Nutrition and Genomics: Issues of Ethics, Law, Regulation and Communication
By David Castle
2.5/5
()
About this ebook
- Explores the rapidly developing, yet not fully understood, impact of nutrigenomics on the relationship to food medicalization, genetic privacy, nutrition and health
- Provides ground for further exploration to identify issues and provide analysis to aid in policy and regulation development
- Provides ethical and legal insights into this unfolding science, as well as serving as a model for thinking about issues arising in other fields of science and technology
Read more from David Castle
Living with Bipolar: A Guide to Understanding and Managing the Disorder Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Science, Society, and the Supermarket: The Opportunities and Challenges of Nutrigenomics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Nutrition and Genomics
Related ebooks
Nutrigenetics: Applying the Science of Personal Nutrition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gut Microbiota: Interactive Effects on Nutrition and Health Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Diet-Microbe Interactions in the Gut: Effects on Human Health and Disease Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Diet, Microbiome and Health Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Nutritional Pathophysiology of Obesity and its Comorbidities: A Case-Study Approach Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBioactive Food Components Activity in Mechanistic Approach Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFood Quality: Balancing Health and Disease Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Human Microbiome in Early Life: Implications to Health and Disease Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnalysis in Nutrition Research: Principles of Statistical Methodology and Interpretation of the Results Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssential and Toxic Trace Elements and Vitamins in Human Health Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Impact of Nutrition and Statins on Cardiovascular Diseases Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complex Interplay Between Gut-Brain, Gut-Liver, and Liver-Brain Axes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman-Gut Microbiome: Establishment and Interactions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlternative and Replacement Foods Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Developing Microbiome: Lessons from Early Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPractical Nutrigenomics: a guide to setting up your personalised nutrition service Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Molecular Basis of Nutrition and Aging: A Volume in the Molecular Nutrition Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Molecular Nutrition and Diabetes: A Volume in the Molecular Nutrition Series Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Handbook of Lipids in Human Function: Fatty Acids Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNutrient Metabolism: Structures, Functions, and Genes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Molecular Nutrition of Amino Acids and Proteins: A Volume in the Molecular Nutrition Series Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNutritional and Therapeutic Interventions for Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Abdominal Obesity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Nutrition and Functional Foods for Healthy Aging Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNutritional Genetics Part 5: Diseases C Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMicrobiome, Immunity, Digestive Health and Nutrition: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Prevention and Treatment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Gut-Brain Axis: Dietary, Probiotic, and Prebiotic Interventions on the Microbiota Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Microbiome and Metabolome in Diagnosis, Therapy, and other Strategic Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuide to Nutritional Supplements Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Biology For You
Anatomy and Physiology For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Your Brain: A User's Guide: 100 Things You Never Knew Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anatomy 101: From Muscles and Bones to Organs and Systems, Your Guide to How the Human Body Works Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fantastic Fungi: How Mushrooms Can Heal, Shift Consciousness, and Save the Planet Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Obesity Code: the bestselling guide to unlocking the secrets of weight loss Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dopamine Detox: Biohacking Your Way To Better Focus, Greater Happiness, and Peak Performance Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5All That Remains: A Renowned Forensic Scientist on Death, Mortality, and Solving Crimes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nursing Anatomy & Physiology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Will Make You Smarter: 150 New Scientific Concepts to Improve Your Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Genius Kitchen: Over 100 Easy and Delicious Recipes to Make Your Brain Sharp, Body Strong, and Taste Buds Happy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Grieving Brain: The Surprising Science of How We Learn from Love and Loss Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Peptide Protocols: Volume One Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lifespan: Why We Age—and Why We Don't Have To Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Written in Bone: Hidden Stories in What We Leave Behind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Winner Effect: The Neuroscience of Success and Failure Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mother of God: An Extraordinary Journey into the Uncharted Tributaries of the Western Amazon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Woman: An Intimate Geography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Blood of Emmett Till Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5"Cause Unknown": The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Crack In Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gut: The Inside Story of Our Body's Most Underrated Organ (Revised Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Gov't Told Me: And the Better Future Coming Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Trouble With Testosterone: And Other Essays On The Biology Of The Human Predi Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Nutrition and Genomics
2 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Nutrition and Genomics - David Castle
1
Gene–Environment Interactions: Where are we and where should we be Going?
Jose M. Ordovas and E. Shyong Tai
Summary
Introduction
Genes or environment? Limitations of the traditional approach to disease risk assessment
Cardiovascular risk factors
Gene–Smoking Interactions
Gene–Alcohol Interactions
Gene–Physical Activity Interactions
Gene–Diet Interactions
Statistical Methods for gene–environment interactions
Personalized nutrition and the consumer
Summary
Acknowledgment
References
Summary
This chapter examines the reasons for studying gene–environment interactions and evaluates recent reports of interactions between genes and environmental modulators in relation to cardiovascular disease and its common risk factors. Recent studies focusing on smoking, alcohol, physical activity and coffee are all observational and include relatively large sample sizes. They tend to examine a single gene and fail to address interactions with other genes as well as other correlated environmental factors. Studies examining gene–diet interactions include both observational and interventional designs, and are of smaller scale, especially those including dietary interventions. Among the reported gene–diet interactions, it is important to highlight the strengthening evidence for APOA5 as a major gene involved in triglyceride metabolism and modulated by dietary factors and the identification of APOA2 as a modulator of food intake and obesity risk. This chapter concludes that, overall, the study of gene–environment interactions is an active and much needed area of research. While technical barriers in genetic studies are being quickly overcome, the inclusion of comprehensive and reliable environmental information represents a significant shortcoming to genetic studies. Progress depends on larger study populations being included and also more comprehensive, standardized and precise approaches to capture environmental information.
Introduction
After more than two decades of great expectations but few deliverables, the field of genetics related to common and complex disorders has made remarkable progress towards the identification of novel loci and genetic variants associated with these diseases. This has been possible thanks to the combination of more robust experimental approaches, including large population studies, with the availability of high density genotyping (>1 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)). At the time of writing, there have been both consolidation of some of the traditional candidate genes, especially in the area of lipid metabolism, and, more exciting, identification of new lipid-related loci. These findings will provide us with a more complete understanding of the metabolic landscape and new insights into the pathogenesis of disease (Smith, 2007; Zeggini and McCarthy, 2007). The search is far from over, however, and for the newly discovered and for well-known candidate genes, current knowledge needs to be augmented by using deep re-sequencing and phenotyping of individuals carrying functional variants at these loci to understand the pathways and metabolic fluxes affected by these genetic variants and to provide greater insight into the physiologic basis of disease (Tracy, 2008). Based on current knowledge, however, many of the observed gene effects will not be insulated from environmental modulation. Therefore, there is a compelling need to further the initial association studies with well-designed investigation of gene–environment interactions.
Genes or environment? Limitations of the traditional approach to disease risk assessment
From an epidemiologic perspective, studies of genetic and environmental factors will continue to underestimate the population-attributable risk associated with either genetic or environmental factors. In fact, consideration of the joint effects of genetic and environmental factors strengthens their associations with disease, permitting the identification of risk factors that have small marginal effects. Even the best well established genetic markers for common traits show inter-population differences. For example, the recently identified fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene has been heralded as the most solid locus for obesity risk. Yet there are conflicting reports of lack of association in African Americans or Han Chinese (Li et al., 2008). It remains unclear whether these are due to genetic differences between the different populations, or whether a gene–environment interaction may be masking the effect in these other ethnic groups. Findings from a Danish population, for example, indicate that physical activity may attenuate the effects of the FTO genetic variants in support of gene–environment interactions (Andreasen et al., 2008).
Reliably capturing environmental measures and the complexity of the dietary ‘environment’ present major difficulties in studying gene–environment interactions. Methods to capture dietary information from observational studies have been criticized for years for a lack of accuracy, precision and objectivity. Moreover, foods are very complicated mixtures and we may attribute an observed effect to a specific nutrient because we know about it but, in reality, it may be due to another component of the food that we may not know or pay attention to. For example, coffee consumption shows a well-replicated association with the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (van Dam and Hu, 2005; Pereira et al., 2006). But coffee is a complex mixture of compounds and it is common to equate coffee with caffeine. Still, the specific compound in coffee that produces this effect is unclear. In fact, caffeine may not be important after all, since the association is also seen with decaffeinated coffee (van Dam et al., 2006). Therefore, integration of genetic variability with gene expression studies will pinpoint pathways that the environmental exposures may act through and will provide some guidance as to the specific environmental components that warrant further investigation.
From a public health perspective, it has been suggested that the identification of genetic variants that encode susceptibility to disease could be used in risk algorithms to identify individuals at high risk of disease. The identification of gene–environment interactions may suggest specific interventions that may attenuate the risk in these individuals. Taken to an extreme, it has been suggested that these studies could lead to individualized health plans based on a person’s genetic make-up (Subbiah, 2007). In this chapter, we summarize current knowledge related to gene–environment interactions as they pertain to cardiovascular disease risk factors, particularly those related to metabolic phenotypes. In addition, we raise some of the issues that need to be addressed to advance this field of research and to develop applications for the public.
Cardiovascular risk factors
The scientific literature is heavily populated with papers reporting cardiovascular risk factors. The latest catalog published over one decade ago listed 177 of them with many of them falling in the categories of ‘Nutrition-Related’ and ‘Environmental’ (Omura et al., 1996). Many of the reported risk factors are rather questionable, however. Updating this catalog today would probably add a few hundred more to the list. Besides diet, the best characterized environmental risk factors include smoking, inadequate physical activity, alcohol and, more recently, coffee drinking (which, given its popularity and widespread use, has received increased attention as a modifier of cardiovascular disease risk) (Campos and Baylin, 2007). Those common and well established behavioral risk factors are the focus of this section.
Gene–Smoking Interactions
The study of interactions between genetic factors and smoking has been an active area of research primarily in the fields of cancer and neurodegenerative diseases (Wang and Wang, 2005; Elbaz et al., 2007), but it also caught the early attention of cardiovascular researchers (Kondo et al., 1989) and a substantial body of evidence has accumulated during the last two decades, as summarized by recent reviews (Talmud, 2007). Considering what we know about the risk associated with tobacco smoking, it is obvious that all the reports are supported by observational data and there are no randomized intervention studies. Of the behavioral factors contemplated in this section, tobacco smoking may be the most reliable in terms of validity of reporting. Moreover, it is a variable most epidemiological studies collect. Therefore, studies reporting gene–tobacco smoking interactions tend to be large and probably have adequate statistical power to examine single gene–single factor interactions. This is still far from ideal as no single study can yet fully address the complex interactions involving multiple genes and environmental factors. Genes currently under examination span a variety of metabolic pathways, including the obvious ones involved in drug metabolism and detoxification, those involved in lipid traits known to be modified by smoking (Gambier et al., 2006; Goldenberg et al., 2007; Cornelis et al., 2007b; Manfredi et al., 2007) as well as others involved in a variety of more remotely connected metabolic functions (Lee et al., 2006; Saijo et al., 2007; Jang et al., 2007; Stephens et al., 2008). In addition, the arrival of genome-wide association studies has allowed the identification of chromosomal regions of interest (North et al., 2007) for which no candidate genes have yet been identified. The increased size of recent studies and the creation of large consortia are allowing the examination of disease events and non-invasive biomarkers of disease (Lee et al., 2006; Goldenberg et al., 2007; Cornelis et al., 2007b; Manfredi et al., 2007; North et al., 2007; Stephens et al., 2008) (Table 1.1). As expected from the publication bias, most published reports identify significant gene–smoking interactions and most of the studies, but not all of them (Goldenberg et al., 2007; Cornelis et al., 2007b; Saijo et al., 2007), conclude that carriers of the minor alleles were more susceptible to the deleterious effects of tobacco smoking. While uncovering gene–smoking interactions may reveal interesting physiological mechanisms, the practical utility of this knowledge is limited as the relevant public health advice is that every smoker should quit, regardless of genotype.
Table 1.1
Gene–smoking interactions
Gene–Alcohol Interactions
As with gene–smoking interactions, lipid researchers have long been interested in interactions between genetic factors and alcohol consumption (Hannuksela et al., 1994). Like smoking, recent reports describing gene–alcohol interactions are based on observational studies with information about alcohol drinking derived from medical records or questionnaires involving thousands of subjects (Beulens et al., 2007; Jensen et al., 2007; Volcik et al., 2007; Tsujita et al., 2007) (Table 1.2). The genes selected include traditional lipid candidate genes (Tsujita et al., 2007; Jensen et al., 2007; Volcik et al., 2007) as well as those involved in alcohol metabolism (Beulens et al., 2007). For the most part, the modulating effect appears to be driven by HDL-C concentrations as reported in earlier work (Hannuksela et al., 1994). Moderate alcohol consumption is positively associated with health, but the potential benefits may not be universal. Knowledge of these studies could help identify subjects who benefit from moderate drinking, those who have no effect and those who experience