Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

April 2020 Mackey v. McDannald, etc., et al-

April 2020 Mackey v. McDannald, etc., et al-

FromOral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia


April 2020 Mackey v. McDannald, etc., et al-

FromOral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia

ratings:
Length:
33 minutes
Released:
May 6, 2020
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

This podcast is provided by Ben Glass and Steve Emmert www.BenGlassReferrals.com - www.Virginia-Appeals.com Granted Appeal Summary Case G. NELSON MACKEY, JR. v. HARRIOTTE DODSON MCDANNALD, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF E. GRIFFITH DODSON, JR., ET AL. (Record Number 190671) From The Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke; H. Franklin, Jr., Judge. Counsel Timothy E. Kirtner (Gilmer, Sadler, Ingram, Sutherland, & Hutton) for appellant. James J. O’Keeffe, IV (Johnson, Rosen, & O’Keeffe, LLC); Anthony M. Segura and Arthur P. Strickland (Strickland, Diviney & Segura); and Matt J. O’Herron (O’Herron Law PLLC) for appellees. Assignments of Error 1. The trial court erred in holding, pursuant to § 8.01-229(D) of the Code of Virginia, that the statute of limitations applicable to Appellees’ conversion claims was tolled by Appellant’s alleged statement to Quinn, which occurred before Appellant had committed any allegedly wrongful or tortious act and before any cause of action arose. 2. The trial court erred in finding that Appellant committed an affirmative act or misrepresentation intended to conceal the conversion claims. 3. The trial court erred in applying § 8.01-229(D) to Urso’s and McDannald’s claims based upon a statement that was not directed to them or communicated to them. 4. The trial court erred in concluding that the stock and case [sic] were not assets of the firm of Dodson, Pence, Viar, Woodrum & Mackey. 5. The trial court erred in finding for the Appellees on their conversion claims where Appellees failed to prove they had a current possessory interest in the stock and cash at the time it was allegedly converted. http://www.courts.state.va.us/courts/scv/appeals/190671.pdf
Released:
May 6, 2020
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (100)

Public domain audio of oral arguments from the Supreme Court of Virginia. Whether you're a lawyer, law student, or just an interested citizen, this podcast is a great way to learn how the Supreme Court of Virginia operates and what's expected of each side in a case. Not affiliated with the Supreme Court of VA. Created by entrepreneurs.