3 min listen
MPEP Q & A 31: Applicant Action After Invention is Found Obvious
MPEP Q & A 31: Applicant Action After Invention is Found Obvious
ratings:
Length:
4 minutes
Released:
Sep 2, 2016
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
Question: Once Office personnel have established the Graham factual findings and concluded that the claimed invention would have been obvious, what must the applicant do? Answer: Once Office personnel have established the Graham factual findings and concluded that the claimed invention would have been obvious, the burden then shifts to the applicant to: show that the Office erred in these findings or provide other evidence to show that the claimed subject matter would have been nonobvious. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 2100 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Patentability. The answer is from…
The post MPEP Q & A 31: Applicant Action After Invention is Found Obvious appeared first on Patent Education Series.
The post MPEP Q & A 31: Applicant Action After Invention is Found Obvious appeared first on Patent Education Series.
Released:
Sep 2, 2016
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (100)
MPEP Q & A 10: Contesting an Objection: Question: What is one way an applicant may contest an objection? Answer: An applicant may contest an objection by: asking the examiner to reconsider it. filing a petition to the Commissioner. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast