Advanced and Refractory Ceramics for Energy Conservation and Efficiency
()
About this ebook
This volume contains a collection of 19 papers from the 11th International Symposium on Ceramic Materials and Components for Energy and Environmental Applications (CMCEE-11), June 14-19, 2015 in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Papers were presented in the below five symposia from Track 2 on the topic of Ceramics for Energy Conservation and Efficiency:
- Advanced Ceramics and Composites for Gas Turbine Engines
- Advanced Refractory Ceramic Materials and Technologies
- Advanced Ceramic Coatings for Power Systems
- Energy Efficient Advanced Bearings and Wear Resistant Materials
- Advanced Nitrides and Related Materials for Energy Applications
Related to Advanced and Refractory Ceramics for Energy Conservation and Efficiency
Titles in the series (79)
Indentation Techniques in Ceramic Materials Characterization: Theory and Practice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Joining of Ceramics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Fusion and Processing of Glass III Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMorphotropic Phase Boundary Perovskites, High Strain Piezoelectrics, and Dielectric Ceramics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInnovative Processing and Synthesis of Ceramics, Glasses, and Composites VI Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCeramic Armor and Armor Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCharacterization and Control of Interfaces for High Quality Advanced Materials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Ceramic Matrix Composites VIII Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSilicon-Based Structural Ceramics for the New Millennium Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCeramic Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProcessing of High Temperature Superconductors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnvironmental Issues and Waste Management Technologies in the Ceramic and Nuclear Industries VIII Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in SiC / SiC Ceramic Composites: Developments and Applications in Energy Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsColloidal Ceramic Processing of Nano-, Micro-, and Macro-Particulate Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBioceramics: Materials and Applications IV Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCeramic Materials and Multilayer Electronic Devices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCeramic Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Ceramic Matrix Composites IX Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInnovative Processing and Synthesis of Ceramics, Glasses, and Composites VII Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Advances in Ceramic Armor X Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMechanical Properties and Performance of Engineering Ceramics and Composites XI Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Ceramic Armor XI Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCeramic Materials for Energy Applications VI Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdditive Manufacturing and Strategic Technologies in Advanced Ceramics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and Electronic Ceramics II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvanced Processing and Manufacturing Technologies for Nanostructured and Multifunctional Materials II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and Electronic Ceramics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEngineered Ceramics: Current Status and Future Prospects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvanced Processing and Manufacturing Technologies for Nanostructured and Multifunctional Materials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMechanical Properties and Performance of Engineering Ceramics and Composites VIII Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDevelopments in Strategic Materials and Computational Design IV Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProcessing, Properties, and Design of Advanced Ceramics and Composites Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCeramics for Environmental Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells X Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCeramics for Energy Conversion, Storage, and Distribution Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Materials Science for Environmental and Energy Technologies IV Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Materials Science for Environmental and Energy Technologies III Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvanced Processing and Manufacturing Technologies for Structural and Multifunctional Materials VII Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNanostructured Materials and Nanotechnology VII Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvanced Ceramic Coatings and Materials for Extreme Environments III Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvances in Ceramic Armor, Bioceramics, and Porous Materials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Materials Science For You
Additive Friction Stir Deposition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemystifying Explosives: Concepts in High Energy Materials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplied Welding Engineering: Processes, Codes, and Standards Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings1,001 Questions & Answers for the CWI Exam: Welding Metallurgy and Visual Inspection Study Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Geotechnical Problem Solving Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChoosing & Using the Right Metal Shop Lathe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMad About Metal: More Than 50 Embossed Craft Projects for Your Home Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPiping Materials Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Handbook of Adhesion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhysical Metallurgy and Advanced Materials Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Metalworking: Tools, Materials, and Processes for the Handyman Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Welding: Featuring Ryan Friedlinghaus of West Coast Customs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStoring Energy: with Special Reference to Renewable Energy Sources Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCrack Analysis in Structural Concrete: Theory and Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElectric Vehicle Battery Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDistributed Renewable Energies for Off-Grid Communities: Empowering a Sustainable, Competitive, and Secure Twenty-First Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Foseco Foundryman's Handbook: Facts, Figures and Formulae Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Nanobiomaterials in Dentistry: Applications of Nanobiomaterials Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Manufacturing Technology for Aerospace Structural Materials Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dynamics of Nazism: Leadership, Ideology, and the Holocaust Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHigh Pressure Pumps Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Non-Destructive Evaluation of Corrosion and Corrosion-assisted Cracking Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSkilletheads: <b>A Guide to Collecting and Restoring Cast-Iron Cookware</b> Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Advanced and Refractory Ceramics for Energy Conservation and Efficiency
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Advanced and Refractory Ceramics for Energy Conservation and Efficiency - Hua-Tay Lin
Preface
The global challenges we face require innovative thinking and sustainable technology to meet increased demands for energy, clean water, and infrastructure. Research of materials, specifically ceramic materials, continues to provide solutions to everyday challenges such as environmental protection, energy supply and generation, and healthcare. The 11th International Symposium on Ceramic Materials and Components for Energy and Environmental Applications (11th CMCEE), held June 14–19, 2015 at the Hyatt Regency Vancouver in Vancouver, B.C., Canada, identified key challenges and opportunities for ceramic technologies to create sustainable development.
This Ceramic Transactions volume contains papers submitted from the following five symposia held in Track 2: Ceramics for Energy Conservation and Efficiency:
Advanced Ceramics and Composites for Gas Turbine Engines
Advanced Refractory Ceramic Materials and Technologies
Advanced Ceramic Coatings for Power Systems
Energy Efficient Advanced Bearings and Wear Resistant Materials
Advanced Nitrides and Related Materials for Energy Applications
After a peer-review process, 19 papers were accepted for inclusion in this proceedings volume. The editors wish to extend their gratitude and appreciation to all the symposium co-organizers for their help and support, to all the authors for their cooperation and contributions, to all the participants and session chairs for their time and efforts, and to all the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. We also acknowledge the organization and leadership provided by the meeting chairs, Mrityunjay Singh, Tatsuki Ohji and Alexander Michaelis.
We hope that this proceedings will serve as a useful resource for the researchers and technologists in the field of energy conservation.
HUA-TAY LIN, Guangdong University of Technology, China
JAMES HEMRICK, Reno Refractories, Inc., USA
Advanced Ceramics and Composites for Gas Turbine Engines
DAMAGE OF CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES (CMCs) DURING MACHINING OPERATIONS
R. Goller, A. Rösiger
Department of Composites Process Technology, University of Applied Sciences, Augsburg, Germany
ABSTRACT
Machining is for many products the ultimate operation in a complex manufacturing process with the goal to give the final shape to a part and to reach the required tolerances. If this process damages the part a big economic loss is the consequence. However during those operations mechanical damage can occur which only lead to a degradation of the material. In the case of ceramic matrix composites, which already play an important role in components like turbine vanes, combustion chambers and brake disks, the damage often cannot be identified. In this paper special machining operations for different CMC materials are compared with respect to influence on part quality. A new method for quantifying the damage using an optical focus variation and image processing is presented.
INTRODUCTION
Ceramic matrix composites are a group of materials, in which ceramic matrices and ceramic or carbon fibers are combined. These materials have typically a high temperature resistance, a high fracture toughness and compared to high temperature resistant metal alloys, a low density. These combination of properties make them interesting for many different applications e.g. turbine vanes and combustion chambers for gas turbines as well as brake and clutch applications [1, 2]. However the market success in the future will depend on further progress in cost reduction combined with reliable prediction of the performance and lifetime. The final machining operation is a challenging process, with high cost and high quality risk. In the past some experimental work regarding drilling of CMC with diamond grinding bits have been published [3, 4]. The experiments presented in this paper were done with diamond tools with determined diamond cutting edges, which is a new approach to machine CMCs. The results will be presented on two different CMCs materials, 2d-Ox/Ox and 2d C-SiC. For the quantitative evaluation a special optical method combined with a 3d digital imaging software was used. The results show two different damage mechanisms of the to materials and a significant influence of the machining parameters on the finish quality.
EXPERIMENTAL
MATERIAL
Two fiber reinforced ceramic composite materials were used in the present investigation:
1) A 2d-C-SiC material (Product name CF226 P75), produced by Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik, Heuchelheim, Germany and
2) a 2d Ox-Ox material (product name OFC-P1), produced by University of Bayreuth, Germany.
The CF226 P75 [5] is a 2d-C/C-SiC ceramic matrix composite material produced by the so called PCI process (pack cementation and capillary infiltration), a liquid silicon infiltration process used for industrial production. For composition 8 layers of 0/90° woven fabric were laminated. The resulting composite had a thickness of 3 mm, a fiber content of up to 60%, a silicon carbide content of up to 10 vol.-% and a total porosity of 6 vol.-%.
OFC-P1 is also a 2d laminate based on woven 0/90° fabrics of 3M™ Nextel™ alumina (Al2O3) fibers. The investigated composite consists of a lay-up of twelve 0/90° layers. The composite was infiltrated with a pre-ceramic slurry and then sintered resulting in a fiber content of up to 40 vol.-% and a porosity of 30 vol.-%. The laminate thickness was 4 mm. The low density also leads to a low ILT strength.
TOOLING
Polycrystalline Diamond (PCD) 8 mm diameter twisted drills with massive PCD tip, 120° point angle, 25° rake angle, 15° clearance angle, 50° wedge angle (producer: Hufschmied GmbH, Bobingen) were used.
MACHINE
DMG Ultrasonic 55-5, linear (Fig. 1) was used for all experiments. The machining environment was 8% cooling liquid at 23 bar applied through flexible ducts directly onto the tool tip.
Fig. 1 Test machine DMG Ultrasonic 55-5 linear with basic parameters
The machining setup for drilling operation is schematically shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2 Machining set up for drilling experiments
EVALUATION WITH FOCUS VARIATION AND IMAGE PROCESSING
Digital image analysis to determine delamination after drilling composites was applied by Davim et.al. [6] on fibre reinforces plastics. In our case the method of focus variation, which describes a procedure, where a microscope is scanning in 3 axis the surface of a specimen was applied on CMCs. The digital pictures of single stacks were arranged by a special software tool to create a 3d digital image. These images represent the surface and the surface near zones, which could be reached by the microscope and from these pictures surfaces and volumes were calculated. In Fig. 3 the measurement and digital imaging process is explained.
Fig. 3 Analyses with focus variation from Alicona
The introduction of the dimensionless chipping factor FChip,L is described in a previous paper [7]. Eq. 1-3 describe the calculation of the edge chipping factor FChip,L.
(1) numbered Display Equation
(2) numbered Display Equation
(3) numbered Display Equation
A Chip,I Single sheet element area
A0 Nominal hole area
t Specimen thickness
tChip,I Thickness of single sheet elements
V0,L Nominal hole volume
VChip,L Calculated chipping volume
To evaluate the OFC-1 material the chipping factor could not be used, because the damage did not show any chipping, but fraying. The quantitative evaluation of fraying length or fraying area did not show any consistent result. Therefore it was decided to use a qualitative evaluation. The problem of this evaluation method is that it depends on the experience of the observer’s eye. Nevertheless 3 levels of fraying have been defined:
Plenty = the whole area shows fraying traces
Moderate = only partial fraying
Low = very little or no fraying
RESULTS
As a result of the drilling operation 2 fundamentally different damage mechanisms were seen. While the C-SiC material showed brittle fracture behavior in the case of Ox-Ox a kind of fiber pull-out was observed. In the microscopic pictures of Fig. 4 the two mechanisms are compared. We called the brittle behavior edge chipping
and the fiber pull out (non cut fiber residuals respectively) fiber fraying
. This leads to the hypothesis, that the different fiber/matrix bonding of the two materials causes also different cutting behavior. In the C-SiC case much better bonding than in the OFC case. At the same time density (matrix porosity respectively) can be related to the inter-laminar shear/tensile strength (ILS). Especially the porous Matrix properties of the Ox-Ox lead to low ILS [8]. Looking at the resulting images the link between porosity, fiber content and machining behavior can be explained. To further find out, if there is also an influence of the machining parameters on chipping and fraying intensity, these were varied according to Tab. 1.
Tab. 1 Machining parameters
Fig. 3 Comparison of the mechanical damage characteristics when drilling - Left side: 2d-C-SiC - Right side: OFC-1 CMC
In Figure 5 the effect of feed rate on the edge chipping factor FChip,L of the 2d-C-SiC shows that increasing feed rate increases the chipping. At 0,2 mm/rev the chipping factor is with 2 % two times the value at 0,01 mm/rev. The scatter also increases significantly.
Fig. 4 Effect of feed rate on the Edge chipping factor for CF226 P75
Keeping the feed rate at a lowest point (with lowest chipping result), the increase of cutting speed shows, that FChip,L depends much more on the cutting speed (Fig. 6). At 175 m/min cutting speed the chipping factor was only at 1%. At 300 m/min an increase to 8% was observed and the worst result showed the experiment at 425 m/min with a factor of 32%.
Fig. 5 Effect of cutting speed on the Edge chipping factor for CF226 P75
In Fig. 7 the qualitative analysis of 0FC-P1 material shows, that the combination of low constant speed of 175 m/min and low feed rate gives lowest fraying. Increasing feed rate increases the fraying. In all cases fraying occurs mostly at the hole exit, which also can be seen in the images below,
Fig. 6 Effect of feed rate on fiber fraying for OFC-P1
On the other hand cutting speed seems not to have a strong influence on fraying in the case of the OFC-P1. The results in Fig. 8 do not show significant differences between low and high speed. Also entrance and exit of the hole show no difference in this case.
Fig. 7 Effect of cutting speed on fiber frying for OFC-P1
CONCLUSION
Two ceramic composite materials have been investigated regarding their damage behavior through a drilling operation using diamond tipped tools with defined cutting edges and varying feed rate and cutting speed.
The results show two different damage mechanisms of the two materials. Where C-SiC shows chipping of edges in surface and volume, the Ox/Ox Composite shows fiber fraying mainly at the exit of the holes.
C-SiC shows a small increase of chipping with increasing feed rate, at constant cutting speed. However a strong effect of cutting speed on chipping can be observed. One explanation for this behavior could be the strong fiber/matrix bonding of the C-SiC and the micro cracked micro-structure of this laminate. This leads to the chipping of material from the matrix. At higher speed more cutting power is introduced into the material and leads therefore to more damage. Depending on the final requirements this is a clear indication that the cutting speed cannot be increased over a certain limit, which is on the one hand given by the tool stability and on the other hand by the micro structural bonding of fiber and matrix.
In contrast to the chipping of the 2d-C-SiC, the Ox-Ox material behaves completely different. In this case no chipping but fraying of alumina fibers can be observed. One explanation could be the much lower fiber matrix bonding between alumina fibers and alumina matrix, which leads to more fiber pull out. No direct influence of the cutting speed but significant more fraying by increasing the feed rate. Low feed rate give in this case low fraying even at high cutting speed.
The experiments and investigations will be continued to find out, how the damage will influence the mechanical performance of the part and to find an optimum tool/machine/parameter configuration. As inter-laminar damage can be expected, further research has to be done on shape, type and detection of those damages.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors thank Hufschmied GmbH, Bobingen for providing the tools and the machining capacity, Schunk Group for offering the C-SiC material and University of Bayreuth for offering Ox-Ox material.
LITERATURE
[1] Krenkel, W. (ed.): Ceramic Matrix Composites Fibre Reinforced Ceramics and their Applications. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA, 2008.
[2] Krenkel, W. (ed.): Keramische Verbundwerkstoffe. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA, 2003.
[3] D. Biermann, T. Jansen, M. Feldhoff, Faserverstärkte Keramik effizient bearbeiten, MM-Maschinenmarkt. Das Industrie Magazin 11 (2009) 28–31.
[4] K. Weinert, T. Jansen, Machining Aspects for the Drilling of C/C-SiC Materials, in: W. Krenkel (Ed.), Ceramic Matrix Composites, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany 2008, pp. 287–301.
[5] Weiss, R.: Carbon Fibre Reinforced CMCs: Manufacture, Properties, Oxidation Protection, in: W. Krenkel (Ed.), High Temperature Ceramic Matrix Composites, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany 2001, pp. 440–456.
[6] J. Davim, J. Rubio, A. Abrao, A novel approach based on digital image analysis to evaluate the delamination factor after drilling composite laminates, Composites Science and Technology 67 (2007) 1939–1945.
[7] Rösiger, A.; Goller, R.: Damage evaluation of CMCs after drilling with geometrically defined cutting edges. In: Proceedings of the 20th Symposium on Composites, 2015, pp. 271-278.
[8] Wamser, T.; Scheler, S.; Martin, B.; Krenkel, W.: Novel oxide fiber composites by freeze casting. In Journal of the European Ceramic Society 34 (2014) 3827–3833.
CMCS: THE KEY FOR AFFORDABLE ACCESS TO SPACE
Johannes Petursson, Luis Gonzalez
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, FL, 32114.
