Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

MPEP Q & A 31: Applicant Action After Invention is Found Obvious

MPEP Q & A 31: Applicant Action After Invention is Found Obvious

FromPatent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast


MPEP Q & A 31: Applicant Action After Invention is Found Obvious

FromPatent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

ratings:
Length:
4 minutes
Released:
Sep 2, 2016
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

Question: Once Office personnel have established the Graham factual findings and concluded that the claimed invention would have been obvious, what must the applicant do? Answer: Once Office personnel have established the Graham factual findings and concluded that the claimed invention would have been obvious, the burden then shifts to the applicant to: show that the Office erred in these findings or provide other evidence to show that the claimed subject matter would have been nonobvious. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 2100 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Patentability. The answer is from…
The post MPEP Q & A 31: Applicant Action After Invention is Found Obvious appeared first on Patent Education Series.
Released:
Sep 2, 2016
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (100)

Patent Bar Review