Can justice prevail in the labyrinthine twists of the Delphi murder case involving Richard Allen? As the case approaches a critical juncture, with a pivotal hearing set for January 18th, the legal community and public alike are grappling with this question.
 
 The hearing will address three crucial motions: conducting the trial within 70 days, reinstating Allen's original attorneys, and potentially removing Judge Gull from the case. These decisions could significantly impact the trajectory of the case and the pursuit of justice for the two young victims.
 
 Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, and his guest, psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott, delve into the complexities surrounding these motions. Scott, offering her insights, states, "It’s Indiana, which is, as I’ve been told, a different state...I’m also skeptical if it will [go in Allen's favor], just because it’s Indiana, and I’ve been told they do things, you know, a bit different there than the rest of us."
 
 The defense's insistence on a speedy trial aligns with Richard Allen's Sixth Amendment rights, which they argue have been violated. The removal of his attorneys, who offered to serve pro bono, and the potential bias of Judge Gull have raised serious concerns about the fairness of the legal process.
 
 Adding to the case's oddities is Allen's recent transfer to another correctional facility, not to a jail, which many consider the appropriate location pending trial. "It's almost like people are covering up for covering up, and now it's like there's not really a rhyme or reason to some of it," Brueski remarks, highlighting the perplexing decisions made in this case.
 
 Scott expresses hope that Allen's new location might offer better psychiatric care, crucial for his deteriorating mental state. However, she acknowledges the possibility that the move could be mere optics, intended to deflect criticism rather than address the underlying issues.
 
 Discussing the argument used to remove Allen's attorneys, Brueski questions if a different approach, focusing on the unusual defense strategy involving odinism, could have been more effective. Scott agrees that this could have been another factor in Judge Gull's dissatisfaction with the defense.
 
 As the conversation concludes, both Brueski and Scott emphasize the need for a fair trial and the thorough examination of evidence, which has been overshadowed by the legal entanglements. "We really want to get to the trial so we can see all the evidence, and we want to feel like we can trust the process," Scott asserts.
 
 As January 18th approaches, the legal and public communities are left pondering: Will the Indiana Supreme Court's decisions untangle the legal knot in the Delphi murder case, paving the way for a fair trial and, ultimately, justice for the victims? The answer to this question remains shrouded in the unfolding legal drama.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com