Exploding the Big Bang Theory

By Joseph Donnelly

The essence of this my third effort at publication now stands to be the true basis of our human species new working philosophy. My main interest is of our relationship with God on all fronts. Simple when realised we under the split headings of humanity in tribe, clan, national or of different skin colour configurations, have amassed over 10.000 religious philosophies to meet our personal needs. Of which none seem to work for all over the limit of tribe, clan national or colour configuration?!
Because of the very modern sophisticated trend of rejecting God, generally understood to have been the creator; and in using the guessed at elements of how science really works or had been given credit for how it must work. Many in that field of study have felt qualified enough to snub those 10,000 religions by stating there never is or was God in any case?
My personal stand and standards revolve around humanity in us, getting the understanding of God right in the first place, but slightly askew in the opinion we were expressly chosen by God to promote enlightenment upon the universe!
Yes we got it right, there is God, and no arguments can be valid against this acceptance. To endorse that statement I have been able and commit my to be our understanding of how and why God set the clock of creation from the beginning of all time, now scientifically proved by us, through the open discovery of the God particle, much more than a scientific phenomena? .
Part of my style and method stands to the terms of all religions in best choice to be monotheistic by character. This fits with the full progress of all histories naturally connecting with the future of self. Self to be the individuals we each are, but hailed to be of species over tribe, clan, colour or national.
Our monotheistic relationship stands also to self, in that however we are in style by colour or creed. We will meet to be the same image of God as seen in self, but only able to manage that wonderful spectacle on Gods terms from our solid belief in God, reality, and our future!
See what you think, when from now you can also evaluate the latest of sciences exposs over and above some of the scientific ranting of how any form of intelligent life began, but more importantly, why, remembering we are here on Gods terms not ours!

• Language: English
• Publisher: AuthorHouse UK
• Release date: Aug 14, 2015
• ISBN: 9781504987455

Book preview

© 2015 Joseph Donnelly. All rights reserved.

No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means without the written permission of the author.

Published by AuthorHouse 09/10/2015

ISBN: 978-1-5049-8744-8 (sc)

ISBN: 978-1-5049-8743-1 (hc)

ISBN: 978-1-5049-8745-5 (e)

Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Thinkstock are models,

and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.

Certain stock imagery © Thinkstock.

Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.

CONTENTS

1. Introducing the Big Bang Theory?

2. Expanding the Big Bang Theory

3. Religion if standing, is the Big bang falling?

4. Who lit the fuse or pulled the trigger

5. Religious re-emergence

6. Monotheism opened for examination Judaism Christianity Islam by time

7. Big Bang going, not yet gone!

8. Replacing the Big Bang?

9. Contraction or expansion?

10. The properties of Deity

11. Is Politics Culpable?

12. Political reactive responses religiously

13. Is Religion first over Science?

14. Our religious Charter?

15. Scientific Charter?

16. Science and Politics

17. Science and Religion

18. My Science 1

19. My Science 2

20. Empty Politics in conflict

21. God to Science

22. Exploding the Big Bang theory

23. Replacing the Big Bang theory 1

24. Replacing the Big Bang Theory 2

25. Replacing the Big Bang Theory 3

26. God particle Physics 1

27. God particle Physics, ad infinitum 2

28. God Particle formula 1

29. God Particle formula 2

30. No religion

31. Religion 1

32. Religion 2

33. Post nineteen forty five

34. Comparative narratives

35. Religion 3

36. Real politics

37. Real reality

38. Exploding the big bang theory

39. Spontaneous replacement of the big bang theory 1

40. Spontaneous replacement of the big bang theory 2

41. God Reality 1

42. God Reality 2

43. The scales of just time

44. Big Bang going, going, gone

45. Turning the last key

SUMMARY: Politics Religion Science and Theory

INTRODUCTION

The following is to be a matter of fact set to the very same level of all previous, present and futuristic theorising in the name of scientific guessing?

In short I have been able and decode the mist-full thinking of many of our new lordly masters; those with prophetic talents within our scientific communities! Of whom in true good faith, many do believe they are part of the same community we all belong to, but have been blessed with knowing all the answers before most can ask the questions?

Science in all of its wonderful guises leads in the proof of the future. Yet can be easily undressed by any examination of how it walks on past human efforts aimed in proof of how she herself first rose to any prominence.

My own standards are much the same in that I too pontificate, but my theorising stands on the bones of how our monotheistic religions first grasped our imagination. Connecting us all with the how and the why through to the theory of everything, but still leaving most of us in doubt of our own species excellence.

With this my third effort at publishing, I can at last reconnect us all with the human reality of who we are and for what?

