In a revealing discussion on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott delved deep into the complexities surrounding the potential re-trial of Alex Murdaugh. The conversation spotlighted the controversial allegations of jury tampering linked with the clerk of court.
 
 "If the allegations are true," Brueski began, "Alex Murdaugh is entitled to a new trial." However, he emphasized the procedural labyrinth this case must navigate before reaching that point. The psychological toll of the previous trial was evident in Scott's commentary, "Oh my gosh, what a traumatic, awful trial that was for everybody."
 
 The spotlight on Murdaugh during the trial was intense, with the prosecution painting a picture of a man with questionable financial activities. As Brueski put it, the perception of Murdaugh played a significant role in his conviction. Removing the shock element from the information revealed in the initial trial might alter the jury's perception in a potential new trial. "Take all that out of the equation," Brueski mused, "If that was not there, I think there is an argument to be made that maybe he would not have been convicted of murdering his wife and son."
 
 Despite the past surprises in the trial, including Murdaugh's change in testimony, a fresh trial wouldn't necessarily harbor the same dramatic revelations. Brueski pondered on the possibility of portraying Murdaugh in a different light, asking if "too much damage [had] already been done."
 
 Scott acknowledged the need for different strategies if a new trial were to occur, but she also touched on the defining moments of the first trial, such as the audio recordings. For her, those revelations were the "nail in the coffin."
 
 Brueski raised a captivating point about a potential new defense for Murdaugh, speculating if he could claim he remained silent during the first trial to protect his family from further harm. Yet, there remains a haunting sentiment, as Scott revealed, "I've always felt like there are still secrets, there are still missing pieces."
 
 A peculiar aspect of the conversation was Murdaugh's prison behavior. His nonchalant demeanor behind bars raises questions about his mindset. As Scott articulated, "He's waiting for the cell door to open and he can walk back out and go back to Moselle and live his life." Such an attitude from a man facing grave allegations and possible life imprisonment is indeed bewildering.
 
 Scott theorized that Murdaugh’s behavior could stem from psychopathic tendencies, suggesting that he processes reality differently than most. “People with psychopathic tendencies don't feel fear the way the rest of us do,” she remarked. This might explain Murdaugh’s calm and collected demeanor even in confinement. Furthermore, his actions, like hosting a birthday party for his deceased son while in prison, veer on the side of bizarre.
 
 Brueski, offering a unique perspective, mused if Murdaugh had come to terms with his imprisonment long before it occurred. He drew a parallel with someone in an abusive relationship, eventually making peace with its inevitable end.
 
 As the conversation wrapped up, both Brueski and Scott seemed to agree on one thing: even if Murdaugh manages to clear his name concerning the murders, the financial crimes would likely ensure he remains imprisoned. The question that then arises: is Murdaugh more focused on cleaning his reputation, rather than securing freedom?
 
 As the debate around Alex Murdaugh's potential re-trial intensifies, one can't help but ponder: will a new trial unveil the complete truth, or are some secrets destined to remain buried forever?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside th