Quarterly Essay 67 Moral Panic 101: Equality, Acceptance and the Safe Schools Scandal
By Benjamin Law
()
About this ebook
In 2016, the Safe Schools program became the focus of an ideological firestorm. In Moral Panic 101, Benjamin Law explores how and why this happened. He weaves a subtle, gripping account of schools today, sexuality, teenagers, new ideas of gender fluidity, media scandal and mental health.
In this timely essay, Law also looks at the new face of homophobia in Australia, and the long battle for equality and acceptance. Investigating bullying of the vulnerable young, he brings to light hidden worlds, in an essay notable for its humane clarity.
“To read every article the Australian has published on Safe Schools is to induce nausea. This isn’t even a comment on the content, just the sheer volume … And yet, across this entire period, the Australian – self-appointed guardian of the safety of children – spoke to not a single school-aged LGBTIQ youth. Not even one. Later, queer teenagers who followed the Safe Schools saga told me the dynamic felt familiar. At school, it’s known as bullying. In journalism, it’s called a beat-up.” —Benjamin Law, Moral Panic 101
‘This is a timely and important work’ —Steven Carroll, Sydney Morning Herald
Benjamin Law
Benjamin Law is the author of The Family Law, Gaysia, the Quarterly Essay Moral Panic 101, and editor of Growing Up Queer in Australia. He's also a TV and radio broadcaster; co-creator, co-executive producer and co-writer of the Netflix comedy-drama Wellmania; creator and co-writer of three seasons of the award-winning TV series The Family Law (SBS/Hulu/Comedy Central Asia); and playwright of the sold-out mainstage play Torch the Place (Melbourne Theatre Company). He appeared on Survivor: Heroes v Villains in 2023.
Read more from Benjamin Law
Gaysia: Adventures in the Queer East: Adventures in the Queer East Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Family Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to Quarterly Essay 67 Moral Panic 101
Titles in the series (93)
Quarterly Essay 20 A Time for War: Australia as a Military Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 10 Bad Company: The Cult of the CEO Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 5 Girt By Sea: Australia, the Refugees and the Politics of Fear Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 1 In Denial: The Stolen Generations and the Right Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 8 Groundswell: The Rise of the Greens Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 9 Beautiful Lies: Population and Environment in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 23 The History Question: Who Owns The Past? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 22 Voting for Jesus: Christianity and Politics in Australia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 4 Rabbit Syndrome: Australia and America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 11 Whitefella Jump Up: The Shortest Way to Nationhood Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 16 Breach of Trust: Truth, Morality and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 7 Paradise Betrayed: West Papua's Struggle for Independence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 18 Worried Well: The Depression Epidemic and the Medicalisation of Our Sorrows Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 2 Appeasing Jakarta: Australia's Complicity in the East Timor Tragedy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 6 Beyond Belief: What Future for Labor? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 21 What's Left?: The Death of Social Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 42 Fair Share: Country and City in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 14 Mission Impossible: The Sheikhs, the U.S. and the Future of Iraq Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 13 Sending Them Home: Refugees and the New Politics of Indifference Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 19 Relaxed and Comfortable: The Liberal Party's Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 12 Made in England: Australia's British Inheritance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 32 American Revolution: The Fall of Wall Street and the Rise of Barack Obama Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 3 The Opportunist: John Howard and the Triumph of Reaction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 33 Quarry Vision: Coal, Climate Change and the End of the Resources Boom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 48 After the Future: Australia's New Extinction Crisis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStop at Nothing: The Life and Adventures of Malcolm Turnbull; Quarterly Essay 34 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quarterly Essay 17: ‘Kangaroo Court’: Family Law in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 15 Latham's World: The New Politics of the Outsiders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 25 Bipolar Nation: How to Win the 2007 Election Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 27 Reaction Time: Climate Change and the Nuclear Option Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Growing Up Queer in Australia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/530 Queer Lives: Conversations with LGBTQIA+ New Zealanders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNo, You're Not Entitled to Your Opinion: And 49 Other Essays That Got the World Talking Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTransgender Body Politics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 45 Us and Them: On the Importance of Animals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gay and Lesbian, Then and Now: Australian Stories from a Social Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 1 In Denial: The Stolen Generations and the Right Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 74 The Prosperity Gospel: How Scott Morrison Won and Bill Shorten Lost Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 35 Radical Hope: Education and Equality for Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 37 What's Right?: The Future of Conservatism in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 71 Follow the Leader: Democracy and the Rise of the Strongman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 69 Moment of Truth: History and Australia’s Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 8 Groundswell: The Rise of the Greens Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 65 The White Queen: One Nation and the Politics of Race Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Politics Of Suffering: Indigenous Australia and The End of the Liberal Consensus Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 43 Bad News: Murdoch's Australian and the Shaping of the Nation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPink and Blue: Gender, Culture, and the Health of Children Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 56 Clivosaurus: The Politics of Clive Palmer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 60 Political Amnesia: How We Forgot How To Govern Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 50 Unfinished Business: Sex, Freedom and Misogyny Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 73 Australia Fair: Listening to the Nation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 54 Dragon's Tail: The Lucky Country After the China Boom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGender Politics: Citizenship, Activism and Sexual Diversity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTransgender Student Issues in Higher Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSmash the Church, Smash the State!: The Early Years of Gay Liberation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Growing Up in Country Australia Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Beyond Binary: Understanding Transgenderism and Gender Identity in the 21st Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 77 Cry Me a River: The Tragedy of the Murray–Darling Basin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 28 Exit Right: The Unravelling of John Howard Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Popular Culture & Media Studies For You
The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As You Wish: Inconceivable Tales from the Making of The Princess Bride Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fifties Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Butts: A Backstory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5100 Things You're Not Supposed to Know: Secrets, Conspiracies, Cover Ups, and Absurdities Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Rage Becomes Her: The Power of Women's Anger Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Thick: And Other Essays Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Pimpology: The 48 Laws of the Game Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Communion: The Female Search for Love Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hollywood's Dark History: Silver Screen Scandals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Libromancy: On Selling Books and Reading Books in the Twenty-first Century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Satan's Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern American Witch Hunt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Element Encyclopedia of 20,000 Dreams: The Ultimate A–Z to Interpret the Secrets of Your Dreams Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Truth: Sex, Love, Commitment, and the Puzzle of the Male Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dream Dictionary from A to Z [Revised edition]: The Ultimate A–Z to Interpret the Secrets of Your Dreams Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Devil's Notebook Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Psychology of Totalitarianism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear and Loathing at Rolling Stone: The Essential Writing of Hunter S. Thompson Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5And The Mountains Echoed Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Regarding the Pain of Others Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gamer's Bucket List: The 50 Video Games to Play Before You Die Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Misinformation Age: How False Beliefs Spread Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Quarterly Essay 67 Moral Panic 101
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Quarterly Essay 67 Moral Panic 101 - Benjamin Law
Main.
A LITTLE LIFE
What makes a thirteen-year-old kill himself?
It was November 2016 in Guangzhou, China, and I found myself asking this question after reading the news from home. Reports were coming in that a kid named Tyrone Unsworth had taken his life in my home state of Queensland. I call him a kid
for a reason: Unsworth had barely hit his teens. Photographs showed a fair, freckly, curly-haired boy, a sassy moppet who danced and worshipped at the twin altars of Gaga and Beyoncé. Those who knew him told me later that he was the kid doing cartwheels at lunch; the sensitive one who’d tell his teachers, to their faces, that he loved them. For anyone to take their life that young is gutting, but what really got me was how his mother raged that Unsworth had been bullied to death for being gay. The Courier-Mail ran a heart-bruising headline that day: Mum’s anguish: ‘They ended up getting him.’
Unsworth’s suicide was front-page news in the state. The story was splashed across the ABC, News Corp’s metro titles and Fairfax’s Brisbane Times. It ran on TV news bulletins across the country and was featured on the ABC’s 7.30 and international outlets in the following weeks. Curiously, though, the story didn’t run in the Australian, the country’s only national broadsheet. In fact, the Australian would never run a single word about Unsworth’s death.
My mind wandered back to the first time I’d set foot in mainland China, half a decade ago, when I’d spent months interviewing young gay women and men in Beijing for a book chapter. There was a lesbian who didn’t even know the word for gay
until adulthood; a man who’d been overprescribed antidepressants as a teenager to cure him of homosexuality; gay men and women who’d held elaborate sham weddings to fool parents into thinking they were straight. Many told me about the times they’d considered or tried killing themselves. When the book came out, the most common response was pity. Poor China. So backward for queers, especially compared to Australia. Yet here we were.
Another Australian at the Guangzhou conference was the writer Melissa Lucashenko. Like me, Lucashenko is queer and from Queensland; like Unsworth, she’s Indigenous. For queer Indigenous Australians, Unsworth’s suicide was felt even more keenly.
That day, Lucashenko and I sought each other out.
Did you read the news?
Christ, poor kid.
Apparently he was gay.
Thirteen years old, too.
The unspoken thought hovered between us: imagine wanting to kill yourself at that age.
Thing is, we probably could.
