3 min listen
MPEP Q & A 90: Conditions an Examiner Should Check for Before Requiring Applicant to Add Claim to Provoke Interference
MPEP Q & A 90: Conditions an Examiner Should Check for Before Requiring Applicant to Add Claim to Provoke Interference
ratings:
Length:
4 minutes
Released:
May 16, 2017
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
Question: What 5 conditions should an examiner check for before requiring an applicant to add a claim to provoke an interference? Answer: The 5 conditions an examiner should check for before requiring an applicant to add a claim to provoke an interference include: that the application is otherwise completed that the required claim does not encompass prior art or would not otherwise be barred that the applicant has not stated that the commonly described subject matter is not the applicant’s invention that the application provides adequate support under 35 U.S.C. 112, 1st paragraph for the subject matter of the required claim…
The post MPEP Q & A 90: Conditions an Examiner Should Check for Before Requiring Applicant to Add Claim to Provoke Interference appeared first on Patent Education Series.
The post MPEP Q & A 90: Conditions an Examiner Should Check for Before Requiring Applicant to Add Claim to Provoke Interference appeared first on Patent Education Series.
Released:
May 16, 2017
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (100)
MPEP Q & A 3: Significant Differences Between Nonprovisional and Provisional Applications: Question: List two significant differences between nonprovisional applications and provisional applications. Answer: The following list includes significant differences between nonprovisional applications and provisional applications: No claim is requi... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast