Can one alleged act of jury tampering unravel the verdict in a high-profile murder case? This is the pivotal question that has emerged following Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new trial. The once-prominent South Carolina lawyer, convicted in a saga that gripped the nation, is seeking another chance in court, claiming jury tampering by a court official. In an eye-opening episode of "Hidden Killers," trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine delves into the murky waters of this claim with host Tony Brueski.
 
 During the podcast, Constantine articulated skepticism about the jury tampering allegations involving Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill. "The four jurors unequivocally say...she never told us that," Constantine stated, referencing the jurors' dismissal of any improper influence. Despite these claims, the notion of Hill potentially being too personable with jurors sparked debate about courtroom boundaries and the implications for Murdaugh's conviction.
 
 "If there was prejudicial influence, then, of course, a new trial is warranted," Constantine asserted. Yet the crux of the matter remains proving such influence occurred, a challenge that looms large over the case. The jurors, according to Constantine, have no incentive to protect Hill: "There's no skin in the game."
 
 The discussion took a turn when Brueski asked about Murdaugh's previous courtroom demeanor. Constantine did not mince words: "He's a horrible witness." Her blunt assessment of Murdaugh's testimony painted a picture of a man who was not just unconvincing but appeared to be outright deceptive. "He lied, continued to lie, and then admitted he lied," she said, concluding that if Murdaugh were to take the stand in a potential new trial, his lawyers would face an uphill battle to manage his presentation.
 
 The conversation went deeper into the psyche of Murdaugh as Constantine dissected his patterns of lying and manipulation. "When you listen to a person long enough, you start to figure out how they lie," she explained. Her analysis of Murdaugh was unyielding: "He is the textbook liar."
 
 Moreover, the potential for a new trial raised questions about what Murdaugh's defense could present differently. Constantine speculated that new evidence or witnesses would be the likely route. "Had we had this information, this would have come out," she posited, hypothetically speaking from the defense's perspective.
 
 In an environment where the credibility of the justice system is often under scrutiny, the Murdaugh case stands out as a complex amalgam of legal drama, personal tragedy, and a deep dive into human behavior. With experts like Constantine providing insights, the public gets a glimpse into the intricate processes that determine the fate of those who stand trial.
 
 The episode of "Hidden Killers" wrapped up, leaving listeners with a profound question that encapsulates the entire saga: If Alex Murdaugh is granted a new trial, what new narratives, evidence, or strategies will come into play, and will they be enough to navigate the "maze" of the legal system for a different outcome? Or will the same patterns that led to his initial conviction simply re-emerge, solidifying the case against him?
 
 As the legal community and the public alike await further developments, one thing is clear—Alex Murdaugh's story is far from over, and the world is watching. Will justice be served, or will it be reframed? What do you think?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The