Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Modern Essays in Theology
Modern Essays in Theology
Modern Essays in Theology
Ebook145 pages1 hour

Modern Essays in Theology

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Are there any new thoughts in theology? Are there any books about contemporary topics? How does one think about God and his church today? Modern Essays in Theology describes theological principles from a fresh, new perspective. Theology has a fresh look!
LanguageEnglish
PublisherXlibris US
Release dateJan 19, 2018
ISBN9781543478105
Modern Essays in Theology

Related to Modern Essays in Theology

Related ebooks

Christianity For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Modern Essays in Theology

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Modern Essays in Theology - Justin Rawson

    Copyright © 2018 by Justin Rawson.

    Library of Congress Control Number:   2018900597

    ISBN:      Hardcover         978-1-5434-7812-9

                    Softcover          978-1-5434-7811-2

                    eBook               978-1-5434-7810-5

    All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner.

    Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Thinkstock are models, and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.

    Certain stock imagery © Thinkstock.

    Rev. date: 01/18/2018

    Xlibris

    1-888-795-4274

    www.Xlibris.com

    773055

    What is revealed to us, for our knowledge? Ask the approved males. Only they know.

    Is there knowledge that is revealed? The Reformers used to say…? A secret garden? Something these guys know that those guys don’t know? Only women are excluded? The sick? The weaker capacities are excluded, unless, perhaps, they ask the stronger ones? The young don’t have the secret knowledges?

    Not really true.

    If one thinks, all think. If one knows, all know. If one considers, all consider. If one philosophizes, all philosophize. If one can learn, or may learn, all can learn, and have the ability to understand. If one ought to learn, one and all know, since it is possible, for one, to learn, since one is said to ought to learn. One may and can, then. So one can. And may. Again, to repeat.

    If necessary for one, possible for that one. And if necessary, accessible. If possible, accessed, at will, since, will desires. Will accesses, if willed. If willed, willed. Willed is successful acquisition, since desired. No one may will, without acquiring the thing desired. If will desires, will moves to the target, since it desires the thing. If will desires something, it moves itself to get it, since it desires it. Then, since moving there, there. There, after the move.

    People don’t know things, that other people don’t know. There is no authority. The stronger? The well born? The gifted? The well, or perfectly positioned? The approved? How approved? Why approved? Approved, since..?

    What is a bad thing, for someone? I think the only bad thing a human can experience, is their own dislike of something.

    When does the millennial period begin? The period of gospel success, on the whole planet? 2014.

    Morality is just a half hearted attempt at posing questions for people to be troubled with.

    Is there an elder in the church? If churches exist, they are only engaged, in lying. So all planners of church, all leaders, are guilty of capital offenses. All. They only plan, on and on, the crime of society. Absolute breach of societal good.

    Does America, the United States of America, have a religion? By declaring itself without religion, it adopted the true religion, only, of the time of its founding. Duh.

    If the world is mainly of evil people, as it would be if there were any problems, then some day, at some point, it would of itself, cry out, for change, and change that would be all encompassing, and directly different from the evil and problem, in other words, a reforming and revolving alteration of people’s minds and cores, now in this day, starting, since at the worst time ever, and since all is democratic, and all people vote, for their leaders and issues, and even with a conservative executive head of the wealthiest nation, in the world, loving the most egalitarian form of government, not republic, though a republican, but democracy, as form in government; and this change must come of the intelligence aspect of the government of the wealthiest nation, since it has the burden of plan and thought, of plan, thinking of planning and plannings, and thinkings in general; and at such a time (as this), it would and is (therefore), seeking to promote change, reviewing the bases of law, in every category, so at, in sum, and in summary, and in point, at the pinpoint, or at all points, therefore, true guidance of legal behavior, true religion; and is at this time, seeking reformation of religion, for the people of its own country, and for the world, promoting what would be, and is, therefore, called, a covenanted reformation, after the bases of the covenants of civil governments of the past, in the direction of the gospel; it must therefore, and is, therefore, seek the flush out of all criminal tendencies, at all, and of any kind, so as to see all potentials, all people who would potentially, in mind, at all, evil at all in mind, in core, commit crime, to be found out. It would then, and therefore is, seeking the people who are strongest, the royal families of the world, living in its country, to pursue the finding out of all evil people who are at all, even, willing to commit crimes, ever. The royalty, who were born in the Garden of Eden, before death, pursue it, now, then, to begin it, and so also their children, will soon, and have been quite a bit. Only these could handle it, probably, and none of these, would refuse the opportunity.

    Who would be the promoters of the reformation of today?

    What do they do?

    In the evils of humanity, the evil folks adopted religionous principles of the good, as they got refuted, as the evil people were refuted, they adopted peaceful principles, because it was proved, beyond shadows of doubts, the ways of peace.

    But sometimes, peace is not established for very long.

    The evil return to violence, finding the strength of their hands, to do violence, in the generations that follow the peaceful times. Society seems to have turns, changes and revolutions of behaviors, circles and waves, ebbs and flows, tides and times.

    Today, the peace of good religion has been assumed, and no longer followed. The evil preachers preach peace, and do violence. No matter what was proved. Peaceful ways must be proved again. Truth must be established.

    The Westminster Assembly, assumed peace was in agreement, in chastity principles. Of peace in chastity. What does that mean? Purity that conduces to peace. Chastity is purity of sex principle, that conduces to peace. One partner, sexual, is the assumption of the Westminster Assembly. Not of truth, nor of scientific reality, or of literal absolutes, nor of technical literalities, nor of technical accuracy, but of peace. Violent souls did violence when people had more sex partners than one. Marriage was the solution, and has always been.

    At this time, it is not helpful, to abstain, any longer, from outside marriage sex, necessarily. Society’s democratic assumptions, assume a unilateral agreement principle, that unifies the world, in good civil principle, with all people involved in governments, not simply the monarch and elite of money. All people participate today, in their own government and penalty for crime. The unity of this situation, warrants the reality of marriage as no longer necessary, since agreement is reached by voting, and by all people, not just some.

    Marriage was the means of handling disagreements. Today, assumed is voting. Solidarity is assumed, today. Totalitarians vote, too. Marriage held society together, instead of voting, in the past.

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1