Sermonettes, Volume 2

By Vincent Cheung

Chapters include: "The Axiom of Gabriel," "The Anointed One," "The Elephant in the Room," "Cast Your Lot with Christ," "Why You are Not a Christian," "Evangelism at the Workplace," "The Legalist's Worst Nightmare," and "Is the Death Penalty Hypocritical?"

• Language: English
• Publisher: Lulu.com
• Release date: Nov 25, 2014
• ISBN: 9781312707566

Book preview

Sermonettes, Volume 2

SERMONETTES, VOLUME 2

Copyright © 2010 by Vincent Cheung

http://www.vincentcheung.com

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted without the prior permission of the author or publisher.

Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION. Copyright 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved.

CONTENTS

1. The Axiom of Gabriel

2. All Things are Possible, When You Believe

3. The Unsurprised Simeon

4. The Anointed One

5. Only Believe

6. The Elephant in the Room

7. Cast Your Lot with Christ

8. Debt, Pardon, and Love

9. Why You are Not a Christian

10. An Invitation to the Frontlines

11. Evangelism at the Workplace

12. Bold as a Lion

13. The Fear of Men

14. Christ and Temptation

15. What is Love?

16. On Love and Rebuke

17. Don't Judge Me for Judging

18. The Legalist's Worst Nightmare

19. It Gets Worse, Much Worse

20. Is the Death Penalty Hypocritical?

21. Grace for His Own

22. Emotional Grenades and Divine Sovereignty

23. Two Silly Things

24. But What About the Thingamajig?

25. Creationism vs. Traducianism

26. The Covenant of Works

27. When a Leader Falls

28. Blessed Mother, Blessed Rather

29. The Giver and His Gifts

30. An Emphasis on the Holy Spirit

31. Empiricism and 1 John 1:1-3

1. The Axiom of Gabriel

How will this be, Mary asked the angel, since I am a virgin?

The angel answered, The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. Even Elizabeth your relative is going to have a child in her old age, and she who was said to be barren is in her sixth month. For nothing is impossible with God.

I am the Lord's servant, Mary answered. May it be to me as you have said. Then the angel left her. (Luke 1:34-38)

Here God sends the angel Gabriel to tell Mary that she will become pregnant and give birth to a child. This will not be an ordinary child. As the Son of the Most High, he will be divine. And since he will be born through a woman, he will be human as well. He will be the incarnation of deity. According to God's promise, he will take permanent possession of the throne of David. And unlike those who prefigured him, this king will never die, and his kingdom will never fall.

Mary is perplexed. She does not ask about this Son of the Most High, or the throne of David, or the permanence of the kingdom. But she says, How will this be, since I am a virgin? In times past, God enabled barren women to conceive, and he made Abraham and Sarah fertile in their old age. However, to conceive without a man is something that has never been done. It is without precedent even in the records of the acts of God.

Gabriel begins with a relatively concrete answer: The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. It is not a detailed or a mechanical explanation, but he makes it clear that this will be an act of divine power, with specific reference to the Holy Spirit's role. He also tells Mary about Elizabeth, who has been pregnant for six months by this time, although she was barren. Then, the angel appeals to a basic principle that covers both events: For nothing is impossible with God.

This shows us something about the method and the content of his thinking. The plan of salvation now overlaps with a question on biology, or on a more basic level, a question on possibility. To address this, Gabriel first mentions what God is about to do and what God has already done. Although this is significant, his final appeal is made not to the past and future history of God's acts, but to his knowledge of God's nature, stated in a proposition that is broad and abstract, and that is intelligible even apart from the history of divine actions. It is not dependent on the history of redemption; rather, the history of redemption is explained by it and dependent on it. As for the content, it is simply this: For nothing is impossible with God. This is excellent theology.

Objections against divine omnipotence commit categorical fallacies, among other things. Can God create a rock so big or heavy that he cannot lift? is an overused challenge, but it comes in different forms, and it illustrates the failure of other attempts. It is also a fair teaching device, since it offers the opportunity to follow Gabriel in his appeal to a basic axiom on the divine nature. That is, the Bible teaches that God is spirit; therefore, size, weight, and other physical properties do not apply to him, and when he moves a rock, he does not lift it. The challenge commits a categorical error, and reflects the usual ignorance of non-Christians.

Then, it is asked whether God can perform a contradiction, as in, Can God create a square circle? This is answered by noting the nature of a contradiction, so that because a contradiction is what it is, this attempt also commits a categorical fallacy. A contradiction is in fact nothing. This is often obscured by the fact that we can still say it. To illustrate that we can utter meaningless sentences, suppose I ask, Can God walk a cat wrench omelet door super? Even I do not know what this means. I cannot conceive of a cat wrench omelet door super, nor do I know if it is something to be walked. I can state the question, but it is meaningless, and because it is meaningless, it is not a question that applies to God's ability. Likewise, although we can say nonsense like a square circle or a rock that is not a rock, these are nothing. They are not things to be created, nor does anyone who talks about them know what they mean. We maintain that divine omnipotence is a coherent concept and reality.

