Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Code of Human (Civilisation)
The Code of Human (Civilisation)
The Code of Human (Civilisation)
Ebook847 pages11 hours

The Code of Human (Civilisation)

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Behold what manner of race the fathers of the Golden Age left behind them! Far meaner than themselves! But you will breed a viler progeny! Verily wars and cruel bloodshed shall be unto men and grievous woe shall be laid upon them- Aratus, Phaenomena 123

Aratus was Greek poet that in his poem Appearances have presented the predictions delivered by Astraea, daughter of Zeus and Themis, devoted to human justice on Earth. Themis was known as goddess of divine law. The law of absolute principles of logic of endurance of humanity always would connect to rules of correctness. Accordingly, she would be real predecessor to the institution of Supreme Court. Yet, it seems exactly there we have to confront the other side, into claiming and declaring what Supreme is and can possibly be on Earth.

What I found almost necessary is to point out that if anyone is to claim any legacy on anything it has to be clear what kind of legacy can be only acceptable to be claimed first of all. I am to insist on the conception of licencing of the civilizational stamp of Earth as declared with in main civilizational declarations of present times of protectionism of civil rights, while we still recognize the meaning of having a soul so no anyone can claim it and interpret it as one wants, especially in the future. I have on mind some kind of sealing of the cultural identities of the nations in terms of qualitative differences that each nation is making, promoting further straightening of civilizational values as a consequence. Origin with in such perspective does and will matter. Yet, I am trying to establish humanity with in its abstract dimension, through the set of clear rules of civilizational conduct, justice and exactness that than only we can call civilisation, as it will be something on what our future generations can rely.

LanguageEnglish
PublisherXlibris NZ
Release dateMay 20, 2016
ISBN9781499098310
The Code of Human (Civilisation)
Author

Mary Olympia Themis

The Author is born in 1960 in Macedonia, Former Republic of Yugoslavia, in mixed marriage of father Serb and mother Macedonian. Born in middle class family, her realm in early childhood was defined by her love for comics, passion for readings legends of various cultures and well typical for the time, strong admiration for irresistible magic of moving pictures created in studios of Hollywood. Love for math and generally relatively normal curious nature, created out of school subjects just another journey and identified thrive for accomplishment. Today she consider herself lucky of a choice she has made to study economy, graduating at University of Economy, although at a time she perceived it rather as a compromise. As many others of her generation back home, she experienced the war in 90’s as losing of a country she was in love with, as losing of her right to legacy of her parent’s generation and of generations before. Starting family of her own and having two small kids born at a time of beginning of the war, a decision to move abroad sounded rather as a good than as a bad, although she encounters that leaving everything behind is never clever or easy. Life abroad assisted better her understanding of global affairs that inevitably, she is finding, are influencing life of any individual. She also believes that social awareness is a matter of personal integrity and has devoted several years of her life contributing into assisting global community of better understanding of times in which we live. In the mean time she graduates at Business School in Accountancy, acquiring much better understanding of the way of thinking of western societies, she found almost as imperative upon arrival in the new environment.

Related to The Code of Human (Civilisation)

Related ebooks

Politics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The Code of Human (Civilisation)

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    The Code of Human (Civilisation) - Mary Olympia Themis

    Copyright © 2016 by Mary Olympia Themis.

    ISBN:      Softcover      978-1-4990-9830-3

                    eBook           978-1-4990-9831-0

    All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner.

    Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Thinkstock are models, and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.

    Certain stock imagery © Thinkstock.

    Rev. date: 05/19/2016

    Xlibris

    0-800-443-678

    www.Xlibris.co.nz

    511569

    CONTENTS

    The Beginning

    Prelude

    The Roots

    Chapter One -- The Fundamentals

    Chapter Two -- The Present Times

    Chapter Three -- Basic Principles

    Chapter Four -- The Essence

    Chapter Five -- The Humanity is about Human

    Chapter Six -- The Order

    Chapter Seven -- Clarification

    Chapter Eight -- The Socio -Political Realm

    Chapter Nine -- The Fairy -Tale

    Chapter Ten -- Da Vinci Code Decrypted

    Chapter Eleven- The End of the World

    Chapter Twelve -- The Political Dimension of Humanity

    Chapter Thirteen -- The Theatre of Politics

    Chapter Fourteen - About Politics

    Chapter Fifteen - Letter H for Human is actually X

    Chapter Sixteen - The Excellence

    Chapter Seventeen -- The Voice(s) from the Bottle(s)

    Chapter Eighteen- The Blue Romance

    Chapter Nineteen - Mother Terra vs. Father Sky

    Chapter Twenty-- Global Overview / the Ground for Defence

    Chapter Twenty One - The Dimension of Empire

    Chapter Twenty Two -- The Concept of Authority

    Chapter Twenty Three- The Excalibur of Humanity

    Chapter Twenty Four -- The Notion of Meridian

    Chapter Twenty Five -- Hitting the Notch

    Epilogue -- Recovery

    Closure -- Supreme Court Legal Grounds

    My Scenario For Peace

    LEGAL DECLAIMER

    The writhing of this book took approximately seven years for which time the issues discussed here gained enormous popularity and audience (the question of availability before publishing of not only my book but any book written on PC today is issue on its own). As result various initiatives, foundations and movements emerged aiming to assist the cause. I will need to alert here of enormous possibility that such audience that I have right to see it associated to my authority rights, with-in such attempts actually become someone else field of management. Because this book delivers very sensitive material I cannot grant such rights, but have asked the Governments of NZ, UK, Macedonia, Greece, Serbia as well as UN to be direct ambassadors to my work as political authorities, insisting on my authority rights and accordingly the fact that this work is matter of my responsibility to present it properly to various working groups that will be assisting my practical work on relevant fields.

    On the names used

    Some of the names that I am using are personal. Yet, even than it is a realisation well- developed here that our given names do have meaning rather than not with in some view from the above game played on Earth. The intention of this book is to replace the concept of game of life played by various upper class layers of society with the notion of pursue of life as matter of free, responsible and qualitative leaving, that I am sure many would see as much more correct definition of human society and human life. The names that I am using in addition to my personal are well assisting the mission I have found myself in, and are in reference to:

    • Birth, mother, woman, creation

    • Higher houses of historical legacy

    • Absolute justice, Supreme Court, logic, reason, science

    • Human as defining specie on Earth, yet given highly 'personal' note here with in all of the previous

    • Developing the Star Wars Concept of 'I can see you' position of eye, as real definition of Authority and real history making on Earth. Accordingly I declare my title as adjoin to my name by the rule of facts and confiscate the notion of Imperialism on Earth. The intention of the term 'confiscate' is not to leave any space for misapplication of my work or to be declared by other strongholds of power, taking away from them any ground to declare it in any serious manner, as this book will leave no such space. I will call it accordingly ruling of absolute positive justice. I defend here the standing that Authority is word derived from Author and Author is in reference to wordings and writings accordingly, in the case of social orders inevitably writings of law.

    You will agree that person does not attempt of such work being an ordinary person of some ordinary suburb. Nothing in this book is ordinary, neither I am. Neither are the times in which we live, and so neither you should be.

    I am accordingly bringing my names with in statement that this work is not personal, and neither I am private person. I insist accordingly that this work does have me as Author, as it reflects my personality. Many people will not find this peculiar as they have been in business of philanthropy for some time. What probably is less certain is that they had an opportunity to really confront such real 'replica'. Yet, I am not replica, I am HUMAN.

    The concept of life to some people is defined through their work, we call it on Earth duty when with -in the highest aspirations. There has been long tradition on Earth to diminish such people and set them on opposite of where they naturally belong, in real 'castles'¹. My work enclosed is to prove such perceptions wrong, but also to present the entire matter of exceptional standards rather than regular. I hope I will manage to explain better the exceptionalism in practical presentation.

    So, let's start the journey........

    To my Mum and Dad that I respect highly

    To my kids that I love very much

    To my entire family that is so important in my life as defines my thrive for belonging

    To my friends that are my family

    To my country as defines me as permanent

    To the World that defines me as absolute

    There is something about the swards, the shoulder they touch will need to sustain the weight of it. Otherwise you are not in business of honouring.

    The Beginning

    The Concept of Intelligence vs Realisation

    The manifestation of intelligence would not be exactly describable as a cracker but rather as something that would be identified as EXPLOSION. Not with intention to be hidden, so it is not applicable any notion of 'covered' or 'cup' or 'open mind so anyone can read it'.

    It will rather represent EXISTENCE, where accordingly would not be applicable the notions of 'hiding', 'opening' or 'closing'.

    Knowledge is therefore the existing, we are just in search of it. It is not my mind open to anyone to read it, it is rather my realisations, my announcement, my statement, my declaration that are in existence the moment it created itself as thought in my mind. No doubt and no compromise. These are our realisations, our acknowledgement of facts. Am I going to shout it or not will not change at all the fact that such logic exists as corresponding outcome of existence of certain facts.

    Facts are the only truth, no ideology no cover up mission.

    The Concept of Logics

    Logic is when we try to make sense of something. It is us vs the facts. The chemistry of our CONSCIENCE vs. the facts. Who we are equals here to our conscience.

    Yet, is it our logic all of our conscience? I would refer to our conscience here as to something more substantial, to our subconscious inclusive. If I refer to my development from the beginning of writhing on this book to the present stage, I would refer it as to 'search of soul', 'search of relevant answers', 'personal before anything else', 'as any scientific research is'. It is here the point where the knowledge actually was translated using my logic, I would see it as subconscious equally quite enough.

    What is relevant scientific question however is what makes our chain or evolution, and why it is used the wording chain? And also should we assume that our less or more developed stages of evolution do not co-exist with us? Is it that we just occasionally sign on to be brain washed, just because we cannot be bothered thinking behind the square, or we are actually not that much used to?

    Ideology vs Politics

    Politics is manipulation of facts and of various logics to accommodate various groups' interests. Ideology would be something more pure, connects to idea, reason, logic. The travel from logics toward politics would be having reason and ideology as natural path. Ideology would be more abstract, clearly relevant to principles of life itself in long perspective, rather than to specific politics.

    Here it is where we can see religion categorizing as institutionalized ideology. Stagnate, frozen in time.

    So, where is the natural flow between out realisation, knowledge, logics and reason on one side as naturally dynamic vs ideology that lead to politics and are static to the extent that are defining certain realm and the game of it?

    The natural flow is what we would call science. Many times there is clear conflict between the two. Why? Because any system will create its safeguard to protect certain cast of entitlements.

    What our present religion is increasingly protecting? It seems something or rather anything that it is growing from inside in ages of under-developed societies.

    As we develop as humanity, our realisations are developing as well. And we should not mix the basics that any educated mind would be careful about principles and order of thinking. Science will always belong to scientists. The numerous reality TV shows are empowering today individuals in very random ways.

    As we can notice here there is difference between truthful facts, its logical translation and the politics at any time.

    The path is accordingly, facts, logics / reason, realisation, ideology or social formation, than politics, where most of humanity would automatically categorise, as or prime instinct of survival.

    Where would you be standing, trying to deliver some facts? Where one stands when delivering facts? This question can be political or more abstract. Technology today allows us to exit political much easier than any time before. We are today undoubtable on the levels of much more abstract investigations of who we are. Today we are on the levels of questioning the ideology. Yet, look what precedes the ideology.

    Who is making the explosions of realisations and knowledge today? Who is the Author? Who is the scientist?

    The point of religion erased individuality. It erased the point of real authority, introducing the point of symbolic or representative authority. (Fact) Today any of such (political) orders is simply not acceptable, as they disconnect from the notion of real accomplishments and real characters. (Reasoning)

    Human vs Individual

    We also know (knowledge, fact) how much real science usually goes with morals and ethics. Development as product of intelligence is always more humane, explaining why scientist are usually humanitarians as well. To disconnect from such definitions is not better, it is worse. We have to see religion today increasingly bringing on surface much more than historical records. It is equally hiding from us, manipulating and accordingly preventing our realisations. It is already heavily in breach with any regular legal institution of orders, to the extent that it is just being all together ignored.

    I am equally disconnecting any connection of intelligence to homosexualism, because, I (the Author) am here using my logic and reason (sincere, the notion of purity of scientist searching for answers) to certain specific, yet most general features of life on Earth, being that any developed life form on Earth exists as two gender organisms, as Mammals, where Home Sapiens definition of human evolution is accepted as good enough to the extent that recognises:

    • the existence specific bio defection of human as a specie and,

    • it equally introduces the concept of natural or graduate evolution. (being my point of ideology, what I am ready to reconcile with the specific definition of human life on Earth, the concept of human on Earth).

    May be at some point of future we will question this fact as well. However, my attention at the present time is to prevent escalation of chaos and agendas of end of World, so I have chosen to think that we need to hold rather what we have and we are happy with. I will question any further definitions of any subsequent religion or tribunal culture, ancient or not.

    My attention is equally in this regard enormously wasted to insist of the standard of our inner being, conscience that results from our identity of human and defines who we are. I would not use the notion of soul in any serious manner as it would need to be referred to in 21st Century rather as to 'energy", since we have our science developed that much. However soul refers to something much more personal yet in more general terms as sub-conscience is, and would be eventually intelligent energy. We will need to comprehend it yet as applied with-in political and any other specific Earth-y conditions, being already complicated enough.

    Accordingly, I found urgent enough to focus on standard of identity of Earth. Therefore I will try to generate in this book the soul of Earth and everything that we call historical heritage to our civilizational performances. I especially insist on my testimony that the two, the face (the institutions of order) and the substance have been disconnected since year 0. In that respect what cannot be avoided noticing is the name of the new tower in NY, referred as to ground 0? It is as someone is in intention to announce some new 'new' beginning again? It sounds rather as new civilizational circle. How about we stop for a second and see where we are so far?

    My intention is to promote what I identify as my ideology, the notion of Homo sapiens and the fact that humanity on Earth, does have its evolution, although did not happened with by the best practices employed in terms of emergence of institutionalized orders and religion that just it seems rather stopped our evolution.

    What appeared as evident is that various ancient or / and increasingly our present cultures connect to some much more extreme definitions than what we accepted as bio standard on Earth. Extreme definitions being equally much more predatory and threatening with in its present stampede of wildness. It seems that any civilisation has been destroyed in same way, using the stampede of wild or less developed over more developed worlds, although the historical records of last civilisation - the Roman Empire, describe it as decadent society rather than developed, or developed but decadent as well. It seems as someone is trying to duplicate the same scenario again, so we have some increased culture of decadency that I would rather call stupidity. Decadent is something more as spoiled and overwhelmed. That is not our case exactly. We feel threatened and increasingly stupid. Is it possible that our past chains of evolution are working against us? Green bio extremism. Or our future is reaching us as more predatory than evolutionary? The blue dimension.

    Or our Gold designers lost any designer inspiration any- more, so they just repeat themselves? Or they have never been that much of Gods anyway?

    Prelude

    Start of Civilization

    The notion of kinetic (kin -etic) energy in physics is an energy given to the initial throw of a stone (or ball) that will continue to follow the direction initially given. In the Bible the time given was -- two millenniums. The entire play of course stands for disaster. Point one - Initiating disaster, point two -- Collecting the harvest.

    Also it seems as very probable that the sign of infinitive does exist as two realms, it would make difference if the writing is going left handed or right handed. As the sign of infinitive, as number eight. A glimpse of an opposite reality, a mirror. Like plus and minus. The well exploited notion of a double faced mask equally represents manifestation of a double realm, where again there are philosophically or conceptually and clearly politically two opposites as a defining point, the back side and the front side of the ......realm. A smile and a sorrow, happiness and sadness, heaven and hell. A destiny with in a story. The unavoidable question here is how absolute the story is, apart from the question of relativity of such relationships where the random two (as with - in some lotto ticket game) just get the roles? It is as that the roles are there and we just need to fit them. Various dispersed units will need just to be combined with in some well aligned scenario of mutual cooperation?! What if it is not in question cooperation but sucking one's life force and everything in package? Would we expect occupation by unknown forces to look any different? It is not that we are to wait on someone's attack. We are living it. It is in the form of some invisible pipelines or chains that are slowly reducing the free air surrounding our lives.

    Going backwards would be to continue politics of piping, going forward would be to comprehend the other story or the reality for that matter and establish if maybe there is some contradiction between the two and of what kind.

    Live sand image or stuck in a bucket of honey cannot give that much of a run, unless you are ..............the kid.

    My conscience is something else. I reflect something else. I reflect normal.

    When what means Balance on one side means War on the other, when Red means colour of Wealth on one side and Revolution on the other, to be nobody's fool would be the only correct statement. And ultimate definition of Freedom. As they all cross, war or balance at one point, one revolution, one idea, one planet, one source, one definition of human.

    Prelude

    We do exist as physical or material bodies and it would be logical that we would initially imagine the related civilizations, on what -ever level that might be, as of some articulate physical intelligence. We would go into polemics about the manifestation of differences in dimensions of our realisations as of body, character and intelligence and would try to identify these civilizations as evil or primitive or humble and in danger, as advanced and in danger or as advanced and calculative. Most certainly, that is exactly how we will find the Universe, as a splendid manifestation of diversity of matter and intelligence design, but multidimensional as well. It would be quite probable that our World therefore appears as a miniature manifestation of the entire complexity of the notion of creation, where the question of any point of time would be how much of such multidimensional existence we can catch with in our frequency of visibility, but how much we can comprehend as well. Apart from the realisation of course would come a question of the relationships as definitive of the entire environment that we call our realm today.

    Our World has its dimension already. It is not blank either within its bio concept or with in its prevailing notions of fundamental civilizational thinking.

    We always build the roof above our heads. It is an instinctive notion of survival. That roof is our ideology. Who we are and what are our laws.

    Few years ago, although it can probably refer to my entire life, I found myself in circumstances heavily stepping on top of my entire life. Something was always pushing me in corners of life to such extent that I could not possibly continue pretending that I am not aware that there is something going on that is literally suffocating me. And it happened that all of the sudden people started to talk to me as they have known me my entire life, although I have hardly a few friends. Something was not adding up here. With a speed of a light I found myself in The Alice in the Wonderland movie set. Anger combined with fear not to lose to be on the top of the happenings. To catch before the molecules of chaos continue their dancing. To prevent disaster. It is as when you scream but it is in different frequency and you have to move the entire mountain of misconceptions to make them, the humanity to stop for a while and listen. Have you ever had that unexplainable instinct to catch this World and never let it to break?

    Our lives are nothing else but the roles we play. When we are with friends we are one person, when we are with parents another, with ourselves totally different, as with kids, or at work. Have you ever thought that we may fit as many faces as circumstances are dictating upon us. And if one day someone asks you to save the World you'll probably do it, but your way.

    Consequently, this book is about the particulars of a certain point of time and on a specific territory that we identify as planet named Earth. I found myself in a mission to identify the basic energy dimensions of the Planet or the generated personality and intelligence as manifestation of life, point at the organisational problems and identify the available solutions. My mission is defined and so I am through it.

    The Concept of Swirl

    The notion of Swirl is a perfect example of how the principle of multiple dimensions works on our Planet. The law of physics or physical appears to create multiple manifestations not only with in the bio design, but with -in the adopted social habits or practices, in the ways how we think, in the languages and the regulations, crowning the circle with the creation of the notion of governance and conditions of creation of power centres. The interconnection of such manifestation of what humanity is at any particular time resemble I am afraid some shape of swirl that can be used as a fishing net, as a swirl of exploitation of human energy on Earth. Is it the Universe or the way how human organises it is enigma to most of us at this stage. It can be however identified the multiple dimensions of some civilizational swirl on Earth as follows:

    - The Physical (swirl) dimension as a chunk of pra- matter creating its own Constellation of Stars (e.g. Milky Way). It is clear that at this stage exists as manifestation of dispersion of matter and its magnetic interactions.

    - The Conceptual / Philosophical swirl dimension on some broader level as Religion. In music is the Key, the starting point, the Beginning, indicating therefore further emergence of a dimension of human life with in its highest manifestation as creativity is, with in the entire complexity of the social affairs and the human mind itself. Still dispersion. At this stage there is appearance of elements of manipulation interfering the source of information and the audience, well accomplished with the death of Jesus. From that point of time onwards the most influential story telling of human race become disconnected from its source, with the certainty of entire civilizational swirl getting opposite direction of what would be more straightforward and correct perception, leadership and influence rather than cultural self-service that instead become starting guidebook for cultural evolution. Point of adversity again.

    - Ascending as combination of ingenuity, communication, emotions and other various social and cultural expressions, therefore the Cultural swirl dimension expressed by the aggregated experiences, exposing the fact that creativity or identified human value of any kind was creating a tail of social hanging behind the back of the hope, star, 'horse', light, 'oil' or what -ever they would choose to refer to the notion of what we would identify as human being, human capacity and potential for accomplishment. Investment with in perspectives to wealth aggregation. Although such logic in economy can go away as sound, the real problem emerged at very early stage obviously of something very unnatural present in the relationship creator -- value, extensive network of interconnected circles of conspiracy of creating conditions of in-slaving the potential, of buying it, owing it before it starts its creativity. Slavery. Slavery over kids.

    - Another aspect of the previously identified social designs would identify the Financial swirl dimension that is developing into well -arranged financial models of investing into sucking 'the blood of a talent, of a scientist, of a beautiful and/ or attractive, by the notorious financers, accordingly establishing such negative social attitude with in the face of institutionalised exploitation;

    - The Political swirl dimension developed into practice of well evolved social circles that were serving the investors and the management of such affairs, becoming in essence model of creation of political powers by creation of social pipelines of corruption.

    - The Civilizational swirl dimension well functional when centralization of the pipelines become equal in a dimension to a Civilization, becoming a force beyond the touch of its particulars and obviously working against them and ultimately against itself. It is therefore a force that it is to be identified as a matter of life creation with purposes of extraction or consumption.

    Few years ago, it was all ready for some civilizational event of total change, music became darker, kids became drugged enough, economy was collapsing well, Noah ark was about to departure and the cataclysm was about to be welcomed. The elite were happy enough to hold the stick called compass as a definition of eternal happiness.

    It is obvious that if at the point of ideological (religious) swirl creation, the relationship with the value creation was positive instead of negative, we would not have the civilizational syndrome of self -destruction. The centre piece of such given acceleration of a distraction was a notion of human as an asset for trade and exploitation, a notion that we usually connect to the times of slavery as socio-political phenomenon but not to the world of spiritual. Yet, that is exactly were 'the devil' went.

    Speaking of 'devil' however will bring us to the next discussion.

    The Notions of Mother and Father (as tribunal concepts with -in global politics)

    What of course I instinctively attempted to do was summarising various accomplishments that create the World in which we live today, and how much various cultures can be accredited with, where I equally considered as not less important determining of what would be defining the accomplishments as well. The second was providing me definition of survival, I realised suddenly is my World, World I sign on and World I need to bring forward. The World of virtue, humanity itself.

    In mission like this, the name of the Planet itself would be the starting information. More and more I got involved in the analytical research of such scope, I equally realized that our given names were played with in some broader concept of theatre delivered as our destiny, totally irrelevant of who we are or how we want to present our self. Become equally clear that with- in same perspective, the names of our cities, countries, territories, continents and further our entire languages are some interrelated codes on the level of logic that exceeds officially declared conscience of this Planet or just officially declared education.

    • The above projected levels coincidence with the concept of Mother and Father respectively that would rather appear on Earth clearly as events than as subjects. Us, the humans of Earth will need to see ourselves with in the concept of human subjects and associated to the concept of human integrity, as freedom human rights etc., than part of such events that we could not possibly be held accountable for.

    • For the same reasons it would not be correct at all to project any political position of group on such premises, especially because of lack of point of responsibility and accountability defined. It is noticeable that many of old-fashion orders that exist on premises of cultural distinctiveness, are finding them-selves today caught with-in realisations of much larger dimensions of such rooting.

    • Present times require much more efficient definitions of cultural ethnicity that will serve the population of finding their identities, in enough save and defined ways with in the decaled institutionalised official socio political orders with in nations. The nations will need to be aware of such events, providing properly identified and defined standards of human conduct and much more standardised educational foundations on the subjects of origin of humanity. Today on national or international levels the entire matter is rather unrestricted and requires proper standardisation of conditions and behaviour relative to such events. The other side of the problem are the institutions of powers that exist today as stronghold of centralised capital without any sense of social responsibility and totally idle in direction of imposing proper civilizational orders, (apart from the fact that it is imposed upon us without any transparency). We are realizing today how much each of these forces exists with- in some rather highly antagonistic mode, even present with-in some concept of clearance of grounds of Earth without any closer attention paid to any selection of what is to be eliminated.

    • Elimination (and devaluation) of life on Earth is happening with employing of such recklessness in appreciating the institution of human life in general terms, that should be seen as high alert issue. The two forces, so called Father and Mother, exist with in such antagonism, that they are constantly damaging their own positions, killing the best of kids they have been created here out of our life forms. We exist as some meeting place of the two, all making the folk of cultural presences much more than naïve or innocent. It is equally evident that the two presences are creating kids that would be demonstrating features of combined performance, but clearly also with in some diluted version indicative that what is sliding on this planet would be of less substance in relation with the initial concept of human as introduced on Earth. Present development of science and social organisation are making possible corrections on the filed either of more civil standards of birth control everywhere in the World or of DNA improvement as part of well organised and morally correct World. The associated problems of over-controlled societies are already being used as school of what should be improved with in better understanding of what was driving our differences and associated conflicts. As we develop as civilisation and learn more about ourselves, we are there knowing more, understanding more so we can do things better not giving it up all and continuing to exist of less dignified levels.

    The humanity will always be defined as not giving up on excellence but being defined by it, yet point of excellence starting with being 'humane'. That is why it is very important that we prepare our World for the future that science if offering. Science cannot ever be seen as free drive for over spoiled kids! It is equally time that we make our definitions better into identifying who would really deserves the title of Fathers / Mothers of civilisations, and from there start our discussion on evolution of humanity.

    Meaning of the Name of the Planet

    Non-transparency indicates condition of a limited view and therefore of a limited freedom to understand, be equal, participate, live, be alive. It is a notion of subordination or discrimination. That automatically gives my entire research rather note of an investigation of a crime.

    The identity is the name. The name is Earth. E-art-H. H clearly indicates bridge or bride. It is a marriage of someone with E-art. Bridging the art, or marring the Art by the mind who would think of a marriage as a construction -- builder, constructor, engineer. A notion of Father? Obviously '-a-r-t' would be defining the Mother civilizations. Under art would come theatre, music, writing, philosophy etc. In such context, and explained in some more details latter, one would think of letter E as a symbol of Kid, for no other reason but following the self --declared civilizational concept of 'Parents', involving the notion of 'family' with in the entire rather political matter. Unless we hear Earth sounding as 'E our tell', well associated to the older name of Tell-us.

    Accordingly, latter E can be seen in some other ways, equally recognizing the entire social construction that has obviously existed as parallel to the actual institution of family, as some kind of double reality. E as electricity, aura, energy centres of our bodies, well defined with in Eastern literature but not that much, if at all, subject to official system of education of Western societies. Does it mean that our body energy is not that much matter of equality between East and West or rather Mother and Father civilizations? Analysing the relationship E-art-h, as relationship of 'Kid, Mother and Father', it is unavoidable to make a correlation with the relationship well- established within the religions, the relationship of 'Father, Son and Holly Spirit'. It seems the difference between the two categories of relationships is the character of the relationship itself. In the first option there is a gender polarisation and definition of a family (although rather with in some political dimension), in the second there is no gender polarization and there is no a definition of family. Witnessing the disappearance of an institution of family lately and enormous spread of the disease of homosexualisam, it seems the second, the religious relationship is getting increased influence. It is worth mentioning in this context that the two relationships appear today as backdoor philosophy of the (two) main political parties in almost any political system today, defined as democratic.

    I do not know how much before we have been already close to reveal the truth, but many kids died as a result of obviously not that much friendly nature of 'Parents' or 'kids', all depending on the angle of observation. What we can today succeed more than anyone before is the degree of answered questions.

    As any research can be random rather than systematic, I will however of course value initially the official records of the prime names of Earth being Gaia, Tellus, Terra.

    The Greek nouns of 'gaia' or 'gaea' have been used in reference to land. With- in the Greek mythology the name Gaia, or in pronunciation Gaea, symbolizes the primal mother goddess, creator and giver of birth to the Earth and all the Universe, the heavenly gods, the Titans and the Giants, born from her union with Uranus (the sky), while the sea-gods were born from her union with Pontus (the sea). With- in the awareness we possess today the previous can simply allude to the DNA alteration or crossing of original (or present at some point of civilizational evolutions) of Gaia / land life form with the DNA / life coming from Universe (extra-terrestrial) on one side and the water (either own life formations or extra-terrestrial water dependent life forms), on the other side.

    The further evolution with in the history, accordingly of the naming of the planet as well, is bringing wording tellus, telluris, a Latin common noun for land, territory; earth, as is terra, earth, ground (it sounds so much as tell us, indicative of the concept of kids). And not coincidently obviously, in ancient Roman mythology, 'Tellus' or Terra Mater is a goddess of Earth. (mater/mother). It is worthy to be mentioned here the symbol of Rome, the two kids and their wolf foster --mother.

    It is however, boldly to be notified that the concept of mother become symbolically embodied with in the foundations of what it is to be recorded until present days as the most lasting ideological influence over the human race, the Christianity. I would to say equally, symbolizing the emergence of market based on nothing else but obviously playing of woman and marketing the kids.

    I am to simplify all of the previous into basic conclusion of the most certain facts, that the domestic population of Earth, at some point of time continued to evolve, as presented with -in the records of the old civilisations, being mixed by accident or not with civilisations that would have some other domicile place than Earth. The present relationship between the various civilisations is however demanding much more of the interpretation and consequent regulation of all of the aspects on the issue, from the perspective of well- defined and protected interest of planet Earth.

    It is fact that such conditioning will constitute very sensitive arena to confront with, as it is involving our kids, and that is where we are the most sensitive. That is where defence need to be, with in emigration policies and careful birth management (Health Care System).

    However, the initial question would be -- who is the bad guy? Is it necessarily the unknown bad, even when it is coming from distant territories? Because they are already part of us. We just need to figure out which part. And -than, we have the entire majestic history unfolding in two and more millenniums infused with enormous talents and creativities and benefactors that have been applying themselves unselfishly for the benefit of the group, society, nation. Are we clear that we know who the bad guys are?

    Accordingly, we need to investigate very carefully what drives the present political powers and top profit making powers. The overall conclusion is that the civilizational swirl today do exist as some kind of invisible pump, pumping our happiness basically, rather than shining problem solving, coordination, improvement, education, advancement etc. It is enough indicative that we are dealing with rather negative than positive agenda, with in the entire concept of Massive Attack on the very essence of humanity.

    Our defence strategy would require answering of what the code of human is. I am using conceptual analysis with in the process of searching for logical relationships of notions as we know them or should notice them and have comprehended them in certain perspectives. The political constrain is very strong so many answers that are already there on various levels of powers many of us need still to rather speculate.

    For example, Oscar / oska / axis / o --s-car / golden boy / human / code of human / Meridian / defence of Earth.

    The impact of such problems is unavoidable noticing and would impose need of serious political response not only in direction of addressing the violation of principles of humanity but imposing them as order respective of national identities, insisting on standards of quality with in various cultures and on conduct as well as of any other qualitative dimension human should be represented by.

    The Origin of the Concept of Church / Temple

    As I well set my-self into building the contemporary set of logical political thinking it sounds as I am building a....... Church. As natural this need appears to me, my scepticism in present institutions of various religious orders become more frequent.

    In a process of only moderate civilizational analysis it becomes clear that our present realm exists in the environment of created global social dimension of human 'lambs', 'sheep', 'goats', 'fishes' or similar, governed by human 'dogs' and possessed by 'unknown'. Here is where the trickery is evolving further, the owner can be changed any time once such social construction has been accomplished. We see it in any of so called regime driven countries ongoing, in less careful fashion and more subtle or just different in the rest of the societies, following nothing less but the Dante Alighieri's division of Sky to Haven, Cleaning and Hell.

    Apart of the facts that all of the nations has been defined as certain animal category and let to evolve in such cultural set of social affairs, going no further than what certain group on animal category would create as its environment, the enigma unresolved would be who is calling for obedience, the religions backed by extremisms, their political patrons or the next door business caught in the spider net, creating the latest civilizational sensation, all well as part of regular definition of economy? And of course the spider -man is just a modern days Gladiator. But who is the master mind? The unknown and non-transparent wisdom of our lost memory, the agenda or just the logic of modern human with in modern set of civilizational rationale?

    However, as I am not yet given any response by the institutions I have been contacting on the subjects I am delivering in this book, so I do not have any position of influencing or being influenced by any political powers or similar. I will equally need to insist strongly on clause that my workings presented in this book cannot be used as delegated right to anyone to intervene with any of these areas in ways that would be of any destructive nature.

    We are witnessing today increased activity of various terrorist organisations and increased activities with in field of oil derivation or its cultural counterpart using a gun, both sides endeavouring into application of very prime and hostile practices rather than properly resolving problems in contemporary way and equally inventing much more suitable language. Old civilisations are marching in some stampede of prime wisdoms revived instead cultivated and recognised. Profit making is still main driving force in addressing of these issues, although is clear that we are living times of confronting our cultural and accordingly ideological identities to such extent that I am convinced profit making will be seen only as category of what it is, highly dependent on what this work is about, making definitions and clarifications.

    Thrive for liberation in many countries, hunt for human as increasingly is becoming one of the rare beings increases, old civilisations rights have been and are rather violated, and I am afraid someone is marching them today on very bad terms, revoking prime wisdoms in some frozen mode instead allowing real development of such elements and structures with in societies. Plenty is on the way of real engagement of these supressed elements on Earth, and today we are realizing old civilisations withhold with in their orders culture of oppression and discrimination as well, being on the level of primeval stages of human development. The real ancient flame of wisdom it seems is covered with layers of primeval beings, continuing their occupation of any concept of liberty on Earth.

    ******************************************

    It can be summarized at this point that we are confronting today two main platforms of problems:

    1. Earth vs Universe

    2. Order of life on Earth itself.

    To resolve the two levels will demand clear standards applied on both levels.

    First level, Earth vs Universe will impose as necessity drawing conclusions on definitions of life on Earth, the history of our evolution, present conditioning, and applied careful programmes to win over our kids, our people in the order of humanity, drawing the lines with any external to Earth interests or agendas. Difference between Mercy and full should not be meter of confusion here. As we live on the stages of development that we refer to as to civil, our practices will need to reflect civil and educated behaviour.

