King Charles now rules a monarchy that may have to change to survive
LONDON — The flood of sorrowful memories and admiring tributes for the late Elizabeth II recognize her multigenerational effect as a woman and the queen.
But the respect and love she engendered as a international figure do not necessarily extend to the monarchy itself, an institution that costs a fortune to sustain and embodies a bevy of arcane and perplexing traditions that help define Britain but that often seem anachronistic.
A rising tide of anti-royal sentiment thrusts a British throne without Elizabeth into precarious territory, particularly when her successor happens to be her less popular, long socially awkward son Charles.
Royal-watchers say the situation raises questions about the future of the monarchy and how, or whether, it can continue hold its sovereign sway. At the least, they say, Charles will have to streamline an
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days