Could Alex Murdaugh, embroiled in scandal and previously convicted of heinous crimes, truly be on the verge of a retrial because of alleged jury tampering? And if so, what might his demeanor and the actions of his legal team tell us about the forthcoming legal battles?
 
 In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved deep into the intricacies of Alex Murdaugh's case alongside Forensic Psychologist Joni Johnston. Murdaugh's potential journey to a new murder trial has been ignited not because of his direct actions against others, but due to the strong indications of jury tampering, which if proven could indeed grant him a new trial.
 
 "He seems to be like a very happy, easygoing man in jail," Brueski noted, commenting on the startling demeanor Murdaugh has displayed since his incarceration. His seeming joviality behind bars has left many wondering about his mental state, especially given the gravity of his crimes and the possibility of him spending the rest of his life in prison.
 
 Johnston weighed in on the issue, explaining, "I think a couple of potential scenarios kind of pop up for me. One is… for somebody like Alex Murdaugh, who his entire life has been able to get out of things basically… I think I would imagine and I believe that he is still thinking, I'm going to find a way to get out of here."
 
 Much of the conversation revolved around the Murdaugh family legacy, its importance, and how it might be influencing Alex's behavior now. According to Johnston, image, power, and maintaining the reputation of the Murdaugh name have always been paramount, potentially influencing Alex's actions and choices. Even in prison, he could be positioning himself as a dominant figure, holding onto that ingrained need for control.
 
 Brueski raised the question of strategic positioning by Murdaugh's legal team. Could they be setting the stage for a new trial, attempting to paint Alex in a more favorable light, despite the seemingly insurmountable task ahead? "Right now, I think they're focused on the message that the criminal justice system isn't fair," Johnston explained. The essence is to present Murdaugh as a victim of a system that has been manipulated against him, capitalizing on any evidence that supports this narrative.
 
 This possible strategy has roots in the revelations about Murdaugh's financial crimes. During his murder trial, he openly admitted guilt to several of these charges. This confession was shocking, and as Brueski mentioned, it played a significant role in the jury's perception of him. The public revelation of his wrongdoings could potentially be used to his advantage in a new trial. Without the shocks of his financial misdeeds, the narrative might change, focusing solely on the murder allegations.
 
 Johnston agreed, emphasizing that while the overall case against Murdaugh is challenging to fight, his legal team will likely be very strategic. A potential focus could be to argue that Alex Murdaugh has been unfairly targeted and victimized due to his prominence.
 
 Both Brueski and Johnston contemplated the next steps for the defense. Would they present the same narrative, or add new chapters to Murdaugh's story to boost his defense? And while speculations abound, Johnston highlighted the insurmountable evidence against Murdaugh, chiefly the video proof that placed him at the scene of the crime after having lied about it for nearly two years.
 
 In conclusion, the case against Alex Murdaugh is riddled with complexities, from the crimes he committed to his family legacy and the potential for a new trial. As Brueski aptly put it, "Only Alex knows" the whole truth.
 
 With the possibility of a new trial and endless speculation around it, one lingering question remains: Will Alex Murdaugh ever reveal the full truth, or will he take it to his grave?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj