Layman's Transformation of String Theory: Plotting The Arcanum In Spreadsheets

By Keaton Williams

The title concept was a name to reach out to a broad spectrum of readers and those that do very little reading. It was also to convey that there are two parts--one, the publication, and two, a spreadsheet file.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Fulton Books, Inc.
• Release date: Jan 24, 2023
• ISBN: 9781638603696

Book preview

Contents

Preface

Part I Process

1. Our Present Use

2. Making a Foundation

3. Linguistic Physical Transformation

4. Linguistics’ Fourth Piece

5. The Initial Approach

Part II Practical

6. Proving Grounds

7. Leads that Provides Discoveries

8. Returning to Chapter-3

9. Incorporating Spreadsheet Formulas

Part III Progress

10. Attempts to start

Preface

This book will provide new technology developed from the concepts of string theory. Using the concepts of this theory that has been unified with linguistics concepts, a pattern can be established. The pattern is diverse and has hidden dimensions. This hidden speech pattern is very effective for data analysis applications particularly the development of a spreadsheet which, in turn, unifies the formulas that will eventually lead to a question-form statement for the formulas, in which all formulas will be open arguments. This will remove the challenges endured at development a spreadsheet dashboard which will allow the user to develop stronger linguistic skills to present true data that is in the same form as its actual linguistic occurrence in our spatial dimensions. Formulas will already be present and ready for arguments to provide the solution of how much.

The author Brian Greene provided a book entitled The Elegant Universe. This book provides theories called string theory, which is something I never heard of during any of my educational training life span. The most important theory is the perturbation method, which is a process of overhauling anything to get an initial estimate. After that estimate, do another estimate, but this time pay closer attention to finer details that were initially ignored. The focus was the hidden dimensions, which is another piece of the string theory. These dimensions became viewable when a transformation was done from one form into another form, which were repeated patterns from one into the other.

The overhauling process was required for multiple fields of education. My English language skills required overhauling, meaning I needed to reread the guide to the use of the dictionary and the definitions of words that have been a part of my everyday life, from which I soon learned that I had taken the definition and use of these words for granted and did not fully understand their functional uses as depicted in the guide. This was also required for the teachings I have previous received for math, chemistry, and physics. Even our date system required this process, which eventually provided a path to the successful results at present which was not achieved when beginning this process, as included in the first written book about this new linguistic system I titled Layman’s Use of String Theory: Overhauling the Use of Linguistics (US Copyright TXu 2-097-104). I had never imagined that the use of linguistics would ever require overhauling due to excessive uses. It was also learnt that the function of parts of speech had a hidden dimension of being able to dismantle a word’s definition into various pieces with time being a part of the procedure.

This publication is organized using three techniques from string theory: 3-pieces-of-information, perturbative, and magnification processes. The 3-pieces-of-information is relatively large-scale, being a math equation of the domain; and the perturbative is somewhat a midsize scale, also being a math equation of the range; and the smaller-scale alternative mathematical form of equation being the limit for the domain and range. This process is not in exact order but is the foundation to present this new technology. It is not recommended to skip though the book and go to various locations, but to endure each step in the sequence that it is written. It is my opinion to do this because the information being provided is not of a familiar form, and it is not comparable to anything else until it is understood in the specific steps as written. At some places, it may appear that I’m just babbling some words—bear with this; it’s the only words which are presently known to present this unseen technology. The first part is the theoretical process of establishing linguistic equations. This is like a layman viewing of Albert Einstein’s notes of general relativity on chalkboard, which means nothing, but plotting stars’ positions relative to another before and after being shadowed by a massive object like the Sun has an explanation that is comprehensible for even a layman. The physical features which is later provided by a spreadsheet in Part II will make a better presentation.

The key element for a process is the ability to have a system being able to make a transformation into another. This requires a strong basic foundation of understanding each system and the initial starting place for each system. This requires reviewing math systems involving algebra, trigonometry, and their higher form, calculus. The English system is definitely involving a refresher of the basics. Those are parts of speech, definitions, and sentence structuring. Although the date and time system can easily be taken for granted, a history of calendars by many cultures provides a good starting point. The internet Bing and Editors’ Dictionary communities was a good resource for this information, particularly the history of the various calendars: Mayan, Jewish, Gregorian, and Islamic. The initial manuscript written with just the information from the physics community did not provide a very good foundation, in linguistic terms, to explain the transformation of multiple processes.