It might seem self-centred and disingenuous, a performance of false intimacy, to grieve for someone you’ve never met. But if you grew up queer in Australia, Tyrone Unsworth’s suicide felt personal. At Unsworth’s age, I attended a school where – as in most Australian schools, I’d venture – being gay was one of the worst things you could be. Some would argue it is the worst. After all, it still has the strange honour of being the only identity ascribed to anything in the schoolyard deemed to be shit.
If you grew up queer in Queensland, your experience was likely tougher still. After New South Wales decriminalised homosexuality in 1984, Queensland dug in its heels the year after and attempted to pass an amendment to the Liquor Act banning bars from serving perverts
and deviants.
Earning its reputation as Australia’s Deep North,
it was the last mainland state to make gay sex legal.
Every push for the protection of queers in Australia has been accompanied by a jeering soundtrack of loathing. For some commentators, howling down queer activists is something of a family tradition. In 1994 columnist Frank Devine wrote in the Australian of Tasmanian efforts to decriminalise gay sex, that one must deplore the arrogance and meretriciousness of the effort by homosexuals to have [these laws] rescinded.
A generation later, his daughter Miranda would take it up a notch in News Corp metro newspapers, advising marriage equality activists to take our olive branch and shove it where the sun don’t shine.
In all of this, kids were assumed to be off-limits. However, by the time Unsworth killed himself, the Australian was in its tenth consecutive month of indefatigable, sustained coverage and criticism of Safe Schools Coalition Australia, a federally funded program launched in 2014 to support lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer school students. SSCA was inexpensive – $8 million over three years (by contrast, the National School Chaplaincy Programme cost $243.8 million over four years) – and designed to address long-documented higher rates of abuse, suicide and self-harm. Independent studies consistently show LGBTIQ Australians have the highest rates of suicidality of any demographic in the country. When it was launched, Safe Schools was largely seen as a political no-brainer. These were kids, after all.
That changed in February 2016, when the Australian ran its first front-page story excoriating the Safe Schools program. (Its headline: Activists push taxpayer-funded gay manual in schools.
) Within hours of the story, Safe Schools was being debated in parliament. Within days, Coalition backbenchers had pledged to destroy it. Within a fortnight, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull requested education minister Simon Birmingham launch a review. After one month, Birmingham confirmed that Safe Schools’ federal funding would not be renewed. That didn’t mean the coverage stopped. As long as Safe Schools continued in any form, so too would stories in News Corp papers.
Like many Australian queers, by November 2016 I was exhausted by the Australian’s coverage of Safe Schools. The suicide of Unsworth – a kid who was likely driven to his death by schoolyard taunts and physical assaults – felt like the last straw. That afternoon in China, in a fog of self-righteous rage, I leapt over China’s firewall and logged onto Twitter, where Australians were already posting about Unsworth. The hot takes had begun. Linking to the Courier-Mail’s story, I added my own:
Tell your kids – no matter how young – that being LGBTIQ is fine, that bullying is torture, and then demand Safe Schools.
I’ll admit it. I felt smug when it was retweeted over 300 times. That’ll show them, I thought. Who I’d shown – and what, exactly – well, clearly, I hadn’t thought that far ahead. In researching this essay, I now see that tweet for what it is: a premature take on something I thought I understood, but actually knew next to nothing about. I’d read a lot about Safe Schools by that stage, mostly in the Australian and its metropolitan sibling titles, but my knowledge of the program had been gleaned from stories I now realise were at best inadequate or misleading, at worst simply false. My tweet, in its own way, was a small drop in a pointless slurry of commentary about Safe Schools, built on shaky foundations, bad faith and half-truths.
Some News Corp journalists would have you believe Safe Schools involved queer activists accessing classrooms and students, without parental consent or knowledge, to teach children about same-sex attraction and transgender people. (Horrifying to some; actually sounds like something I wish I’d had growing up.) Or maybe you heard Queensland MP George Christensen denounce Safe Schools in the Lower House for promoting penis-tucking, chest-binding and gender fluidity to primary-school kids, or for handing them tips on where to buy sex toys online. None of these things was true.
This essay is an attempt at a corrective. We know certain things about Tyrone Unsworth’s life and death. We know he posted about killing himself on social media. We know he was involved in an argument with other teenagers so violent that they broke his jaw. We know he expressed distress over his sexuality. It’s impossible to know whether Safe Schools could have saved Tyrone Unsworth’s life. It very well could have. But what remains now is an opportunity – and arguably the ethical obligation – to take a breath and move beyond tedious queers-versus-parents, activists-versus-moralists trench warfare. To do this, we might need to acknowledge something uncomfortable: that everyone invested in this discussion wants the same thing: to keep kids safe. The conundrum, of course, is that our interpretations of what constitutes the safety of children differ wildly. While members of the Australian Christian Lobby and the anti-same-sex-marriage lobby group Australian Marriage Alliance see Safe Schools as an extreme ideology
designed merely to make LGBTI children feel ‘comfortable’
(quote marks theirs), Australian queers are impatient for change, seeing one kid’s suicide attempt as one too many.
