3 min listen
MPEP Q & A 5: Situations in Which Drawings are Not Considered Necessary
MPEP Q & A 5: Situations in Which Drawings are Not Considered Necessary
ratings:
Length:
3 minutes
Released:
Jun 3, 2016
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
Question: List a situation in which drawings are usually not considered necessary for the understanding of the invention. Answer: It has been USPTO practice to treat an application that contains at least one process or method claim as an application for which a drawing is not necessary for an understanding of the invention. Other situations in which drawings are usually not considered necessary for the understanding of the invention are: Coated articles or products; Articles made from a particular material or composition; Laminated structures; Articles, apparatus, or systems where sole distinguishing feature is presence of a particular material. Chapter Details:…
The post MPEP Q & A 5: Situations in Which Drawings are Not Considered Necessary appeared first on Patent Education Series.
The post MPEP Q & A 5: Situations in Which Drawings are Not Considered Necessary appeared first on Patent Education Series.
Released:
Jun 3, 2016
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (100)
MPEP Q & A 10: Contesting an Objection: Question: What is one way an applicant may contest an objection? Answer: An applicant may contest an objection by: asking the examiner to reconsider it. filing a petition to the Commissioner. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast