Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Fundamental Duality of Nature
The Fundamental Duality of Nature
The Fundamental Duality of Nature
Ebook54 pages33 minutes

The Fundamental Duality of Nature

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Every generation marvels at the complexity of our
universe. Each of us has to decide whether present
scientific theories adequately explains the way nature
works and how the panoramic view of the heavens on
display each night came to be. The ongoing discovery of
new data from more precise instrumentation, forces
ongoing change to all current theories. We need to take a
closer look at exactly what nature has to work with. All
that our senses allow us to experience comes from the
interactions of nature's fundamental duality.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherAuthorHouse
Release dateJul 28, 2011
ISBN9781463420734
The Fundamental Duality of Nature

Related to The Fundamental Duality of Nature

Related ebooks

Science & Mathematics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The Fundamental Duality of Nature

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    The Fundamental Duality of Nature - Richard Zindell

    © 2011 by Richard Zindell. All rights reserved.

    No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means without the written permission of the author.

    First published by AuthorHouse 10/03/2011

    ISBN: 978-1-4634-2072-7 (sc)

    ISBN: 978-1-4634-2073-4 (ebk)

    Library of Congress Control Number: 2011911130

    Printed in the United States of America

    Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Thinkstock are models, and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.

    Certain stock imagery © Thinkstock.

    This book is printed on acid-free paper.

    Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.

    Contents

    Dedication

    Acknowledgement

    Part 1

    Part 2

    Part 3

    Part 4

    Dedication

    I dedicate this paper to the people I care most about in this world. To my wife Barbie, my daughter Stefi, my daughter Tracy, and my son Scott.

    Acknowledgement

    A big thanks goes out to my daughter, Tracy, whose help was invaluable in the organization and preparation of this paper.

    missing image file

    Part 1

    Something 


    to Believe In

    It is the goal of many scientists to simplify the fundamental set of rules that nature uses to produce the full workings of our universe. They have come to be known as grand unified theories. Most end up attempting to join the four accepted forces of gravity, strong, weak, and electromagnetism. The success of merging three of the four forces at some point of temperature or time more than hints at their commonalities.

    When Einstein was working on his initial theory of relativity, he came upon only two points of certainty that would end up shaping his views. The laws of physics are the same everywhere and the speed of light is constant. If these two simple ideas were true, then a great deal of the beliefs at that time needed to change.

    If we were to craft a grand unified theory from scratch we would likely begin with any points of certainty and analyze the validity of any remaining beliefs. Those that are at odds with these basic certainties may need to be modified.

    So are there concepts that have yet to be budged by the scientific method? The following four statements may be the right place to start.

    1) The conservation of mass/energy—When Newton produced his second law of motion the calculations of all forces producing an acceleration on any and all mass was theoretically possible

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1