Book one, ‘THE FIFTH DIMENSION The Missing link’, tentatively published through Authorhouse, was done in the excitement of a teenage boy (but not by my actual age), after stealing his first kiss from a young lady he often mooned about. I was excited, not least by the sheer romance of the situation, but also holding that from a very limited academic background, I dared enter the adult world of publishing to support my own emotions.

My effort was poor, a jumble of my own ideas about the rights and wrongs of how I saw we in our separate communities had developed. Nevertheless the core of what I can still address as pure philosophy had been laid down. It is not a worthy read, but can be held in the terms of being a reference in how my mind then churned over or worked with the realities of study at any level.

Time permitting I intend to rewrite it, but still keeping it within my thinking of the day (of the specific time when first thought) so not to destroy my actual lines of thought then ago, along with my reasoning or influences leading up to how my opinions were formed.

Much of the layout of my second publication through the same publishers Authorhouse, to me were a refinement of what I had first delivered earlier even in its garbled form, this time from book two, ‘FIFTH DIMENSIONISM’ - DIETY – GODSOME. My efforts were of vast improvement and for me hit the mark.

I was advised through my publishers in order to maximise the effect my book might have, I should use various publishing aids on offer, like proper advertising, even to have my book(s) professionally reviewed, of which I took their advice and paid my dues.

In all understanding, my previous experiences of trying to legitimately publish, have not yet fully failed. Of the many impressions I have experienced, one has remained with me, that of being ignored. Not for what I have to say or for how or why I have been able and draw my conclusions. But wholly for my presentation, by being cast as a general low achiever, given to have expressed myself from the lower end of scholastic, grammatical or intellectual levelling cast by the standards of others?

The result of which had put me on the defensive when expressing my own heartfelt views. Like for instance if asked in the simplest of manner, what is your book about? I had been unable and express my intentions emotionally when answering the general theme is for us all to be Godsome, meaning for us all to believe in the Entity through our monotheistic religions, by then everybody had fallen asleep.

By resolve I decided to remain in the picture, not least because of how and why I had developed my utterly new philosophy; and the dour consequence for us all not heeding my own generous remedial outlook.

To remind all, my first titled book draws all of our attention to the expression ‘The FIFTH DIMENSION The Missing Link’. My refined second title ‘FIFTH DIMENSIONISM’ calls for the expression to have substance. In that I claim the so far un-described proposed fifth dimension for all of us. The Fifth Dimension is religion by those who must now follow monotheistic religious countenance by our lead!

Without direct belligerent intent I have been quite dismissive of many of our leading political philosophies, many of whom spiral in constant opposition to the real facts of natural human justice by promoting their own coat as the only method of progress? Yet when and if in opposition through the acclaimed democratic process, each fall in a heap of misunderstanding because we can oppose?

Politics to me is of small issue, in the sense on all levels it pretends to support all, yet while opposing other ideologies belonging to the same people; it usually ignores the silent majority! Unfortunately, among our universal two hundred plus flagged separate nations. Some do not understand the concept of opposition, because they hold to be secular or dictatorial, offering self opinion only from the so called leading elements of such societies!

Almost in parallel, a much worse standard has been allowed generate its own impetus on the religious level. Whereby in the described terms of being or keeping to be a spiritual (religious) society, leaders thereof only manage to alienate our single species integrity to or for unknown individual ideals if that is my correct reading of some situations?

From these ends, by my own judgement seemingly, our scientific community turns more and more to the secular, forgetting its own beginning of at first being educated by our own scientific understanding of godliness! Science is a wonderful medium, but has to be seen through its own openness. How ever far it may take us, its totality of answers will end with the same question mark held over the head of all sane religions in the Godsome frame?

Big Bang, big Guess, big bluff or through the God particle, big answer!

EXPLODING THE BIG BANG THEORY

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCING THE BIG BANG THEORY?

Knowing little of many subjects can often lead to the understanding of much, in the sense of wanting to know, it can also be a means for false trail laying?

I have often indicated there is nothing really new under the sun. My lead in modernity refers that knowledge in turn has just been a matter of picking up the pieces that are all ready there and assembling them as they must be!

Science and all of its tributaries have been doing just that over millennium; and the past five hundred years in particular. Science in real terms is we of the one species, even not to know, we all contribute from what ever level of understanding we have. All of its achievements are truly ours, not least because we have given ourselves in species array to the concept of the future through the full and proper promotion of our religious acceptances and studies.

Alas many of our religious errors to date fall to the supposed acceptance we take through tribe or clan over species, an uncomplicated matter of wanting to be right, a quite natural emotion. We were also cast with the birth right of all other living creatures, that of instinct; highlighted by our concerns of procreating. But our view was for the future while all other species reacted for the now only?