Can we agree on a baseline, then? In his 2012 book Far from the Tree, American-British author and journalist Andrew Solomon suggests: It seems right to prioritise each child’s mental health over a system that makes universal predictions about what should constitute happiness or what values are healthy.
Few of us would argue against this. Yet the past two years of debate over Safe Schools have seen reporters elevate the opinions of zealots (one of whom publicly proclaimed transgender children the work of Satan) and selectively defer to medical and education experts
who have long histories of expressing anti-gay sentiments in their professional work. Subsequently, some of the most vocal backlash has come from extremists on the other side, including queer activists who’ve raided and trashed the office of a senator, and those who argue any journalist working at News Corp has blood on their hands. (For what it’s worth, I happily wrote for News Corp every week for six years.)
In all the posturing and point-scoring, vital context and nuance have been lost. Who has the time to get their head around the complicated intricacies of departmental bureaucracy when there’s an ideological scrap to be won? Important voices have also been erased, including non-partisan medical experts, education academics and LGBTIQ youth themselves.
This essay is for people who’ve read the stories and suspect – rightly – that there must be more to it. It’s for anyone tired of seeing Safe Schools used as a handy battleground to score points in a bigger culture war. It’s for parents and guardians who’ve read the countless newspaper stories and are still confused. It’s for anyone who wondered why so few Australian kids were engaged in a discussion that was, apparently, about their welfare. It’s for anyone baffled why, in 2017, commentators are still railing against a queer agenda
or ideology,
something that would sound anachronistically quaint if it wasn’t so nakedly hateful. But given we’re planning to spend $122 million on a non-binding survey on the rights of our citizens that will be delivered via the post, it’s fair to say we’re fond of strange anachronisms right now.
In the spirit of clearing up confusion, then, let’s start with some facts, and rewind to 2014, when Safe Schools Coalition Australia was being launched – an almost prelapsarian moment. Nowadays Tony Abbott might try valiantly to revise the past, painting Safe Schools as a program lost down in the bowels of the bureaucracy that the people at the top of the system aren’t aware of.
But let the record show that there was a time when everyone – on both sides of politics, and including him – was seemingly happy to back Safe Schools.
THE CHILDREN’S HOUR
In retrospect, it feels fitting that Tony Abbott’s Coalition launched Safe Schools on Friday the 13th, a day associated with impending horror. Melbourne was cold and crisp that June morning in 2014 – light fog, temperature hovering at 10°C – and people were streaming into the NAB’s Village complex at Docklands, plonked north of the Yarra. Village
is a misnomer: if you’ve been inside, you’ll know it as a cavernous, corporate pit of a space, all labyrinthine escalators and cross-platform corridors jutting over impossible drops, as if an international airport had attempted to swallow a shopping mall.
Schoolkids, teachers, principals, policy-makers and politicians were headed to the Village’s 320-seat theatrette for a quietly historic moment. Today was the inaugural National Safe Schools Symposium and the launch of Safe Schools Coalition Australia (SSCA), the first national program supporting LGBTIQ school students, a smaller version of which had been running successfully in Victoria for almost four years. Organisers were chipper about the federal injection of cash and the prospect of a national rollout. Eight million dollars over three years wasn’t much, but it would do the job, and was inexpensive enough to stay uncontroversial. They even had merchandise: postcards, lanyards and pens.
Labor ministers had initiated the program in August 2013. By then the political fiasco of the Rudd–Gillard–Rudd years meant Labor was facing annihilation. Just a week before the election, finance minister Penny Wong, education minister Bill Shorten and Labor’s candidate for Melbourne, Cath Bowtell, gathered at Fitzroy High School to announce SSCA’s funding. Schools are already doing a lot to make sure students are safe and supported,
Shorten told the press, but too many young Australians still experience bullying and discrimination in schools.
When I ask Wong if this was something Labor rushed through, forcing the inevitable Abbott government to deliver Safe Schools when in power, she gives the faintest ghost of a smile. "Well, you could turn it around and say, ‘Labor people believe a whole range of programs are important, and whatever we can do in the face of a hard-right prime minister to protect young people is not