseen by humans unless humans have a thinking ability beyond subhumans (in reality, an incontrovertible fact, thankfully). In some way, it is even against biological evolution to say unforeseen elevating advancing progressions stop with mankind. I have always wanted to ask Darwinists, In the cone of space-time, how can you stop the next evolutionary leap and how can you deny it is possible? as in The TheoGeoCalculus.⁴⁵ The answer, of course, is: Like simplistic unaware subhumans, atheists are biologically hostile and defiant to extraordinary pending advancement (evolution beyond their simple understanding) even though revealed by elementary physics, spirituality, transcendental religion and the Church. It is one thing to realize that no creature has been able to anticipate natural selection; it is another for atheists to claim they are not in the same dull state. A real thinking being, in contrast to subhumans and atheists, can figure out that There is more than this craziness and misery! Religious evolution is not survival of the fittest but survival of the transcendental! In a way, evolution as currently promoted demands there be more, unless humans take over reproduction/genetic interaction at which time it will no longer be evolution in Nature but truly will be the worst pollution against Nature ever perpetrated, as well as against and thwarting the highly touted random basis for life’s ascendancy up to now (If evolutionists believe what they claim, they would be fools to interfere with it).

Nevertheless, Repent and get your sins forgiven is a maddening corrective metaphor from the Church, but it is evolutionarily sound unless you unscientifically claim, this is it as do atheists and subhumans. So Who needs it? The answer is: creatures made in the Transcendental Image of God…if they want a real evolution for themselves.

Biology rebuts biological evolution²⁶,⁴⁷,⁴⁸ and contemporary human sexuality⁴⁸,⁴⁹,⁵⁰,⁵¹,⁵²,⁵³

Atheists do not want to know this, but agnosticism about biological evolution persists in many scientists because the same biology which allegedly proves evolution disproves it more so, if one is honest and allowed to speak freely in spite of academic inquisitions promoting materialism as bigotry and prejudice. The doubting of contemporary biological evolution is because sexuality is reproductive in nature and it is pheromone dependent –copulation will not occur among animals unless the time is right for reproduction which means no sex with the immature, no sex with other creatures with the wrong pheromones, no sex without high probability of conception and no sex for recreation (Admittedly, there are isolated exceptions because animals get mental illnesses and chemical imbalances too). But ordinarily, sexuality (copulation) in Nature is overwhelmingly chemistry dependant, (and it is inexplicable that atheists are so blind and defiant about chemically controlled sexuality when molecular explanations are demanded for everything else). Nevertheless, humans are the only creatures which are not regularly pheromone dependent for mating; and this explains why human sexuality has become almost everything except for mating. It is obvious that humans cannot be more out of synchrony with Nature than in sexuality—without biological pheromone control as in the rest of the animal kingdom, human sex has become meaningless and disordered. Without pheromones, humans choose polluting unnatural anti-planetary behavior as sex, consistent with man’s tendency to pollute thoughtlessly—but such so-called freedom has adverse consequences, denied and censored but real never the less even about anti-natural sex. (All human acts are really understood only by reference to Nature which determines salutary when in support of being or evil if promoting non-being.) Nature strikes back when disrespected, and without pheromone control, humans do not readily have the copulation standards of animals or Nature. Without pheromone control, humans become seduced and obsessed by glitzy degrading sex-as-recreation with meaningless unnatural squirt and slime contests (excretory relief most accurately called sexcretion) all of which is just another example of humans out of synchrony with the planet again—only it feels soooo gooood that it makes us crazy even to the degree of forgetting that pheromones exist and that Nature has standards beyond gravity and chemicals.

In the final analysis, forgetting about pheromones is the cause of the theory of biological evolution itself, because evolution as currently promoted is nothing more than a projection of man’s pheromone independence onto the animal kingdom resulting in a delusional denial that subhuman sexuality (copulation) is pheromone dependent. And pheromone dependency (physiological or psychosocial) means the biological theory of evolution fails because different subhuman species will not mate (never have, never will) without matching pheromones.

(To atheists’ chagrin, a case can be made that the Church has been and is the psychosocial pheromone for mankind—by the Sacrament of Matrimony—because the Church is the only organization recognizing and promoting sex as primarily reproductive and life-offering consistent with, for all practical purposes, the animal kingdom and Nature.)

Biological evolution is also undone by the problem of hybrids. Not only do major genetic transfers across different species require absence of pheromones so different species will un-naturally mate out of species, but significant evolution-required gene transfers will mandate the presence of hybrids resulting from this cross-species mating of greatly different species. But no one has ever identified any natural hybrids in nature because there is no evidence of cross species mating (or biological miscegenation, for want of a better word). Basically, if the pheromones do not match, there will be neither mating nor hybrids.

Anti-Naturally, humans have forced hybrid creation by manipulating fairly similar species resulting in mules or tigrons, for examples. But this proves even more damaging to evolution theory because the resulting created hybrids cannot reproduce, likely because of non-matching meiosis. And if hybrids are unable to reproduce, biological evolution again just went to hell (Atheists, please pardon the phrase)!

