A Flaw From Within: How Women's Higher Status Defies Equal Justice, Violates Men, and Destroys Society

By Alan Millard

    A Flaw From Within addresses a 'sacred' code that elevates women above men (on a pedestal) that defies equal justice for all and opposes our country's constitution created by men in good conscience. This Euro/Anglo-originated injustice culturally built into the male psyche' (commonly referred to as chivalry) corresponds to the female entitlement mindset that pervades society today. (Only based upon the premise of chivalry could feminism ever exist.) A Pandora's Box is opened that underlies a subversive effort to destroy society which can be easily accomplished when men, discounted as mere pawns for women, openly wield injustice without conscience at women's discretion. 

----The common politically-correct influence that may prevent you from reading this book illustrates the very reason you should read it.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Alan Millard
• Release date: Dec 19, 2016
• ISBN: 9780976873815

Book preview

A Flaw From Within

How Women’s Higher Status Defies Equal Justice, Violates Men, and

Destroys Society

Alan Millard

Copyright © 2016 Alan Lee Millard

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the author/publisher at [e-mail] or contact through Facebook. www.alanleemillard.com

A Flaw From Within: How Women's Higher Status Defies Equal Justice, Violates Men, and Destroys Society / Alan Lee Millard

ISBN 978-0-9768738-1-5  (Electronic version)

Nonfiction

First Edition

I dedicate this book to my mother and father who instilled in me the ability to know right from wrong and allowed me to think for myself, inspiring me to stand against injustice.

America will never be destroyed from the outside.

If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.

—Abraham Lincoln

Foreword

By engaging to read A Flaw From Within you are about to embark on a very unique intellectual experience—a journey of discovery and enlightenment yet unfamiliar to the masses. This journey will enable you to see how a cultural entity, taken from the past and exploited, allowed a privileged segment of society to further gain at the expense of others. You will understand how this societal crowbar was then used to break apart society, as the opportunity created allowed government and big business to control the people. It is necessary that you follow the sequence of events to best comprehend how it all transpired to transform society, as one foundation was built upon to support the next. If we could take away the initial problem (the flaw within), the rest would vanish.

Familiarity can be used to conceal the truth and true events can be altered to conveniently fit a modern political agenda supported by continual propaganda. Just like an optical illusion, what we think we know or see holds untruth, and what is familiar to us can be used in place of the truth to gain our acceptance. In complement to this avenue of persuasion, another way we can accept untruth is through a cult, or a type of blind devotion and dictatorship rule, in which case people are mentally taken over by flashy fashion and a unique popularity, especially if combined with other, although unsupported, 'rationalizations' through those provided a privileged status. Completely bypassing a rational-thinking process is more plausible by first establishing a mass shallow-mindedness, accomplished through fashion, popularity, and a need to belong, all supported by lack of prior traditional or family influence—this redirection being vital to the transition. And the societal re-sculpturing is even more possible if packaged through an avenue already deemed sacred and untouchable. Any resistance is then condemned as a threat to (or hatred of) those given this privileged status who are attached to the effort or means of conversion, thereafter carrying forth its agenda with little resistance.

Links for references cited are provided within the text for electronic reading convenience, with all references fully cited at the end of the book. Providing efficient and practical accommodations, news articles are referenced by title whereas research articles and books are referenced by author. Some cross-over many apply as when news articles include books and research. Many issues covered in my prior work are also included due to their relevance. The primary focus is the United States although the message and content applies to other countries where chivalry and feminism occur.

Preface

Real intellectual value, knowledge, is only gained from the truth. Some who may not agree with the contents of this book may try to discount its value by claiming it is not the truth nor based on research, and that it is merely opinion. Neither claim could be more unfounded. This work includes research, but it is much more than that, conveying and working out (actually demonstrating) knowledge to be gained, including examples, comparisons, documentation, testifying events, and cross-referencing. Although research is valuable, it also has its limitations. Research helps support points being made, but alone it has little value. There first needs to be a purpose combined with valid points (legitimate applications) that give meaning to research. A problem needing to be resolved, and accurately identified prior, is first necessary. Meaning comes from logic and showing pertinence and connections. A continuity forms from revealing direct correlations and consistencies when effectively conveying information in the process of forming knowledge. Relevance, consistency, and reasoning are essential in conveying truthful messages and making a point. Research alone cannot do this, and it is often arbitrarily used in an attempt to illegitimately support illogical, unfounded or misguided conclusions. Thus, if the logical or rational premise is flawed, no amount of research will compensate. Documentation, cross-referencing events, showing comparisons, and providing examples (historical, policies, practices) all contribute, conveying valuable and accurate information when proving one’s point. Research alone is stagnant, or commonly skewed for a preferred outcome, and often does not exist in a working condition that can produce a tangible, applicable or relevant result.

And opinion can consist of unsupported conclusions based on personal bias. This, as stated, is not what this book offers the reader. Points made, evidence gathered, and relevant cases all contribute beyond research or mere opinion to demonstrate how valid points and content being conveyed work in application to affect the outcome of the whole. Providing understanding and explanations and pointing out important factors that contribute to one’s knowledge fills in the gaps. One’s opinion may be founded on truth and knowledge, but the facts come first to support one’s opinion, not vice versa. Taking a subject that we recognize, but providing additional information that will increase our knowledge, is evident of a valuable intellectual contribution. If explained and well conveyed, this process can even change personal opinion—that is if the trait or capacity exists in the receiver to accept it. One’s acquired knowledge and experience also contributes to coordinating and processing information as well as to conveying information and providing insight to fact-based conclusions.

A process takes place in the diligent thinker/reader that cultivates comprehension and realization. Any more knowledge to be gained is left up to the reader to seek. What is provided herein will hopefully inspire the reader to become further engaged and learn more in an effort to understand and be part of an effort conveying accurate information to others.

Checkpoints or calibrations are provided throughout to keep the reader attached (on-track), in effect re-conveying how every process, including other parts of different processes, relates to the whole. These may at times seem redundant, but they serve to fill in gaps that other parts do not include and provide continuity by reaffirming another message (connection) to be gained from placing that information within the context of the whole.

