Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

MPEP Q & A 90: Conditions an Examiner Should Check for Before Requiring Applicant to Add Claim to Provoke Interference

MPEP Q & A 90: Conditions an Examiner Should Check for Before Requiring Applicant to Add Claim to Provoke Interference

FromPatent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast


MPEP Q & A 90: Conditions an Examiner Should Check for Before Requiring Applicant to Add Claim to Provoke Interference

FromPatent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

ratings:
Length:
4 minutes
Released:
May 16, 2017
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

Question: What 5 conditions should an examiner check for before requiring an applicant to add a claim to provoke an interference? Answer: The 5 conditions an examiner should check for before requiring an applicant to add a claim to provoke an interference include:  that the application is otherwise completed  that the required claim does not encompass prior art or would not otherwise be barred  that the applicant has not stated that the commonly described subject matter is not the applicant’s invention  that the application provides adequate support under 35 U.S.C. 112, 1st paragraph for the subject matter of the required claim…
The post MPEP Q & A 90: Conditions an Examiner Should Check for Before Requiring Applicant to Add Claim to Provoke Interference appeared first on Patent Education Series.
Released:
May 16, 2017
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (100)

Patent Bar Review