Could a typical CVS pharmacy worker just decide on an impromptu afternoon walk to commit a chilling crime? Or was the act the bizarre impulse of an elusive group of Odinists? As layers unravel in the Delphi case, more questions than answers seem to emerge.
 
 The podcast "Hidden Killers" hosted a profound discussion between Tony Brueski and former FBI Special Agent and contributor, Jennifer Coffindaffer, dissecting the peculiar details surrounding Richard Allen's implication in the murders. The heart of their conversation? A concerning lack of concrete evidence and a mysterious confession.
 
 Brueski commenced by highlighting the difficulty in discerning the most plausible theory: "You try to look at both theories here and go, what are the odds that the CVS pharmacy worker is going out for a walk and he just randomly decides to kill two young girls on that walk?" Meanwhile, Coffindaffer echoes similar sentiments, emphasizing her unease over the manner of Allen's arrest and subsequent treatment, particularly given the shaky grounds of the evidence.
 
 According to Coffindaffer, one of the prosecution's primary ties to Allen is tool mark evidence, which connects a bullet to the crime scene. She raises concerns regarding the reliability of this method, noting, "tool mark evidence is a bit of a pseudoscience. It's not exact." The debate lies in whether the marks on the bullet can be precisely attributed to Allen's weapon, given the variable factors surrounding the bullet's extraction.
 
 Yet, despite the insufficient evidence linking Allen to the crime scene, what is most confounding is his own confession to his wife and mother. Brueski queries, "Was that [confession] under duress? And, if you're going to believe that it was under duress, then you kind of got to go along with some of the Odinistic stuff, because that's how that was phrased." These statements, laden with ambiguity, form the crux of the case, as Coffindaffer asserts. The underlying question is whether Allen's confessions revealed previously unknown information about the crime or were mere exclamations borne out of exasperation.
 
 The theory that Allen might have been under the influence of Odinistic guards when he made these confessions introduces an element of salaciousness to the narrative. Coffindaffer articulates the psychological toll that sudden imprisonment might take on an individual, especially someone accustomed to the freedoms of everyday life. "I would think that would also possibly elicit a false confession for somebody that's just gotten to the point of feeling mad," she suggests.
 
 The incarceration conditions Allen faces are stringent. These extreme conditions have ignited debate over whether they might influence or force Allen into a false confession, potentially leading to further complications if the case goes to appeal.
 
 With so many intertwined complexities and a paucity of clear-cut evidence, it's no wonder Coffindaffer admits to being "50%... it could be him and 50%... it couldn't be him." There seems to be a consensus between her and Brueski that the prosecution might find themselves in troubled waters should the case move to the appeal phase.
 
 In conclusion, the Delphi case stands out as a compelling mosaic of theories, allegations, and intricate details that challenge conventional wisdom on criminal justice and evidence evaluation. As the case proceeds, one can't help but ponder: In our quest for justice, are we ignoring the glaring gaps or are we simply too eager to find a culprit?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mo