Once the old habit of looking at our date format, which does not choose to approach it from a 3-pieces-of-information—meaning starting from the largest part to the smallest—kept dimensions hidden in which a pattern could be established. The pattern that had taken shape was that linguistics took on the shape of an equation, just like those for math equations. Linguistic functions like adjectives, prepositions, and verbs became viewable or transformable into the appearance of a math equation like the summation. Then the series of equations makes the pieces of a summation became noticeable for the part-of-speech labels as a series of equations that were the definition of the labels.

This newly developed technology could not have been achieved without the actual performance of duties in an industrial work place. It was initially attempted in the year 2001, with failure in achieving anything feasible for teaching or providing an understanding that was consistent with a pattern. Basically, the problems were dreamt-up work, which led to a bad dream for the results in spreadsheet form. Taking on jobs including the craft of being a helper, painter, and scaffold builder, and receiving training and achieving certification in the craft of scaffolding and electrical provided the actual events which were documented using the linguistic terms used by each of the different crafts, and from there, the pattern began to take shape—that is, each craft has the same pattern, but the words were different by definition.

The industrial companies at which was used as the foundation to begin the structuring of this new technology are Michaelson; Connor and Boul; Michigan Southeast Counties, as HUD inspector; Invista Refinery—Orange, Texas, as a helper; LNG Golden Pass—Sabine, Texas, as painter; BASF—Port Arthur, Texas, as a painter; Huntsman—Port Neches, Texas, as painter; Valero—Port Arthur, as painter and scaffolding; ExxonMobil Refinery and Chemical as scaffolding; Vessel Repair—Port Arthur, Texas; then Cooper Marina—Port Arthur, Texas; each as a painter. If these work settings were not available, the structure construction of the linguistic universe and its transformation into a spreadsheet would not be as fully developed as it is today. Then, of course, the Chicago, Illinois, televised program of the author Brian Greene (book title: The Elegant Universe) that reached out to a large group of people about this new technology which can improve a broader group of audience, where he envisions that string theory will become an everyday part of our daily life.

There is another person I would also like to thank for creating a musical research and development work environment that had no distractions, like those distraction from advertisement commercial breaks. Thanks! Rusty Hodge the DJ for the internet radio station on iTunes internet radio, stream-Ambient, Groove Salad from Soma FM or web address: www.somafm.com.

Be prepared to purchase an additional piece of this publication in electronic form which is a 2019 Excel spreadsheet file for interaction with the learning steps provided in the later chapters.

1

Process

Chapter 1

Our Present Use

There are many variations of spoken languages that have been used for centuries (Arabic, Dutch, English, French, Hindi, Mandarin, Slavic, Spanish, etc.). Each has subparts to support localized communications, such as the USA law enforcement and the truckers using the statement, What’s your twenty? when communicating by CB radio. It is well-known that this statement, 10-20, is slang for my location. These various forms of languages have similarities with each other, being part-of-speech labels (adjective, adverb, conjunction, noun, pronoun, preposition, and various verbs [intransitive and transitive], slang, etc.), with the exception of America’s Navajo language, which is consider not composed of these parts-of-speech labels (statement by a televised documentary of World War II). But all are compatible to translate to another form of language when the word function is identifiable. The Navajo people proved this to be true as their language was used for encrypted communication during a war, in which their language could not be deciphered by anyone other than another Navajo speaker due to it using pitches of vowels for the parts of their language.

Of all the various languages in use, none are known to have overhauling due to excessive use like an overused engine. Consideration was put into the Arabic language as a language that may not require overhauling due to using a book to stabilize the language. A Royal Saudi Naval Officer of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, informed me that their religious text, the Quran, stabilizes their language due to the absence of changes, which is mandated by the founder Muhammad. I began reading the Quran—spelled with a Q, not the one spelled with a K as Koran. The Quran was in its legal form being in the Arabic and the English literature. The law requires publishing in both languages. I received inspiration from reading the Quran. The inspiration is that I’m responsible for things that I have, things that I use, and the things that I want, along with the desire to stabilize the use of linguistics. My conclusion was that because the Quran is one book for all variations of groups of people, the majorities being Shiite and Sunni, the stability for each of the various readers are at the same location in the book when speaking from a specific chapter and paragraph. For example, if two different employers have similar complaints but the complaints are different in locations, let say, the Shiite employer states he feels that his employees should think of themselves as slaves, and the Sunni employer states he feels that he does not like the ideal that his employees feel as if they are slaves. If both employers heed the teaching of the Quran for the parts of having slaves, then each employer should come to the same conclusion that is it’s their function to show respect to the people conceived as slaves. The stability is that when a discussion occurs from an area in the book, each reader knows or has the same general area of location from where the other person is speaking about and what the teachings are with the parts having some kind of function of slavery in the book. This is unlike books like a city’s municipal laws or state laws of a joint union, where an attorney that reads a chapter from one lawbook to an attorney of a different state will not come to the same conclusion for a similar set of laws. For an actual scenario, school zone speed limits in the Golden State of California have a different set of laws that school zone speed limits in the Lone Star State of Texas. In California, the function-of-speed in a school zone is in effect if a child is present. In Texas, the function-of-speed in a school zone is in effect at specific times of day and the day of the week, regardless of whether a child is present. It is argumentative about the time of holidays that is used. Clearly, California laws will not argue about the time; it is only about the child being present—any time is relevant when a child is in a California school zone. Both fail because it should be when a pedestrian is present, otherwise what is the age range for the word child and how does the operator of the vehicle determine if the pedestrian is a child or adult. The function to carry out due to the parts (school zone) is clear, but the components (child, time, day, holidays) present by form and shape is argumenta. The components change the overall shape of the speed zone. Change in shape means change in the dimensional amount, and dimensional shape making up a definition is relative to the orientation view by the driver.