Thus, the whole large genetic interplay and transferring required by biological evolution for cross species mating and major species creation and change is a pseudo-scientific fantasy. In nature, there is no mating without pheromone matching. There are no animal hybrids in nature. And even if they were found in nature, they will be unable to reproduce and be as sterile as artificially created hybrids. It is thus unscientific to believe in biological evolution as presented. Basically, atheism and agnosticism are more appropriately applied to current beliefs about evolution than about God or historical religion. (And, incidentally, if we humans forced our pheromoneless (non-marital/non-reproductive) pseudo-copulative sexuality onto other creatures, it would be animal cruelty pure and simple and against the law just as should be the sexualization of children or immature animals.)

Pre-biological evolution requires a brief explanation also, and that is readily included in a universally accepted atheistic understanding of the universe: X is the naturalistic result of irrational endless blobs of chemicals interacting numerically and randomly into blind purposeless forces and congeries of meaningless mechanics. Sort of takes your breath away as all are reduced to irrational nothingness by atheologies.

An Example of Atheist Thinking:

A far cry from St. Thomas’ God of Pure Act, of Uncaused Cause, of Necessary Being, of Supreme Being, and of Pure Intellect, are some of today’s atheist tomes. Richard Dawkins is an atheist’s atheist. Here is some of his coprolallia or tour de phoney:

But I was starting to tell the story of how lenses might have evolved in the first place, from a vitreous mass that filled the whole eye. The principle of how it might have happened, and the speed with which it might have been accomplished, has been beautifully demonstrated in a computer model by a pair of Swedish biologists called Dan Nilsson and Susanne Pelger. I shall lead up to explaining their elegant computer model in a slightly oblique way (pages 160-161)… The lens has condensed out of the vitreous mass by gradual, point by point changes in the refractory index (Page 163)…¹²

The Nilsson-Pelger article (Proc.R.Soc.Lond.B (1994) 256, 53-58), is bizarrely anti-intellectually and anti-academically distorted by Dawkins—he obviously does not think believers can read. In contrast to Dawkins’ lies about it, the article was a theoretical mathematical schematization of postulated 1,829 mutations of 1% changes in 8 stages from a light sensitive flat patch to a deepened vitreous body filled cavity (a camera eye) with an assumed refractory index of 1.35, which is only slightly higher than that of water and not enough to give the vitreous body any significant optical effect. Mathematical changes by the authors were schematically introduced gradually as a local increase of refractive index. The article schematized that it would take less than 340,000 years for this to occur by juggling their model as they did. Basically, the article presented a model of a speculative series of sketches mathematically compounded by an imposed rate of change. There was no elegant computer model and the word computer was not even in the article. There was no condensing out of the vitreous mass and the word condensed, quoted by Dawkins, is not in the article. There was no research. The article itself states that the model does not introduce structures for a functional eye such as adjustable iris; structures for distance accommodation; a vascularized layer; the choroids; retinal cells for photoreception, polarization sensitivity, and colour vision; a supporting capsule; the sclera; the blood supply; structural support; or external protective structures—none of this bothered Dawkins as he, in delusion as he uses the word⁹, claims: The central message of this chapter is that eyes evolve easily and fast, at the drop of a hat (page 190).¹² That Dawkins is in print as a scientist is an outrage and he has proved his atheistic defiance of not only religion but of science. His ph is too low, and his faith in himself is too high. He is an unprincipled deceiver filled with scientific conceit and, from a religious perspective, is a leader of a contemporary Committee of Public Safety i.e., this time, a bunch of scientists and liberal editors ready to relive the French Revolution. (I have complained to Oxford University several times about Richard Dawkins being a fraud of science, but he apparently still remains in good standing on the faculty—think what you will about the alleged illustrious reputation of Oxford University).

(And by editor imposed unconstitutional illegal prior restraint, the liberal press and media censor my right to a free press about all this, as liberal editors continue to mislead the people by suppressing and censoring the truth that Dawkins is a pseudoscientific lying flagrant fabricator. Being an atheist has its advantages but even Church-hating atheist emperor wannabees and totalitarian editors and producers usually know the truth and are obligated to promote it even when counter to their own faithlessness. Because atheism and contemporary evolution are protected religious myths, the First Amendment becomes a joke, because the liberal editors of the pressarchy in charge do not allow equal livability of free speech, free assembly, free press and free exercise for all citizens—because truth from citizens is excluded by the so-called free press. News is not news unless the editor says so—and the First Amendment is, as stated, a joke on the people.

Also, psychiatrists know that fabricators are often brain damaged, but I hope in this case that Richard Dawkins and other atheists like him are not brain damaged but are just wrong in their dogmatic imperialistic efforts, which, hoist with one’s own petard, are typically worse than the Church’s dogmatisms ever were. To everyone: Be careful of what you believe from atheists—like subhuman animals, they cannot understand or believe in more than themselves—and liberal editors, along with Hollywood celebrities,⁵⁴ are the worst. Atheism et al are psychopathogies.)

What is Entropy?

So, as the only pheromone provider for humans to be consistent with Nature, as agnostic about the secular evolution belief system, but with the Mass Mantra of Life Sacrifice Virtue Love Humanity Peace Freedom Death and with do not be or increase entropy by sin, the Church dares to tell people what personal entropy is, i.e., what sins are! Entropy is wasted energy; sin is willful entropy, and no one wants to hear how they are wasting their lives when entropic. Indeed, telling people they are wrong makes people more crazy than sex or money, especially atheists, even though atheists call religious people wrong by an extravagant presumptuous dogmatism based on distortions and denial of history more than the Church ever did or does. It seems that when it comes to wrongdoing, people, atheists in particular, tend to want a cult of nihilism—nothing matters and nothing is wrong except disagreement with them. Somehow, today’s culture makes people place their personal energy into one of the following categories: niloisie (nothing), sexoisie (squirt/slime), booboisie (ignorance), or, best, anti-entropic loveoise.

