In the Beginning God Created a Hologram (The Origin): The Rebellion of Sakla, #4

By Frederick Guttmann

In this fourth thesis I explain the story of biblical Genesis in the light of metaphysics and literality, and not starting from the common error of taking the translated text, but starting from the original sources (first, Hebrew and Greek), and not according to not the religious interpretation, but also the scientific interpretation of the archetypes of the mind. But this cannot be achieved correctly without corroborating the information and comparing it with other sources. This is because there are hundreds of other manuscripts from the Hebrew people, many of which also address the creation of the universe.
You will not find a story that begins with chaos and an abyss, since that is a later scenario. Things didn't start out like that. There was already "something", and from that "something", made up of other types of kingdoms and worlds, this universe was produced. A primordial, non-physical universe, from which physical universes and their dimensions, like our own, were produced. There was no Big Bang from a specific or unique point. The light burst simultaneously, in terms of cosmic consciousness, although it was experienced at different "times" due to "space" (distance). There were not 6 days of creation. There were cycles before that "light", and 6 eons after that time frame.
What does all this story about the so-called "days" of Genesis (or 'Barashit') mean? You would be surprised to know that E-Din (Eden) was not a concept originating from the Sumerians, but evokes the kingdoms prior to this universe. Adam (Adam) was not a person, but the human race. Javah (Eve) was not a person, but Life, the daughter of Wisdom and Faith-Certainty. Here you come to understand what all these archetypes that were myths that first occurred in another universe really mean. Yes, that "snake" was not an animal, but the ego. And everything that is related represents the Collective Mind that produced this universe, which is called Elohim, Adam or Christ, as the case may be.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Frederick Guttmann
• Release date: Apr 15, 2024
• ISBN: 9798224574667

Frederick Guttmann

Israeli writer, researcher, disseminator, documentary filmmaker and influencer. He is the writer of more than 35 books, mostly research and dissemination theses.

Book preview

Frederick Guttmann R.

AND IN THE BEGINNING GOD CREATED ...

A HOLOGRAM

The Sakla IV Rebellion

- The Origin -

"The followers said to Yeshua: 'tell us what our end will be like.'

He said: 'Have you discovered the beginning so that you are therefore looking for the end?'

Because where the beginning is, will be the end.

Lucky is he who is at the beginning:

that one will know the end and will not taste death'".

(Gospel of Tomas, saying 18)

The Rebellion of Sakla IV – The Origin

First Thesis - June 2017

Second Thesis – August 2019

Cover: Frederick G.

Pages: 162.

Contact: [e-mail]

Blog: www.frederickguttmann.com

Candelaria, Tenerife (CP 38530) – Canary Islands (SPAIN)

Abbreviations and Particular Uses:

· Adam: The man.

· Alphabet: Hebrew alphabet.

· OT: Old Testament.

· Avatar: body vehicle.

· Cognate: particle from which arises the root of a word. Several definitions can come from the same sound source or cognate, such as the sound 'Lib' in Spanish would be cognate with 'book' and 'freedom'.

· DU: Book 'The Disappearance of the Universe', by Gary Renard.

· Aeon: from the Greek Aeon, is a sphere and state of reality where a superior deity is personified, and which also defines a time.

· ES: context of the spirit, or of the spiritual.

· Sphere: context of a reality.

· Ev: E-uanggelion (Gospel).

· Gnosis: Greek word meaning Knowledge, Knowing, Understanding.

· Heimarmene: interstellar and dimensional region of destiny.

· ICAR: Roman Catholic Apostolic Church.

· Irushalaim: Jerusalem.

· Jevah: Eve, or Jivah. The woman who brings life or who is Life.

· Monad: uniqueness, in Greek.

· Moshe: Moses.

· World: material cosmos.

· NH: Nag Hammadi, an Egyptian town where in 1945 almost 50 manuscripts of the Valentinian school were found.

· NT: New Testament.

· Permutation: exchange or re-positioning, in its case of the situation of the letters, in Kabalah called Temura. For example, the name 'Mijael' (Michael) by rearranging its letters can be read as 'Malajei' (angel).

· Pleroma: totality, in Greek.

· RS: The Sakla Rebellion (the previous books I've written in this saga).

· SAO: Service To Others.

· SAS: Service To Oneself.

· Tanak: Old Testament.

· Torah: Pentateuch (the first 5 official books of Moses).

· Towsang: our solar system.

· ACIM: book 'A Course in Miracles', by Helen Schucman.

· Valentinian: from the school of Valentino (or Valentin), from the 2nd century AD. C in Rome.

· Yeshua: Jesus of Nazareth.

Index

Introduction – 7

Chapter I - Before the Beginning

Day Minus One – 11

The Sky and the Water -14

Everything is Energy – 16

The Parody of Christianity – 17

Day Minus Two – 23

The 5 Places of the Monad – 30

The Kingdom of Uios – 32

The Veils – 34

The Projection – 36

Day Zero – 37

Chapter II - Maia

The Illusory Matter – 39

The Death of Matter – 42

Monstrous Archetypes – 43

The Levels of the Mind – 44

The Spirit Moved – 46

Chaos or Randomness – 48

Water and Gas – 49

A Lightning in Infinity – 50

Chapter III - The Firmament of the Heavens

The Stories – 57

Day Two – 59

The Children of the Dawn – 60

The Rakia – 61

Understanding the Scriptures – 65

Chapter IV - A World of Archetypes

Day Three – 71

A Characteristic Garden – 73

The Offspring – 74

Ethereal Worlds – 79

Day Four – 81

The Intermediate State – 89

Day Five – 90

Chapter V - The Avatar was Created

Day Six – 97

What animals are you referring to? - 97

The Ape Man – 103

The Male-Female Projection - 107

They bear fruit and multiply it – 110

God Took a Sabbath – 113

The Eighth Day – 114

Cosmic Particles of Light – 120

Chapter VI - The Wrong Mind

Cosmic Particles of Light – 117

Metaphorical Jordan – 118

The Immortal Mathematics – 121

Side as Shadow – 126

The Archetype of the Tree – 130

And He Fell In A Deep Sleep – 133

Sleep Levels – 136

Males and Females – 137

Original Sin – 140

The Expulsion from Eden – 144

The Son of the Serpent - 149

The Later Age - 150

Summary - 153

Archaeological Curiosities - 161

INTRODUCTION

«Yeshua said: 'whoever drinks from my mouth will become like me.

I myself will become that person, and hidden things will be revealed to him.'

(Ev. Tomas, said 108/106)

Unlike animals, we can consider that human beings attach great importance to our personal reality. Certainly, other forms of life that we know of on this planet do not have a sufficient level of consciousness to carry out this type of reasoning. When thinking about who we are, we cannot exclude another existential question: 'where do we come from?'. Empirical science from the 16th to the 20th centuries would tell us that we simply proceed from certain chance processes in particular environments that resulted in various changes in life forms, which were changing psychically, morphologically and biologically, to leave turning into completely different ones, and that thousands and millions of years later would become what we could now say that we are.

For the speculative and superstitious mind, man, and the rest of existing things, were created by one or more supernatural beings from some other state of abstract reality, while others would attribute this fact to a source in other dimensions, or other planets. Mythologies are a clear example of these phenomenal and achetypic reasoning. Although, only until the consolidation of ideas about the mind that exploded with individuals such as Sigmund Freud and Carl Gustav Jung - among many others - began to understand mythology and its archetypes, and the idea of a Collective Mind. Plato and a few before him, up to Freud and Jung, had already commented on this, and had indicated the reality of Mind over the world of phenomena. However, the ability to fully comprehend the apparent bottomlessness of Mind was not yet entirely plausible until less than two centuries ago.

Do you wonder what the mind has to do with the origin of the cosmos? All. I am not going to address data that I already covered half a decade ago in the initial trilogy of The Rebellion of Sakla, but I do have to remind you, if you read it, that mythology plays an important role in our understanding of the perceptible universe - as long as it is understand its symbols and know how to adapt to the principles of the mind -. As a point of reference, I use the story that we have received by transmission from the Hebrew prophet Moses (or Mashah, if we read it literally from the Hebrew language, or Moshe, as the Jews call him). Because? Well, I am Jewish by descent, an Israeli citizen and I speak Hebrew, so what better than to give my opinion from a more scholarly angle on this field? And if you ask me, why Moses? Although, I can take some isolated source as a skeleton to build the body of this book, but what happens is that circumstances have arisen in such a way that these writings - which we could call biblical - have undergone fewer changes over time. of thousands of years, from which other remote sources have suffered, and this, based on the fact that few cultures as old as the Hebrews came to notify things in writing. Apart from this detail, it has been proven - especially with the understanding of the Kabalah, and theses such as the book by journalist Michael Drosnin, 'The Secret Code of the Bible' - that these texts could not have simply been invented by mortals.

Yes, the Sumerians and the Egyptians wrote important things before the appearance of, for example, Abraham himself. The point is that the Hebrews did not change the written versions or the data for convenience, while the common denominator in the world is that the winner rewrites history, or a king who does not want to be a loser for future generations, would change engravings about its history, and leave its image and that of its dynasty, in a very good position. This is how history is made up, and it already lacks objectivity. Let's be honest, no town is perfect. It does not mean that because the Tanak was written by people of flesh and blood with a severe fear of deception - so as not to be punished by their god -, it means that everything they wrote lacked ambiguities, duality or conceptual errors. Of course they err and make mistakes in dates, numbers, locations, names, words, ideas and, above all, in scientific knowledge, not to say that they were extremely dual. Ergo, the essential point here is to start from something. However, it will not only be Moses who is the main component of this thesis. Other writings will accompany me, only without too much detail, because in addition to not having the same purity in the historical process of their conservation, they are difficult to compare with the sources that can be preserved from them.

As you will come to understand, the manuscripts in the Nag Hammadi Library are much closer to the truth than those that were imposed and made up by ICAR. You will hear me speak of Valentino the Gnostic, through his school in Rome in the 2nd century AD. C. He is a very important speaker in this study. One will not refute the other, as all of these are going to deal with their version of the dual universe. Also consider that I will use my own Hebrew words, since the translations do not have the same value as in their original language. An example is that I will use definitions such as: Torah (or doctrine, which is generically used in this context to refer to the first books of the Bible, which are attributed to Moses, and are known as the Pentateuch), Tanak (the 3 sets of texts that make up the so-called Old Testament), Barashit (Hebrew name of the first book of the Bible, known in the West as Genesis). Now, the Genesis account (Greek word meaning 'generations') is supported by dozens of other sources around the world. The same Moses in Jubilees, as well as Enoch, Baruch or Ezra treat the same points, they do not mention some others, or they add characteristics that had not been addressed in the others. In general, all together give us the sum of information for this thesis.

At the beginning of Genesis, the Hebrew voice Barashit (beginning, created) appears as the first word, and it follows: 'Bará' (created), 'Elohim' (god, gods, strong), 'et h a Shamaim' (the heavens) 've et ha Aretz' (and the Earth). The additional article 'Et' did not need to be added. Why did they put it then? 'Et' is a reaffirmation; is to reliably ensure that it refers to that specifically. But, above all, this 'Et' is an accusative case particle, and therefore adds the direct object. The accusative is not the case of the cause but of the effect. What does this mean? That the Heavens and Earth created were not the root, but the consequence. The Elohim creates those Heavens and that Earth as a result of something that the account has apparently not included. But as you will see reading this work, that which is not exposed - at least to the naked eye in the narrative - as the reason for said creation, was and is, in reality, the source - and that source is neither in time nor in space -. Just think about it for a moment: if there is no space, how can there be time? If there is no time, how can one speak of space? Imagine yourself in the nothing, in the vacuum, and you want to calculate the time. How do you do it? Suppose you create an object in that void. You could already define that there is a time between your apparent location and the object, which takes you to reach a certain speed. Still, we would have to have perceptual measures to measure time. Who defines a second or a minute, or an hour, or a year or a century?

How do I come to all these conclusions, from what sources do I base myself? Through various ancient and contemporary literary sources, as well as through kabbalistic deductions. The Kabalah is the use of 5 methods to discover hidden mysteries, both in the Tanak and in the phenomena of the world and in dreams, and that is applied to the Mind itself. I have added this essay to the comparative study in light of the famous book 'A Course in Miracles' and similar works. Thus, it is easy to understand the dynamics expressed by Yeshua in the book he transmitted to Helen Schucman between 1956 and 1965, which has been published and shared until today by the 'Foundation For Inner Peace' (or 'Foundation for Inner Peace '). This work (ACIM) was carried out by the psychologist Helen Schucman channeling Yeshua, and being helped in the work of writing and subsequent teaching by Bill Thetford, Robert Skutch and Ken Wapnick. Said work (UCDM) could not be previously shared by Yeshua due to more than 15 centuries of obscurantism and Catholic repression, due to the high level of global illiteracy and because certain parameters of psychology had not yet been explained (this knot was undone thanks to works such as those carried out by Carl Jung - such as the famous book 'Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious' - and Sigmund Freud, among many others).

After this advance and the discovery of the Nag Hammadi manuscripts (in December 1945), which were not destroyed by the ICAR (Roman Catholic Apostolic Church), it was possible to know much of the true message that Yeshua wanted to transmit and that it was not possible. understand due to the radical traditions of the Jewish community that determined the birth of the so-called Christianity. The texts of Nag Hammadi (Egypt) were hidden by Saint Pachomius when he learned that Theodosius had decreed in the First Council of Constantinople (382 AD) the prohibition of the teachings and texts where Yeshua spoke about the pre-existence of the soul, reincarnation, transcendence and enlightenment and spiritual freedom. From the First Council of Nicaea, by order of Constantine the Great, a first Bible (canon) was set up, later translated by Jerome of Estridón into Latin, called the Vulgate. But this version did not include most of the fundamental references on the transcendence and illumination of the soul or on revelations given to the patriarchs, prophets and apostles of the Hebrew people, due to the difficulty that it would entail for the ICAR to be able to keep the people under control.

In addition to this, they removed 20 books from the official canon, 25 quotations from the gospels that they did allow to incorporate in which Yeshua spoke of sensitive issues for ICAR, progressively added words and references that did not originally exist in the Greek manuscript, and took advantage of the differences between Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek and Latin to enter translated words at your convenience. In addition to this, they decreed excommunication to whoever studied those texts, such as the disciples of Valentino (of the Gnostic school of Rome in the second century AD, which until now had been the most versed in the understanding and study of the mysteries taught by Yeshua to his apostles), and any mention of these matters as heresy. Once the Course (UCDM) was published - in 1965 - its diffusion began, but the growth and propagation of the information took time to expand, especially due to the explanatory complexity of the Course. That is why Yeshua sent two of his apostles, Thaddeus and Thomas (introduced as Arten and Pursah) to transmit to Gary Renard the mechanisms of the Course in an understandable way, which were taught from a first visit in Maine (USA). in 1993. From then on, through a dozen appearances, they gave him the content for a first book: The Disappearance of the Universe. This was published in 2002, and was followed by two more works that complete the trilogy: 'Your Immortal Reality' (2006) and 'Love has not forgotten anyone' (2013).

Arten and Pursah explained to Gary that the awakening thought system taught by the course (ACIM) - which is the same as that of the Buddha (Buddhism) - was not accepted by the Jews when Yeshua wanted to teach it - although some wanted to understand it. (but they did not do it, just like their brother James, the apostle Peter or Paul of Tarsus), and Philip and Mary Magdalene understood them perfectly (Thomas, Thaddeus, Andrés and Esteban were the ones who later almost understood the Message) -, but its combination with Jewish mysticism explains the entire structure of manifest and non-manifest reality, and accelerates the path of awakening and the application of reality-altering mental exercises. This was confirmed by Arten and Pursah as well as the work of psychic Jane Roberts, who was channeling Seth throughout the 1970s, and from whose recordings she published 8 books ('Speak Seth'). These works were also supported - and form a whole - by the works of researchers Carla Rueckert, Don Elkins and James Allen McCarty of L/L Research, who published 'The Ra Material' in 1982 (5 books that complement the revelation of the Oahspe, of 1882, by John Ballou Newbrough), among other groups that have been receiving updated messages from consciences from other worlds and other dimensions (as in their time other peoples received them, especially the prophets of Israel, or the famous Edgar Cayce).

Kabalah is a Hebrew word whose meaning is 'reception', that is to say what is received, referring to the Tanak (the 3 sets of books that make up the so-called Pentateuch, in Greek). The Kabalah has 2 mechanisms: one pragmatic and the other symbolic. The pragmatic is divided into 3: Gematria (numerical meaning of Hebrew letters and words), Temura (anagrams and permutations of the letters of a word) and Notaricon (reconfiguration of new words through the union of initials or final letters of a word). Biblical quote). The symbolic method has 2 areas: Bereshit (study of the book of Genesis and its analysis from the understanding of the symbols used in the text) and Merkaba (analysis of celestial or non-physical phenomena and their archetypal meaning). This book complements the courses I teach on Personal Growth (Transformational Development) and Kabala (UCDM-K).

Part I.

BEFORE THE START

"The Father dwelt in the [Son] and the Son in the Father:

this is [the] kingdom of heaven."

(Ev. Philip, verse 96)

Day Minus One (-1)

As a civilization we have had an obvious interest in knowing our origin and the reason for our existence. How to go to the past to know the ins and outs of what arose when there was no human way to record what happened for the last generations? Do you believe in revelations? Do you think that other, more advanced civilizations from another world or another dimension, or from the future, could have been giving us knowledge? In itself, over the last two centuries scientific advances and theories have increased considerably. Although many estimates are based on assumptions, mathematical calculations or probabilities, it is accepted that models that present the idea of the origin of the universe have, to a large extent, a high percentage of possibility of being right, and coincide with what the myths of the ancients represented. However, mainstream science and much of the Abrahamic religious community supposedly do not agree on their views, and this seems to create a huge gap in ideology or popular belief. The vast majority of Christian and Muslim groups - and even Jews - reject the official version of classical science, arguing that the origin of the universe is already presented in the biblical book of Genesis, in its first chapter, and does not correspond to the theory that It is supposedly attributed to scientists, who are classified as atheists.

On the contrary, in Hinduism this discrepancy does not seem to exist, even in the Catholic leadership, considering that the study of both currents has simply been misinterpreted, and they do not have to be incompatible or mutually exclusive. Many refute that a Hebrew (Moses) could have had the resources or knowledge to know the origin of the cosmos and of life to capture it, for example, in the so-called book of Genesis - much less any other human being even a hundred years ago -. In contrast, whether supporters of creationism or panspermia (especially defenders of ufology) are - to a greater or lesser degree - convinced that an alien intervention (angels, gods, extraterrestrials, interdimensional beings or time travelers) provided to the peoples of the past (not only to the Hebrews) of a knowledge that only now is science beginning to discover. If so, could the first chapter of the first book of the Hebrew Moses really deal with a fully scientific worldview? And I'm not saying evolutionary science, but pro-panspermia science (theory defended by the illustrious Fred Hoyle that assumes that life was brought to Earth, it did not occur here).

בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶ ץ׃

With these Hebrew characters the story of the biblical creation begins, where transcribed it would say, «barashit bará elohim et ha.shamaim ve-et ha-aretz», but what do all these words mean? Barashit, or Bereshit is the Hebrew name for the book of Genesis, and comes from the same root as Persian 'Bahashit' (heaven). This word means beginning, of the form 'ba-rashit' (head), where 'Rosh' is head, beginning or leadership. The word 'Bará' means 'to create' or 'to form'. That is, ' created'. Said word is formed from the abjad letters Beit, Reish and Aleph, where the root can denote an associated hidden meaning of Bor (Beit, Vav and Reish), which is well (compare many other cosmogonic texts). Precisely the first word is made up of the same initial letters as the second: Bará = Bara-shit, thus being an evocation of a principle of creation or establishment (because 'Shit' would come from the voice 'Set' (establish)).