If you are one of those few people who can look beyond the ‘obvious’ and has the depth and integrity to value the non-politically correct, then read on. We cannot remain united or a country built upon justice when we allow people and their secular issues preference over others and when programs, policies, and laws are implemented for the benefit of some at the expense of others. What better way exists to break apart a society, especially one built upon the premise of unity and equal justice for all.

Truth may get you in trouble with the ignorant, but it resonates in the minds of the intelligent.

—Alan Millard

Chapter 1

Adding Two plus Two and Connecting the Dots

Our predecessors first came together as male and female, and together they formed a child. This created the family. Several of these units formed a community. The male's territory claimed by this institution eventually led to marriage by his namesake. At first humans were little different from other primates, but due to a slightly advanced intellect that began to separate them from the others, cooperation from the human organism's desire to best succeed became apparent as social organization developed into well-established sex roles. The more humans advanced the longer it took them to develop into adults (18-21 years), with the time-span correlating to intellectual development (and a brain size) far surpassing any other species. And thus, the more vital sex roles became necessary to accommodate, supporting the organization and cooperation needed to fulfill the parental commitment (optimizing perpetuation of the human species) to maintain and carry forth advanced human life. A pride, sex identity, and self-worth was strongly attached to these roles supporting an advanced human intellect. (Housewives were smart women—as they had to be, calculating family needs, prioritizing tasks, involvement in shopping, care, food selection and preparation.) This is the basic bio-sociological premise to our human existence, somewhat evident in other primates, although more specialized, sophisticated, and advanced in humans, until now.

A genetically-favored ability to walk upright along with opportunities and resources, that only an advanced intellect could tap, played a large part in the success and advancement of the human species. This eventually led to acquiring the most favorable living environments and a corresponding lifestyle that amongst some created the farming community. But this is when a split occurred within humans. Some were content with a basic life, establishing small farms or just conforming their way of life entirely to the land and seasons, selecting different locations to live based on the time of year and corresponding climate, available resources for shelter, wild game for meat, and natural harvests the land offered—nomadic. Others had a lifestyle consisting of both characteristics, semi-nomadic, and still remained in harmony with the natural environment. They continued to advance through the realms of the written word, creating institutionalized education and technology. Some, bound by greed and lack of contentment, exploited other humans and the land, and acquired a desire to extract resources and develop, beyond trade, a common means of exchange—money. Accompanied by further greed, money became power, and an abuse of power became evident with wars and a disrespect for life itself, to even include what's recently become known as the battle of the sexes, in which case money (or the human conversion of resources) has been taken out of its original context and intended purpose.

Humans became the only species capable of altering the environment to suit their preferences, significantly increasing the caring capacity of the land for their own species, but also eventually destroying their own and others' natural habitat in the process. Disease, famine, and wars took their toll, but the basic advanced human bio-sociological structure was always present to allow recovery—very resilient. Only by destroying a vital part of this basic human bio-sociological structure—the very mechanics upon which our existence depends—could the human community be brought down. What would become the most advanced segment of the human population would develop and carry forth a flaw within that would later be used by rivals to overtake it, thereafter converting it to a unsubstantiated way of life never before experienced by humans or any other species.

Forged from a people of distinction, Americans, who believed in equal justice for all, was the U. S. Constitution. But somewhere within this advanced segment of humanity was also harbored a flaw that, if exploited, could be used against a people who, no longer tied to their origination, would later succumb to societal takeover through manipulation, coupled by greed and lack of contentment, selling out to misguidance, yet still undaunted by blatant ethical contradictions.

This foreign influence, and resulting intellectual digression, must be recognized for what it is—a type of bio-sociological parasitic disease that has overtaken the masses. Metaphorically-speaking, just as a hen first welcomes larva for her meal, the larva in this case, unbeknown to the hen, contain parasites that she brings back to her nest, harbored in her body and placed in her mind, that will eventually bring her and those around her down. This creature (a human being in this case) took the bait, and in the process changed, conforming to what it was fed rather than maintaining the integrity held within its past.

Complementary Sex Roles Hold Society Together

A species is served best by what secures its progeny (biological premise or creation). Something not fully realized is that our progeny's perpetuation is dependent on another person's progeny's perpetuation, and that means the best arrangement that benefits each of these people (half-units) simultaneously serves as the best preferential outcome for both, even if it's not immediately realized. Two can not occupy the same role (niche') and be as successful as two in complementary roles who work together in tandem as a team (complete unit). Equality of the sexes doesn't mean being the same because we are not the same but opposites in a pair of two equal parts.

The brain itself reflects a very similar arrangement. Besides having both a right and left hemisphere, the brain requires a basic ability to function. For a mind to think, a person must have memory content. But having a memory isn't enough. A person must not only have something there but be able to use it. This requires reason and application, like a motor requires a transmission to put a vehicle into motion. Thus, both are essential to engage the mind to think—like a tool box and someone who knows how to use the tools and for what purpose they are used. But male and female brains are different too which also reflects a bio-social component at the most basic level of our human existence.

The smallest human unit/component necessary to perpetuate life involves a very similar arrangement existing between a man and a woman, with one known best for reason and the other more prone to memory¹ (Other complementary sex differences exist, as long as they are not used against the other half of the sex population.) As a part of the complementary arrangement created by nature, neither role incumbent is better than the other nor is therefore to have privileges or a status above the other. They exist as equals. When members of the opposite sex tear down the other sex, they are tearing apart that portion of the other for whom they are biologically designated to complement, destroying a part of themselves as a whole in the process. The complete unit being essential to our existence—a biologically proven pathway to perpetuating human life—is now purposely being destroyed due to indoctrinated hatred that does not exist in any other species. In addition to creating a much poorer quality of people in this self-destructive process, it's pathetic that humans think of themselves to be so smart yet foolishly deny their existence at such a basic biological level.

A Politically Correct State is a Police State

America and other developed countries are being subverted by new terms that not only by-pass the people served but defy a logical thought process under the blind title of politically correct (PC). This terminology is only deemed necessary because modern politics are not correct. What is correct does not need a qualifier to be acceptable. Therefore what is revealed by qualifying something as politically correct is that modern-day politics are admittedly in defiance of what is correct and differ from a more just governing system of our past when there was no politically correct, or that is when politics were more matched to the just minds of the people served. The principle at work to determine the politically correct is the tail wagging the dog—a mental, emotionally-based dictatorship launched against the people by their government. A special but self-serving term is therefore needed to qualify what is going wrong to be 'acceptable', in essence the incorrect correct dictated to the people versus a government run by its people. Thus, what is wrong is 'right'. Therefore the politically correct and politically corrupt are synonymous.

How can we as a people and proud society be so stupid? This whole politically correct process sheds new light on the dumbing down of America. What is deemed as politically correct takes away our freedom of expression and the ability for the people of this country (and others influenced) to have a voice and any power. This lock on our freedom, and suppression of an intellect supported by freedom, must be broken. Otherwise, we are blindly bound to accept our fate as sheep being led to the slaughter—a fate not becoming of the U.S. and a country supposedly of the people, for the people, and by the people.

Politics don't mix well with government. Let's go back to a time when government, not politics, ran a country represented by the people.

As a people, we must be big enough to not be turned off or emotionally influenced by an issue but intellectually competent enough to hear out matters that may be controversial and objectively address issues regardless of who we are, our individual circumstances, or the issues at stake. Segregation by issues is perhaps the most pending problem we face in today’s society, unacknowledged but extensively used by mainstream society. This is evident by racial, sexual, generational, and cultural segregation and the associated issues developed regarding each of these segments or divisions within our society. (This issue is also covered in more detail in chapter 7.)

Many of us get locked into a politically-staged discriminatory mindset (e.g. gay rights, women’s rights, minority rights). Those who step on our toes regarding issues prescribed to secular interests are automatically deemed as people we oppose without objectively considering the issue presented to us. A politically canned response is all we can expect, much as from a robot or computer-program. We fail to use the ability to think for ourselves. No one should ever be allowed to set the terms for our own ability to think and to dictate our views considering important matters. This dumbing down process influences people at all levels of society, even the doctoral level, in research and education. To really be at an intellectual level capable of addressing today’s problems takes people who are independent thinkers—those who are not bound by issues that only benefit them as a race, sex, democrat or republican but who stand in their concerns for the good of all. We must oppose the current trend of political social engineering and instead become united under a common front—a unity that was still evident merely five to six decades ago—and not allow ourselves to be controlled by self-centered issues or misguided by popular politics.

Minority Rule through Arbitrary and Subjective Selection

As many people are aware, lobbyists and special interests have been allowed to influence, breakdown, and control America. Over the last fifty to sixty years as a result America has experienced some major changes to its basic infer-structure. Efforts to completely reconstruct society have had a major effect. Such a push originally did not come from the people but from exclusionary/extremist organizations and segments of the population given selective preference by the government over the majority.

Laws that oppose the people are passed through the selective use of minority groups and their self-centered issues to support a political agenda.²Minority issues are used as a political front (tool) to impose laws against the people (majority). Public money is then funneled through programs established for these special interests.

For example, if the gay rights movement, just as the women's movement, was not a mere politically-based effort (ploy), then why would gay rights even be an issue, since the majority of people are not gay? The minority would not have more influence than the majority in society. Under the standard of equal justice for all, basic rights are secured for everyone. No one—gay, woman, minority—is to receive special privileges over others (e.g. a hate crime status or job/hiring preference).

[Note: This autocratic process is now at work concerning other issues such as opposing prayer in school, pledging allegiance, or the right to bear arms (e.g. the Brady Bill), with individual cases, their emotional mascots, and events used as opportunistic excuses to take away our freedom. The manipulative technique, due to what amounts to a mere popularity contest, with issues deemed acceptable via public money spent on propaganda, is a far cry from the constitutional republic created and the type of government we had in the past. The continual push (expressed intent) to take away our gun rights alone is all we need to reveal that we as Americans are now under a constant internal attack.]

Politicians are continuously being bought off by special interest groups and lobbyists which is what happens when the people (the majority) are no longer in control and when the government no longer represents the people, implementing its own agenda. Exceptions to the rule of the people are selected and then used as excuses to dictate the new standard, accompanied by government-supported propaganda via education, news, media programs, movies, and emotionally-motivated excuses to make new laws. (e.g. Images and cases of abused children are used to make new laws deeming traditional discipline as spanking to be child abuse; or the Sandy Hook incident, with the killing of school children, is used to take away our gun rights.) And again, this is accomplished through propaganda and lobbying by special interests (a minority of the population) and a government selecting their issues and granting them priority and funding over the rest of society to support its own agenda, not due to the wishes of the majority (the people) who the government is sworn to serve. The effort does not originate from the people. When an election takes place do we heed the minority vote or do we honor the majority in selecting the incumbent for whom the most votes have been cast?

But beware, this process only works if the majority is not successfully indoctrinated through new generations via media and educational sources, and by destroying the family's influence, without the guidance of the past, that would otherwise allow new generations to detect and oppose the take-over.

Our basic rights are never to be questioned or allowed exceptions. The rights of the individual (one) are secured by preserving the rights of everyone (the whole) under the premise of equal justice for all. Any exception formulates an excuse to destroy our country and what it represents.

The Foreign Take-over Progresses

Society has taken many hits. First attacked were men via the women's movement, with a direct sacrifice of our freedom and constitutional rights via a chivalry premise. And this extreme injustice set a precedence that has since set in motion a continual flow of corruption resulting in societal deterioration. As we have seen with the hypocrisy applying to feminism, guilt is often concealed through falsely accusing others. This psychological projection³ commonly expressed by feminists, with an unfounded sense of guilt created against others, bought by, and coerced into the minds of many against men, forms a political climate that disallows acceptance of unbiased terms applying to both men and women.

Little research has been done to address the negative effects of the women’s movement/feminism because it is not politically correct to even question it. This mental coercion and intellectual oppression openly reveals a dictatorship type of government and established sheep or robotic mindset with a climate preventing free speech and expression. Through many new laws, government programs and policies, additional federal money has been earmarked to support special interests, create more correlated policies, and fund lobbying for additional laws that persecute men and fathers and work to destroy families. This is assisted through anti-male propaganda, stereotyping, and gender profiling.

One example of this is the common personally-applied reference to many men He's sort of creepy, creepy no longer having the innocent connotation it did in the past, previously implying a scary-type situation—e.g. being in a graveyard after dark, etc.. It is now used as a way to profile men, commonly applied by law enforcement officers, men, women, and children who are negatively conditioned regarding people they don't even know, further advancing the dirty associations of sex with age and being male. Hence, it brings the discriminatory term of 'dirty old man' to yet a new level, now implying a sex criminal pedophile personage to many innocent people. This sick seed once planted in people's minds grows. Ironically, if today's average 'Christian' were to see children sitting on Jesus Christ's lap, due to their feminist anti-male conditioning, many would likely be creeped out by that.

Catering to this recent sex-prejudice, Qantas Airlines, August, 2012, imposed a new policy that does not allow a man to be seated next to an under-aged girl. How does this differ from racial prejudice and other discriminatory treatment?⁴ One Arizona grandfather, looking at books for his grandchildren in the children's section of a Barnes and Noble bookstore, was asked to leave, which incident gave the corporate chain due negative publicity. See Arizona grandfather accuses Barnes and Noble of gender bias at the following:

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/06/04/12051277-arizona-grandfather-accuses-barnes-noble-of-gender-bias?lite.

Profiling is a subjective way to make everyone guilty within a given category. Once placed there, a person's stand is no longer equal. His or her status is immediately compromised. When this is done, due say to one's physical features, sex, race, etc., he or she is a victim of prejudice and discrimination. This injustice is applied to men as a group on a daily basis. Do you think the black man in the following example, injured in a car accident and desperately seeking help, would have had the police called on him and then shot ten times had he been a woman? N C police shoot unarmed man who survived car crash. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-police-accident-idUSBRE98E0AT20130916n.

Anti-male policies have been applied to sports and education (e.g. Title IX, with opportunity deprived males and finances previously allocated to males and acquired by their own merit, denied males, and given to females). Many anti-male sex laws (e.g. Megan's Law, rape shield laws) and sex discriminatory domestic violence laws (e.g. the Violence Against Women Act), have also been created to aid the extreme injustice. This is in addition to courts predominantly awarding child custody to mothers in child custody cases, with additional funds earmarked toward child support collection and family services agencies that persecute fathers who are deliberately deprived equal parental rights as a way (excuse) for the government to extort money from them. The negative effects are compounded by child adoption, foster care, and law enforcement agencies all getting kickbacks (bonus funds) from the government for their male persecution to include collection efforts, prosecution, and convictions, thus creating additional financial incentives for government agencies to arbitrarily create more cases, convictions, and laws to accommodate as they enact the roles of thugs and tyrants. The following example illustrates how this process works in regard to only one aspect of the whole.

In one case, a male university student had sex with a girl who told him she was 18 but who was actually 17 (first occurring in the state of Wyoming, where the age of consent is 16, yet prosecuted in Utah where the age of consent is 18)—no force, no violence or ill-intent was involved. She was also sexually active prior. She thought he was being unfaithful to her after he relocated to Utah, so she contacted the police. He was arrested and convicted for statutory rape, then sentenced to serve time. Neither the girl or her parents wanted him charged. After he served his time, he was placed in a halfway house and put on the national sex offender registry. He was required to get work within a 12-mile radius of the halfway house. How many people will hire a felon sex offender at all let alone within a 12-mile radius of this halfway house that has a continual flow of felons requiring work to be released? This is a set-up for failure and a business in collusion with the government that depends on it. A private contractor operates the halfway house and receives government funds to run its business. [Note: These operations exist all over the country and have lobbyists who lobby for laws to increase punishment, time served, and conditions that make parole more difficult to increase their business, receiving 2.9 billion in revenue of public tax money, with a portion of this money used to buy-off politicians and judges. The following website provides several news broadcasts and first-hand accounts, with personal interviews, pertaining to this issue: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/private-prisons.htm (Private Prisons for Profit Out of Control, November 10, 2014).

This man, mentioned above, branded as a sex offender, has been continually harassed and persecuted by authorities ever since. What harm did he really do? In the adjoining state in which the legal age of consent is 16, he was not guilty of any crime, but he is now deemed a sex predator even when he is in the state where what he did is not even a crime. A 16-year-old girl can drive a car yet she is not responsible enough to consent to sex? Isn’t she equally accountable as an adult by having a driver's license and operating a motor vehicle and equally liable for her actions then?

Modern Girls and Statutory Rape

Pertaining to crimes now being committed, juveniles, due to their modern culpability level (being more worldly and lacking the innocence common in prior youth), are often certified as adults. Shouldn't this certification policy also apply to girls and statutory rape by determining carnal knowledge (connotes manifestation of one's sensuality, establishing this status) regarding their sexuality? Lack of virginity would be a factor used in determining this status. Most girls today lack what is often referred to as sexual innocence, with their mental, sexual, and physical development now equivalent to girls well past the age of consent in the past. This prevalent sexual culpability needs to be taken into consideration determining statutory rape rather than allowing advanced female sexual attributes to be used to criminally entrap men. What determines one's accountability in social interaction with another person and accountability in a murder case no less applies to sexual activity. This incongruity is especially realized (in fact, the inequity exaggerated) when the legal age of consent is not consistent throughout the U.S., whereas the same act with the same person in one state is legal and in another a felony. (Also keep in mind where the age of consent is 18 or over, juveniles under 18 can also be used to entrap men on child porn charges. This is further covered in upcoming sections.)

A Government System used Against Men and the Family

As covered, the nuclear family is the smallest unit of our social structure upon which the whole is built. The male has been the cornerstone of this institution, and its structural arrangement is only possible (held together) by the unity and complementary sex role arrangement held between men and women. Their inherent worth lies in being opposites as two pieces of a whole fit together in tandem to complement the other. The attack against men and the traditional nuclear family continues now behind the scenes by use of tax-payers’ money with the indoctrination of new generations at the continual expense of citizens’ rights and freedom. Fewer jobs are now available to men than ever before in our country's history. We have Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action to thank for this societal reconstruction and redistribution of finances. Yet, more financial burdens are imposed upon men by society and a government that, through assistance programs, freely gives to women, who it discriminatingly grants child custody—what (benefits, finances, and other compensation) it requires men to pay back by force and continual threat of force and imprisonment. (When men and women are separate they share their roles and are equally entitled to the same rights and freedoms—equal justice for all.) Our government through family court now serves as a self-prescribed debt-collection agency that not only by-passes judiciary due process but uses the criminal justice system to imprison innocent people. Supposedly, here in the United States no one is to be imprisoned for a debt owed—a condition existing in Old England (debtor's prison) that inspired people to come to America and revolt against the tyranny. Even Mexico has this law—that no person shall be imprisoned for a debt—and announces it on a brochure for visitors entering the country. To get away with violating this basic right to freedom, courts/judges call child support, which is determined by the same source, an obligation and if not paid a contempt of court—same thing. Isn’t a debt an obligation to pay someone back? Courts/judges calling something by another name doesn’t change what it is or their violation of our basic rights and liberties. Debt imposed by the courts, however, has even less founding, since it is not derived from borrowing money, a lender, but from someone else creating it at will, using your own child in the process to do it. We are merely witnessing by this process a breach of justice and abuse of authority, tyranny—something we have not heard of in this country since the days preceding the Revolutionary War and debtor’s prison existing in England. (This is one example of what is now often referred to as legislating from the bench.) The common practice—deprivation of parental rights to excuse extortion of state-defined child support and what are often its unconstitutional consequences per court order—attests to a violation of our Constitutional rights. A person is only to be imprisoned or cast into indentured servitude for a crime he or she is convicted of per the 13th Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. Thus, Section 1: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. We should be ashamed. The U. S. now has the most people imprisoned per capita of its population than any other country in the world (Liptak, 2008).⁵ Land of the free?

This Big Daddy government practice is replacing fathers and then dictating that fathers pay a determined amount of money to mothers (since in most cases mothers are granted legal and physical custody by the courts) or go to jail. The same court determines child support if not paid to be a criminal act—a conflict of interest. No government intrusion, let alone coercion (punitive bearing as this), exists prior in our lives, and then it is masked by calling the debt (money deemed owed) an obligation and a contempt of court if it isn’t paid. But again, the financial imposition is actually derived with less founding than a debt because it is an amount arbitrarily made up by the government (court) it requires to be paid to the adversary party in the custody case, rather than instilling an arrangement of joint physical custody that allows both parties to provide the goods directly to their children as is the case prior to and outside any court intervention. (The complete process and its ramifications is explained in more detail in the next section, but first check out the following video by Dr. Carlos Rivera at

https://www.facebook.com/100005828822943/videos/565201563684133/ to help get the full scope of what is being done by government tyrants to fathers, rendering them helpless slaves and placing them into debtor's prison.)

This is not only corruption; it is a violation of our fundamental rights by use of public taxes. An intentional effort to use tax-payers’ money against the people is implemented by use of the same government system created by the people—a government formed from the traditional family structure it has now turned against and one originally created for the people who it is sworn to serve and protect under the premise of equal justice for all. G. K. Chesterton once suggested that the family was the main check on state power and that weakening it would destroy freedom (as stated in Baskerville, 2009, p. 171). This condition in an undivided country would have created a revolution in the past when men, women, and communities were united. Divide and conquer is a concept that is now playing out within through our biased court system spurred by chivalry and feminist influence.

Government interference and intrusion into the lives of families has also deemed spanking or yelling at or in front of children a form of child abuse, thus sacrificing proper discipline and upbringing of children. Research has found spanking to be good for kids (Gunnoe, 2010). Common heated discussions and discipline are arbitrarily misconstrued and condemned due to the government’s intrusion into our personal lives. Reporting incidents involving spanking or yelling is commonly used as a weapon against the opposing party in domestic disputes and child custody battles. And with men often being the main disciplinarians and already profiled, they are easily set up. Gender profiling is evident by social workers, judges/courts, and the police who use new laws sculptured against men who are often, due to their larger size and deeper voice, prejudged as the bad guy or the greater threat—a typical subjective practice supported by the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).

The Violence Against Women Act is one of the most pronounced examples of injustice ever wielded by our government, along with the prejudiced and inaccurate propaganda that goes with it pertaining to domestic violence. All crimes of violence are to be covered by law equally applying to everyone. Any exception per law applied to a segment of the population is discriminatory and therefore unconstitutional—unlawful. And contrary to the popular propaganda and contempt for men, all major research reveals there is actually as much and slightly more, and as severe, violence perpetrated by women upon men as there is perpetrated by men upon women (Arias, Samios, & O’Leary, 1987; Barber, 2008; Brinkerhoff & Lupri, 1988; Fiebert, 2012⁶; Fiebert & Gonzalez, 1997; Gelles, 1974, 1994, 1999; Hines, D. A. & Malley-Morrison, 2001; Jurik, 1989; Jurik & Gregware, 1989; Lawrence, 2003; McNeely & Mann, 1990; McNeely, Cook, & Torres, 2001; Morse, 1995; Sommer, 1994; Stets & Henderson, 1991; Straus 2007; Straus, Hamby, Boney-McCoy, & Sugarman, 1996). Other sources acknowledge a modern difference in male/female character contributing to the problem: The more educated women are the more violent they are toward their male partners (Brinkerhoff and Lupri, 1988), and During conflict, women are more likely to be demanding; men are more likely to withdraw (Kassin, Fein, & Markus, 2008, p. 342). With today's anti-male propaganda administered through education and the media, is it any wonder? But more is at stake adding to the injustice for men. Men are often too embarrassed to call the police when abused by a woman, with those involved in the process often demeaning them for being abused (Barber, 2008; Farrell, 1993; Hines & Malley-Morrison, 2001).⁷ Other research reveals that male victims fear calling the police because they will be the ones arrested (George, 1994) which is often the case (Barber, 2008). An abused woman is nine times more likely to call the police than an abused man (Sacks, 2001). The male abuse statistics are therefore under-represented.

Equal Justice? Equal Status? Rational Thinking? Mutual Love?

The following scenario conveys far too common parental bigotry regarding the assault of a boy who hits a girl back:

It doesn’t matter if she hit you first; you are never to hit a girl,

say the parents to the boy who is being punished.

But isn’t she getting punished for hitting me? says the boy.

No, because you hit her, the parents respond.

No child should ever be subjected to this discriminatory treatment.

[Note: Could a child ever feel the same toward a parent who expresses this lack of equal love and consideration for him? The consequences of this degraded status for males is immense and a topic that is essential in addressing male behavior and development, to include lesser self-esteem and suicidal tendencies. (See Chapter 8, Male Denigration).]

Anti-male sentiment adds to the problem, as many man-haters commonly try to excuse women for committing the same acts for which they condemn men. One by the name of Kathy Beebe, director of Sexual Assault Support Services, had the audacity to say in response to research showing more assaults by women than men that A woman who is abused in other ways may simply be retaliating physically, not necessarily initiating the abuse. (Dating violence study: More males are victims, by Seva Korogod, June 4, 2006, The Portsmouth Herald) It's amazing how far we can twist logic when we are consumed by prejudice. A woman is initiating the abuse if it's expressed by her later, versus when her and her partner are engaged. [Women are a lot more likely than men to use weapons—guns, knives, boiling water, bricks, fireplace pokers, and baseball bats—and the element of surprise (Sacks, 2001).] Researcher Murray Straus (2006) responded to Beebe that retaliation and self-defense are being equated when legally the two acts are completely different. Could the same excuse" be used for a man's physical abuse of a woman—having his fill, he later retaliates against her—as self-defense? The study conducted by Murray A. Straus (2006), Dominance and Symmetry in Partner Violence by Male and Female University Students in 32 Nations, published in 2007, surveyed 13,601 students, almost a third of whom admitted to having assaulted their partner. The study revealed that 69 percent of cases featured mutual violence. However, in 21 percent of the cases, the physical abuse came strictly from the female, while only in 10 percent of surveyed situations were males the sole sources of violent behavior. And thus, recognizing prejudice as the main culprit, the article also states that chivalry is not dead. Activist Phyllis Schlafly explains the corrupt ramifications and extreme injustices of VAWA at http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/2005/oct05/psroct05.html in Time to Defund Feminist Pork—the Hate Men Law.

A policy by the Department of Justice (December 15, 2015) is designed to supposedly help law enforcement become less sex-biased: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-issues-guidance-identifying-and-preventing-gender-bias-law-enforcement. But one will find this guidance policy comes packaged by deception, since the Justice Department's Office on Violence Against Women (OVW), a prejudiced cancer embedded within, weighs in on the so-called guidance. How does this differ from an office formed of Nazis guiding the treatment of Jews? This likely ensures, if anything, that the gender bias that now exists will continue or get even worse.

Millions are spent every year, including a large portion from the Violence Against Women Act, on education and training that shape the understanding of judges, prosecutors, legislators, and others regarding domestic violence. These perceptions eventually influence legal decisions, government policies, legislative initiatives, and funding priorities (Education for Injustice, 2010). Many men and women need to be reconditioned, in fact recalibrated, to be even-handed and just, with no chivalry sex prejudice and discrimination existing in their mental process, necessary to implement equal justice for all.

Although it's not the standard, there does exist equal justice within today’s world of injustice.

"Detective Inspector Sylvia Aston, West Midlands Police Force (UK), reported:

We've made absolutely sure through our training that no officer will ever dismiss a male domestic violence victim just because he's a man. We don't take the attitude that a man can leave—many can't. And it's invariably the nice sensitive ones who get battered. I think we risk going down a very dangerous path by discriminating between the sexes in these offenses. Some of the most violent people I've dealt with as an officer are women, and if you don't judge a woman by her crime, but by her gender, then not only do you perpetrate the old, misleading stereotypes but you risk such offenses recurring, perhaps in another relationship. Domestic violence as we see it is not a women's issue—it's a social issue. (quoted in Kirsta, 1994, p. 229)"

A woman can use a gun, knife, club, rock, a situation (being asleep, taking a bath/shower) or other vulnerability (even a cliff) to inflict harm or death upon a man if she wishes. The following case refers to a newlywed who pushes her trusting husband over a cliff: Newlywed pushes husband off cliff after 8 days of marriage: Court records. Refer to http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/10/20415649-newlywed-pushes-husband-off-cliff-after-8-days-of-marriage-court-records?lite. One's trust of another is held in the vulnerability that person has to the other.

A horrifying act took place when Jodi Arias stabbed and slashed her former boyfriend, Travis Alexander, 27-29 times, slit his throat and trachea, and shot him in the forehead, leaving him in his shower where friends found him about 5 days later. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Travis_Alexander and chapter 4 where this case is covered in more detail.)

A terrible incident occurred when X Factor's hopeful, Lucie Slater, beat and slashed boyfriend William Aitken's face. Refer to X Factor boyfriend beater Lucie Slater should be spending Christmas in a cell, says writer Peter Lloyd, retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2252882/Why-X-Factors-boyfriend-beater-Lucie-Slater-spending-Christmas-cell-says-writer-Peter-Lloyd.html and to X Factor hopeful whose band were booted off show after horrendous glass attack on ex-boyfriend faces five years in jail, retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2229237/X-Factor-hopeful-whose-band-were-booted-off-show-after-horrendous-glass-attack-on-ex-boyfriend-faces-five-years-in-jail. Why was not at least the same outrage expressed regarding this incident as was expressed in response to NFL player Ray Rice's 2014 assault of his girlfriend in the elevator? Shortly after the Ray Rice incident a television announcement with the motto No More, played several times during commercial breaks of NFL football games, conveying the need to stop men's domestic violence and sexual violence against women. Opportunists grabbed the chance to use Rice's case to support their sex-prejudiced efforts, apparently buying time from the NFL (who sells out) to do it. But no alliances were made with national violence organizations on behalf of men in response to William Aitken, with any exclusive women's sport time or product affiliation used as a medium to convey an anti-violence message to women regarding men in response to Lucie Slater disfiguring his face. Doubtful it (the equivalent) would even be allowed by the sex-biased media networks. And much more severe harm was inflicted upon Aitken.

Although the psychologist featured in the following video does not have the statistics right, claiming women don't inflict the severity of harm men do, this video, created by ABCNews.com, conveys the extreme discriminatory sex prejudices and double standards of many (but not all, as is also conveyed) modern-day people regarding men. The skit, capturing the public's reaction, is portrayed by a female abuser and male victim: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlFAd4YdQksHYPERLINK http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlFAd4YdQks&feature=player_embedded&HYPERLINK .

Ironically, this relinquished truth reveals the same character qualities possessed by many women are the same ones we despise in men. Excuses and misinterpretations are commonly applied to women for the same character flaws we condemn in men. One example is that women are deemed as picky in the mating process as if they are better when they are actually more selfish, egotistical, and lack genuine values regarding men. Other examples that reveal a poor female character is when the same concern is not expressed regarding the same act committed by a man against a woman as when it is committed by a woman against a man. Instead of expressing the same compassion, a woman (and a chivalrous man) asks "What did he do? and He must have really made her mad for her to do this to him," as if she (or he) can identify and relate to the violator! This discrepancy is often conveyed over the media and in movies as well as in our educational and judicial systems.

Policy-makers and law enforcement personnel are persuaded to misuse the system through forced-fed anti-male propaganda, often by incentive money granted to create male criminals with new laws (and additional funding available) to accommodate. This includes false information (e.g. that women are victims of domestic violence more than men) as an excuse to ‘justify’ prejudiced and discriminatory enforcement actions including mere allegations used by women to get protective orders placed on men that violate both due process of the law and the right to bear arms.

Some police departments per policy automatically arrest the man in any domestic dispute. The Violence Against Women Act conveys this mindset. Why is a man’s liberty (right to freedom) so easily relinquished compared to a woman’s? This is another example of men having less rights than women.

And more gender profiling, used as an 'excuse' to freely grant protective orders, is self-fulfilling. Fathers are systematically violated, and as a result express anger—a natural response of a rational person who has been treated unjustly. Then, using this condition, and ignoring its basis, the system attaches anger issues to fathers. The whole thing is a set-up. Violations of protective orders (which are unconstitutionally derived and imposed) result in criminal charges—tools routinely used in child custody cases to take children from their fathers, all supported by Washington D.C. and a corrupt court system and discriminatory police policies. Thousands of men who have no criminal record are criminalized through this illegal process for the love of their children.⁸ And no punishment (rightful consequence) exists for those who make false accusations, freely used to deem others guilty who are deprived their equal rights without due process.

Judges, without even providing a hearing, issue protective orders that oust a person in the street and by federal mandate automatically take away a person's gun rights. These are innocent people deprived of their Constitutional rights, to include access to their own residence, children, and family in domestic violence incidents. (This issue is revisited in upcoming sections.) The family pet has more rights than a father does within his family and residence. Justice is bought off by an anti-male, chivalrous, feminist-based influence, and the self-perpetuating, destructive judicial machine created as a result profits from it at the expense of our human rights.

[Note: In many cases protective orders basically allow women to cop-out of accountability as irresponsible cowards leaving a man cold without him even knowing why, allowing no chance of reconciliation or closure. No conscience exists, like a doctor saying after a thorough diagnosis, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but... then nothing. And this same lack of understanding and acceptance experienced by a man may also be experienced by children if involved, confused as to why Daddy was ordered out of their house (and their lives) by the police—suddenly an outcast. This doesn't set well with children and is often when it's deemed necessary (convenient) to alienate children from their fathers, in effect kicking a man when he is down and can't defend himself, even to his own children. In addition, he is often reduced to living like a tramp, as his bank account is drained, credit is ruined, and his assets frozen, with a betrayal that leaves him destitute and defenseless.]

Custody of Children

Due mainly to how it affects others, men's lack of equal rights to women is felt most by everyone when pertaining to the custody of children. But besides traditional inherent biases, the demonizing of men as fathers becomes important as a means to justify the injustice.

Fathers are routinely immediately hit with additional financial burdens and obligations and isolated from others in the custodial process, with most people taking the mother's side in custody battles, whereas mothers are often immediately provided help and assistance that is denied fathers. In addition, custody cases are often built on false pretenses (to include lies/false allegations in the protective orders) against fathers that result tainting a case, influencing a court's custody decisions that should otherwise be built upon equal and mutual consideration given to both parties involved from the start. Mothers work with the court and government agencies in this process targeting men and fathers within a system filled with female sympathizers. Documents are deliberately altered, deadlines are knowingly set that fathers can not meet (often set too soon for the father to receive notification or intentionally delayed when he does), all resulting in permanent judicial decisions pertaining to custody as well as potential criminal charges against fathers, in addition to depriving any fair and equal status regarding custody and a continued relationship with their children—what should be the only focus. Suicidal tendencies for fathers forced into these dire circumstances becomes an issue that goes unnoticed and unaddressed, or worse, identified as a problem/tendency the father had prior, reaffirming his poor standing as a parent that in turn supports the false allegations stated on the protective order—very self-fulfilling—completely disregarding the prejudiced process that produced this result.

Sgt. Tom Ball, a loving father of three who fought for our country, but who was ruled out of his children’s lives, except as a financial obligate, provides testimony to the system’s extreme corruption.

Arrests are mandatory for the police in New Hampshire for domestic violence. That is not law. That is police department policy. Laws come from the Legislature and the Governor's office together. God only knows where these policies come from. The State's Attorney General also has a mandatory arrest protocol for domestic violence. I call these policies, procedures and protocols The Second Set of Books. You never cover the Second Set of Books your junior year in high school. That ['s] because we are not suppose [ed] to have a Second Set of Books. This is America — we have the rule of law.

[Author's Note: The police have no business or right subjectively using the law, in essence making their own laws by policy. Police discretion is allowed given certain situations, but under the guidance of the law, not by standardized policy that circumvents equal application of the law. An in addition, built upon this platform, defying the premise of being unbiased, courts will often use biased police reports as evidence applying to people (e.g. fathers) who were not even charged, let alone convicted, of any crime.]

Ball continues:

Feminists had always claimed that when women took over, we would have a kinder, gentler, more nurturing world. After 36 million arrests and 72 million evictions what we got was Joe Stalin.

Shortly after writing a statement on June 16, 2011, addressing how the system persecutes and discriminates against men and fathers, from which these quotes have been extracted, Thomas Ball committed suicide. Refer to Last Statement Of Retired Army Sergeant Thomas Ball, Equal Justice Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.ejfi.org/DV/dv-44.htm.

Several years prior to this incident a case, without lasting recognition, although accurately perceived by Fox News, Are Fathers' Rights a Factor in Male Suicide?, involved a father, 43-year-old Derrick K. Miller, who went to the San Diego court house where he was violated and, with his court papers in hand, drew out a gun and shot himself. (Wendy McElroy, January 29, 2002. Fox News.) Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/story/2002/01/29/are-fathers-rights-factor-in-male-suicide.html.

Gender Profiling: An Effective Tool commonly used in Custody Battles

The dirty/guilty sexual connotation mentioned earlier associated with being male is especially used by mothers in custody battles as fathers are routinely profiled as child molesters to enable mothers to gain custody. And they often, with the help of feminist social workers, use their own children in the process to do it.

One man, falsely accused of raping his own 8-year-old daughter, serving a 30-year sentence, continues to be held despite the daughter shortly thereafter confessing, while with another relative and out of her mother's presence, that she had lied due to her mother's threats. He even continues to be held after the mother herself later admitted she had threatened her daughter to do it. Refer to Daughter said she lied and sent dad to prison for rape, but DA upholds conviction, NBC News, December 16, 2013. Retrieved from

http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/12/16/21880908-daughter-said-she-lied-and-sent-dad-to-prison-for-rape-but-da-upholds-conviction?lite. This is yet another way that subjects a man (father) through a completely non-related avenue (equal custody interests), by the use of his own child, to being a criminal.

Author's Note:

Clients and their attorneys, guided by a feminist-influenced, anti-male mindset, routinely take normal, but personal, situations and use them in a twisted fashion out of context to purposely embarrass and humiliate fathers, causing many to feel uncomfortable, and therefore implement a process used to force fathers to accept a prescribed guilt association, convicting many innocent people in their efforts to take fathers out of children's lives. This was tried in my own case by my daughter's mother, her attorney, and a social worker but proved unsuccessful when I embraced it as an opportunity, rather than cowered to any condemnation, testifying that of course I touch my child's private parts as a responsible parent must in properly caring for a child as when changing diapers and cleaning and bathing is necessary in performing personal hygiene duties. Embracing the suggestive accusation, but placing it in proper context, I defused the whole argument. (The same stigma doesn't exist, nor is it therefore applied or used, against mothers.)

Due to fear of being criminalized as a pedophile, many fathers are prevented from bonding with their children (e.g. children sleeping with their parents, especially when little and scared or troubled). And, as we know, emotional/physical bonding is very important to children's normal development. This plays well into parent alienation.

Even to Win is to Lose in a System Bound by Chivalry and Female Bias

All the cards, even from different decks, are stacked against fathers. If a father gets a fair shake, he is often resented by others in the system. For example, in my own case, after I finally achieved a legal status of joint physical custody (although I had custody of my daughter slightly over half the time prior to going to court), the special master assigned to our case to enforce the judge's order and ensure that I received the time I was being deprived with my daughter by her mother, literally rewrote the order in favor of the mother. He even told me in a private conversation that I would get more from my daughter's mother than I would ever get from him as he defied the court's order, taking half the summer allotted to me away from me and then charged me more because I complained about it. And he never received punishment for doing it. This violation was so blatant that I thought the judicial conduct commission would jump all over it when I filed my complaint with their office. But revealing complete corruption (self-evident collusion) by those supposedly holding positions to disallow this injustice, when this blatant violation was disclosed to them, they found no problem with what he did, despite the evidence, per the court's order and what he did to change it, being so flagrant and in direct violation of the court's order and the role he was assigned by the court to fulfill. It was not even addressed or considered wrong. People outside the system are placed in jail for doing this—violating the court's/judge's order, especially so blatantly. And then what's termed a DeNovo hearing was held for me to get back the original order that he failed to uphold without consequence, further adding irrefutable testimony to the special master's violation. (Another Special Master assigned and aware of the case and the court order, was appalled at this, stating that what the first Special Master did was so illegal that he couldn't believe he could get away with it. Then, bowing out due to the corruption applying to our case, he said he didn't want to be involved in it.)

To add further to injustice, the same special master (Brian Florence) who had changed the order years later is still continually being used by the same court as an appointee for other cases. The DeNovo process, for me to regain what I had lost, again subjected me to defending all elements necessary to grant me back what I had lost, costing me even more due to what this special master had been allowed to take from me. In the meantime, in addition, I had lost time allotted to me with my child and I had to travel further than the original order stated, needlessly spending thousands more. The system is shamelessly corrupt and thinks nothing of this exploitation under the cover of justice. (Few can imagine what one