Doting Doormat: Part I

By Patrick E. Chauvin

Are you tired of corny stories about mysterious “dominant” billionaires who end up being manipulated sugar-daddies and unpaid life coaches? Have you had your share of “submissives” who are just plain lazy and passive?

Or maybe you are bored of “hard” stories that are just a string of trite descriptions of physical movements and flat characters, lacking emotions of any kind? Eating a burger is great, but who wants to read a book filled with descriptions of someone’s munching?

If you have followed me to this point, “Doting Doormat” may be for you. A gritty, morally corrupt tale of a young woman becoming truly devoted to satisfying the unglamorous fantasies of a common and seriously flawed man.

You can buy now this pioneering work in the genre of thousandaire dark romance, so when it becomes a fad, you can brag about how that’s just old news for you.

Kinks: egoistic domination, female submission, male domination, misogyny and sexism, cmnf (clothed male naked female), sadism, romantic masochism, devotion, 247 submission, stepford wife, maid, lingerie, bimbo.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Patrick E. Chauvin
• Release date: Jul 4, 2020
• ISBN: 9781005051549

Patrick E. Chauvin

Patrick E. Chauvin, Ph.D. is a French engineer and polymath who likes to invest some of his free time writing pamphlets that extol the glory of sexual dimorphism, for this is for him the day and the night that create the convection winds that rustle and power our souls.Patrick won’t insult the intelligence of his readers by using a corny female pen name or spending more time on the cover of the book than on its content. Also, he won’t treat his readers as cattle, throwing at them things he doesn’t personally enjoy, just because they happen to be popular. Patrick does not claim to be a top-notch writer (he has weird non-native prose), but he writes with a passion of which industrial formulaic writing is devoid. Whether you like the product of his passion is entirely another matter.Some self-published authors use different pen names for different genres, but Patrick uses the same for quite different things, so please check the description, the tags and even the free pages before you buy.If you want to send feedback or hate-mail, feel free to write to [e-mail]

Book preview

Doting Doormat

Part I

Patrick E. Chauvin, Ph.D.

[e-mail]

Distributed by Smashwords

Copyright 2020 Patrick E. Chauvin

This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to your favourite ebook retailer and purchase your own copy.

All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, or other real-life entities, past or present, is purely coincidental. All sexually active characters are 18 years of age or older.

The reader is welcome to send feedback to the author. Patrick’s ego trips on feedback, including hateful one.

Contents

Preface

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

Chapter 3

Chapter 4

Chapter 5

Preface

A very boomer note.

Many of my stories are set in the 2000s in places whose culture one could call predominantly white, and the actions and feelings of my characters will often be affected by their surrounding culture. It is my experience that some readers, especially people who were too young in the 2000s, may miss some parts of the story that happen to hinge upon elements of this culture. The purpose of this preface, which is meant to be added to other stories as well, is acquainting these readers with some of these cultural elements, so they can have an easier time understanding some of the characters’ actions and thoughts. It may be redundant for other readers, especially people born before 1990 and raised in very white environments, but these are always free to skip the preface.

Some differences between the 2000s and the 2010s, such as those related to the prevalence of political correctness, are quite well known so I will not delve into them. But there is one difference that, by the time of this writing (2020), increasingly more people seem unacquainted with, especially those who had not reached adulthood by 2010, and who are American or heavily influenced by 2010s American culture. This difference is the enormous shift that there has been regarding body standards for women. Because my stories touch topics such as self-image and body shaming, and many English readers are likely to be American or influenced by American culture, I consider this introduction very important.

Let’s go into the matter. Before the early 2010s, when there was no Instagram and no Kardashians, and words like thicc and phat had not yet become popular jargon on the Internet, the virtual totality of white women were obsessed with having thin lower bodies, to the point that women with very modest body mass indices (think of twenty-two down to even nineteen) would be worried of being too fat down there. But while in the fashion industry the all- thin body was the gold standard, when it came to pleasing the male gaze, the most popular archetype for the female body was a relatively thin lower body combined with a large bust. Contrary to how some people think today, a thin lower body wasn’t considered flat (the typical ad or media piece displayed a bottom that was from medium to small, but always perky), and the exact bust size that was required to qualify as large was highly dependent upon context. Most guys would be content with something around C cups, but the idea of the bigger the better was often floating around, even if just as an excuse to make bawdy jokes, and commercial pornography (still the most common type back then) often featured much larger sizes.

One could find the occasional hot celebrity with a small or even flat-ish bust, but she would be considered alt-hot rather than just hot, like filling a niche, and it would only be allowed if she was proportionately slim and athletic (e.g. Milla Jovovich in the Resident Evil movies is a good example; she had a following but she was