Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

Dr Thomas Roulet on Negative Social Evaluations: the science behind the ways we judge each other

Dr Thomas Roulet on Negative Social Evaluations: the science behind the ways we judge each other

FromThe Human Risk Podcast


Dr Thomas Roulet on Negative Social Evaluations: the science behind the ways we judge each other

FromThe Human Risk Podcast

ratings:
Length:
58 minutes
Released:
Oct 8, 2020
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

We all instinctively know the impact negative reviews have on individuals and organizations; whether TripAdvisor ratings or publicly administered regulatory sanctions. It's not good. Yet there are many people and organisations thriving on precisely that. Sometimes, negative social evaluations, might actually not be a bad thing.My guest, Dr Thomas Roulet of Cambridge University, has just written a book called 'The Power of Being Divisive; Understanding Negative Social Evaluations'. In our discussion, we explore why divisive politicians can benefit from negative perceptions and why banks who are publicly admonished for bad behaviour, can actually make more money. It's fascinating, often counter-intuitive stuff. In a world where all of us can rate others and be rated ourselves, understanding how we perceive ratings, is highly valuable.For more on Thomas visit his website: https://www.thomasroulet.com/Thomas_Roulet.htmlYou'll also find him on Twitter: https://twitter.com/thomrouletHis book The Power Of Being Divisive: https://bit.ly/34BEY1V
Released:
Oct 8, 2020
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (100)

People are often described as the largest asset in most organisations. They are also the biggest single cause of risk. This podcast explores the topic of 'human risk', or "the risk of people doing things they shouldn't or not doing things they should", and examines how behavioural science can help us mitigate it. It also looks at 'human reward', or "how to get the most out of people". When we manage human risk, we often stifle human reward. Equally, when we unleash human reward, we often inadvertently increase human risk.