Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

February 2020 Davis v. Davis

February 2020 Davis v. Davis

FromOral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia


February 2020 Davis v. Davis

FromOral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia

ratings:
Length:
32 minutes
Released:
Mar 6, 2020
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

This podcast is provided by Ben Glass and Steve Emmert www.BenGlassReferrals.com - www.Virginia-Appeals.com   Granted Appeal Summary Case BRIAN I. DAVIS v. MERYL R. DAVIS (Record Number 180040) From The Court of Appeals of Virginia. Counsel Deborah L. McIntyre-Yurkovich (McIntyre DeFede Law PLLC) for appellant. David M. Zangrilli (Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.) for appellee. Assignments of Error 1. The Court of Appeals erred in applying an improper legal standard when affirming the trial court’s decision that the Husband will be required to deplete his assets to satisfy the spousal support award. 2. The Court of Appeals erred in holding that the Husband’s depletion of assets to satisfy the spousal support award is not in the reasonable foreseeable future. 3. The Court of Appeals erred in finding that Husband had a continuing obligation to support Wife when the parties are now similarly situated. 4. The Court of Appeals erred in incorrectly balancing the Husband’s ability to pay with the Wife’s financial needs. Assignments of Cross-Error 1. The Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s granting of the Appellant’s Motion and modifying spousal support, in light of the facts that: the evidence showed that Appellant had the ability to continue to pay the previously ordered spousal support, Appellant’s financial circumstances have improved since the last support order, Appellant’s standard of living has increased since the last support order, and Appellant’s living expenses are excessive. 2. The Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s granting of the Appellant’s Motion and modifying spousal support, in light of the fact that the evidence proved that Appellee’s receipt of social security income has not reduced her need for support, and her current standard of living is lower than during the marriage. http://www.courts.state.va.us/courts/scv/appeals/180040.pdf
Released:
Mar 6, 2020
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (100)

Public domain audio of oral arguments from the Supreme Court of Virginia. Whether you're a lawyer, law student, or just an interested citizen, this podcast is a great way to learn how the Supreme Court of Virginia operates and what's expected of each side in a case. Not affiliated with the Supreme Court of VA. Created by entrepreneurs.