ABSTRACT
Escape Dynamics is designing a reusable single-stage-to-orbit launch system for small to medium payloads that would significantly lower the cost and turnaround times for accessing space. Part of the necessary increase in propulsion efficiency is a proprietary, innovative system where the energy is delivered to the moving vehicle by microwaves antennas on the ground, reducing the launcher weight dramatically. The microwave energy is converted into propulsive energy in Ceramic Matrix Composite heat exchangers.
A top level description of the system and the first step in the generation of design data is presented. Specifically, the elastic modulus and ultimate tensile strength. These mechanical properties were measured using specimens prepared following the ASTM standard. The test results are presented and discussed in the context of the intended application. Areas of further research and development are presented.
INTRODUCTION
To place a pound of payload in Earth orbit costs $10,000 (roughly $20,000/kg)¹. One of the reasons for this is the fact that rockets are expensive pieces of machinery, using multiple stages that are completely discarded after every single launch. These costs could be reduced by orders of magnitude with reusable vehicles; a goal that has proven quite difficult to achieve. The problem of Single Stage to Orbit (SSTO) launchers is that a comparatively large mass needs to be carried along all the way to orbit, even when the fuel has been spent as opposed to multistage vehicles that shed weight (by discarding stages) as the trajectory proceeds. An ideal situation would happen if the rocket could keep a low mass by having its energy source, not on the vehicle, but rather on the ground, where the energy could be practically limitless. Escape Dynamics, a Colorado-based company, has devised a way of achieving this dream by transferring the energy by microwaves to a fully reusable, fast turnaround SSTO spacecraft that can carry and deliver small to medium sized payloads to Low Earth Orbit (LEO). The microwave energy is converted into propulsive energy in specially designed heat exchangers which must endure extreme conditions of pressure and temperature. It is clear that this type of engines requires a new kind of materials suitable for that environment and Escape Dynamics is performing pioneering work in the development of Ceramic Matrix Composites for this application.
This paper will explain Escape Dynamics launch concept and will provide the results of the measurement of the mechanical properties of the CMCs intended for the Spaceplane carried out at the labs and in collaboration with Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
Figure 1. Artist’s impression of Spaceplane1.
The use of external microwave energy to power the thermal rocket engine eliminates the need for on-board carrying of the oxidizer used by chemical rockets, effectively reducing the required propellant mass fraction from 90% for chemical rockets down to 72% for the more efficient SSTO thermal rocket². An SSTO vehicle with the stated weight benefits of external propulsion would allow Escape Dynamics to deliver to LEO 100-200 kg payloads at a disruptively low cost of around $150per kg. The consequences for the space industry would be enormous.
This propulsion system requires the efficient transmission of energy between the microwave beam and the propellant which is accomplished through a microwave absorptive heat exchanger. The heat exchanger should be capable of withstanding high temperatures, pressures, and active chemical conditions. While some refractory metals offer advantageous mechanical and thermal properties for this application, they have low corrosion and oxidation resistance and possess prohibitively high densities, which affect the spacecraft empty weight. Conversely, ceramic materials are well suited for handling these conditions, but their fundamental limited tensile strength and crack resistance requires a binder or matrix with higher mechanical properties. Thus, in pursuit of the reusable SSTO spacecraft for disruptively economic space access, the development of high performance ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) has been identified as critical to the success of the microwave thermal rocket engine.
Figure 2. Example of CMC Heat Exchanger Tubes².
CMCS FOR SSTO ENGINE APPLICATION
Ceramic composites generally fit into two categories: oxides and non-oxides. Oxide matrix composites are especially suited for highly reactive environments such as nuclear reactors, where hot, oxidative environments are common, and chemically inert, reasonably strong materials are required. Non-oxide matrix composites have higher strengths than oxide CMCs, but at the cost of higher reactivity. The specific strength and thermal resistance of non-oxide composites are especially desirable for high temperature aerospace applications with examples such as components in turbine combustion chambers and heat tiles for reentry vehicles.
Figure 3. Specific Strength Comparison of Materials³.
This foundation of the propulsion system is the power source, an array of gimbaled microwave emitters, known as gyrotrons that track the spacecraft and beam W-band millimeter wave radiation to it throughout the trajectory from launch to LEO. This radiation is converted into thermal energy by the proprietary, highly absorptive material, heating and expanding the propellant, cryogenic hydrogen, thus providing the necessary thrust. Theoretical calculations indicate that this system will operate with specific impulse higher than 750 seconds, a significant increase over chemical propulsion systems. Figure 5 shows an upper bound for chemical rockets around 500