Present to New Construction of a Sentence

There’s the old saying: Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me. But words are used as if they are sticks and stones. The uses are to produce harm, particularly in derogatory manner constructed in the form of discrimination by race, religion, sex, age, or other unique status. I see that words can become construction material like wood boards, mortar, bricks, and nails. With proper construction of words, they can be used to build a supporting structure for linguistic use to help in linguistically stabilizing repeated larger functions with smaller changes.

The structure that I see is a statement that is a new type of sentence. This new type of sentence does not use any capitalization or periods that provide the beginning and ending of a sentence, just as schools have posting of the entry into a school zone. The new sentencing structure will use parts of speech in a unique form for the posting of the beginning and ending of a sentence structure. The new structure will also, by posting, provide which parts-of-speech and sense of the word is present. The word sentence comes in two types of parts of speech, being a noun and transitive verb. In the noun form, there are five senses for this parts-of-speech. The transitive verb parts-of-speech for the word sentence has two senses. Just as a sign is posted for a school zone, any driver in the zone has the same function to carry out. But depending on the location by state, the function that the driver must perform by the function of speed is unique with the present time or the presence of a child. But in a posted steep-grade-level zone, only the drivers of semi-tractor trailers have a unique function to carry out for the function of speed. Now the word’s parts-of-speech is equivalent as being in another state. If California is the part-of-speech label transitive verb, and Texas is the part-of-speech label noun in respect to the function of speed in a school zone, the presence of the child is one sense and the present date-time is another sense.

If the word sentence is in a location specified for verbs in a new type of sentence structure then it is equivalent to being a verb parts-of-speech, not a noun. Because the word sentence is located in the verb area of the new type of sentence and its only form of label is transitive verb, the objects will be located in another area that will be the location for nouns which is the object for the transitive verb. Our present-style sentences do not clearly post the location of the subject. The reader must complete the entire sentence to determine the subject. With the new sentence structure, the reader will be able to go directly to the subject or verb without completely reading the entire sentence. Because at the new specific location of the transitive verb, the reader knows which direction (left or right) to go in the new sentence to find the noun-labeled objects of the transitive verb by the posting in use for the subject of the transitive verb.

I’m looking for a pattern that will provide the signs of where my location is with each part-of-speech label. Let’s take a drive from one state to another. Driving along Interstate-40 from Arizona or Texas into New Mexico. There is no defined river bank like the Rio Grande, continental divide, or other natural form to provide the sign or symbol of entering the State of New Mexico either from another country (Mexico) or the other states (Oklahoma, Colorado, or Utah). New Mexico does provide a large sign posting, Welcome to Enchantment, on the interstate, indicating that entry has begun at this location. Once entry is done into another state like Colorado, it too has posted, Welcome to Centennial. There needs to be a pattern with signs and symbols, other than capital letters and periods, to let the reader know the presence of which state the parts-of-speech, which will also identify which form of sentencings (the old or the new) is present while providing what sense the parts-of-speech is by posting part-of-speech zones as a new structured sentence.

Basic Geometric Shape

The physicists’ community, using the book The Elegant Universe by author Brian Greene (chapter 15, page 378, first paragraph, last sentence), has complained that the present form of our language is too coarse to handle the new ideals of string theory. One such ideal is that it takes three pieces of information (first, a street name; second, another street name; and third, a floor level) along with a fourth piece, time, to provide a location. Mathematicians provide a formula known as vector coordinates for a location in space, particularly when magnitudes are involved. I cannot conceive a pattern with linguistics components using the dot or vector product like the formula (2i, 4j, 6k) dot