MPEP Q & A 195: Necessary Items for a Petition for Retroactive License

MPEP Q & A 242: When will an international application not need a foreign filing license?: Question: List two reasons why an international application filed with, or forwarded to, the International Bureau would not need a foreign filing license. Answer: An international application filed with, or forwarded to, by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

MPEP Q & A 101: Petition for a Derivation Proceeding: Question: What must a petition for a derivation proceeding provide? Answer: In a petition for a derivation proceeding, the petitioner must: (i) identify which application or patent is disputed; and (ii) provide at least one affidavit addressing communi... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

MPEP Q & A 135: When May the Prior Art Date of a Reference Under Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) be the International Filing Date?: Question: When may the prior art date of a reference under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) be the international filing date? Answer: The prior art date of a reference under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) may be the international filing date if the international fil... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 198: Items Necessary to Accord the International Filing Date the Date of Receipt of the International Application: Question: What does the Office need at the time of receipt in order to accord the international filing date the date of receipt of the international application? Answer: The receiving Office shall accord as the international filing date the date of rec... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 167: When Must Applicants Timely File a Notice of Foreign Filing to Avoid Abandonment of a U.S. Application?: Question: Name one circumstance where applicants must timely file a notice of foreign filing to avoid abandonment of a U.S. application. Answer: Applicants must timely file a notice of foreign filing to avoid abandonment of a U.S. by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

MPEP Q & A 247: When is a protest considered timely?: Question: When is a protest considered timely? Answer: A protest is timely if (1) filed prior to the date the application was published under 37 CFR 1.211 or the date a notice of allowance was given or mailed, whichever occurs first, by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

MPEP Q & A 131: What Does an Applicant Who Uses the Patent Cooperation Treaty Gain the Benefit of?: Question: What does an applicant who uses the Patent Cooperation Treaty gain the benefit of? Answer: An applicant who uses the Patent Cooperation Treaty gains the benefit of: (A) a delay in the time when papers must be submitted to the national offices... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

MPEP Q & A 267: What are the four purposes 35 U.S.C. 101 has been interpreted as imposing?: Question: What are the four purposes 35 U.S.C. 101 has been interpreted as imposing? Answer: 35 U.S.C. 101 has been interpreted as imposing four purposes. First, 35 U.S.C. 101 limits an inventor to ONE patent for a claimed invention. by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 221: What are the Three Types of Patent Documents Available as Prior Art …?: Question: AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) sets forth three types of patent documents that are available as prior art as of the date they were effectively filed with respect to the subject matter relied upon in the document if they name another inventor. by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 81: Items Applicant’s Must Establish Under 35 USC 156: Question: List one item the applicant must establish under 35 U.S.C. 156(a)(1)-(5). Answer: 35 U.S.C. 156(a)(1)-(5) require that the applicant establish that: (1) the patent has not expired before an application under 35 U.S.C. by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

5 min listen

EPISODE 12 - The Examiner Whisperer - Motiva LLC v ITC & Nintendo - May 23 2013: In this episode of the Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, discussion concerns patent trolls! A patent troll, suing on a contingency fee, gets his client zapped out of the International Trade Commission by failing the domestic... by Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

22 min listen

MPEP Q & A 192: Overcome Provisional Obviousness Rejection: Question: How can a provisional obviousness rejection be overcome? Answer: A provisional obviousness rejection can be overcome by: Arguing patentability over the earlier filed application; Combining the subject matter of the copending applications into... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

5 min listen

MPEP Q & A 34: Item an Applicant May Submit as Objective Evidence That Common Ownership Existed: Question: Name one item that an applicant may submit, in addition to a statement regarding common ownership as objective evidence that common ownership existed? Answer: The applicant may submit the following evidence: (A) Reference to assignments recor... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 206: Requirements for an Applicant to Rescind Nonpublication Requests: Question: What are the requirements for an applicant to rescind a nonpublication request? Answer: The applicant may rescind a nonpublication request at any time. A request to rescind a nonpublication request must: Identify the application to which it i... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

MPEP Q & A 152: Information an Attorney of Record May Have to Submit in Reply to an Office Action, Reissue Application, or Reexamination Proceeding: Question: An attorney of record may have to submit information in reply to an Office action, a reissue application, or a reexamination proceeding. List 2 different types of information this may include. Answer: An attorney of record may have to submit ... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

MPEP Q & A 254: What must a statement under 37 CFR 1.97(e) state?: Question: What must a statement under 37 CFR 1.97(e) state? Answer: A statement under 37 CFR 1.97(e) must state either; that each item of information contained in the information disclosure statement was first cited in any communication from a foreign ... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 107: Times When Explicit Petitions for Foreign Filing Licenses May Be Considered by Applicants: Question: Name two times when an applicant may want to consider an explicit petition for foreign filing licenses. Answer: Explicit petitions for foreign filing licenses may be considered by applicants when: the filing receipt license is not granted; th... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

MPEP Q & A 53: Details on AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a): Question: What does AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) state? Answer: Specifically, AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) states that: [a] person shall be entitled to a patent unless— (1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

MPEP Q & A 56: Four Conditions That Establish a Statutory Bar Under Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d): Question: Name the four conditions which, if all are present, establish a statutory bar under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d). Answer: Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d) establishes four conditions which, if all are present, by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 110: What a Petition Filed On or After September 16, 2012 Must be Accompanied By to Correct Inventorship in a Patent: Question: What must a petition filed on or after September 16, 2012 be accompanied by to correct the inventorship in a patent? Answer: A petition filed on or after September 16, 2012 to correct the inventorship in a patent must be accompanied by all of... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 233: List application filing dates for determining whether patent is subject to maintenance fees: Question: What are the application filing dates for purposes of determining whether a patent is subject to payment of maintenance fees? Answer: Application filing dates for purposes of determining whether a patent is subject to payment of maintenance f... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

EPISODE 27 - The Examiner Whisperer - Rambus v Rea - Oct 17 2013: In this episode of the Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, Craige talks about a case where the Patent Office, in an Inter Partes re-examination, rejected a technology patent by correctly construing most claim terms but improperly... by Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

27 min listen

MPEP Q & A 204: Definition of a National Application: Question: What is the definition of a national application as described in chapter 200 of the MPEP? Answer: A national application as used in this chapter means either a U.S. application for patent which was filed in the Office under 35 U.S.C. 111, by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

MPEP Q & A 55: Obtaining Permission to File a Patent Application Abroad: Question: What are the two ways in which permission to file a patent application abroad may be obtained? Answer: The two ways in which permission to file a patent application abroad may be obtained include: either a petition for a foreign filing licens... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

EPISODE 1 - The Examiner Whisperer - Interdigital Communications V ITC & Nokia - Jan 17 2013: In this episode of the Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, the discussion concerns a federal court decision regarding whether or not a domestic industry, based solely on licensing activities, should have access to the International Trade... by Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

21 min listen

MPEP Q & A 111: What Must Each Information Disclosure Statement Include a Legible Copy Of?: Question: In addition to the list of all patents, publications, U.S. applications, or other information submitted for consideration by the Office, what else must each information disclosure statement include a legible copy of? by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 285: What don’t the provisions of 37 CFR 1.114 apply to?: Question: What do the provisions of 37 CFR 1.114, request for continued examination, not apply to? Answer: The provisions of 27 CFR 1.114, Request for continued examination, do not apply to: (1) A provisional application; (2) An application for a utili... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 166: Further Written Opinion Established by the International Preliminary Examining Authority: Question: Name one item any further written opinion established by the International Preliminary Examining Authority should set forth. Answer: Any further written opinion established by the International Preliminary Examining Authority should set forth... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 126: Time When a Third Party Submission Must be Made: Question: When must a third party submission be made? Answer: A third-party submission must be filed prior to the earlier of: The date a notice of allowance is given or mailed in the application; or The later of: (i) Six months after the date on which ... by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

4 min listen

MPEP Q & A 197: What Must a Petition for an Unintentionally Delayed Claim be Filed With?: Question: What must a petition for an unintentionally delayed claim be filed with? Answer: A petition for an unintentionally delayed claim must be accompanied by: (A) the reference required by 35 U.S.C. 120 and 37 CFR 1. by Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

3 min listen

Discover this podcast and so much more

MPEP Q & A 195: Necessary Items for a Petition for Retroactive License

MPEP Q & A 195: Necessary Items for a Petition for Retroactive License

Description

Titles in the series (100)

More Episodes from Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

Related podcast episodes