    Second, well connected to the previous, well understanding our definition of humanity and employing such standards extensively in main civilizational arenas as it is politics, social orders, economy, but also increased cultural polarisation that creates its own worlds already as film industry, or music industry, computer and Internet or sport industry. These cultures, as they grow with in their own Worlds increasingly tend to implement their rules of game. Politics is increasingly weaker on its own drive to the extent that we are experiencing today danger of total civilizational collapse. Recommended approach would be much more established by now in terms of classical politics and science of moral and ethics, however in need to be heavily adjusted by the latest realisations of mass manipulations on-going where the general principles that are to guide life have been actually systematically violated, all together making this task nothing easier than the previous. We have to be clear here however that the story of humanity begins with order not with lack of it.

    What is also evident is that the chair of global control was for some time unattended or attended under wrong terms.

    It equally became evident absence of real manifestation and comprehension in all of the aspects of its real life dimension, inclusive politics and socio-political affairs, of the concept of beauty of mind, soul and body, with- in the criteria of political advisory, advocacy and accordingly again authority.

    It became already a call that we need to rebuild our temples and reclaim our institutions of orders.

    On the Concept of Jesus

    People tend to associate to the field of their engagement, to the extent of considering such fields as their zone. The question of where personal stops in terms of one's engagement, public field have been for some time matter of very specific regulations.

    Mass movements will have much bigger place in the future, and mass media is clearly replacing the position of churches on the field of mass handling. Therefore it should not be disregarded the presence of concept of mass manipulation, that is easier to accomplish when people are less educated, or educated on different levels, with in different knowledge given to them.

    Masses can be wild cord if left to exist like that. Leadership accordingly can be initially polarised to two basic types, engaging people and not engaging people. Yet people rarely have time to mind even their own behaviour, especially if not taken care of properly, and would when unorganised exercise the level on which someone is holding them. The concept of organised society will always be in need of two correct sides of the game, proper leadership and proper masses, reflecting the time or charting any particular period of history. We expect in the future to see human race as less wild, much more educated, well behaved and subtle. Yet, the overaggressive and militant video gaming, the so called 'bitchy' behaviour introduced as weapon of defence upon weaker of vulnerable, unhappy arranged marriages that create unhappy circumstances, and multiple negative energy in dosages that appear and spreads as a fire, are all very manipulative mass techniques that clearly have for intention degradation of humanity rather than its promotion.

    Capitalism again is promoting personal powers vs collective. Yet in many cases the companies act as collective or integrated force on its own personal interest. Equally, companies do not even accept responsibility to take care of societies other than to make profit. We may argue that the production or services they provide are to assist community, yet we are witnessing today how much the primary subject of these companies is not public health or well -being, but profit making. They do not accept any other legal obligation. Governments are the one given all of the problems of public health, organisation, education, behaviour culture. It is fact that the entire political establishments exists on premises of some watchdog over the population instead of working in their interests although they declare themselves as such and are paid by tax collection from the national and international tax base.

    The international aspect of profit generation with development of globalisation is momentum that requires special attention today with in the entire set of political affairs and jurisdictions. Capitals that are collected on global scale are still declared as national and exist in function of supporting certain national currencies. Increased centralisation of capital does have its political dimension. When in such conditions of such major capital centralisation, we discuss politics as watchdogs business we have on stake plenty, majorly the entire concept of personal freedom and of humanity for that matter.

    This specific writhing on the concept of Jesus deserves special comment or rather warning, that such adverse definition of entrepreneurship caused very heavy consequences today of lost identity and lost standards of what create real values, being lost in the masses of underestimated despair all over our planet. Disastrous consequences of manipulation and downplaying the weaker and real royalties are graduating today into establishment of reckless culture driven by underdogs.

    The two riders on the storm into this World thrown are dancing as phantoms, while we are facing new catastrophe passionately waiting for our saviour. The saviour of our Souls.

    The Roots

    Introduction

    It is clear that as we are all born as humans, we will be defined by our mental abilities to perform, accordingly to the size and functionality of our brain and performance of our body. The notion of equality as bio absolutism of spices here applies. Human as a spices differ from others in regard of the typical body appearance and potential mental (and physical) abilities, matter of environmental, social and cultural conditioning. However, the variations from the template became lately reason for larger political turbulences, bringing on a surface more than we would, very certain, like to deal with. All these questions are in front of us with in full heaviness of the issues that they are bringing.

    What is coming on the surface boldly is the question of inequality, being an issue for a longer period of human history, yet in some newly revealed form as a matter of some bio differences. What is evident is that there is no even serious attempt this topic to be analysed let aside resolved, but rather presented a bold intention to be misused this open space of new realisations in some wild race style for primarily marketability purposes. It sounds as a total mental misconception. I felt and still feel furious to the extent that I just decided to write a book on nothing more or less but normality.

    The problems we are experiencing at present stage of civilizational evolutions are associated to the conflict Universe vs Earth, Earth vs. the template of human as one specie, and the individual vs. the template. What is my main motivation is to clarify and provide regulative grounds for preventing the point of losing ourselves. My discussion is bringing strong awareness of the specific historical timing, incorporating therefore the dimension of time and of space as main defining points of any realm. This can be solely separate issue, but also matter of bigger insight I do not intend to develop outside of the concept of the book being primarily the socio-political aspects. My focus is on our realm where my study of economy and my inclination toward philosophy are assisting me well with in such task.

    We all agree that ancient history, despite the fact that we generally admire the bravery and the magnificence of the characters associated with this historical epoch, was shaped by the socio-economical order of slavery or rights to possess slaves on the ground of being male citizen of the Empire, or not. It was therefore a political matter and part of the well- established system, although from present perspectives with in obviously very narrowed concept of democracy, yet declared such political frame-working. I want to point here however that such terminology may well be used with in the same narrow meaning today still and go away with projected assumed declarations of modern days comprehension of principles of democracy.

    With the arrival of the Barbarians somewhere from East (we were thought from mountains of Ural), the stories of King Arthur and Marilyn emerged and the feudalism equally, bringing bravery and personal qualities of accomplishment as enough ground for possession of a land and 'what is on the land'.

