The Global Refugee Crisis: How Should We Respond?: The Munk Debates
By Louise Arbour, Simon Schama, Nigel Farage and Mark Steyn
()
About this ebook
The world is facing the worst humanitarian crisis since the Second World War. Over 300,000 are dead in Syria, and one and half million are either injured or disabled. Four and a half million people are trying to flee the country. And Syria is just one of a growing number of failed or failing states in the Middle East and North Africa. How should developed nations respond to human suffering on this mass scale? Do the prosperous societies of the West, including Canada and the U.S., have a moral imperative to assist as many refugees as they reasonably and responsibly can? Or, is this a time for vigilance and restraint in the face of a wave of mass migration that risks upending the tolerance and openness of the West?
The eighteenth semi-annual Munk Debate, which was held on April 1, 2016, pits former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour and leading historian Simon Schama against leader of the UK Independence Party Nigel Farage and bestselling author Mark Steyn to debate the West’s response to the global refugee crisis.
Louise Arbour
Louise Arbour is the former Supreme Court of Canada justice and former Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda.
Read more from Louise Arbour
Butcher Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Voice for Human Rights Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related to The Global Refugee Crisis
Titles in the series (17)
Should the West Engage Putin’s Russia?: The Munk Debates Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Global Refugee Crisis: How Should We Respond?: The Munk Debates Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIs American Democracy in Crisis?: The Munk Debates Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Do Humankind’s Best Days Lie Ahead?: The Munk Debates Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Political Correctness: The Munk Debates Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHitchens vs. Blair: Be It Resolved Religion Is a Force for Good in the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Does the 21st Century Belong to China?: The Munk Debate on China Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Has the European Experiment Failed?: The Munk Debate on Europe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Can the World Tolerate an Iran with Nuclear Weapons?: The Munk Debate on Iran Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Munk Debates Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShould We Tax the Rich More?: The Munk Debate on Economic Inequality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5North America’s Lost Decade?: The Munk Debate on the Economy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Are Men Obsolete?: The Munk Debate on Gender Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Future of Capitalism: The Munk Debates Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe World After COVID: The Munk Dialogues on a Pandemic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCan Donald Trump Make America Great Again?: The Munk Debates Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 2015 Canadian Federal Election Debate on Foreign Policy: The Munk Debates Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Is American Democracy in Crisis?: The Munk Debates Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Has Obama Made the World a More Dangerous Place?: The Munk Debate on America Foreign Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe North American Arctic: Themes in Regional Security Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMemoirs Red and White: Poland, the War, and After Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAfterlives of Data: Life and Debt under Capitalist Surveillance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThank You, Anarchy: Notes from the Occupy Apocalypse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Worlds of Women: The Making of an International Women's Movement Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Treasures of War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBelgium From the Roman Invasion to the Present Day Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsForeign Relations: American Immigration in Global Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCharles de Gaulle: A Biography Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5An Infinite History: The Story of a Family in France over Three Centuries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSecrets of the East End Angels: East End Angels, #2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow China Sees the World: Insights From China’s International Relations Scholars Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Portraitist: Frans Hals and His World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe WPA Guide to Rhode Island: The Ocean State Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWoodrow Wilson and the Reimagining of Eastern Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEaton Hall: Pride of King Township Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDifferent White People: Radical Activism for Aboriginal Rights 1946-1972 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe History of Female Warriors: From the Mythological Ages to the Present Era Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClio Wired: The Future of the Past in the Digital Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevolution and War in Contemporary Ukraine: The Challenge of Change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMissionary Diplomacy: Religion and Nineteenth-Century American Foreign Relations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Weary Titan: Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895-1905 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Invisible Sovereign: Imagining Public Opinion from the Revolution to Reconstruction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFighting Bob La Follette: The Righteous Reformer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Thirty Days in Lithuania in 1919 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarold Wilson: The Unprincipled Prime Minister?: A Reappraisal of Harold Wilson Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRussia and Germany Reborn: Unification, the Soviet Collapse, and the New Europe Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Work in a Modern Society: The German Historical Experience in Comparative Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Politics For You
The Prince Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race: The Sunday Times Bestseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Elite Capture: How the Powerful Took Over Identity Politics (And Everything Else) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The January 6th Report Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ever Wonder Why?: and Other Controversial Essays Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Get Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Global Refugee Crisis
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Global Refugee Crisis - Louise Arbour
A Letter from Peter Munk
Since we started the Munk Debates, my wife, Melanie, and I have been deeply gratified at how quickly they have captured the public’s imagination. From the time of our first event in May 2008, we have hosted what I believe are some of the most exciting public policy debates in Canada and internationally. Global in focus, the Munk Debates have tackled a range of issues, such as humanitarian intervention, the effectiveness of foreign aid, the threat of global warming, religion’s impact on geopolitics, the rise of China, and the decline of Europe. These compelling topics have served as intellectual and ethical grist for some of the world’s most important thinkers and doers, from Henry Kissinger to Tony Blair, Christopher Hitchens to Paul Krugman, Peter Mandelson to Fareed Zakaria.
The issues raised at the Munk Debates have not only fostered public awareness, but they have also helped many of us become more involved and, therefore, less intimidated by the concept of globalization. It is so easy to be inward-looking. It is so easy to be xenophobic. It is so easy to be nationalistic. It is hard to go into the unknown. Globalization, for many people, is an abstract concept at best. The purpose of this debate series is to help people feel more familiar with our fast-changing world and more comfortable participating in the universal dialogue about the issues and events that will shape our collective future.
I don’t need to tell you that there are many, many burning issues. Global warming, the plight of extreme poverty, genocide, or our shaky financial order: these are just a few of the critical issues that matter to people. And it seems to me, and to my foundation board members, that the quality of the public dialogue on these critical issues diminishes in direct proportion to the salience and number of these issues clamouring for our attention. By trying to highlight the most important issues at crucial moments in the global conversation, these debates not only profile the ideas and opinions of some of the world’s brightest thinkers, but they also crystallize public passion and knowledge, helping to tackle some of the challenges confronting humankind.
I have learned in life — and I’m sure many of you will share this view — that challenges bring out the best in us. I hope you’ll agree that the participants in these debates challenge not only each other but also each of us to think clearly and logically about important problems facing our world.
Peter Munk
Founder, Aurea Foundation
Toronto, Ontario
The Global Refugee Crisis:
How should We Respond?
Arbour and Schama vs. Farage and Steyn
The Munk Debates
Edited by Rudyard Griffiths
House of Anansi Press logoCopyright © 2016 Aurea Foundation
Louise Arbour, Simon Schama, Nigel Farage, and Mark Steyn in Conversation
by Rudyard Griffiths. Copyright © 2016 Aurea Foundation.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
This edition published in 2016 by
House of Anansi Press Inc.
www.houseofanansi.com
House of Anansi Press is committed to protecting our natural environment.
As part of our efforts, the interior of this book is printed on paper that contains 100% post-consumer recycled fibres, is acid-free, and is processed chlorine-free.
20 19 18 17 16 1 2 3 4 5
Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication
The global refugee crisis : how should we respond?
/ Arbour and Schama vs. Farage and Steyn ; edited by Rudyard
Griffiths.
(The Munk debates)
Issued in print and electronic formats.
ISBN 978-1-4870-0212-1 (paperback).—ISBN 978-1-4870-0213-8 (epub)
1. Refuge (Humanitarian assistance). 2. Refugees—
International cooperation. 3. Syria—History—Civil War, 2011– —
Refugees. I. Arbour, Louise, 1947–, panelist II. Schama, Simon,
panelist III. Griffiths, Rudyard, editor IV. Steyn, Mark, 1959–,
panelist V. Farage, Nigel, 1964–, panelist VI. Series: Munk debates
HV640.G56 2016 362.87 C2016-903819-X
C2016-903820-3
Library of Congress Control Number: 20169429 78
Cover design: Alysia Shewchuk
Transcription: Transcript Divas
Canada Council for the Arts and Ontario Arts Council logosWe acknowledge for their financial support of our publishing program
the Canada Council for the Arts, the Ontario Arts Council, and the Government of Canada through the Canada Book Fund.
Contents
The Global Refugee Crisis: How Should We Respond?
Pre-Debate Interviews with Rudyard Griffiths
Acknowledgements
About the Debaters
About the Editor
About the Munk Debates
About the Interviews
About the Publisher
The Global Refugee Crisis:
How Should We Respond?
Pro: Louise Arbour and Simon Schama
Con: Nigel Farage and Mark Steyn
April 1, 2016
Toronto, Ontario
The Global Refugee Crisis:
How should We Respond?
Rudyard Griffiths: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Munk Debate on the global refugee crisis. My name is Rudyard Griffiths and I have the privilege of organizing this semi-annual debate series and, once again, serving as your moderator.
I want to begin tonight’s proceedings by welcoming the North America–wide TV audience that is tuning in to this debate right now across Canada from coast to coast to coast on CPAC, Canada’s Public Affairs Channel, and across the continental United States on C-SPAN. It’s the first time the Munk Debate has been live throughout the continent of North America and it’s terrific to have that viewing audience joining us this evening.
A warm hello also to our online audience. They’re logging onto this debate right now on our website, www.munkdebates.com. It’s great to have you as virtual participants in tonight’s proceedings.
And finally, hello to you, the more than three thousand people who’ve once again filled Roy Thomson Hall on a Friday night to capacity for yet another Munk Debate. All of us associated with the Aurea Foundation thank you for supporting the simple idea that this debate series is dedicated to: more and better public debates. So, bravo, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for being part of tonight’s conversation.
Our ability to continue these debates year after year, and to bring some of the world’s sharpest minds and brightest thinkers here to the stage, would not be possible without the generosity, the foresight, and the creativity of our hosts tonight. Please join me in a warm appreciation of the Aurea Foundation and its founders, Peter and Melanie Munk.
It’s the moment we’ve been waiting for. Let’s get our two teams of debaters out here centre stage and our debate underway. Our resolution tonight is taken from the inscription on the Statue of Liberty, "Be it resolved: Give us your tired, your poor,