When man abandons the axioms of revelation, or the basic propositions about God's nature, power, and wisdom, his intellect falls from the heights of heaven to the depths of hell. Now his thinking takes after the animals rather than the angels, and he strives more and more to become stupid. When confronted with questions on possibility, he appeals to his sensations, observations, experimentations, and such things. This places a false, artificial, and narrow limit on what he could consider as possible – not because reality is as narrow as the non-Christian thinks, but because his mind is so small and his intelligence so feeble. Without true and basic axioms to anchor his system, and without sound methods to guide his thinking, all his science and philosophy are false, and are the products of arbitrary conjecture and speculation. All his arguments are fallacious, and his learning consists of fantasies instead of discoveries.

True religion first concerns itself, not with man's dignity and progress, but with God's majesty and power. This is a condemnation against all the philosophies of men, and many theological schools and traditions. It may seem obvious that, when we think about God, we ought to assume that he can do all things, and that this basic principle should determine our idea of what is possible. But this is not obvious to everyone. Rather than beginning with God's power, there are those who begin their thinking, even when it comes to theology, with what they regard as men's abilities, discoveries, and experiences. I say what they regard, because they are always mistaken even about men's abilities, discoveries, and experiences.

God is the foundation of theology, and once this is established, the rest of the doctrines are affirmed without any strain or contradiction. These are doctrines such as the inspiration, preservation, and canonization of Scripture, the creation of man and the world, the resurrection of Christ and of his people, and the predestination of individuals for heaven and hell. As Paul said, Why should any of you consider it incredible that God raises the dead? (Acts 26:8). And Jeremiah said, Ah, Sovereign LORD, you have made the heavens and the earth by your great power and outstretched arm. Nothing is too hard for you (Jeremiah 32:17). The foundation for these statements is that nothing is impossible with God.

Gabriel's final appeal is to a principle about the eternal nature and power of God, and not to the history of redemption or to the progress of revelation. The teaching and its application cannot be restricted by eras and epochs. God can do anything he wants at anytime he wants to do it. If he does nothing, we cannot make him do something. If he does something, we cannot stop him.

Let no one trouble you, therefore, with doctrines that impose fabricated limitations on God's sovereignty and omnipotence. We can have confidence in the doctrines of the Christian faith. They are immune to refutations that are based on non-Christian axioms and concepts of possibility. And as God is both transcendent and immanent, we can have confidence in God's ability to care, to protect, and to fulfill his many precious promises in our lives.

2. All Things are Possible, When You Believe

And Jesus asked his father, How long has this been happening to him? And he said, From childhood. And it has often cast him into fire and into water, to destroy him. But if you can do anything, have compassion on us and help us. And Jesus said to him, If you can! All things are possible for one who believes. Immediately the father of the child cried out and said, I believe; help my unbelief! (Mark 9:21-24, ESV)

The desired end is a benefit not in the category of salvation as narrowly considered, but in the category of healing, or deliverance from demonic power. It is not, or not only, a deliverance from ethical influence, but from the demon's mental and physical control over the boy. When the text is applied, this aspect of the event cannot be removed by appealing to its place in God's plan of redemption or the progress of revelation. The event is what it is, and what Jesus says in verse 23 applies to the need specified in this same context, even if it also applies to other things. Otherwise, the alleged respect for the history of redemption would become an excuse to practice allegorical interpretation. And since the principle is tied to the nature of the need, to deny one is also to destroy the other.

Along with verses like Mark 11:24, John 16:23, and a few others, Mark 9:23 is one of those texts that preachers and theologians spend more time to explain away, and to expound on what they cannot do and do not mean, than to assert their truth and encourage belief in them. Those who refer to them without also destroying them with a thousand qualifications are branded as heretics, as those who instill false hope in people. But why should the main thrust of an exposition of a text be to avoid abuse of the text? And what they consider abuse is often clearly within the natural, even undeniable, meaning of the text.

Indeed, our interpretation would be man-centered and merely psychological if we were to ignore the history of redemption and the majesty, the grace, and the power of God that scream for attention in all the verses. However, if we are so theologically acute that we no longer see the troubled father who wishes deliverance for his son, not so that the son would be converted and attain heaven, but so that he would no longer burn or drown himself, then we are so theologically acute that we have become illiterate.

We reject the positive thinking of self-help psychology. Yet there is a biblical faith, which indeed produces a positive outlook, and constitutes a spiritual and psychological power in the Christian. The two are different, and it requires some misunderstanding of both to mix them up. If you reject Budda, do you have to renounce Jehovah? What does one have to do with the other? And if there is any superficial likeness, where do you think the non-Christians stole the idea from in the first place? They desire the power apart from the source. So theirs is a faith without a proper object, and an optimism without a proper basis. Theirs is a counterfeit strength. Theirs is a false hope. When biblical faith is thrown out as if it is self-help psychology, Christians become weak and ineffective. This is why there is so much fear and depression in the church.

Read the Gospels and notice how Jesus behaved. What confidence! What power and composure! What finesse in speech and movement! But that was Jesus. Yes, but Jesus became impatient and rebuked his disciples when they did not possess the same outlook, and even when it came to casting out demons and walking on water. He expected them to think on a similar plane. He never praised unbelief. There are some Christian books on how doubt helps us grow. Now, that is false hope. The Bible calls it sin. Faith helps us grow, and to grow so that we will not doubt.

Therefore, let us take a revolutionary approach to Scripture – let us believe it and be strengthened by it. When we expound on it, let us spend more time telling people that it means what it says instead of explaining to them why it means something else, or spelling out the hundreds of ways that people can abuse it, so that when we are finished they are more depressed and more discouraged than when we started. And when we are unable to assert the plain truth of the text, let us not pretend to be heroes who rescue people from