Regardless, the outcome of past atheism has been the worst entropy—Communism, Naziism, Fascism, Islam (after Mecca I)—and any implemented Godless secularism, all prove that evil is willful entropy—which occurs more without, than with, God. The sins of Rome pale to the sins of atheism. Still the Church is surrounded by vulgar hate and shameless hostility—most likely due to rationalized guilt in loud deniers not wanting to hear that sin has consequences (Ask Tiger Woods, but not Richard Dawkins—yet). So, many dislike the cogent and irrefutable Church lovingly telling us how and when we are transcendentally wrong. They will make the Church pay for getting under their skin by pointing out their entropy.

Nevertheless, an accurate understanding of the sin metaphors of the Church is to see sin and forgiveness of sin as enhancing of the common good as much as are the Church’s promotions of virtue. Any person wanting the common good would hope the Church’s metaphors never change even though they make us feel bad! By following the Church, personal entropy is resynthesized and converted to transcendence by the Sacraments and Grace—there is no more wasting or polluting. The metaphors that evil is the promotion of entropy and you can do something about it are for the Common Good and uplifting.

Against the Church

Believers feel overwhelming therapeutic ecstasy as participants in the Church’s efforts to promote everybody for everybody especially when the Church enables synthesis (as appropriate forgiveness) even while impeccably, irrefutably, rationally telling us what we are doing wrong. But chronic Church criticizers and especially atheists deny the transcendentals in order to feel otherwise. To read and listen to the outrageous dishonest emotional criticisms of and exaggerated accusations against the Church are bewildering and disgusting proof of the metaphor of Original Sin i.e., humans are pathologically entropy suggestible—we can be suggested to believe and do anything when the transcendentals are ignored—Most simply, it is called advertising from junk food to junk ideas. The brainwashing anti-Catholicism so persistent is the low key continuation of World War II Japanese Bushido Code and Goebbels’ Nazism. A regular example is My books are about killing God…I’m trying to undermine the basis of Christian belief⁵⁵ –and the current cultural theophobia, dehumanization and depersonalization are undeniable and psychopathic. Atheists cannot stand the Church for self-serving and evil reasons, and the following are ten reasons to understand the irrational hatred and the psychopathological theophobia and anti-Catholic bigotry of atheists.

(1)                                    God causes loss of self. Nowhere is this more true than Ayn Rand with her Virtue of Selfishness. All one needs to understand of Ayn Rand is in The Bad Catholic’s Guide to The Seven Deadly Sins by John Zimark Pgs. 211-215.

(2)                                    Atheists must defend themselves by extreme emotional attacking.

(3)                                    Atheists selectively condemn ignoring their own misdeeds and those of their allies.

(4)                                    Atheists are totalitarians and experts of suggestibility/gullibility.

(5)                                    Atheists have delusions of nihilism and live in essentially of cruel nothing but themselves.

(6)                                    Atheists pretend a numerological expertise to rationalize their thinking and contentment.

(7)                                    Atheists always project their belief that death is better than spirit.

(8)                                    Atheists tend to be squirt/slime sex obsessed, dirty old men.

(9)                                    Atheists associate wanting all to feel bad or else.

(10)                                    Atheists externalize all wrong doing to achieve their god-selves consistent with Ayn Rand’s thinking.

Maybe irrational hatred is actually the only way to understand that atheists and Church criticizers usually have no spirit – they have no evolutionary anticipation (a good definition of spirit) for themselves – they only have their solipsistic selfishness imposed in a most unfree, irrational, dogmatic fashion far surpassing any Church dogmas. Atheists typically can see through the anti-semitic blood libel nonsense, but they are totally unwilling to see through the alleged lasciviousness of nuns, the scheming of Jesuits, the pedophilia of priests, the protecting of Nazis, the so-called terrible Inquisition, the superstitious Middle Ages, the alleged anti-science about Galileo (the world’s most famous plagiarizer, p.335⁵⁶) and others, the provocative Crusades, the so-called laundry slaves of Irish nuns, the whore of Christendom, or any other bogus distortions, besmirching harangues, unfair caricatures, alleged prejudices and Church based misdeeds against anyone. Whatever, the alleged misdeeds and sins of Rome are almost totally exaggerated or fabricated, as mythical obsessions or hateful magnifications. The incredible arrogant totalitarian dogmatism of atheists typically more oppressive than the worst descriptions of old-fashioned loud churchmen. Contemporary Church condemners constitute a real Dark Age today of meretricious scholarship, disingenuous history, celebrity fakery, and primitive thinking.⁵⁶ In fact, the real creators of the dark for any historical age have been found to be humanists (who basically are pre-atheists or closet satanists)—both living and dead (p. 210 and p. 219).⁵⁶

(After reviewing the Inquisition⁵⁷, for any ruling concerning myself, I would prefer any judge of the 300 year Inquisition to 90% of current USA judges and no judging at all from liberal editors, liberal commentators and gaseous internet-television-movie producers, all of the latter provoking the neologism: pamce i.e,. a noun meaning "a person made into a dunce by the press and media—never more proven for editors and readers than by the 2009 Cleveland Plain Dealer’s censorship of God from a front page article about a surgical operation on an evangelical child⁵⁷ which reminds that plain dealing was what Oliver Cromwell said he was doing when he murdered thousands of Irish Catholics, no doubt well understood by the many Irish immigrants flooding Cleveland when the Plain Dealer was founded in 1842. The press and media, including even The History Channel, are a disgrace when it comes to religion especially about the Church. And finally, the judges of the Inquisition only wanted the Truth, and, in addition, the capital punishment rate of the US today is 20 times that of 300 years of the Inquisition—History is truly bogus when it comes to the negatives about the Church.)

