Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

A Quantitative Study Of The Visible Link Between Discourse Language And Juror Bias
A Quantitative Study Of The Visible Link Between Discourse Language And Juror Bias
A Quantitative Study Of The Visible Link Between Discourse Language And Juror Bias
Ebook236 pages2 hours

A Quantitative Study Of The Visible Link Between Discourse Language And Juror Bias

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

This researcher conducted a quantitative descriptive comparative study to examine (a) what differences exist in potential jurors’ microexpression of emotions across the different felony crimes presented in Superior Criminal Court during the voir dire questions, (b) what differences exist between male and female potential jurors’ microexpression of emotions, and (c) what is the interaction between the gender of the juror and the gender of the lawyer regarding potential jurors’ microexpression of emotions? The theoretical framework was principally based on Paul Ekman’s (1957) study of emotions. Ekman found several micro-facial expressions, such as anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. This study used a quantitative descriptive comparative design in one geographic location in Washington State Superior Court to analyze juror biases which are problematic in the judicial process. Overall, the study results included a sample size of 48; a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) test was used to address research questions (RQ) 1, 2, and 3. In all three research questions, the results of the MANOVA led the researcher to accept the RQ1 null hypotheses that a difference does not exist in jurors’ microexpressions of emotions across juror gender in Superior Criminal Court during the voir dire questions; the RQ2 null hypothesis that there is no difference existing between male and female potential jurors’ microexpression of emotions; and the RQ3 null hypothesis that there is no interaction between the juror gender and lawyer gender in Superior Criminal Court during the voir dire questions regarding the micro-facial expression demonstrated by potential jurors.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateNov 7, 2017
ISBN9781370316069
A Quantitative Study Of The Visible Link Between Discourse Language And Juror Bias
Author

Dr. Phillip Clingan

Dr. Clingan undertook his Psy.D in the Department of Psychology in the School of Organizational Leadership at the University of the Rockies, Denver, Colorado. He is a faculty member teaching in the Departments of Psychology and Criminal Justice in Washington State. Dr. Clingan specializes in preeminent psychology as applied within the field of criminology. His psychology work is based upon field experience in criminal trials since 2013 and heavily influenced by the theoretical frameworks of Dr. Paul Ekman and measuring nonverbal communication. Loves writing and riding his Indian Motorcycle with his wife Linda.

Related to A Quantitative Study Of The Visible Link Between Discourse Language And Juror Bias

Related ebooks

Psychology For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for A Quantitative Study Of The Visible Link Between Discourse Language And Juror Bias

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    A Quantitative Study Of The Visible Link Between Discourse Language And Juror Bias - Dr. Phillip Clingan

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1