Can a man visibly deteriorate before the public eye and yet maintain his innocence amidst overwhelming suspicion and the weight of accusation? This pressing question encapsulates the essence of a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, featuring guest Susan Constantine, a trial consultant and body language expert. They discuss the case of Richard Allen, accused of a double murder in Delphi, Indiana—a case riddled with controversy, not least because of Allen's apparent physical and mental unraveling during his time in solitary confinement.
 
 Richard Allen is set to stand trial on October 24th, yet the evidence against him, as discussed by Brueski and Constantine, seems tenuous, forming what could only be described as a "fairly weak case." Allen, who lacks a criminal history, raised his hand during a call for witnesses who were on the hiking trail the day of the crime, an act that, according to Constantine, could be seen as either an innocent man's plea or a strategic half-confession to ease cognitive dissonance.
 
 As Brueski and Constantine note, the physical transformation of Allen is stark and troubling. His latest mugshot reveals a man with deep-set furrows, sunken cheeks, and a pallor that speaks volumes of his prison ordeal. "He looks unhealthy. He truly looks like he's right on the edge of not being here any longer," Constantine remarked, her words painting a vivid picture of a man broken by the justice system's slow grind.
 
 The crux of their discussion lies in the power of circumstantial evidence and the analysis of body language, particularly in the context of a photograph that captured a figure on the railroad tracks near the crime scene, potentially implicating Allen. While the photograph's subject remains officially unidentified, Constantine emphasizes the uniqueness of individuals' gait and posture—elements that could potentially match Allen to the figure in the photo, should comparative analysis prove conclusive.
 
 Constantine shared her professional experience with similar analysis leading to the identification of a serial killer in Tampa, highlighting the potential significance such evidence could have in court. However, she also laments the fact that body language experts like herself are rarely allowed to testify in court unless to counter testimony from law enforcement.
 
 The debate extends to the court of public opinion, where the "CSI effect" and the surge in true-crime aficionados create an expectation for irrefutable evidence. Constantine suggests that the jury, regardless of their instructions to stick to the facts, will inevitably make personal judgments based on the behavior and appearance of the accused.
 
 The podcast reveals that the defense's strategy may involve odinism, which has been brought to the attention of the public and the court. As the conversation unfolds, the complexities of the legal process are laid bare, along with the human cost of the criminal justice system. The impending trial, the podcast suggests, will be as much about interpreting the nuances of human behavior as it is about weighing the hard evidence.
 
 But what happens when the courtroom becomes an arena where jurors are expected to be part-time body language experts, and where the potential for bias is as significant as the evidence itself? As "Hidden Killers" leaves us pondering, we are reminded that the outcome of the trial could hinge not just on what is proven, but also on what is perceived. Can the legal system rise above the fray of human intuition, or is the court of public opinion an inescapable shadow over the scales of justice?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell,