Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Atheopaganism: An Earth-Honoring Path Rooted in Science
Atheopaganism: An Earth-Honoring Path Rooted in Science
Atheopaganism: An Earth-Honoring Path Rooted in Science
Audiobook4 hours

Atheopaganism: An Earth-Honoring Path Rooted in Science

Written by Mark A. Green

Narrated by Mark A. Green

Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

4.5/5

()

About this audiobook

Every human culture has evolved religious practices. Clearly, there is something inherent in humanity about religiosity: it must fulfill certain needs that evolved with us as our modern brains developed.

ATHEOPAGANISM explores how the evolution of proceeding brain systems contributed to the belief systems, value sets and religious practices that characterize cultures all over the world. And then it implements this understanding of the nature of religion in a science-consistent religious practice that fulfills the human need for meaning, connectedness, inspiration and purpose.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateJun 14, 2023
ISBN9798368952246
Atheopaganism: An Earth-Honoring Path Rooted in Science

Related to Atheopaganism

Related audiobooks

New Age & Spirituality For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Atheopaganism

Rating: 4.333333333333333 out of 5 stars
4.5/5

3 ratings1 review

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Interesting point of view, I liked 90% of it, I just found it odd the while preaching about truth and respecting nature, he then proceeded to call women "uterus-havers" and men "testes-havers" as though denying the biological reality of males and females is at all truthful or respectful of nature. We are not "uterus/testes-havers" we are male and female, men and women. We are not body parts, we are whole beings with whole biology. This dualist (religious) idea that we are somehow just a series of parts and not a complete, interconnected bio-organism is an absurd fiction and hypocritical of what he claims atheopaganism stands for. I understand we all have our little incongruences, but I think this one was obvious enough for the author to catch, unfortunately his cognitive dissonance won out in favour of an unscientific ideology. It perhaps it was just virtue signalling, either way it lacked integrity, a core pillar of atheopaganism.