For its part, the term 'elohim' encompasses any concept related to a powerful being, a divinity or a deity, whether singular or plural. Then, the word 'Shamaim' refers to heavens, starting from the Semitic words it is understood as a compound idea: Sham-maim (over there-waters) or Shem-Iam (name of the sea). The ancient Egyptians considered the night sky as a sea, and this was a very popular idea, so it was accepted that this celestial sea was full of life. While sometimes words such as 'Shamei' or 'Shamai' (sky) are used, the truth is that almost all times the plural 'Shamaim' is used, implying that beyond the celestial vault there are many heavens. Thanks to the large number of texts that exist, we can understand that these skies are all kinds of spaces, whether physical or immaterial, and of various dimensions and universes, not limiting themselves, at all, to the common idea of many monotheistic aspects. In the case of the Sumerian version of the creation story, the origins tablet reads, E-nu-ma e-liš la na-bu-ú ša-ma-mu, referring to Nabu as heaven, and the Sa.ma.mu as the fact that it had not yet been established.

But what would happen if we considered a variation in the initial letters and their meaning, which coincided with the Persian font? If Barashit were a deformation of the Persian Bahashit, that is, of the idea of Heaven, we could dare to formulate an alternative translation that said: Heaven created gods, heavens and earth. Most mythologies usually begin their cosmovisions by arguing that the heaven created everything, and that heaven was the first of the gods, as would be the case of the Roman Caelum, or the Greek Ouranon. That means that there would first be celestial gods who would have created the celestial regions, according to the remote legends of the peoples of the Earth. Another formulation of the letter game could be based on an ancient way of writing that consisted of not separating the words. Thus we could read from the first portion of the initial sentence, for example, with the Aramaic form: bar ash itbara alahim atah, which means, [the] son [of] fire created [a] you gods. Moreover, we could read: bara shit bara elah iam atah, which would be, created foundation, created deity, you are sea. Are you sea? The word Yam, like sea or ocean, encompasses the idea of the material universe, or deep space, the basis of matter, or multiplicity. In fact, Yam is an abbreviation of Yom, which is both day and period of time, era or cycle.

Suppose that a primeval and original Heaven existed before the time and space that we think we know, and from it the Elohim was created, as well as later heavens and earths. Let us take the word Fire as an idea of infinite light. Ergo, we would have as a result that everything came from the light, who had a Son who created the Elohim. The light would come first, then his Son, and then the Elohim. The other interpretation is that of someone who creates a foundation or base, a place, space or scene, also creates the deity, which, if not read as elah iam atah, but as elahim atah would come to be you are Elohim. According to any of these versions, Elohim is not the first to appear, but a later result of a source. Personally I wouldn't consider it egocentric if the deity itself were to show up to begin with, since it doesn't tell us where it came from. Going back to the Sumerian version, in it, the word 'Sa-Ma-Mu' (whose Hebrew equivalent would be 'Sha-Ma-iM') does not seem to be translated as Heaven, but as named. In that way? The word Shamaim is made up of the structures 'Sham' and 'Maim', where the root of Sham is the Semitic Shem (name), from the Akkadian Shemu, from the Sumerian Mu. 'Sham' also means there, and 'Shama ' is over there.

There are many more curiosities to delve into here, and one of them is the fact that the form 'Et' – or 'At' – is the formation of the first and last letters of the alphabet or Hebrew, which in Greek would be Alpha-Omega, or beginning and end. It could thus explain another level of understanding about the sky derived from the primordial emanations, as well as the earth derived from the primordial emanations. If Bahashit is the pristine heaven of Ethe, the subsequent Heaven and Earth are the upper world and the lower world that followed it. In effect, that following Shamaim would be the image of the Bahashit, and the following Aretz, in turn, would be the image of that Shamaim. Both that a later Shamaim and a material Aretz will pass away, as the Bible says on a couple of occasions: heaven and earth will pass away. There lies the hidden meaning of the letters 'Alef' and 'Tau' that form the aggregate 'Et'.