Bible Study Guide: 1 Corinthians Volume II: Ancient Words Bible Study Series

By Andrew J. Lamont-Turner

Welcome to Volume 2 of the Verse-by-verse study of the Book of 1 Corinthians chapers 9 to 16. Step into a world of ancient challenges, timeless truths, and transformative wisdom. In "Bible Study Guide: 1 Corinthians," journey through the depths of Paul's heartfelt letters to the Corinthians and discover a wellspring of guidance for your own life. Join a vibrant community wrestling with divisions, moral dilemmas, and the pursuit of wisdom. As you turn each page, you'll encounter Paul's powerful words that transcend time, speaking directly to the complexities of your modern world. Uncover the secrets of true wisdom and the transformative power of love. Explore the dynamics of leadership, relationships, and the profound calling to live as members of the body of Christ. Dive into the depths of freedom, holiness, and the empowering presence of the Holy Spirit. Prepare to be challenged, inspired, and equipped to navigate life's challenges with confidence and grace. Discover how the unchanging truths of God's Word can shape your perspective, transform your relationships, and bring hope to a hurting world. Are you ready to embark on a journey that will ignite your faith, deepen your understanding, and empower your life? Get ready to unveil the wisdom of 1 Corinthians and unlock the transformative power of God's Word within your own story.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Andrew J. Lamont-Turner
• Release date: Apr 19, 2024
• ISBN: 9798224138944

Andrew J. Lamont-Turner

Andrew Lamont-Turner is a theological scholar, author, and Bible teacher who has dedicated his life to pursuing theological knowledge and disseminating spiritual wisdom. With a profound understanding of the scriptures and a passion for teaching, Andrew has emerged as a leading voice in the field of theology. His extensive academic qualifications and love for God and his family have shaped him into a multifaceted individual committed to nurturing spiritual growth and intellectual exploration. Academic Journey: Andrew's academic journey reflects his thirst for theological understanding. He holds a Bachelor of Theology, Bachelor of Theology (Honours), Master of Theology, and a Doctor of Philosophy in Theology. These qualifications represent years of rigorous study and a commitment to excellence in his field. Furthermore, Andrew's intellectual curiosity extends beyond theology, as he also possesses a Bachelor of Education (Honours) and several Postgraduate Certificates in various commercial fields. This interdisciplinary approach has enriched his perspective and broadened his ability to connect theological principles with everyday life. Teaching and Writing: Andrew's knowledge of theology has been expressed through his teaching and writing endeavours. As an educator, he has inspired countless students through his engaging lectures and insights into the scriptures. His ability to distil complex theological concepts into accessible teachings has garnered him a reputation as an exceptional communicator. In addition to his teaching, Andrew is a prolific author who has published several books and a comprehensive Bible study series. His books delve into various aspects of Christian theology, offering insights, practical guidance, and thought-provoking reflections. With meticulous research, clear exposition, and a genuine desire to bridge the gap between academic theology and everyday faith, Andrew's writings have touched the lives of many, nurturing their spiritual growth and deepening their understanding of God's Word. Pastoral Leadership: Living his faith ensures Andrew takes his Pastoral Leadership very seriously. He is the Pastor of a community church in rural South Africa, where he ensures the flock entrusted to him by God is well-fed and looked after.

Book preview

PART 2: Verse-By-Verse Study

1 Corinthians Chapter 9:1-27

Paul Surrenders His Rights

The absence of the phrase now concerning in this chapter hints that it's not a departure but a continuation of Paul's discourse, initiated in 1 Corinthians 8:1, addressing the complex issue of eating food sacrificed to idols. Paul, recognising the need for further guidance, employs his behaviour as a model to elucidate the delicate balance between personal liberty and communal responsibility in Christ.

It's evident that the Corinthians had misconstrued Paul's stance, assuming his reluctance to exercise certain rights implied their absence altogether, as seen in his decision not to accept material support from them (2 Corinthians 12:13). This ambiguity led some to doubt his apostolic authority, exacerbated by apparent inconsistencies such as his dining practices among different groups (eating with Gentiles but not Jews), a matter he had addressed earlier in the letter.

Throughout his correspondence, Paul confronts the Corinthians' resistance to his authority, which is evident in their failure to submit to his teaching (1 Corinthians 4:1–5; 5–6; also noted in 14:36–37). This chapter presented an opportune moment for Paul to address this underlying issue within the appropriate context.

⁹:¹ Am I not free? Am I not an apostle? Haven’t I seen Jesus Christ, our Lord? Aren’t you my work in the Lord? 

The apostle Paul employs a series of rhetorical questions, each designed to elicit an affirmative response to emphasise his freedom and apostleship. Beginning with Am I not free? he affirms his enjoyment of the same liberty available to all believers.

Continuing, he asks, Am I not an apostle? Here, Paul underscores his divine calling and the privileges inherent in his apostleship. He substantiates this claim by referencing his encounter with the resurrected Christ on the road to Damascus (Acts 22:14-15; 26:15-18), a pivotal moment that marked the inception of his ministry. Corinth, where he established a church (compare Romans 15:15-21), served as a testament to his apostolic authority, as affirmed in Acts 1:21-22.

The Corinthians' perception of Paul's apostleship was tested, as evidenced by various challenges and accusations he faced (see 1 Corinthians 1:12, 4:1-5, 8-13, 14-21, and 5:1-2). Through these questions and reflections on his ministry, Paul asserts his authority and underscores the authenticity of his apostleship.

⁹:² If to others I am not an apostle, yet at least I am to you; for you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord. 

Having directly experienced Paul's ministry, the Christians in Corinth served as living proof of his apostleship. Their faith and transformation under his guidance were a testament to his legitimacy as an apostle. While doubts may have arisen among others, the Corinthians validated Paul's apostolic authority, affirming his status beyond question.

Central to the discourse is the issue of whether Paul had a legitimate claim to financial support from the Corinthian church. This question permeates the entire passage, reflecting the complexities of support for itinerant preachers in the Greco-Roman world.

During this era, travelling philosophers and missionaries relied on various support means, including fees, patronage, begging, or manual labour. Each method had its advocates and detractors, with some believing certain approaches compromised the dignity of their mission.

Paul's approach differed from simply justifying his decision to forgo financial support; he sought to establish his entitlement. This distinction was crucial, given the Corinthians' challenge to his apostolic rights. They questioned his choice to engage in manual labour and whether he possessed apostolic rights, leading Paul to address these misconceptions directly.

⁹:³ My defence to those who examine me is this. 

Paul, recognising the need to address those questioning his decision to relinquish his apostolic rights, declared his intention to defend himself through a written letter. This resolve reflects his commitment to clarifying misunderstandings and reaffirming his apostolic authority. By choosing the medium of a letter, Paul aimed to articulate his rationale clearly and comprehensively, ensuring that his message would reach its intended audience and stand as a testament to his convictions. This decision underscores Paul's dedication to defending the integrity of his ministry and upholding the principles of faith and service in Christ.

⁹:⁴ Have we no right to eat and to drink? 

Paul employs a series of rhetorical questions to compel the Corinthians to recognise a truth that should have been evident to them: his rightful possession of full apostolic rights. This series of inquiries is a rhetorical device to emphasise his entitlement to these privileges.

In particular, Paul's mention of eating and drinking likely alludes to the provision of material sustenance, indicating his readiness to accept financial support for his ministry. This interpretation is supported by the subsequent enumeration of additional rights.

By framing his argument in this manner, Paul underscores his willingness to receive assistance from the Corinthians, highlighting the mutual responsibility between ministers and congregations in supporting the work of the Gospel. This rhetorical strategy challenges doubts regarding his apostolic authority and emphasises the legitimacy of his claim to receive support from those he serves.

⁹:⁵ Have we no right to take along a wife who is a believer, even as the rest of the apostles, the brothers of the Lord, and Cephas? 

It appears to have been a common practice among the other apostles and the close relatives of Jesus, known as the bodily brethren, to travel with their spouses while engaged in ministry. In many instances, the churches they served bore the expenses associated with both the apostles and their wives. Paul may have specifically mentioned Peter, also known as Cephas, possibly because of his significant influence and following in Corinth, as noted earlier in 1 Corinthians 1:12.

The mention of the Lord's brothers in the preceding verse and Barnabas in the subsequent verse does not necessarily imply that these individuals had visited Corinth. Instead, it suggests that the Corinthians may have been acquainted with their ministry through second-hand reports or accounts. This acknowledgement underscores the context of ministry support within the early Christian community, where expenses for apostolic missions often extended to include their companions.

⁹:⁶ Or have only Barnabas and I no right to not work? 

The Corinthians acknowledged the rights of other apostles to abstain from secular work, recognising their entitlement to financial support from the communities they served. However, both Paul and Barnabas opted to engage in manual labour at times to avoid burdening their converts with the responsibility of providing for them (1 Corinthians 4:12; 1 Thessalonians 2:9; 2 Thessalonians 3:7-9; Acts 20:34).

The teachings of Barnabas, Paul's companion in ministry, had significant influence and were widely disseminated. During Paul's ministry in Corinth (as documented in Acts 18:3), he engaged in the humble occupation of tentmaking, a profession regarded as menial by the Corinthians. Some Corinthians interpreted Paul's actions as an indication that he did not consider himself worthy of support, believing that he did not regard himself as equal to other apostles due to his willingness to engage in manual labour. This perception reflects the Corinthians' misunderstanding of Paul's motives. It underscores his challenges in asserting his apostolic authority while maintaining humility and sensitivity to cultural perceptions.

⁹:⁷ What soldier ever serves at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard and doesn’t eat its fruit? Or who feeds a flock and doesn’t drink from the flock’s milk? 

Paul presents six arguments to support his assertion that those who work in ministry have the right to receive wages, as detailed in the following verses.

Standard Practice: Paul establishes the principle by referencing common societal norms. Just as soldiers, farmers, and shepherds expect compensation for their labour, so too should those who serve as ministers of the Lord.

Authority as a Servant of the Lord: Paul provides three examples from everyday life to illustrate his authority to receive financial support as a servant of the Lord. This underscores the legitimacy of his claim and aligns with the broader understanding of supporting those engaged in religious service.

Equality with Other Professions: Paul emphasises that servants of the Lord should not be considered inferior to individuals in other professions. Like soldiers, farmers, and shepherds, they deserve fair compensation for their work. This argument challenges any notion of hierarchy or lower status assigned to ministers of the Gospel compared to other occupations.

By employing these arguments, Paul underscores the validity of receiving financial support for ministry work. He challenges any perception of inferiority or unworthiness associated with it. He asserts the importance of recognising and valuing the labour of those who dedicate themselves to serving the Lord and spreading His message.

⁹:⁸ Do I speak these things according to the ways of men? Or doesn’t the law also say the same thing? ⁹:⁹ For it is written in the law of Moses, You shall not muzzle an ox while it treads out the grain. Is it for the oxen that God cares, 

Secondly, Paul draws on the Old Testament to bolster his argument, highlighting the precedent of compensating those who serve. He references Deuteronomy 25:4, where God instituted a provision in the Mosaic Law to care for oxen used in threshing grain. Paul interprets this provision as a demonstration of God's concern for the well-being of all who engage in service, extending beyond animal welfare to human labourers.

It's important to consider the cultural context of Paul's audience. In Greek society, physical labour was often looked down upon, with slaves typically tasked with such tasks. At the same time, free citizens pursued activities like sports and philosophy. In contrast, Jewish culture highly valued lawful employment, viewing it as honourable and worthy of compensation.

By invoking the Old Testament precedent and addressing cultural attitudes towards physical labour, Paul underscores the importance of compensating those who serve, emphasising the principle of fairness and care for all who contribute to the community. This argument validates the practice of supporting those engaged in ministry and challenges any societal biases against manual labour.

⁹:¹⁰ or does he say it assuredly for our sake? Yes, it was written for our sake because he who plows ought to plow in hope, and who threshes in hope should partake of his hope. 

In instituting provisions for the welfare of working animals, God's intention was to instil a broader principle: the encouragement of those who labour in the earthly realm. This divine directive underscored the expectation that human labourers should engage in their work with the anticipation of fair compensation. Those who benefit from the services rendered by others bear a moral obligation to ensure just remuneration for their labour, recognising the inherent worth and dignity of the labourer.

Paul astutely grasped the underlying message conveyed by the proverbial idiom not muzzling an ox, interpreting it as a call for equitable compensation. While originally a proverbial expression concerning animal welfare, Paul applies it to human labour, recognising its broader significance in advocating for fair treatment and just remuneration in all spheres of work.

This interpretation reflects a common practice of applying proverbial wisdom to contemporary situations, analogous to the modern usage of phrases like You can't teach an old dog new tricks, which extends beyond its literal meaning to address broader principles or circumstances. Paul's recognition and application of this wisdom highlight his keen insight into the principles of fairness and justice in labour relations, underscoring the importance of treating workers with dignity and respect.

⁹:¹¹ If we sowed to you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we reap your fleshly things? 

Paul's argument further supports the fundamental principle of reciprocity within communities. While spiritual matters hold greater eternal significance than material concerns, the transient nature of material possessions underscores the importance of mutual support and reciprocity among believers. If spiritual benefits are received from ministry, then it is only fitting that those who benefit spiritually also provide physical support to those who minister to them (cf. Galatians 6:6).

Paul's intention in presenting this argument is not mere encouragement but rather a vigorous dispute with the Corinthians, as evidenced by his rhetorical question, Is it too much? This rhetorical device challenges the Corinthians to consider the fairness and equity of compensating those who labour in ministry, emphasising the reciprocal relationship between spiritual and material support within the Christian community.

By appealing to the principle of reciprocity and the eternal value of spiritual investments, Paul reinforces the importance of honouring and supporting those engaged in ministry, highlighting the interconnectedness of spiritual and material well-being within the body of believers. This argument underscores Christian community members' mutual responsibilities and obligations, promoting a culture of generosity, gratitude, and mutual support.

⁹:¹² If others take this right over you, don’t we yet more? Nevertheless, we didn’t use this right, but we bear all things, that we may cause no hindrance to the Good News of Christ. 

In addition to the preceding arguments, Paul's thesis is reinforced by the precedent set by the actions of previous Christian leaders. As the primary architect of the Corinthian church, Paul possessed a stronger claim to financial support from the congregation than other preachers. However, rather than asserting his entitlement, Paul chose a different course of action. He opted to provide for himself through manual labour, preempting any accusations that his ministry was motivated by personal gain rather than genuine devotion to the Gospel.

Paul's decision to support himself was strategic, aimed at safeguarding the integrity of his ministry and preempting potential criticisms. By refusing financial support, he demonstrated a commitment to the spiritual well-being of the Corinthians, ensuring that his labour in building the church would not be tainted by perceptions of ulterior motives. This proactive approach mitigated the risk of detractors undermining his efforts. It reinforced the sincerity of his dedication to the Corinthians' spiritual growth.

Paul's example illustrates the principle of selflessness and sacrificial service in ministry. Rather than seeking personal gain, he prioritised the purity and integrity of his mission, setting a precedent for Christian leaders to prioritise the spiritual welfare of their congregations above personal interests. This example is a powerful testimony to the values of humility, integrity, and devotion that should characterise Christian leadership.

⁹:¹³ Don’t you know that those who serve around sacred things eat from the things of the temple, and those who wait on the altar have their portion with the altar? 

Paul draws upon the functioning of the priesthood to bolster his argument. He points to the common practice in both Jewish and pagan religions where those who minister in spiritual matters are entitled to receive material assistance from those they serve. Paul contends that this practice should be similarly upheld within the Christian church, aligning with reciprocity and mutual support principles.

In Jewish tradition, priests were entitled to partake of the offerings brought to the temple and receive their portion from the altar as sustenance (Leviticus 6:16, 26). This practice ensured that those who dedicated themselves to spiritual service were provided materially by the community they served. Paul invokes this principle to argue for the financial support of ministers within the Christian community, emphasising the importance of caring for those who labour in spiritual matters.

By appealing to the example of the priesthood, Paul underscores the legitimacy of receiving material assistance for spiritual service and advocates for its continuation within the Christian church. This argument highlights the interconnectedness of spiritual and material well-being within the faith community, promoting a culture of generosity, support, and reciprocity among believers.

⁹:¹⁴ Even so, the Lord ordained that those who proclaim the Good News should live from the Good News. 

Paul further supports his position by referencing a teaching of Jesus, affirming that those who proclaim the gospel should get their living from the gospel (Matthew 10:10, Luke 10:7). This principle, articulated by Jesus Himself, underscores the right of those engaged in the ministry of proclaiming the gospel to receive material support for their labour.

However, amidst discussions about rights and professionalism, there is a risk of losing sight of the core purpose of this teaching. The essence of this principle lies not in asserting individual rights or entitlements but rather in ensuring the continued proclamation and spread of the gospel. Providing for the material needs of those who dedicate themselves to this task enables the Christian community to focus wholeheartedly on their ministry without distraction.

Paul's reference to Jesus' teaching emphasises the importance of prioritising the proclamation of the gospel above personal concerns or professional rights. It serves as a reminder to focus on the central mission of spreading the Good News, ensuring that discussions about material support do not overshadow the primary goal of advancing the Kingdom of God.

⁹:¹⁵ But I have used none of these things, and I don’t write that it may be done so in my case; for I would rather die, than that anyone should make my boasting void. 

Having passionately argued for his right to receive material support from the Corinthians, Paul now shifts gears. He vehemently asserts his right to relinquish this entitlement, which has been his underlying point from the outset of the discussion. His primary contention is that he can waive this right if he chooses.

Paul delves into the reasons behind his deliberate decision to decline the Corinthians' offer of patronage, providing readers with insight into his character and motivations. This pericope offers a glimpse into what drives and defines Paul as a person and an apostle.

Paul refrains from invoking any preceding arguments to persuade the Corinthians to financially support him. He takes great care to ensure that his discourse on this matter is not misconstrued as a covert plea for assistance. He has resolved to sustain himself through preaching, even though the Lord has not mandated him. Consequently, Paul finds a sense of contentment in his choice, akin to anyone who willingly sacrifices personal comfort for the benefit of others.

Paul's stance underscores his commitment to self-sufficiency and willingness to forego personal entitlements for the sake of the Gospel. This episode illuminates Paul's unwavering dedication to his mission and deep-seated conviction in sacrificial love and service.

⁹:¹⁶ For if I preach the Good News, I have nothing to boast about; for necessity is laid on me; but woe is to me if I don’t preach the Good News. 

Despite his unwavering commitment to proclaiming the gospel, Paul could not find pride in this endeavour because he viewed it as a duty rather than a choice. For him, preaching was not just a task but a calling, a vocation he felt compelled to fulfil. In his perspective, failing to proclaim the gospel would bring dire consequences, as he believed it was a mandate directly from his Lord (Acts 26:16-18; Matthew 28:19-20).

Paul's obligation to share the gospel stemmed from a deep-seated conviction of its importance and urgency. He understood his role as an apostle and messenger of Christ as integral to his identity and purpose. The weight of this responsibility compelled him to preach tirelessly, regardless of personal comfort or recognition.

Paul's commitment to proclaiming the gospel was not driven by personal ambition or pride but by a profound sense of duty and obedience to his Lord. This perspective underscores the seriousness with which he approached his ministry and highlights the sacrificial nature of his service to the Gospel.

⁹:¹⁷ I have a reward if I do this of my own will. But if not of my own will, I have a stewardship entrusted to me. 

Paul understood that if he willingly and enthusiastically spread the good news, the Lord promised him a reward, including monetary compensation, for his efforts. However, suppose he preached the message against his own inclination or will. In that case, he would not be eligible for such a reward because he would merely be fulfilling his role as a steward, a servant entrusted with the responsibility of managing the household of God (cf. 1 Corinthians 4:1-2; Luke 17:7-10).

In this analogy, stewards are tasked with overseeing the affairs of their master's household. Their responsibilities include faithfully carrying out their duties and managing resources entrusted to them. Suppose a steward fulfils these duties faithfully but without enthusiasm or willingness. In that case, they merely fulfil their obligation as servants rather than acting out of genuine dedication and commitment.

For Paul, the promise of reward for his efforts in preaching the gospel was contingent upon his willingness and eagerness to do so. He recognised that his role as an apostle involved more than just fulfilling a duty; it required wholehearted devotion and passionate commitment to his proclaimed message. In embracing this mindset, Paul sought to fulfil his responsibilities and excel in serving God, knowing that his ultimate reward would come from faithfully and fervently serving his Lord.

⁹:¹⁸ What, then, is my reward? When I preach the Good News, I may present the Good News of Christ without charge so as not to abuse my authority in the Good News. 

As a reward for joyfully proclaiming the gospel, Paul was granted the privilege of doing so free of charge to all who listened to him. This opportunity to preach without seeking financial compensation was the greatest reward he ever received. While this choice may seem like Paul's decision, he viewed it as a privilege and reward from the Lord (cf. 2 Corinthians 11:7–12).

As an apostle, Paul possessed the authority to insist on certain rights, including the right to financial support for his ministry. However, he also had the freedom to waive these rights if desired. In exercising this freedom, Paul willingly chose to forego his entitlement to support, viewing it as a sacrifice made out of concern for the well-being of others.

This decision to give up his right to support mirrors his willingness to abstain from eating meat sacrificed to idols, as explained in verse 8:13. In both cases, Paul's primary concern was the welfare of others, prompting him to set aside his own rights and preferences for the greater good.

Paul's choice to preach without charge was not merely a personal decision but a manifestation of his selflessness and concern for others. It exemplifies his commitment to prioritising the needs and spiritual growth of those he ministered above his comfort or entitlements.

Just as Paul was willing to forego his right to financial compensation for the gospel's sake, he exhorts the Corinthian Christians to similarly abstain from consuming meat sacrificed to idols if doing so would undermine their influence among fellow believers.

Paul emphasises the importance of prioritising the spiritual well-being and edification of others over personal freedoms or entitlements. Just as he urged restraint in the previous chapter for the benefit of weaker brothers, he underscores the necessity of refraining from certain actions, even those that are morally neutral, if they hinder the advancement of his ministry.

This passage illuminates Paul's willingness to sacrifice his legal entitlements to serve others. By choosing to conduct his ministry in Corinth without financial compensation, Paul avoided the potential constraints that patronage might have imposed on him. This freedom enabled him to adopt a posture of servanthood, becoming the slave of everyone, as he aptly puts it.

Paul's example underscores the principle of selflessness and sacrificial love in Christian service. He demonstrates a willingness to set aside personal rights and preferences for the greater good, embodying the spirit of humility and servitude that should characterise the lives of all believers.

⁹:¹⁹ For though I was free from all, I brought myself under bondage to all, that I might gain the more. 

Paul was free, not bound as a slave to any human authority. However, as a servant of the Lord, he willingly submitted himself to the authority of every other human being to advance Christ's cause and bring more people to faith. This paradoxical approach reflects Paul's deep commitment to the principle articulated by Jesus in Mark 10:45: For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.

Paul understood that true leadership and influence come not from commanding others but from serving them selflessly. By adopting a posture of humility and servanthood, he sought to emulate the example of Christ Himself, who came not as a ruler to be served but as a servant to serve and give His life for the salvation of humanity.

In aligning himself with this principle, Paul recognised that the most effective strategy for winning people to Christ is through acts of service and sacrificial love. By humbly submitting himself to others and meeting their needs, Paul demonstrated the transformative power of love and service in building relationships and leading others to faith.

Paul's willingness to serve others despite his freedom exemplifies the essence of Christian leadership: selfless devotion to the well-being and salvation of others, following the example set by Jesus Himself.

⁹:²⁰ To the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain Jews; to those who are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain those who are under the law; 

When the apostle Paul found himself in the company of Jews, it was his custom to adapt his behaviour to align with Jewish customs. He did so not out of obligation to the Mosaic Law, as Jesus did not consider Himself subject to it (Romans 6:14), but rather to foster receptivity to his message among the Jewish audience. This strategic approach aimed to prevent hostility towards Paul and his message, as exemplified in Acts 21:20-26.

Paul's primary motivation for adhering to Jewish laws and practices, including dietary restrictions, was the salvation of the Jewish people. These customs were deeply ingrained in Jewish culture. Observing them helped Paul build rapport and credibility within Jewish communities, facilitating his ministry. For instance, Paul had Timothy circumcised in Lystra specifically to enhance his effectiveness in ministering among Jewish audiences (Acts 16:3).

In contrast to Jesus, who transcended the limitations of the Mosaic Law, Paul's pragmatic approach to cultural adaptation reflects his commitment to contextualising the gospel message to various audiences. By respecting Jewish customs and traditions, Paul demonstrated sensitivity to the cultural context in which he ministered, seeking to remove unnecessary stumbling blocks to accepting the gospel among his Jewish brethren.

⁹:²¹ to those who are without law, as without law (not being without law toward God, but under law toward Christ), that I might win those without law. 

Similarly, when Paul was among Gentiles, often referred to as those without the Law, he adjusted his behaviour to align with Gentile customs. This included partaking in their dietary practices and other cultural norms, fostering rapport and facilitating effective communication of the gospel message.

It's important to clarify that when Paul describes Gentiles as being without the Law, he does not imply that they are devoid of morality. As he elucidates elsewhere in Romans 2:14, Gentiles can still exhibit moral behaviour even without adherence to the Mosaic Law. Rather, Paul's designation of Gentiles as without the Law refers specifically to their exemption from the requirements of the Mosaic Law, in contrast to Jewish adherence to it (Romans 2:20).

Paul's distinction between being without the Law (anomos) and being subject to God's authority (ennomos) underscores his recognition that adherence to the Mosaic Law does not define one's relationship with God. Even when he acted consistent with Gentile customs, Paul remained accountable to God's authority and moral standards.

By contextualising his behaviour and terminology, Paul aimed to clarify his approach to ministry among both Jews and Gentiles. His overarching goal was communicating the gospel effectively while navigating diverse audiences' cultural nuances and sensitivities.

As a Christian, Paul was not bound by the Law of Moses but rather by the Law of Christ, as outlined in Galatians 6:2. While the Law of Moses served as God's law for the Jewish people before the time of the Cross, the Law of Christ represents God's law for Christians living in the era of the New Testament. This shift in legal framework reflects the transition from the old covenant to the new covenant established through Christ.

As recorded in the New Testament, the responsibilities and teachings imparted by Christ and His apostles constitute the Law of Christ. While there are similarities between the Mosaic Law and the Law of Christ, the latter supersedes the former, serving as the updated code of conduct for believers under the new covenant.

Though challenging to comprehend, this distinction is crucial, as it underscores Paul's acknowledgement of his indebtedness to God through Christ. By aligning himself with the Law of Christ, Paul affirms his commitment to obedience and submission to God's will revealed through Jesus Christ and His teachings.

Paul's recognition of the Law of Christ emphasises the transformative nature of the Christian faith. It underscores the believer's obligation to live according to the principles and commands of Christ rather than the Mosaic Law. This shift reflects the new covenant relationship