    It seems to me that today we still have same polarization with- in and among civilizations, expressed majorly as a matter of some normal political sense. What I am actually realizing today is that the old structures never stopped to exist within their own definitions and that the social progress is happening as a parallel rather than replacement of the previous.

    I have been born in a country where all of the previous was alive only in the books of story- telling or history. The regime type of a system in which we lived (that I prefer to call protective society, as I experienced it as such) was defined by the simplicity of a state organization, providing degree of a common sense as what we all need in general - space to be our own, to be free, have education, plan our life etc. The ideological part was defining the state of our minds, how to excel in the well- identified path not of any successes, but success that will not compromise any of personal ideals. From such perspective, it was clearly protective society. It was idealistic environment, and I still favour such positioning in regard of what is to be imperative role of any modern, evolved society. What is to be complained about is the external environment that was obviously perceiving these lands as farming of chickens, where it seems our life style or how much we can earn was depending on how much someone from outside would allow us.

    Today we are certainly on the page of discussing the institution of state. Again, it is fact that defence is not, and it cannot possibly in 21 century be a personal matter. It is a matter of evolved institution of state defence system that we call army and police, in function of course to the institution of Governance. Here, applies a rule that a citizen is to rely on what taxation is about, security of a personal integrity and well -being. The economy is therefore defined by such social absolutism of modern life style. I am not saying here that economy should be matter of a state, but matter of defined principles that today we call the institution of law. Money cannot be above the civilizational order, yet as a matter of facts they are creating it. As I explained shortly above, historically the power was the money and the power was the law. Yet, such power was initially introduced (and maintained) by the concept of justice and correctness as a matter of highest moral ideals. And we were buying it. Why? Because we are born as such. We have infusion of idealism as a default. And our lives are nothing else but trying to reach it, again.

    We are today all accommodated with in certain standards of a personal development, clearly being an education and material security, not as predators but as being more and more civil. Social governance needs to follow such state of human mind. Being more civil is not also to appear as being more lamb or sheep or goat but being more evolved. As our reasoning become more complex it will accordingly reach level of conceptual thinking and inclination towards higher organized society not of worshiping predatory methods. The concept of higher conscience that normal healthy educated mind is producing is full package, well incorporating the development of thinking and practices, without fear of losing our identity. In contrary by developing ourselves we stand higher with in our culture inclusive.

    Ideology is not to be seen as some taboo wording, simply because it basically refers to an abstract thinking, and that is what our societies will always need. It is the essence of any policy and regulation as social organization evolved, answering and regulating any contemporary issue that was thrown upon, imposing principles and stretching them as long as they can resist to be either completely abolished or simply advanced, and new invented. We should not see ourselves short in new invention either. What science is if not new view as opposing to old views. And can we really outplay science? So, can we see cultures, any as static or dynamic? Why for example, there are not Celtic medicine providers of natural healing? Is it that they are supressed to such extent or they could not reinvent themselves? Is it that something was withholding them?

    Consequently, the question today is where we want to move, towards some global cataclysm concept or towards the concept of organized societies as a matter of well-defined role of a state and nations as an organization of protecting civilians, where proper education and civil thinking will set standards of how to relate to what- ever is the issue we are to deal with.

    Despite the fact that highly organised society I am talking about did not ended properly, neither was perfect in regard of many issues that are being discussed here, it provided clear vision of many advances of being an organised society. Primarily, the significance of having the state defence and national standards in servicing and manufacturing industries vs. personal approach that capitalism is about, intensively bringing on the surface today with in some neo- royalism movement, all of the Pandora's box vocabulary and behaviour of a clearly undeveloped social conscience. What is naturally clear and need to be accepted as absolute is that capitalism, equally as feudalism and slavery before, just ceased to provide contemporary frame- working of newly created conditions. Today, the increased population and the technological advancements are crossing territorial distances as never before. Such processes can hardly prevent competition or excuse holding another in dis- advantaged position. National became past vision of unsustainable. The global view is alarming and couple of associated issues. Nevertheless, how they are to be dealt with does matter.

    Back to the concept of social organisation, or my travel to the future, we were having built system of free education and medical care, clean and healthy environment as imperative for sustainable development, where personal aspirations were function of collective or social. The wealth was smaller but was still there. I can imagine, in the proportions of the larger economies, it will be proportionally larger. What was away was the vision of a personal greed. Instead there was something that I would call healthy ambition. Corruption was however emerging. Again, attack from outside.

    Racism as a manifestation of nationalism was resolved by declared equality of all of the races. Yet, suburbs and schools were reasonably diverse. There was some accomplished degree of defeating racism, despite the facts that there were big cultural, ethnical and religious differences. The young generations were crushing all of the differences as it is the case on the global scale today. The generational connection was however not working against the institution of family. Regretfully, it is hard to see this aspect as part of the global culture today. For some time there is ongoing trend clearly associated with the creation of so called New Worlds, isolation of people, so they can be easier target. Huge buildings full of lonely people. Some promotion of a well- managed confrontation on the line Kids vs. Parents, creating climate for purely political outplaying of the parents and the wealth that would come with them.

    We appreciated the diversity of the cultures and strong family traditions. What turn to be problem at the end was, however, the hidden political game of moving the big chunk of various origins of population endangering to change the ethnicity of some of the territories, clearly with intention to create sharper polarizations and antagonisms, preparing just the confrontational playgrounds of future. That was clearly some wider regional or global perspective.

    Most probably, what we need to identify as improper today is such political establishment that was building on the positions of exploitation of what is to be perceived as 'resourceful'. Today it is clear more than ever the target is the human itself, but equally the wealth we create. Micro-bedded political destruction. It reminds very much on Nicola Tesla's invention of micro vibrational device that is using method of dismantling of the natural speed of molecules in certain matter, creating macromolecular explosions of changed state of balance. Yet, Nicola Tesla would never apply his work in such destructive manner. Science is by default associated to high sense of moral and ethics. Only

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1