Is the Delphi murder case a straightforward criminal investigation or a labyrinth of legal technicalities and ethical questions? This critical query forms the backdrop of a compelling discussion on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, where host Tony Brueski delves deep into the case's complexities with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke.
 
 January 18th marks a crucial day in the legal saga surrounding Richard Allen, the man accused in the Delphi murders. A new hearing is set to review a second writ motion before the Indiana Supreme Court, where three significant points will be argued: the trial date, the reinstatement of Allen's former attorneys, and the request for Judge Gull's removal.
 
 Dreeke, not a lawyer but an experienced investigator, shares his insights: "These two [attorneys] are so dedicated to trying his case... That's who you want on your side." He emphasizes their commitment and the unusual nature of their dismissal, noting, "I've never heard of that before."
 
 The conversation shifts to the violations of Allen's Sixth Amendment rights, with Brueski pointing out the lack of a proper hearing in the attorney's removal. "None of these things were ever addressed," he states, underlining the unusual legal proceedings in this case. Dreeke concurs, expressing his confusion and concern over the judicial decisions made thus far.
 
 The podcast further explores the transfer of Allen to another maximum-security prison, a move Brueski labels as a possible "bad decision snowball." This term captures the essence of the case – a series of questionable decisions that might have exacerbated the situation. Dreeke agrees, preferring the notion of a series of bad decisions over a complex conspiracy theory, given the difficulty in maintaining secrecy with so many involved parties.
 
 As they dissect the case, Brueski and Dreeke ponder the potential implications of the upcoming Supreme Court hearing. They discuss the possibility of Baldwin and Rozzi's knowledge playing a role in their removal and the broader implications of their reinstatement. Dreeke says, "If they're legally barred, practicing lawyers... I don't understand why they can't [be reinstated]."
 
 As the discussion concludes, Brueski reflects on the potential for incompetence rather than conspiracy in the handling of the case. He suggests that the series of legal missteps could result from borderline incompetence, leading to a perception of a cover-up. Dreeke echoes this sentiment, emphasizing the importance of state oversight in investigating and rectifying these missteps.
 
 The "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke leaves listeners with a pivotal question: In the Delphi murder case, where justice for two innocent girls hangs in the balance, can the truth be untangled from a web of legal will not only impact Richard Allen and the Delphi community but also set a precedent for legal proceedings in Indiana and possibly beyond.
 
 The fate of Judge Gull in this case remains a point of intense speculation. Her decisions have been a subject of controversy, and the upcoming hearing will scrutinize her role in this tangled legal affair. "The optics are just a little bit too not so good anymore," Brueski remarks, pointing towards the growing mistrust in the judicial process as it has unfolded in this case.
 
 The role of Baldwin and Rozzi is equally critical. Their willingness to represent Allen pro bono underscores a level of dedication that raises questions about their abrupt removal. "They're above and beyond their job," Dreeke observes, highlighting the anomaly in their dismissal and the potential breach of Allen's constitutional rights.
 
 Moreover, the podcast sheds light on the broader implications of this case for the legal system. It's not just about a single trial but the integrity of the judicial process. Dreeke's expertise in behavioral analysis offers a unique perspective, sugge