In closing, atheists would appear to be proving original sin: that all are suggestible/gullible to be hateful, or against being, about something, even hateful about an organization which, when fairly and accurately appraised, is for Love…everybody for everybody…Truth, Oneness, Good and Beauty for everyone’s Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness…with gentle Peace, empathic Justice, and gentle Mercy for everyone’s sake—sanity, while, in a civilized society, all else tends to be psychopathology—from simple irrational denial to emotional delusions to psychopathic nihilism.

Conclusion

Perhaps the Theory of General Sacramentality is helpful for atheists and secularists (nothing can be helpful for satanists who choose to reject all but non-being) :

Sa + St =                                    iaT + iaS + iaV

                                    (D x (dd)² ) + (sin)aiy

where Sa is Salvation; St is Statimuum; ia is ideas-actions; T is Transcendentals; S is Sacraments; V is Virtue; D is dumbo, the atheism constant; dd is the damnation distance from God; sin is sin; and aiy is the person’s age in years. For completeness, readers should know that the Theory of Specific Sacramentality can be found in the Baltimore Catechism, The Catholic Encyclopedia, and The Encyclopedia of Catholic Social Thought, Social Science and Social Policy.)

Or, maybe, my father’s frequent Italian originate is the best pan-Catholic summary of all: No heart, no mind reminding of the 800 times the word heart is in the Bible as a reference to love. No atheist could do as well. And it is doubtful that any atheist or secularist can quantify their remedial guilt…as my own mother who would weep in remorse whenever reminded of her Protestant childhood vis a vis the only Catholic family in her small central Kansas town: We all treated them terribly…I cannot believe how terribly we treated them… and she would shake her head and change the subject. It is pathological—it is psychopathologic—not to understand.

The psychopatholgorithm is as follows: Induced/biochemical SELF-PITY, however developed, kills the self to NO-MEANING which means NO EMPATHY. The resulting Hate your neighbor as yourself converts to DESPAIR acted out as HATRED OF ALL BEING and the choosing of atheism, secularism and even satanism. Despair is nurtured instead of the mantra of Life, Sacrifice, Virtue, Love, Humanity, Peace, Freedom, Death.

Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.⁵⁸

1. John O’Sullivan, The President, The Pope and The Prime Minister: Three Who Changed the World, 2006, P. 55.

2. Shing Taun Yau in Discover Magazine, 6/20/10.

3. Harvard-Cornell physicist David Mermin in Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, 1989, p. 50

4. Steven Weinberg, A Designer Universe http:/www.physlink.com/education/essay_Weinberg.cfm talk on Physlink.com, 2007

5. John Allen Paulos in Irrelegion: a Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up, 2008, p. 81

6. Christopher Hitchens in god is not great: How Religion Poisons Everything, 2007 p. 245.

7. Ayn Rand, Anthem

8. Steven Weinberg, The Designer Universe, 2007.

9. Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion, 2006.

10. Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene, 1976.

11. Richard Dawkins, the extended phenotype, 1982.

12. Richard Dawkins, Climbing Mount Improbable, 1992.

13. Sam Harris, Letter to a Christian Nation, 2006.

14. Sam Harris, The End of Faith, Religion, Terror, and The Future of Reason, 2004.

15. Daniel C. Dennett, Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, 2006.

16. Michael Onfray, Atheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism and Islam, 2007.

17. Humanist Manifestos I (1933) and II (1973)

18. Daniel J. Flynn, A Conservative History of the American Left, 2008.

19. David Belinski, The Devil’s Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions, 2008.

20. Anthony Flew, There is a God: How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind, 2007.

21. David Stove, Darwinian Fairytales: Selfish Genes, Errors of Hereditary and Other Fables of Evolution, 1995.

22. Thomas Cream, OP, God is No Delusion: A Refutation of Richard Dawkins, 2007.

23. Benjamin Wiker and Jonathan Witt, A Meaningful World: How the Arts and Sciences Reveal the Genius of Nature, 2006.

24. Tom Bethell, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science, 2005.

25. Paul Johnson, Creators, 2006.

26. Dennis Bonnett, Origin of the Human Species, 2007.

27. David Bentley Hart, Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies, 2009.

28. Dinesh D’Souza, Life After Death The Evidence, 2009.

29. Philip Rieff, My Life Among the Deathworks, 2006.

30. Dean L. Overman, A Case for the Existence of God, 2009.

31. Michael J. Behe, The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism, 2007.

32. William A. Dembski and Jonathan Wells, The Design of Life: Discovering Signs of Intelligence in Biological Systems, 2008.

33. Dinesh D’Souza, What’s So Great About Christianity, 2007

34. Robert J. Hutchinson, The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Bible, 2007.

35. Michael Schooyens, Bioethics and Population: The Choice of Life, 2007.

36. Brendan Sweetman, Editor, The Failure of Modernism: The Cartesian Legacy and Contemporary Pluralism, 1999.

37. Russell Hittinger, The First Grace: Rediscovering the Natural Law in a Post-Christian World, 2003.

38. Catherine Pitstock, After Writing, On the Liturgical Consumation of Philosophy, 1998.

39. Kathleen McGowan, Sins: Science is Looking Inside the Brain to Untangle the Roots of Our Bad Behavior, Discover Magazine, September, 2009.

40. Samuel A. Nigro, MD, Review of The God Delusion, by Richard Dawkins in Social Justice Review, November/December, 2007, P. 190

41. Samuel A. Nigro, MD, Review of A Small Treatise on The Great Virtues buy Andre Comte-Sponville, 1996 in ProEcclesia Magazine, Vol. 26, 2005, P. 24.

42. Wurmbrand, Richard, Marx & Satan, 1986.

43. Soren Kierkegaard, Journals, 1847, quoted in Walter Lowrie, Kierkegaard, Vol. 1, 1938, P. 187.

44. Samuel A. Nigro, MD, Everybody for Everybody: Truth, Oneness, Good and Beauty for Everyone’s Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, Volumes I & II, 2011.

45. Charles L. Raison, MD, Inflammation and Mood Disorders, Audio Digest Psychiatry, Vol. 40, 5, March 7, 2011.

46. Samuel A. Nigro, MD, www.TheoGeoCalculus.com and The Theogeocalculus of Life: Natural Law Has the Answer to Everything The Linacre Quarterly, August, 2006.

47. Samuel A. Nigro, MD, Charles Darwin’s Bicentenary, Time for a Celebration … or An Inquest? Social Justice Review, May/June, 2008, Pgs. 72-76.

48. Samuel A. Nigro, MD, Why Evolutionary Theories are Unbelievable, The Linacre Quarterly, February, 2004, pgs. 58-63.

49. Samuel A. Nigro, MD, Stop Sex Education and Start Marital Education, Social Justice Review, November/December, 1998, Pgs. 181-185.

50. Samuel A. Nigro, MD, Same Sex Marriage, Social Justice Review, July/August 2004, P. 99.

51. Samuel A. Nigro, MD, Marriage and Homosexuals, Social Justice Review, March/April 1997, Pgs. 56-57.

52. Alice von Hildebrand, Man and Woman, A Divine Invention, 2010.

53. Mike Adams, Feminists Say the Darndest Things, 2007.

54. Samuel A. Nigro, MD And Satan Turned Into an Angel of Light

55. Philip Pullman, His Dark Materials: The Golden Compass, The Subtle Knife, and The Amber Spyglass, 1995.

56. James Hannam, God’s Philosphers: How the Medieval World Laid the Foundations of Modern Science, 2009.

57. Samuel A. Nigro, MD, Review of The Spanish Inquisition: A Historical Revision, by Henry Kamen in Social Justice Review, March/April, 1999, Pgs. 62-63.

58. Kevin & Alex Malarkey, The boy who came back from heaven: A remarkable account of miracles, angels, and life beyond the world, 2010, P. 201

59. Frankel, Viktor, Man’s Search for Meaning, 1946.

CHAPTER 2

The Anthropic Principle and the Physics of Human Behavior

This article attempts a summarization of the Anthropic Principle extended into the physics of human behavior. The Anthropic Principle basically is that the universe is undeniably anthropomorphic in ultimate fine tuning, and that humans would not exist if the universe were created any other way. Humans need to know this to be more fully aware of who and what they are, so they will act like humans deserving the universe. The Anthropic Principle of science may help all understand their composition and potential for personal mental conquest of and participation in the universe. To do this, humans need an understanding of not only their physics but the necessary add-ons of transcendental spirit, the variables of mental succor, the humanness living of the community universals, the divine rituals which can link all to all, the virtues, and how to deal with everything in a simple but symphonically effective way consistent with elementary physics enabling the achievement of a higher level of being.

The Anthropic Principle is the most theistic result ever to come out of science(1). Perhaps Anthropic Principle is an atheist’s word for God or the closest an unbeliever can ever come to naming such. Not knowing how to explain the incredibly impossible (nee’ improbable) fine tuning of Nature(2) which is the Anthropic Principle, and the zero probability that chance processes would produce creatures with only left-handed amino acids(3), among other amazing life-requiring necessities all of which enable the phenomenon of Man (4), theophobic scientists become scientifically suicidal and irrational (5), much like Darwinian evolutionists do when confronted with the facts that biochemical control of copulation prevents significant hybridization among animals and that whenever humans have forced such (to create mules, for example), the resulting hybrids are sterile (Thus major genetic transfers required for evolution as promoted are impossible but atheist fundamentalists cling on). This article rejects atheistic paralysis and primitive thinking by deriving human elevating behavioral schemata from elementary physics and the Anthropic Principle.

Atheists seem to have a regressive egoism incapable of accepting that there may be more than themselves even though science, on a probability basis, proves them more wrong than right, not to mention that the evolution they promote justifies belief in an advancement beyond any existing creatures’ awareness as their evolutionary theories prove for all creatures prior to man i.e., how can evolution, if true, stop with man? Indeed, given evolutionary advancements, good science must predict such for humanity and, like all species before, at a level beyond the species comprehension and level of existence—which is what Christianity maintains: There is more! While no prior creature in evolution could predict the next level of advancement, mankind has the ability to do so, and discerns the most rational anticipation of God’s Love and man’s opportunity to embrace Eternity (This real evolution is an ancient Christian belief). To this end, a behavioral theory is offered which enables a personalized evolution to a higher level of existence by metaphorical elaboration on the physics and metaphysics of human behavior so the person can follow the given track and not lose an amazing Future. Finally offered will be an understanding of entropy, always necessary in basic physics, which clarifies suffering as an existential part of human life.

THE ENSOULMENT OF THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE:

21.jpg

The physics of the human body is clockwise presented as the enumerated dark variables. Each physic variable is preceded or followed by its associated transcendental, the variables of healthy human interaction in quotations, the community universals in capitals, the corresponding sacrament or grace followed by the predominant virtue forthcoming, and the quoted Last Words of Christ on the Cross. This metaphorical understanding of basic human physics is to understand the human soul seeking to bring body and soul back to God. The rest of the text explains in more detail.

Physics of Human Behavior

There are eight variables of physical space-time for the human body. Actually, these are the same for all physical reality (6).

1. Event—a point in space-time or something that happens at a certain place and time.

2. Spectrum—the splitting of energy into position-time relationship.

3. Field—A matrix existing through space and time.

4. Quantum—The indivisible unit of receiving or giving energy.

5. Singularity—A point position of gravitational collapse wherein the

6. space-time curvature is infinite.

7. Dimension—Space coordinates and time.

8. Uncertainty—Accuracy of position in inversely related to the accuracy of movement.

9. Force—That which effects matter particles.

These basic physic realities, while starkly foreign as is most physics for most people, are the bases for all human existence on earth, and for all existence in the material universe. These physic realities anthropomorphize the universe and all in it. These physic realities operate totally on the Anthropic Principle from which every human being is derived. Readers are encouraged to place or define themselves reflectively in each of the eight definitions because such gives understanding of one’s physical and scientific basic beingness which can be further understood by transcendental and other metaphorical realities scientifically inferred and herewith to be described.

Transcendentals of Human Behavior

There are seven variables of all being known as transcendentals (7). These comprise the soul or spirit aspects of mankind.

1. Res—matter—the confluence of being with matter completing it (applies to "event," and later to dignity and faith).

2. Aliquid—identity/form—the confluence of being with its form or essence (applies to "spectrum," and later to unity and hope).

3. Verum—truth—the confluence of being with reality (applies to "field," and later to integrity and charity).

4. Unum—oneness—the confluence with being itself and all desirables related to it establishing an epidermal unity with family, neighborhood, community, the world, universe, and God (applies to "quantum," and later to social-community identity and prudence).

5. Bella—beauty—the confluence of being with ascendency or bringing out the best of itself and all around it thereby elevating all involved (applies to "singularity," and later to spirituality and justice).

6. Bonum—good—the confluence of being with proper function in nature (proper choice and transcendental compliance in Natural Law (applies to "uncertainty," and later to liberty and temperance).

7. Ens—the being as having existence (applies to "dimension, and later to life and fortitude and also applies to force," and later to pursuit of happiness and holiness).

These transcendental realities metaphorically spiritualize humanity. Priests and religious are Transcendental Engineers wielding the sword of matter, the scalpel of form, the battle ax of truth, the throw net of oneness, the battering ram of good, and the scaling ladder of beauty. Readers are encouraged to place themselves and all done into each physic reality as transcendentally possible because such gives spirit which can be further understood and activated by the variables of healthy human interaction.

Mental Succor—Veriables of Healthy Human Interaction

There are eight elements of healthy human interaction which give mental succor (8, 9). These are the templates for positive encounters with others on an individual basis.

1. Living things are precious. This is the First Law of the Universe—choose life, hurt less, kill little.

2. Selective ignoring. Consciously select what is to be overlooked in the interest of mutual respect. Hate will be thwarted and love may personalize whatever confronts.

3. Subdued spontaneity, non-self excluded. Spontaneity is to be genuinely reponsive (It is a kind of freedom). However, subduedness is necessary to avoid raucous overbearingness. And excluding non-self (that which is not really you) is to be without affectation and, as well, is to play not a fraudulent role. In sum, avoid artificial pretending and be yourself openly free but subdued so as not to offend others.

4. Affect assistance. Express the affects: I am angry, worried, scared, sad, disgusted, confused, happy. You are angry, worried, scared, sad, disgusted, confused, happy. By the calm expression of the affects, unconditional help is given to oneself and to others in mutual self- understanding and tacticless interaction, and in self-aware interpersonal commitment to care. This also controls excitement, the excess of which always spoils the happiness.

5. Detached warmth and gentleness. Warmth brings closeness; detachment avoids being too close; and gentleness makes love more than a word. Altogether, one’s voice, touch, and manner are more mild, more true, and more conducive to family, friends and strangers having love for one another.

6. Non-reactive listening. Non-reaction allows full expression which, if listened to, gives understanding—the basis of actions for growth, love and peace.

7. Personhood—Conscious of Consciousness (C²) for the species. Consciousness squared (C²), gives partial freedom from biology and physics by virtue of reflective thought manipulating matter in the priorities of Life first, Liberty second, and the Pursuit of Happiness third. This is personhood: A Conscious of Consciousness Capable Creature (C²CC) able to choose.

8. Make that relationship count. Live and teach the Pledge: I pledge allegiance to Mankind and to life on this planet, for living things are precious. I pledge to treat all humanely by caring for and respecting other’s bodies; by understanding others’ minds but being true to myself without disrespect; and by accepting the emotions of others as I control my own. I will have mercy on others with gentle liberty and empathic justice for all. (10)

These healthy human interaction variables enable human physical particles to support and enhance the transcendental one-on-one beingness of each human being, and thereby is created a society of humanness by the community universals.

Humanness—Variables of Community Universals

There are eight community universals enabling humanness in social community interaction (11).

1. Dignity—event, to be treated as an inviolable end and never used as a means.

2. Unity—spectrum, to be honored as a totum and no part treated in isolation from oneness.

3. Integrity—field, of moral good upheld and never divorced from Natural Law.

4. Identity—quantum, maintained as an individual and as a member of the human species to be valued and allowed to develop without radical alteration.

5. Spirituality—singularity, to be affirmed and upheld and never treated as merely natural.

6. Life—dimension, of agency conflating as primary priority.

7. Liberty—uncertainty, of contingency confronting consistent with Natural Law.

8. Pursuit of Happiness—force, of strategy consecrating transcendentally.

These community universals enable more being and less entropy when humans interact. They are maximized by sacraments and grace.

Sacraments and Grace—Rituals Linking

to the Statimuum (12) and to God (13)

There are eight divine variables known as sacraments and grace which are rituals linking human particles to the universe, to the Statimuum and to God. Priests are the Masters of Sacrament Administration (MSAs), knowing the real world, immune to the physical, immune to the illusions of television, movies, newspapers, and WWW, never supporting the monkey worship of celebrities, helping all become what we ought to be instead of following the fakery and flickering light ink smudged decarnating nothingness of the press and media, leading by mysterious experiences beyond individuality when participating in the Mass and all other Sacraments.

1. Baptism—to cleanse one’s soul and become alive; to enter the realm of God; and to live a dignity event giving faith.

2. Reconciliation (Penance)—to suffer and convert entropy to synthesis; to live a unity spectrum giving hope.

3. Holy Communion—to be in the Body of Christ; to live an integrity field giving charity.

4. Confirmation—to be in the Gifts of Holy Spirit i.e., wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, and fear of the Lord; to live an identity quantum giving prudence.

5. Extreme Unction—to be in the Father; to live the spirit singularity giving justice.

6. Holy Orders—to be on the Cross; to live dimensions for Life (the Father) giving courage.

7. Matrimony—to be two in one flesh; to live an uncertainty for Liberty (the Son) giving temperance and able to choose in concert with Natural Law.

8. Grace—to enter the world of Loving Truth; to live the force of Transcendental Pursuit of Happiness (the Holy Spirit) giving holiness.

These sacraments and grace are ritual realities of human activity which continuously enable the recitation of the mantra: life, sacrifice, virtue, love, humanity, peace, freedom, death. This mantra is a salutary repetitive phrasing which puts one in a state of Christian Spirit. Actually, all life is sacramentalized by virtue.

Virtue—Variables of Will and Incarnating Acts

The virtues are many (14), and it has been understood that to have one virtue is to have them all (and vice versa). This being so, only the three Theological Virtues, the four Cardinal Virtues and Holiness will be listed, with confidence that any other virtue could be also comparably formulated into the Incarnation of the Word (and word’s) of God on earth consistent with physic realities.

1. Faith—event assent to God.

2. Hope—spectrum trust in ultimate positivity and ascension.

3. Charity—field of conscious commitment to perfection.

4. Prudence—quantum of practical reason seeing and recognizing the will of God in all things and aware of the interdependence of all virtues in life.

5. Justice—singularity regard for and giving to all that is due them.

6. Fortitude—dimension of strong, firm, assured, practice of all virtues in pursuit of the transcendentals.

7. Temperance—uncertainty of moderation and self-control in choice of desirables.

8. Holiness—force dedicated and consecrated to God’s service.

These virtues are free will decision making by choosing paradigms of behavior which have a high probability of converting the Anthropic Principle into Incarnating finality. The virtues are most easily activated by living The Eight Last Words of Christ.

The Eight Last Words of Christ

Joseph Haydn’s Symphony, The Seven Last Words of Christ is misnamed (15), as most others have unwittingly done the same. As there are eight movements in the symphony, there are eight last words i.e., as the Earthquake is the last movement, so the Earthquake is the last word of Jesus on the Cross. Basically, all feelings and everything else should be processed by the Eight Last Words of Christ converting all into Anthropic Principle understanding and consistency, and thereby Sacraments have become symphonic verbs.

1. Father forgive them for they know not what they do. By selectively ignoring, Reconcile/Confess into a unity spectrum giving hope.

2. This day thou shalt be with me in paradise. By non-reactive listening, Holy Order into a dimension for life (the Father) giving courage.

3. Woman behold thy son. Living things are precious, Baptizes into a dignity event giving faith.

4. Oh my God, why hast thou forsaken me. By subdued spontaniety non-self excluded, Holy Communion into an integrity field giving charity.

5. I thirst. By personhood or conscious of consciousness for humanity, Matrimony into an uncertainty for Liberty (the Son) giving temperance.

