Summary of Reading the Constitution by Stephen Breyer: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
By GP SUMMARY
()
About this ebook
This book does not in any capacity mean to replace the original book but to serve as a vast summary of the original book.
Summary of Reading the Constitution by Stephen Breyer: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
IN THIS SUMMARIZED BOOK, YOU WILL GET:
- Chapter provides an astute outline of the main contents.
- Fast & simple understanding of the content analysis.
- Exceptionally summarized content that you may skip in the original book
Stephen Breyer, a retired Supreme Court Justice, presents a compelling analysis that challenges the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and advocates for a better interpretation of the Constitution. Breyer argues that understanding the purposes of statutes and the consequences of a case is crucial for interpreting law. He examines significant cases in the nation's history, such as the Dobbs and Bruen decisions, which he believes were wrongly decided and have led to harmful results.
Read more from Gp Summary
Summary of The Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Bad Therapy by Abigail Shrier: Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Summary of Why We Remember by Charan Ranganath: Unlocking Memory's Power to Hold on to What Matters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Worthy by Jamie Kern Lima: How to Believe You Are Enough and Transform Your Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Saturated Facts by Idrees Mughal: A Myth-Busting Guide to Diet and Nutrition in a World of Misinformation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Nuclear War by Annie Jacobsen: A Scenario Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Sociopath a memoir by Ph.D. Patric Gagne Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Age of Revolutions by Fareed Zakaria: Progress and Backlash from 1600 to the Present Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of The Hunter by Tana French Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Summary of Reading the Constitution by Stephen Breyer
Related ebooks
The Theory and Practice of Statutory Interpretation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLegal Hermeneutics: History, Theory, and Practice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCourts: A Comparative and Political Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Restitution: Civil Liability for Unjust Enrichment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Conscience: The Moral Dimension of Judicial Decision Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIdeology in the Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Democratic Constitution: Experimentalism and Interpretation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPurposive Interpretation in Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Ministers of the Law: A Natural Law Theory of Legal Authority Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThoughtfulness and the Rule of Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Supreme Court Review, 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat Cases in Constitutional Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Age of Foolishness: A Doubter’s Guide to Constitutionalism in a Modern Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Critical Legal Studies Movement: Another Time, A Greater Task Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Student's Guide to the Study of Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLaw's Order: What Economics Has to Do with Law and Why It Matters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLooking for Law in All the Wrong Places: Justice Beyond and Between Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssential Law for Social Workers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLaw, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 1: Rules and Order Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Law as it Could Be Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDiscretion to Disobey: A Study of Lawful Departures from Legal Rules Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReason in Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLaw in the Health and Human Services Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Courts in Comparison: The US Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Judge as Political Theorist: Contemporary Constitutional Review Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEvidence of the Law: Proving Legal Claims Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Study Aids & Test Prep For You
The Art of Seduction: by Robert Greene | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/512 Rules For Life: by Jordan Peterson | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 48 Laws of Power: by Robert Greene | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Barron's American Sign Language: A Comprehensive Guide to ASL 1 and 2 with Online Video Practice Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Verity: by Colleen Hoover | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Do the Work: The Official Unrepentant, Ass-Kicking, No-Kidding, Change-Your-Life Sidekick to Unfu*k Yourself Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fluent in 3 Months: How Anyone at Any Age Can Learn to Speak Any Language from Anywhere in the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Finish What You Start: The Art of Following Through, Taking Action, Executing, & Self-Discipline Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Circe: by Madeline Miller | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5One Hundred Years of Solitude: A Novel by Gabriel Garcia Márquez | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Power of Habit: by Charles Duhigg | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Man's Search for Meaning: by Viktor E. Frankl | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Becoming Supernatural: by Dr. Joe Dispenza | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Behold a Pale Horse: by William Cooper | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Writing Series You'll Ever Need - Grant Writing: A Complete Resource for Proposal Writers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dare to Lead: Brave Work. Tough Conversations. Whole Hearts.by Brené Brown | Conversation Starters Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Between the World and Me: by Ta-Nehisi Coates | Conversation Starters Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5My Year of Rest and Relaxation: by Ottessa Moshfegh | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking by Susan Cain | Conversation Starters Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Secret History: by Donna Tartt | Conversation Starters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKillers of the Flower Moon: by David Grann | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for Summary of Reading the Constitution by Stephen Breyer
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Summary of Reading the Constitution by Stephen Breyer - GP SUMMARY
PART ONE
PURPOSE VS. TEXTUALISM
Judges traditionally use various interpretive tools to determine the proper interpretation of statutes and the Constitution, including text, history, precedent, tradition, purposes, values, and consequences. There is no specific rank order among these tools, and which one proves more helpful depends on the particular case. Judges have long differed in their importance of certain tools compared to others, with some placing greater weight on text and related linguistic features, while others place greater weight on a statutory or constitutional phrase's purposes. Recently, the differences between textualist
and purpose-oriented
judges have become more pronounced. Many judges, legal scholars, and practicing lawyers claim to be textualists, focusing primarily on a phrase's text to find its proper interpretation or application. However, the textualist approach, particularly in its more text-exclusive versions, is an undesirable way to interpret legal text.
Purpose-Based Approaches
Purpose-based approaches to judicial interpretation focus on the purpose of laws and their intended purposes. These approaches are often closely linked to the common law mode of judging, which proceeds case by case, resolving new questions based on the particular facts of new cases. They are rooted in judicial pragmatism, which accounts for how a particular legal decision will affect other legal rules and principles, and often consult a hypothetical reasonable legislator
to determine how a statute serves broader democratic ends.
Common law methods, which focus on the facts of a particular case, are often used to guide statutory interpretation. However, interpreting a statute can lead to narrow decisions, as the breadth of the holding is a matter for judicial decision. This allows judges to tailor their holding to the statute's purpose while leaving the full scope of the language to be fleshed out or decided in future cases. Common law decisions often exhibit similar, incremental characteristics, allowing judges to tailor their interpretation to the statute's purpose while leaving the full scope of the language to be fleshed out or decided in future cases.
In the 2020 case of County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Supreme Court debated the extent to which the Court should have left aspects of the problem to be decided in future cases. The Clean Water Act defines a pollutant
as any substance that can be discharged from a point source into navigable waters. The court held that a sewage treatment plant in Hawaii may need a federal permit if the sewage mixture travels hundreds of miles before reaching the Pacific Ocean.
The Court reached a compromise that drew heavily from the common law method. Instead of adopting either extreme, the Court decided that a permit was needed if the addition of pollutants through groundwater is the functional equivalent of a direct discharge from the point source into navigable waters.
The Court added considerations that would help lower courts determine when the functional equivalent
standard applied, such as the length of underground travel, its duration, and its having mixed with other nonpolluted water.
The Court provided examples to guide future cases, such as discharges that fall five feet through the air between pipe and sea would still need a permit, while discharges that travel underground for fifty miles over several years would not. The Court left room for future development, recognizing the usefulness of the traditional common-law method
in an era of