Other good fortune came when we collectively began to imagine matters of concern to the future as we only could tribally. For which we have not been able and rationalise, even now I accept our future thoughts were first visualised sixty thousand years ago, when at places like Shanidar in northern Iraq we buried one of kind in ritual. Discovered a mere sixty years ago, we have struggled to equate the situation, but now have a better example of a ritual burial shown from the Paviland Caves in South Wales. Discovered almost two centuries ago, but alas rationalised through the opinions and thinking of those times? Which need yet to be raised by proper twenty first century thinking of how we thought some thirty four thousand years ago when burying one of tribe and leaving grave goods?

Of all our weaknesses, thinking of the day is perhaps our most fickle, especially when expressed through the medium of our monotheistic religions. Classed by my thinking of the day now, to have been set in general order by time from the geographical area of the world given to be the Middle East?

From one small opinion, mighty ideas can grow, but from now to be delivered like the properties of science. Unarguable, because they have followed experiment through its own entire means of delivery to count the results our truths!

Which will be highlighted in this futuristic first chapter, later to be endorsed in the following chapters by answering the weighted unanswered questions so put by some scientists, who glow in their own tribal superiority, by forming the future to be totally secular; and of their reasoning alone?

The Big Bang Theory might prove to be the nemesis of most scientific remedies if toured through with real futuristic rational thinking! A standard I have taken on myself, but with much trepidation, because my procrastinations stand on the concrete shoulders of many very modern and great scientists. Some of whom have already taken to preach of the mysteries of science over and above the religious mysteries of God?

The Theory of the Big Bang was first given with the utmost sincerity, if only to support the fact of evolution by accepting the vast time scale required for everything to have become what we are now?

Unimpassioned, this theory was set against the acceptance of the matter of religious creation. An idea we of the one species we are, had been constructed in Gods own image, but by tribal definition to do Gods bidding since the created start of history?

Before the great head to head, which seems to be intensifying, many of our great scholars had been working to equate the standard of creation in the name of God and evolution in the name of progress! Many held to high grade religious beliefs, but felt the genuine need for study of the human condition in all avenues.

In general, many of our high office religious leaders, although in heed of progress, began to regress to the core of most religious theories, that of establishment. Although now accepting the need of futuristic studies in the name or their own tribal religions! Given that such modern scientific studies over the past one hundred and fifty years offered opinions in the name of science in exclusion of what had been taken as Gods intention. Reaction by both entities centred in forms of denial.

Late in the twentieth century in scientific circles a joint awareness emerged from the study of the cosmos, whereby it was agreed the universe was expanding with every galaxy moving away from each other? This grouped with the theory of relativity seemed to fit with the emerging awareness of everything.

In counter, such expansive views were set to drive a wedge between the secular and the spiritual aspirations so far formed in the shadow of recorded history. Monotheistic religions locked into their God man, God tribe philosophies became wary of the suggestion that God was to be a small part of formula only?

Some or indeed the primary scientist suggesting the idea of scientific creation, actively belonged to the Christian religion and had no qualms about following science by guessing how things began or were created! It would seem from that time ago, the second quarter of the twentieth century; many held the view of secular and religious/spiritual harmony. How the emphasis changed or moved is always open to intelligent speculation.

Taken we are in an expanding universe, with all the galaxies moving away from each other, was a well worked progressive theory, backed up by massive study and measurements in real terms by many eminent scientists. In the very same light, the first scientist to suggest the Big Bang theory in form was somewhat lampooned by others.

Following we were in an expanding universe anyhow. He worked that by extrapolation back in time should lead to the epoch! Which by minds eye means if we try and retrace how the universe is constantly expanding, we will come to a relative position of understanding to the matter of from when and whence it was at first and in what form?

If the universe is still expanding, that is a progressive fact, to regress in extrapolation has to be taken, each of the expanding and moving away galaxies are then shrinking within themselves getting closer and closer?

By such reasoning, we have to conclude that all matter will eventually gather together by the natural process of contraction! In loose form, but by true scientific reasoning, that is the only conclusion we can draw when accepting the universe of now is actually expanding!

By the unscientific standard of guessing, but in good faith, all to do now is set the criteria for the status quo. In that if all matter had compressed to be the size of a pea. How could it have reached its present state and size over anything other than massive timescales?

From the state of minutia there is always the suggestion of rapid expansion. Not unlike how an explosion might work or how a big bang might create a situation? On first reading the submitted papers about the theory of expansion from contraction or on reasoning how the universe was as it is. Some scientists in mock relief connected to the unscientific term of The Big Bang Theory, to be the final statement.

Although a little derisory the term stuck and came to be supported by other eminent men working to join all scientific studies to the one connected field of knowledge. Our cosmos now had a true and supportable beginning. We are here because a fingernail size of all matter combined, took it upon itself to rapidly explode or expand. We are here now because of The Big Bang in theory, was?

I like many others have little option but to go for the theory first lent from heartfelt studies of our human condition. I have little idea of how such a theory might work even when to consider its complexity of structure. I can full see and accept how many of our eminent scientists and others well educated in all the aspects of communication, human interaction, human reaction or natural human inquiry. Might be inclined to join the pure logic of scientific creation over how many of our religions have gathered to accept creation spiritually.

It is only through my ignorance I dare challenge any aspect of pure study or logic when given to deny human integrity gathered through our monotheistic religions. Even if it means I have to fault those same religions in the matter and from the time they interpreted the understanding they should have accumulated when in the presence of the study of Gods influence upon us all. Which may be negligible in all cases?

The Big Bang was an event, a feasible way for the universe to have formed given how we have measured timescales, especially when our measurements are balanced by some of our reasoning? What we must guard against is neither the insecurity of self worth, but not on personal levels, nor tribal or clannish or political nor so on monotheistic religious levels. Our worth can only be measured on or too or through the one species we are.

CHAPTER 2

EXPANDING THE BIG BANG THEORY

By following the Big Bang Theory, dangers of definition we might incur fall to the fact we begin to measure all around by the light such a theory might throw on any situation. Like from when the theory was first put forward by a Christian Jesuit, no issues were perceived of how we generally thought of God religiously. He was Deity and responsible for everything?

The Big bang was cause or how the clock started. If it has since become the means of how we can dismiss the aspect of God. In the finest tradition of human endeavour, we can likewise render our opinions of God without proof, in the same way we accept The Big Bang without proof. It is simply a matter of balance by reflection, remembering in all cases of reflection, the image we actually see is not always what is actually there!

I know the small matters now raised by myself have been studied in depth by many of our scientific community. Which in consequence opens the door for my questioning when looked at through my reflective eyes. That simply means science needs to be explainable to the moderate of us, those who can readily accept the aspect of Gods importance in the order of scientific creation through time.

By extrapolating to the epoch with all matter super, super compressed to the size of a pea, what is or was or had become of the room our galaxies are/were going to expand into?

Almost to the same matter of projection, but completely sidestepping the space or in ignorant parlance, the room, this imagined explosion (the big bang) was going to fill with the new forms of matter which were mysteriously going to form! Such observations along with many I will be making are not my attempt to discredit any of our scientific community, but hold to be lines of query addressed in the same manner some scientists have become dismissive of religion, if ever that was the assumption?

Fast forward by thirteen point four billion years, to about the times of now, with the general acceptance of the physical state of the cosmos in the form of separate galaxies moving away from each other at speed. What now is the involvement of the empty space at the edge of measured space where our most extreme galaxies move into?

I know and accept such scientific pronouncements have very real and solid mathematical come projected formula realisations or come from solidly based theoretical physics thinking. I must represent the logical, not by expecting answers I can’t understand in any case, but by returning to my own basic understanding of very minor physics principles, hooked to how I and others can think in the God vein as well, then my scientific questions are not one way or the other, they are proactive!

The statement in question, all galaxies moving away from each other formed by my own mind set; almost the same query taken by some religious institutions when in scientific terms it was proclaimed the earth revolves around the sun and not the reverse?

From where I draw ignorant exception to the modern scientific explanation of an expanding universe is from the core of that suggestion! Although alluding to a different study in chaos, my own theoretical imagined experiment asks more than can ever be delivered in answer.

For my peers, instead of asking to imagine the immensity of the universe, not even to imagine the immensity of our own galaxy the Milky Way, with its own billion plus stars. I ask for us to imagine a great arena perhaps like the coliseum in Rome. For my experiment, the central performance area has a diameter of some sixty metres. In true good fashion and for effect we can replace individual galaxies representatively with me and my peers, people!

Across the diameter we can place ourselves some 5 meters apart starting five meters in from the edge. Effectively we will have about eleven galaxies/people on the widest line. Turning the arena area we are populating into a vast clear jelly sphere. In layer form, still five meters apart we can populate this sphere with as many galaxies, people the spherical area permits.

Naturally or unnaturally at the core of my jelly sphere some 13.4 billion years ago was the pea of total matter, but not then surrounded by my sphere. Big Bang; and the advent of time passing bring us in shape to suit the essence of my experiment. A great sphere representing the universe but in this case populated by objects we can all recognise, people.

Thirteen point four billion years of time has brought us to stand 5 metres apart in every direction; and by recent discovery, we are all moving away from each other? Let us run the model, this time in our heads, like how we might have originally taken our religious sustenance. Not so to confront science, but to better rationalise human emotions over and above how expertly we can allow computer projections be misleading.

My sphere