Get .1 ASHA CEU hereYou are preparing for a speech and language evaluation. You’ve read through the client / student’s file, (previous IEP, intake form, etc.), maybe you’ve conducted an interview with other stakeholders, and you have the general sketch of what issues need to be assessed. You start thinking about how you want to measure these areas. Likely you are thinking about which tests you might want to give and why. Every SLP has gone through this process, and most of us move forward with the assessment prioritizing the use of norm-referenced tests.We as SLPs heavily rely on norm-referenced measures (per several articles we reviewed). While norm-referenced measures have their place and serve a very specific purpose, these tests are not well suited to designing individualized treatment. In this episode we dive into the literature to explore the pros and cons of the standardized assessment, when they serve a purpose, and why they should not be used to drive individualized treatment plans.Join us, be our nerdy friends and take a dive into the literature (in our time machine back to 1991). Let’s explore the culture of norm-referenced assessments, why it is the way it is and what we can (and should) do about it.This episode is offered for 1 ASHA CMH (equal to .1 ASHA CEU). If you have questions about CEUs or how this works, please see our How It Works or ASHA Professional Development pages.Learning Outcomes1. Identify at least 1 ethical underpinnings of assessment and the overall purpose of assessments2. Identify at least 2 fundamental components of assessment3. Identify at least 3 components of a standardized assessment and how to report use of any modificationsReferencesAustin, L. (2010). Dynamic Assessment: Whys and Hows. Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 11(3), 80-87. doi:10.1044/sbi11.3.80Eichstadt, T. (2016). Best Assessment Ever? You. The ASHA Leader, 21(3), 32-33. doi:10.1044/leader.scm.21032016.32Ebert, K. D., & Pham, G. (2017). Synthesizing Information From Language Samples and Standardized Tests in School-Age Bilingual Assessment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(1), 42-55. doi:10.1044/2016_lshss-16-0007Fulcher-Rood, K., Castilla-Earls, A., & Higginbotham, J. (2019). Diagnostic Decisions in Child Language Assessment: Findings From a Case Review Assessment Task. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(3), 385-398. doi:10.1044/2019_lshss-18-0044Maloney, E. S., & Larrivee, L. S. (2007). Limitations of Age-Equivalent Scores in Reporting the Results of Norm-Referenced Tests. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 34(Fall), 86-93. doi:10.1044/cicsd_34_f_86Prath, S. (2019). Using Informal Measures to Separate Language Impairment From Language Influence When Working With Diverse Students. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 4(5), 1121-1127. doi:10.1044/2019_pers-sig16-2019-0002Power-Defur, L., & Flynn, P. (2012). Unpacking the Standards for Intervention. Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 13(1), 11-16. doi:10.1044/sbi13.1.11Wilson, K. S., Blackmon, R. C., Hall, R. E., & Elcholtz, G. E. (1991). Methods of Language Assessment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22(4), 236-241. doi:10.1044/0161-1461.2204.236Online ResourcesASHA Practice Portal: Assessment Tools, Techniques, and Data Sources: https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/late-language-emergence/assessment-tools-techniques-and-data-sources/The Informed SLP: https://www.theinformedslp.com/qa_standardized_tests.htmlDisclosures:Financial: Kate Grandbois is the owner / founder of Grandbois Therapy + Consulting, LLC and co-founder of SLP Nerdcast. Amy Wonkka is an employee of a public school system and co-founder of SLP Nerdcast.Non-financial: Kate and Amy are both members of ASHA, SIG 12, and both serve on the AAC Advisory Group for Massachusetts Advocates for Children. Kate is a member of the Berkshire Association for Behavior Analysis and Therapy (BABAT), MassABA, the