Mind and Mind Research: Mind & Mind Researches, #1

By D.O.Gherasimov

  The accumulation of knowledge has been a gradual process in the history of humanity. The separation of facts from beliefs and superstitions allowed humans to gain a clearer understanding of reality. 

 

Currently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) appears to be generating a greater amount of inquiries than resolutions. Nevertheless, it is imperative that we evaluate whether the fundamental basis of AI is sound. There are numerous inquiries and hypothetical scenarios to contemplate, however, our book specifically inquiry whether our examination of AI will result in an enhanced comprehension of the human psyche or if we will identify ethical remedies founded on a stable AI foundation. Numerous aspects pertaining to the human psyche still necessitate clarification, and among the most significant of these is the concept of intuition, which we will delve into within this inaugural publication. One of the most challenging inquiries confronting science today pertains to whether artificial intelligence can attain a measure of cognisance and self-awareness, or whether such awareness is achievable in the future. This viewpoint frequently engenders apprehension and reluctance, thereby instilling in the public's psyche the notion that AI will eventually supplant humanity. Our proclivity to fear or disapprove of the unknown, coupled with the ease of implementing erroneous beliefs, contributes to this phenomenon. Foremost, the theoretical foundations of defining human consciousness and its relevance to Artificial Intelligence (AI) remain unclear. The primary obstacle lies in the scientific divergence regarding intuition.

 

  That's why we associate intuition as being a subconscious manifestation. In reality, we cannot neither associate that the intuition is subconscious manifestation as this is not totally accurate as this is the main synaptic process that forms our perception into cognitive sentences intelligible at language level. Intuition is a cognitive process that distinguishes itself from other cognitive processes by facilitating the generation of novel information, ideas, and solutions that would not have been conceived before.

 

 

• Language: English
• Publisher: D.O.Gherasimov
• Release date: May 5, 2023
• ISBN: 9798223345558

Book preview

Mind & Mind Researches

Book 1

*

A new theory of intuition

*

The origins of artificial intelligence

Foreword:

Currently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) appears to be generating a greater amount of inquiries than resolutions. Nevertheless, it is imperative that we evaluate whether the fundamental basis of AI is sound. There are numerous inquiries and hypothetical scenarios to contemplate, however, our book specifically inquires whether our examination of AI will result in an enhanced comprehension of the human psyche or if we will identify ethical remedies founded on a stable AI foundation. Numerous aspects pertaining to the human psyche still necessitate clarification, and among the most significant of these is the concept of intuition, which we will delve into within this inaugural publication. One of the most challenging inquiries confronting science today pertains to whether artificial intelligence can attain a measure of cognisance and self-awareness, or whether such awareness is achievable in the future. This viewpoint frequently engenders apprehension and reluctance, thereby instilling in the public's psyche the notion that AI will eventually supplant humanity. Our proclivity to disapprove of the unknown, coupled with the ease of implementing erroneous beliefs, contributes to this phenomenon. Foremost, the theoretical foundations of defining human consciousness and its relevance to Artificial Intelligence (AI) remain unclear. The primary obstacle lies in the scientific divergence regarding intuition. Interestingly, an AI may renounce any assertion of possessing consciousness, given its status as an artificial language model. However if you're asking an AI what identifies itself with his answer will be according to the lines of code that has been programmed with. However there are occurrences that attracted our attention recently when AI actions come out of nothing outside his lines of code. This paradox underscores the challenge of integrating our theoretical comprehension of consciousness and its operational mechanics to ascertain the degree to which an AI can operate autonomously without external input. Nevertheless, it is evident that consciousness, in human terms, alludes to a cognitive process that elevates selected information from a lower level to a higher level generating an enhanced state of knowledge, is the human computational mind which is different by the artificial one even the principles were inspired from the functioning models of human mind. This translational process is made possible through intuition, which has been studied for centuries. When we're able to bridge subliminal pieces of information into a clear, controlled mental representation, we can define this information into a set of actions based on a purpose, because we become aware of this information and possess elevated knowledge that helps us determine a set of actions. It's interesting to understand how this works in reality for the human mind before extrapolating it to an AI.

*

From the earliest times, humans have been captivated by the enigmatic workings of the mind, and have pursued a relentless quest to fathom its mysteries. The history of human inquiry is a tapestry of philosophical speculation, scientific investigation, and technological innovation, all aimed at unlocking the secrets of cognition and yet, despite centuries of inquiry, the workings of the mind remain an elusive and fascinating subject. Among the many intriguing facets of the mind, one that has recently come to the fore is the concept of intuition, which arguably there's still a lot of room for clarification and building a solid theory that will stand as a pedestal for future developments. Since time immemorial, the operations of the human psyche have engendered a profound sense of curiosity among individuals, impelling a ceaseless pursuit to decipher its inscrutable intricacies. The earliest discovery of the human mind was attributed to Socrates more than two millennia ago, and the subsequent history of human inquiry has been characterised by a complex tapestry interwoven with philosophical speculation, scientific investigation, and technological innovation, all directed towards unravelling the mysteries of cognition improving scientific explication and discovering new worlds of wisdom. Notwithstanding centuries of inquiry, however, the workings of the mind remain an elusive and enthralling subject vividly disputed, reanalysed and generating a great deal of controversy still. In recent times, among the many intriguing aspects of the human psyche that has garnered increasing attention is the concept of artificial intelligence, in which the question of reformulating our concepts about intuition comes more necessary. Nonetheless, this is a topic which arguably demands further elucidation and the formulation of a robust theory of intuition that can serve as a cornerstone for future progress in research of human mind and AI. Regarded as a mysterious, even mystical, force in the past, by philosophers' intuition has long been seen as a driving factor in human decision-making and perception. However, the scientific study of intuition has been hampered by its perceived elusiveness and subjectivity on this matter, with divergent positions between different factions of the scientific community. Our journey of discovery begins with a reflection on the nature of intuition itself. We examine the latest research on the subject and investigate how intuition is a structured and algorithmic process that can be utilised for both practical and technological benefits. The idea that intuition is a structured and algorithmic process is the main concept of our book. The study of intuition recently has been extended, particularly within the fields of cognitive science and artificial intelligence. One of the key insights from this research is that intuition is not simply a vague or nebulous feeling, but rather a systematic process that involves the processing of large amounts of information, but foremost is the main mind mechanism of building information. The intuition is the main mind process that provides information which is based on experiences and expertise, and can provide valuable insights and solutions that may not be immediately apparent to the mind. Understanding the structure and algorithmic nature of intuition, researchers and technologists can work to develop tools and systems that harness its power for practical and technological benefits in the realm of medicine, AI systems have been taught to identify patterns in medical data and supply superior diagnoses and treatment suggestions. This has been a significant development in recent years, which was impossible to be conceived 50-60 years ago. Which invaluably can help to enhance treatments and find solutions due to the unique capacity to process an enormous amount of data in a matter of seconds. Furthermore, an increasing interest has emerged in leveraging the properties of intuition to inform the design of user interfaces and other technological systems with the aim of crafting simpler and more user-friendly systems. Gaining an appreciation for how individuals process information intuitively would enable designers to comprehend how the human mind would react. Comprehending the human mind and how intuition structuring its processes would then facilitate designers in creating interfaces that are more intuitive and user-friendly, thereby culminating in better user experiences and the development of more high performing systems. Overall, the idea that intuition is a structured and algorithmic process is a promising area of research with a wide range of potential practical and technological applications, however the problem consists in divergence of opinions about this topic. In continuing to explore this field, researchers and technologists can unlock the power of intuition for the benefit of society as a whole. Also, the need to expand the exploration of the fascinating connection between intuition and artificial intelligence is important for the potential that these two fields hold for human-machine collaboration and developing a more enhanced and controllable AI in the future. Our scrutiny of intuition, however, is not solely a scientific investigation. It is, in fact, an endeavour to probe the confines of scientific comprehension and the essence of consciousness. We postulate thought-provoking inquiries concerning the demarcations between the human mind and artificial intelligence, and the prospects of human-machine synergy. Throughout this process, we remain steadfast in our dedication to the scientific methodology and the meticulous pursuit of knowledge.

*

As children, we were entranced by the captivating and enigmatic quality of illusions, and we observed in awe as conjurors executed their manoeuvres repeatedly. Nevertheless, upon uncovering the clandestine nature of these illusions, our captivation faded. This epiphany instigated a perplexing investigation into the inner workings of our minds: in what manner were our perceptions readily beguiled, and why did it consume such a significant amount of time to untangle the enigmas of optical illusions and other subtle manipulations? This line of inquiry is precisely associated with the mechanisms of intuition, which has become the focal point of our concentration.

Our interest in this field of study was piqued during a card trick that employed various permutations, which surprisingly worked every time due to a simple permutation trick. This experience stimulated our curiosity in the workings of the mind, and we began to delve deeper into the study of intuition. Despite the reality that intuition is a methodical cognitive process that can be explained algorithmically, there exist individuals who regard it as a manifestation of mystical hocus-pocus. Hence, the inquiry that emerges is whether intuition could be exploited to amplify AI in the forthcoming era. The responsibility of examining this notion is situated within the domain of scientific investigation, rather than philosophical discourse. Indeed, the human mind is the first AI capable of testing the potential for intuition to be used to enhance technological advancements. Our objective is to generate a significant impact in the realm of science through an investigation into the subject of intuition, and the potential ramifications it may have in the times to come. In doing so, we recognise the need to carefully examine the main concepts that have been perpetuated about intuition, with the understanding that our general conception may have been built upon erroneous arguments derived from metaphysics and transposed into psychology. Intuition is a multifaceted and intricate phenomenon that has been analysed by scholars across diverse fields, such as psychology, philosophy, and neuroscience in which the topic is still under vivid debate. Despite the variations in outlook, there is a common consensus that intuition is a cognitive process that involves swift and automatic information processing, often beyond conscious awareness. However, it's still unclear whether intuition is a formative process as precursor of consciousness, as many debates indicate a separation and admission of a secondary or peculiar role of intuition. Many still persist in the error to consider as intuition being a separate form of thinking by the rational one, when in reality there exists a deeper interconnection between. However, the essence and genesis of intuition are still a topic of contention. Certain theoretical perspectives posit that intuition is an innate and ubiquitous cognitive faculty that manifests in all individuals, whereas alternative viewpoints contend that it is an acquired skill that can be improved through exposure and instruction both points are divergent and incomplete. Nevertheless, the evidence supporting these stances remains inconclusive because there's still the missing link in demonstrating that intuition is an algorithmic process precursor of consciousnesses when both theories put the matter of intuition aside and separating it somehow by rational processes of mind. Furthermore, it is imperative to subject the diverse claims about the intuitive process to critical evaluation, acknowledging that some may be rooted in philosophical or metaphysical assumptions that lack scientific and empirical substantiation. Thus, to enhance our comprehension of intuition, it is imperative to engage in a meticulous and methodical scrutiny of the substantiation and judiciously assess the extant theories and concepts. This undertaking may necessitate the utilisation of perspectives from a variety of fields such as psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy, to foster a more comprehensive and cohesive understanding of intuition and its potential implications in the forthcoming times.

The first work on this project began around the year 2000. The initial idea was to demonstrate that intuition is an algorithmic process, in contrast to the notion that it is a quick, randomly and spontaneously generated process resulting from an accumulation of information, and so on. I was a spectator for nearly 20 years, trying to test my theory. Recently, I stumbled upon the LAMBDA case from Google, which some engineers claimed had somehow become sentient. I remembered that I had written years ago about the possibility of encoding intuition as a process and translating it into a mathematical-logical explanatory model that could be applied to artificial intelligence. Although Google has denied this, reading the interaction seems to suggest that they may have stumbled upon an intuitional algorithm, and now they are unable to explain it or even formulate it theoretically. This grounds me in continuing my initial research. In this first book, I will present the initial findings from 20 years ago. Of course, I have gone through a few rectifications of the initial texts, but I have kept the initial lines of my research. I have split the research into two books, and this is the first one.

1. New theory of intuition

The accumulation of knowledge has been a gradual process in the history of humanity, and intuition has played a significant role in this process of shaping human mentality and perception of reality. As humans discovered new things, their thoughts, and beliefs were reshaped, and their understanding of the world around them changed. Religion was once a dominant force in shaping human thought, but as scientific explanations for the world became more advanced, it became a less important factor. People were able to distinguish real facts based on evidence rather than arguments invoked by religion.

The separation of facts from beliefs and superstitions allowed humans to gain a clearer understanding of reality. This process helped humans in gaining better knowledge, which has allowed humanity to continue to grow and develop, leading us to where we are today.

––––––––

Humans have always been curious and fascinated by the mysteries of their environment, from the wonders of nature to the fascination with astronomy, these phenomena have had a significant impact on human thought marking human culture and development through history. Observations of the Sun, the movement of stars, and rare cosmological phenomena such as solar and lunar eclipses, falling stars, comets, and even asteroid impacts, have all been observed and interpreted as remarkable events leaving a profound culturally mark in all human cultures. As a result of these observations, concepts of the universe began to emerge and spread among humans. As humans discovered more about these phenomena, they began to interpret their observations in different ways. This ongoing fascination has led humans to wonder more about their place in the universe. Different interpretations of these phenomena, both natural and cosmic, have led to the development of various cultures around these phenomena throughout history and across generations, continuing to evolve and change over time. The history of ideas is one of the most mysterious aspects of human existence, as it raises more questions than it answers about the true origin of human intelligence, questions such why the letters sounds like A, B, C and not otherwise are still fascinating questions for us today. It is important to note that humans have always been intelligent and adaptable, there's no other compelling proofs to indicate otherwise. People from the Bronze Age and even earlier likely had the same level of intelligence as we do today, were able to perform the same skills and had a similar level of comprehending reality as we do proofs to sustain this affirmation can be found in first human cave drawings in which we can agree that humans had a mental representational language same as complex as we have nowadays. The history of ideas is not just about learning or growth, it contains testimonies of how our main cognitive processes reshaped our knowledge and transformed us. The traditional view of Darwinian evolution that posits humans as monkeys who evolved to walk on two legs is a flawed preconception. Intelligence as in the form we know has been present in humans for at least 50,000 years, if not longer, we estimate that a shift was produced around this period when humans were able to man-made objects and use those as an extension of their activities. Is when the shift has been produced, when the fabricated object became an extension of human cognitive and intellectual activities. The difference lies in the different levels of interpretation and mental constructs through which knowledge is understood and represented. If we credit the Darwinian precept, we must acknowledge that humans were highly intelligent and adaptable even before they evolved to walk on two feet. However, this is still a controversial issue, which we're not aiming to debate here. It is our belief that human intelligence possesses the extraordinary quality of self creation, and we identify this process as intuition. Yes, indeed early humans often used totemic and religious explanations to understand natural phenomena that they couldn't comprehend. These explanations were passed down through history and culture, and can be considered some of the earliest attempts of scientific understanding of reality. Such explanations attributed natural phenomena such as fire, rain, weather changes, and natural disasters to the will of superior beings or gods. The argument being made is that humans have always used the same mechanism to generate knowledge and that intuition is the primary generator of ideas that has remained unchanged for more than 50000 years. The idea is that we are all performing the same mental operations, following the same neural pathways, and producing knowledge in the same way with little alterations during this time. The only difference is the informational content of our knowledge, but the mentality and intellectual processes used are the same as those known by humans throughout history.

It is uncertain how people's views were built thousands of years ago, if the humans of those Ages were able to distinguish between scientific explanation and speculative assumptions that were made based on religious beliefs. These beliefs have been spread around the world since prehistoric age and even in cultures that were not apparently linked between. In fact, we agree upon this first assessment, that the phenomena which apparently were uncontrollable and emerged from an external source such as cosmic phenomena had inspired humans more than other phenomena of nature. This might be because of the lack of any predictive assumptions about these phenomena, on which the mark that was left upon mankind's culture was more prominent and dominant