The Stalin and Molotov Lines: Soviet Western Defences 1928–41
By Neil Short and Adam Hook
()
About this ebook
Neil Short
Neil Short studied history at the University of Lancaster and graduated with an Honours degree. He then moved to the University of Leeds, where he completed a Master's Degree in Military History. He has published numerous books on fortifications, including a number of titles for Osprey. He lives with his wife and family in Bristol, UK.
Read more from Neil Short
Related to The Stalin and Molotov Lines
Titles in the series (4)
The Forts of Judaea 168 BC–AD 73: From the Maccabees to the Fall of Masada Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Stalin and Molotov Lines: Soviet Western Defences 1928–41 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreek Fortifications of Asia Minor 500–130 BC: From the Persian Wars to the Roman Conquest Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Fortifications of Ancient Israel and Judah 1200–586 BC Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Related ebooks
The Great Bear at War: The Russian and Soviet Army, 1917–Present Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5From Beachhead to Brittany: The 29th Infantry Division at Brest, August-September 1944 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Meat Grinder: The Battles for the Rzhev Salient, 1942–43 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Russian-Soviet Unconventional Wars in the Caucasus, Central Asia, and Afghanistan [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tanks at the Iron Curtain 1946–60: Early Cold War armor in Central Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOperation Typhoon: The German Assault on Moscow, 1941 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOperation Barbarossa: The German Invasion of Soviet Russia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5German Army on the Eastern Front—The Advance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Defence of Sevastopol, 1941–1942: The Soviet Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Aerial War: 1939–45: The Role of Aviation in World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArmoured Trains: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, 1825–2016 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Royal Dragoon Guards: A Regimental History, 1685–2018 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Israeli Combined Arms Employment: Um Katef, 1967 & Suez Canal, 1973 Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Wingate's Men: The Chindit Operations: Special Forces in Burma Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGerman General Staff In World War I Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmateur Armies: Militias and Volunteers in War and Peace, 1797–1961 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVietnam Studies - Allied Participation In Vietnam [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRussian Army and the First World War Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Song of the Legions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Armoured Warfare in the Far East, 1937–1945 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Breaching Walls In Urban Warfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBibliography of the Seven Weeks' War of 1866 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe German Army from Mobilisation to First Ypres Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRed Army Auxiliary Armoured Vehicles, 1930–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPioneers of Irregular Warfare: Secrets of the Military Intelligence Research Department of the Second World War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBritish Boer War And The French Algerian Conflict: Counterinsurgency For Today Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Soviet–Afghan War 1979–89 Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Armies of Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImperial German Army 1914-18: Organisation, Structure, Orders of Battle Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5
Asian History For You
Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Red Notice: A True Story of High Finance, Murder, and One Man's Fight for Justice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dead Mountain: The Untold True Story of the Dyatlov Pass Incident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5To Love and Be Loved: A Personal Portrait of Mother Teresa Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Anarchy: The East India Company, Corporate Violence, and the Pillage of an Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ghosts of the Tsunami: Death and Life in Japan's Disaster Zone Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Voices from Chernobyl Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Unit 731: The Forgotten Asian Auschwitz Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago: The Authorized Abridgement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freezing Order: A True Story of Money Laundering, Murder, and Surviving Vladimir Putin's Wrath Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism: A Ghost Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/577 Days of February: Living and Dying in Ukraine, Told by the Nation’s Own Journalists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Last Yakuza: life and death in the Japanese underworld Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShogun: The Life of Tokugawa Ieyasu Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Forgotten Highlander: An Incredible WWII Story of Survival in the Pacific Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Red Hotel: Moscow 1941, the Metropol Hotel, and the Untold Story of Stalin's Propaganda War Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Countdown 1945: The Extraordinary Story of the Atomic Bomb and the 116 Days That Changed the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 2]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Caste (Oprah's Book Club): by Isabel Wilkerson - The Origins of Our Discontents - A Comprehensive Summary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmbrace Yoga's Roots Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mao Tse-Tung On Guerrilla Warfare Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 3]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Rose Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Tao of Wing Chun: The History and Principles of China's Most Explosive Martial Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Climb: Tragic Ambitions on Everest Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The Stalin and Molotov Lines
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Stalin and Molotov Lines - Neil Short
SOVIET WESTERN DEFENCES 1928–41
INTRODUCTION
Throughout history fortifications have played a pivotal role in protecting the strategic interests of the Soviet Union and its predecessor Tsarist Russia. In the 18th century work began on a series of defences on the Baltic, the best known of which was the great citadel of Kronstadt that protected St Petersburg. At the same time the coastline of the Crimea was fortified and the defences of Sevastopol played an important role in the fighting of the Crimean War, which raged from 1853 to 1856. Half a century later the defences around Port Arthur, the Russian naval base in Manchuria, proved to be a far tougher proposition than anticipated by the attacking Japanese and were to provide a taster of what was to come in World War I a decade later. However, the Russians (and the kingdoms that dominated the region before they were absorbed into the empire) had an even longer tradition of constructing castles and fortresses along the main invasion routes from the west. Towns and cities like Kingisepp, Ostrov, Pskov and Sebezh were fortified against attacks from, among others, the Teutonic Knights, the Poles and the Swedes. This tradition continued into the 19th century when Warsaw was fortified, as was Brest, the largest fortress of the Russian Empire in that period.
The fortress at Kamenets Podolski in the Ukraine. It successfully held out against attacks from Turks and Tartars. Defences have existed on the site since the Middle Ages. Later Soviet engineers established a fortified region to protect this strategically important position. (P. Netesov, courtesy of E Hitriak and I Volkov)
In World War I the great fortresses of Warsaw and Brest were captured almost without a fight as the Central Powers advanced against the poorly equipped and ineptly led Russian Army. Later in the war the Russians did enjoy some limited success, but it proved to be too little too late. The Tsarist regime was overthrown and the new Bolshevik government sued for peace. This turn of events was greeted with consternation in the west and soon ‘White Russians’, backed by Russia’s former allies (principally Britain and France), attempted to wrest power from Lenin and his cohorts. In the Civil War that followed, Trotsky’s Red Army created a series of fortified regions, or ukreplinnyje rajony, to protect the new government’s power base around Moscow and St Petersburg. These were often little more than field works, but these defences played an important part in securing victory for the Red Army.
The value of these defences in the Russian Civil War informed the debate on the shape of future defences much as the experiences of the main belligerents in World War I influenced their thinking on fortifications in the inter-war period. In the Soviet Union the outcome of these deliberations was a decision to create a series of fortified regions made up of pillboxes and bunkers to protect strategic interests. However, even such a relatively conservative undertaking was impossible in the period after the war because the Soviet economy was so weak.
In 1928 work on the western border defences finally began, but with funds limited the programme was restricted to four fortified regions. Later, as the economy grew more resources became available and it was decided to build a further nine fortified regions, which stretched the entire length of the frontier. Thereafter the building programme slowed, but with the rise of Nazism and the almost inexorable drift to war, the building programme was revitalized and in 1938 eight further fortified regions were commissioned to plug significant gaps in the line. However, the signing of the Nazi–Soviet Non Aggression Pact in 1939 and the subsequent partition of Poland rendered the defences of the Stalin Line obsolete. Most of the building work was stopped and the defences were abandoned in favour of a plan to build new fortifications along the revised border, the so-called Molotov Line.
It is worth pausing at this point to consider further the names of these defences. Firstly, although both are referred to as ‘lines’ the defences were not continuous, and as Alan Clark notes in his classic study of the war on the Eastern Front, Barbarossa, ‘the term line, although it may have denoted an ultimate goal, was, in 1941, no more than a geographical illusion founded on the presence of a sequence of fortified districts all in roughly the same longitude’. Secondly, the names of the lines, although widely accepted today and used throughout this text and indeed in the title, were a western invention in keeping with the grandiose titles afforded defences in the rest of continental Europe (Maginot Line, West Wall etc.).
The first line of defences were named after the Soviet leader, although it is not clear how Stalin viewed this ‘honour’, and certainly not after the defences had been breached in the summer of 1941. The new border defences constructed in 1940/41 were, following the war, named after the Soviet Foreign Minister, presumably in acknowledgement of the fact that the fortifications had been constructed along the new border agreed by Vyacheslav Molotov. However, in the Soviet Union the defences were always described as fortified regions (ukreplinnyje rajony).
CHRONOLOGY
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
It is impossible to talk about the defences of the Stalin and Molotov Lines without making reference to the physical geography of the western border area. Perhaps the most obvious feature is the enormous length of the frontier, which when work on the Stalin started in late 1927 stretched from the Gulf of Finland in the north to the Black Sea in the south. A little over a decade later, following the annexation of eastern Poland, the border was moved west and was extended so that it stretched some 4,500km.
The Stalin Line ran broadly from the Gulf of Finland in the north to the Black Sea in the south. Rather than a continuous line, the defences were built as series of fortified regions each of which covered a strategically important area of the border. It was built in three stages – four fortified regions in the first phase beginning in 1928, then a further nine were begun in the early 1930s and finally another batch of eight was started in 1938.
Neatly bisecting the frontier zone are the Pripiat Marshes, a vast tract of swamp and forest, more than 300km across. Throughout history this feature has been a major obstacle for any potential aggressor, but the marshes have also played an important part in the defensive thinking of the Russians and never more so than in the 20th century. Because they are all but impassable to a modern mechanized army, this portion of the front only needed to be lightly defended. But the marshes also effectively meant that the Red Army would have to be split in two, with one half covering