6. It is finished. By detached warmth and gentleness, Extreme Unction into a spirit singularity giving justice.

7. Into thy hands I commend my spirit. By affect assistance, Confirm into an identity quantum giving prudence.

8. The Earthquake Finale. Make that relationship count by Grace into a transcendental pursuing force (the Holy Spirit).

By the Eight Last Words of Christ, humans are symphonically fine tuned (Sacramentalized) into the Anthropic Principle. Finally, from the Cross comes not only the physics of human beings, the transcendentals, the variables of healthy human interaction, the community universals, the sacraments/grace, and the virtues, but an understanding of suffering—possible only from the Cross.

The Eight Last Words—in Sacramental order…

How to Deal with Everything

Woman behold thy son

Baptize into a dignity event giving faith…and res.

…Living things are precious.

Father, forgive them for they know not what they do

Confess into a unity spectrum giving hope…and aliquid.

…Selectively ignore.

Oh my God, why hast thou forsaken me?

Holy Communion into an integrity field giving charity…and verum.

…Subdued spontaneity non-self excluded.

Into thy hands I commend my spirit.

Confirm into an identity quantum giving prudence…and unum.

…Affect assistance.

It is finished.

Extreme Unction into a spirit singularity giving justice…and bella.

…Detached warmth and gentleness.

This day thou shalt be with me in Paradise.

Holy Order into a dimension for Life (the Father) giving courage…and ens.

…Non-reactive listening.

I thirst.

Matrimony into an uncertainty for Liberty (the Son) giving temperance…and bonum.

…Personhood—Conscious of Consciousness for the species.

The Earthquake Finale

Grace into a transcendental pursuing force (the Holy Spirit) giving holiness…and res.

…Make that relationship count.

Suffering—Entropy Properly Understood

Suffering is the rock of atheism (16). This rock has been crushed by Dinesh D’Souza’s triumphant God Forsaken (17), which profoundly proves that evil and suffering cannot be rationally used to destroy God as discovered by Christians. Readers are encouraged to grace themselves with his book. No attempt will be made to duplicate D’Souza’s tour de force but offered will be two additional approaches to the problems of suffering and evil as allowed by God (and which atheists try to use to discredit God).

1. Atheists cannot logically invoke the spiritual concepts of suffering and evil to deny God because they must deny spirituality. If all is biochemically unfeeling, untranscendent, unteliological, brutely randomly organized materialism (without the Anthropic Principle anthropomorphizing all), there cannot be any relevance to the ideas of right and wrong or any other psychological non-chemical spiritual constructs. For atheists, all people must be equally confined and interactive with what life offers without being judged or measured except biochemically. Basically, atheism, as confined to paralyzing unfree unjudgeable biochemistry, offers no basis for judging others. Physics confined to physics offers no spirit and nothing beyond except as metaphorically realized supra and most rationally understood as Christianity. Suffering and evil cannot be part of the vocabulary of science based atheists except as self-contradicting debate tactics. Instead, scientific atheists are obligated to accept the Anthropic Principle and all it scientifically anthromorphically implies supra described.

2. Even more discrediting, atheists have failed scientifically, specifically biochemically, in not understanding entropy as a scientific basis for suffering and evil (18). Thus, they have misunderstood suffering and evil as proof that there is no Loving God. But entropy clears the air. Entropy is the loss of energy intrinsic to all interactions in physics. And entropy can also be metaphorically understood in all human behavioral analyses as listed supra. My favorite example for human entropy was witnessing a 10 year old boy growing tired of hearing a peer bragging about being first of a hundred in a school contest. The frustrated boy sternly said to the braggart, You could not have done it without me! I was number one-hundred! And therein is entropy as synthesis, and even better phrased, "entropy as usually overlooked then corrected as synthesis. Somehow, entropy is like feelings (or emotions)—perhaps the most common human loss of energy, physical or spiritual. Neither entropy nor feelings are substantially right or wrong (they just are!"), but they can be later determined as having positive or negative outcomes and values. The author’s Theogeocalculus (19) defines suffering as the awareness of pain and sin—pain as random entropy and sin as willful entropy. By living as described in the human behaviors described supra, entropy can be sanctified and converted to synthesis and advancement—a rather startling Christianizing of all reality. Thus, if basic physic realities are real, then entropy and all derived metaphorical realities listed above attendant thereto are also real, and, viola, the problems of suffering and evil are solved because both are consistent and necessary to the Anthropic Principle which must now also include the fact that all the universe is the entropy needed not only for the phenomenon of man but for the phenomenon of Love. Thus the Anthropic Principle is The Church: the Ship For Those Who Go To God: Entropy In Person, the creeky, old, sworn at, besieged, constantly leaking, perpetually ruined, always sinking barque, no bone in her teeth, magnanimous, charitable, committed, non-political, rational, humanity proclaiming, agelessly revolutionary, genuinely free and cultured, filled with ancient secrets, fertile, sacrificing, identity conferring, truth seeking, oneness creating, good demanding, beauty promoting, life dedicated, male/female complementing instead of competing, environmentally sound by Natural Law, and helping any and every in all ways, with never less than one-twelfth of its crew in mutiny or incompetent, plowing along as the only Behemoth moving in the one direction flow of the Divine Substance, rescuing anyone who reaches out a hand, collecting sinners who finally realize they have intrinsic value and worth in the sight of God and can return to Him in the plan of Salvation.

Final Recommendation: Schema 1 are attached to condense and summarize. Readers are encouraged to embrace all the metaphysical add-ons as they live their physics and thereby bring peace and mercy to the world and, in all