Get .1 ASHA CEU hereWhether we like it or not, we (as SLPs) share a lot of “territory” with behaviorally oriented professionals. While we like to feel like we own the majority of the real estate on Communication Island, the truth is we share it with several other professionals (teachers, neuropsychologists, etc.) including BCBAs. Similarly, BCBAs feel that they own the majority of the real estate on Behavior Island, even though several articles we reviewed consider writing functional behavior assessments within our “tool box.” As we discussed in an earlier episode (see Collaborating with BCBAs) this feeling of “ownership” can be a real show stopper. This is a big problem when we have students / clients who are complex learners and benefit from structured behavioral interventions and communicate with augmentative alternative communication strategies.Using augmentative alternative communication within the context of a behavior plan is a clinical issue that should visit both islands. There are AAC users with complex behavior needs that require the expertise of a BCBA, and there are individuals under the care of a BCBA without functional speech who need an SLP to evaluate and prescribe AAC strategies. When a situation arises that requires the expertise of both professions it is crucial that we know our roles and responsibilities, where our scope of competence ends, what to do when a communication tool isn’t supported within an environment and / or behavior plan, and how we can effectively collaborate with one another to benefit our client. Only through effective collaboration can we build bridges between these isolated islands and make treatment more effective for our students and clients.Tune in for an hour of commentary and literature review about collaboration specifically related to AAC within the context of behavioral programming. Learn about scope of competence, roles and responsibilities, and how to meet in the middle at Collaboration Station (get it?)This episode is offered for 1 ASHA CMH (equal to .1 ASHA CEU). If you have questions about CEUs or how this works, please see our How It Works or ASHA Professional Development pages.Learning Outcomes1. Identify roles and responsibilities when collaborating around AAC within a behavior plan2. Identify when to modify a tool or select a different tool for integration into a behavior plan3. Identify environmental variables that may play a role in tool modification for behavior plan integrationReferencesDrumb, L. (2018). Analysis of Collaboration between Board Certified Behavior Analysts and Educators to Address Challenging Behaviors [ProQuest LLC]. In ProQuest LLC.Brodhead M. T. (2015). Maintaining Professional Relationships in an Interdisciplinary Setting: Strategies for Navigating Nonbehavioral Treatment Recommendations for Individuals with Autism. Behavior analysis in practice, 8(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0042-7Kelly, A., & Tincani, M. (2013). Collaborative training and practice among applied behavior analysts who support individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 120–131.MORGAN, L. (2020). Building Working Relationships With Applied Behavior Analysts: Interprofessional collaboration can help clients become better communicators. ASHA Leader, 25(3), 8–9. https://doi-org.proxy18.noblenet.org/10.1044/leader.fmp.25042020.8Mitteer, D. R., Randall, K. R., Van Winkle, L. J., & Greer, B. D. (2020). Incorporating discriminative stimuli into functional communication training with augmentative and alternative communication devices: a tutorial. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 1–8. https://doi-org.proxy18.noblenet.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1731761Andzik, N. R., Cannella-Malone, H. I., & Sigafoos, J. (2016). Practitioner-Implemented Functional Communication Training: A Review of the Literature. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(2), 79–89