Quarterly Essay 48 After the Future: Australia's New Extinction Crisis
By Tim Flannery
()
About this ebook
In this passionate and illuminating essay, Flannery tells the story of the human impact on the continent. He revisits his Future Eaters hypothesis, discussing how firestick farming helped to shape the ecology and preserve native fauna. He looks at the way recent governments, in tandem with an indifferent populace and a rabid libertarian right, have let environmental knowledge and commitments erode. Finally, he describes new approaches to wildlife conservation and argues that Australia must take the lead on these. This is an essay that rings the alarm on behalf of the natural world, and asks us to think again about protection of its irreplaceable riches.
‘Such is the depth of public ignorance about Australia’s extinction crisis that most people are unaware that it is occurring, while those who do know of it commonly believe that our national parks and reserves are safe places for threatened species. In fact the second extinction wave is now in full swing, and it’s emptying our national parks and wildlife reserves as ruthlessly as other landscapes.’ —Tim Flannery, After the Future
‘Flannery is known as a passionate advocate for conservation, but rarely has he sounded so angry.’ —Fiona Capp, Sydney Morning Herald
‘He's a scientist of world standing, a prolific and bestselling writer, a noted explorer, passionate about the Australian environment, and believes global warming is a calamitous crisis facing us all. Tim Flannery is also a controversial, outspoken stirrer who promises … to tread on toes if he has to, to get his blunt views across.’ –Kerry O'Brien, The 7:30 Report
Tim Flannery
Professor TIM FLANNERY is a leading writer on climate change. A Scientist, an explorer and a conservationist, Flannery has held various academic positions including Professor at the University of Adelaide, Director of the South Australian Museum and Principal Research Scientist at the Australian Museum. A frequent presenter on ABC Radio, NPR and the BBC, he has also written and presented several series on the Documentary Channel. His books include Here on Earth and the international number one bestseller The Weather Makers. Flannery was named Australian of the Year in 2007.
Read more from Tim Flannery
Astonishing Animals: Extraordinary Creatures and the Fantastic Worlds They Inhabit Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Weather Makers: How Man Is Changing the Climate and What It Means for Life on Earth Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Eternal Frontier: An Ecological History of North America and Its Peoples Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Europe: A Natural History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Here on Earth: A Natural History of the Planet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Among the Islands: Adventures in the Pacific Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Chasing Kangaroos: A Continent, a Scientist, and a Search for the World's Most Extraordinary Creature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Explorer's Notebook: Essays on Life, History, and Climate Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNow or Never: Why We Must Act Now to End Climate Change and Create a Sustainable Future Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Atmosphere of Hope: Searching for Solutions to the Climate Crisis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMammals of the South-west Pacific Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBig Meg: The Story of the Largest and Most Mysterious Predator that Ever Lived Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Quarterly Essay 48 After the Future
Titles in the series (93)
Quarterly Essay 1 In Denial: The Stolen Generations and the Right Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 8 Groundswell: The Rise of the Greens Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 20 A Time for War: Australia as a Military Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 5 Girt By Sea: Australia, the Refugees and the Politics of Fear Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 3 The Opportunist: John Howard and the Triumph of Reaction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 7 Paradise Betrayed: West Papua's Struggle for Independence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 6 Beyond Belief: What Future for Labor? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 15 Latham's World: The New Politics of the Outsiders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 25 Bipolar Nation: How to Win the 2007 Election Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 21 What's Left?: The Death of Social Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 29 Love and Money: The Family and the Free Market Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 26 His Master's Voice: The Corruption of Public Debate Under Howard Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 10 Bad Company: The Cult of the CEO Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 11 Whitefella Jump Up: The Shortest Way to Nationhood Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 24 No Fixed Address: Nomads and the Fate of the Planet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 14 Mission Impossible: The Sheikhs, the U.S. and the Future of Iraq Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 4 Rabbit Syndrome: Australia and America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 13 Sending Them Home: Refugees and the New Politics of Indifference Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 18 Worried Well: The Depression Epidemic and the Medicalisation of Our Sorrows Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 2 Appeasing Jakarta: Australia's Complicity in the East Timor Tragedy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 9 Beautiful Lies: Population and Environment in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 17: ‘Kangaroo Court’: Family Law in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 22 Voting for Jesus: Christianity and Politics in Australia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 30 Last Drinks: The Impact of the Northern Territory Intervention Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStop at Nothing: The Life and Adventures of Malcolm Turnbull; Quarterly Essay 34 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quarterly Essay 31 Now or Never: A Sustainable Future for Australia? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 19 Relaxed and Comfortable: The Liberal Party's Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 12 Made in England: Australia's British Inheritance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 41 The Happy Life: The Search for Contentment in the Modern World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Quarterly Essay 33 Quarry Vision: Coal, Climate Change and the End of the Resources Boom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Wildlife on Farms: How to Conserve Native Animals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAustralian Magpie: Biology and Behaviour of an Unusual Songbird Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cane Toad Wars Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWoodlands: A Disappearing Landscape Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCollected Papers of Michael E. Soulé: Early Years in Modern Conservation Biology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFlooded Forest and Desert Creek: Ecology and History of the River Red Gum Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBoom and Bust: Bird Stories for a Dry Country Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bees of Australia: A Photographic Exploration Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Native Mice and Rats Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBird Minds: Cognition and Behaviour of Australian Native Birds Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Giant Otter: Giants of the Amazon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEcoagriculture for a Sustainable Food Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnnatural Companions: Rethinking Our Love of Pets in an Age of Wildlife Extinction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCats in Australia: Companion and Killer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAustralasian Eagles and Eagle-like Birds Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGariwerd: An Environmental History of the Grampians Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBiodiversity: Science and Solutions for Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 9 Beautiful Lies: Population and Environment in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 44 Man-Made World: Choosing Between Progress and Planet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFinding Birds in Australia's Northern Territory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTawny Frogmouth Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5RSPB Seabirds Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quarterly Essay 31 Now or Never: A Sustainable Future for Australia? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 51 The Prince: Faith, Abuse and George Pell Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Activist Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 45 Us and Them: On the Importance of Animals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 27 Reaction Time: Climate Change and the Nuclear Option Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 56 Clivosaurus: The Politics of Clive Palmer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunity-based Control of Invasive Species Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complete Guide to Finding the Mammals of Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Environmental Science For You
Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Animal, Vegetable, Miracle - 10th anniversary edition: A Year of Food Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Silent Spring Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homegrown & Handmade: A Practical Guide to More Self-Reliant Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mother of God: An Extraordinary Journey into the Uncharted Tributaries of the Western Amazon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Big Book of Nature Activities: A Year-Round Guide to Outdoor Learning Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Not Too Late: Changing the Climate Story from Despair to Possibility Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Sacred Plant Medicine: The Wisdom in Native American Herbalism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Quickening: Creation and Community at the Ends of the Earth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Druidry Handbook: Spiritual Practice Rooted in the Living Earth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShelter: A Love Letter to Trees Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of Hope: A Survival Guide for Trying Times Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5438 Days: An Extraordinary True Story of Survival at Sea Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Your Guide to Forest Bathing (Expanded Edition): Experience the Healing Power of Nature Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Prepare for Climate Change: A Practical Guide to Surviving the Chaos Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Are the Weather: Saving the Planet Begins at Breakfast Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Horsemen of the Apocalypse: The Men Who Are Destroying Life on Earth—And What It Means for Our Children Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The World Without Us Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Building Natural Ponds: Create a Clean, Algae-free Pond without Pumps, Filters, or Chemicals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plant Intelligence and the Imaginal Realm: Beyond the Doors of Perception into the Dreaming of Earth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Quarterly Essay 48 After the Future
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Quarterly Essay 48 After the Future - Tim Flannery
QUARTERLY ESSAY 48
After the Future
Australia’s New Extinction Crisis
Tim Flannery
Contents
After the Future: Australia’s New Extinction Crisis
Tim Flannery
Correspondence
George Brandis
Chris Uhlmann
Mark Latham
Judith Brett
Jack Waterford
David Marr
Rachel Nolan
Contributors
Copyright
Subscribe
AFTER THE FUTURE:
Australia’s New Extinction Crisis
When it suits them, men may take control and play fine tricks and hustle Nature. Yet we may believe that Australia, quietly and imperceptibly … is experimenting on the men … She will be satisfied at long last, and when she is satisfied an Australian nation will in truth exist.
—Sir Keith Hancock, Australia (1930)
This essay is an investigation into Australia’s efforts to protect its endangered species from extinction. It focuses particularly on the effectiveness of the federal legislation dealing with species officially recognised as being under threat, but it also takes a broader view. How effective, for example, have been state and federal efforts to preserve biodiversity by setting aside national parks and nature reserves? Why are species still becoming extinct, even though tens of millions of dollars are being spent to protect nature? And what more needs to be done to prevent extinctions?
As I researched these issues, I grew increasingly dismayed at how haphazard and generally ineffectual our efforts at preventing extinctions have been. In the twenty years since federal legislation was enacted, just one vertebrate species has increased in number sufficiently to be taken off the threatened list: the saltwater crocodile. Dismayingly, I also discovered that many conservative state governments are rolling back protections for nature, and that the worst are using aspects of our natural heritage as political bargaining chips. Yet some organisations and initiatives are making progress in protecting species – even bringing some back from the brink of extinction. Using them as models, I outline how private–public partnerships could conserve Australia’s biodiversity effectively, and at a modest cost.
Australia is not alone in experiencing an extinction crisis. Many of our regional neighbours are in danger of losing their most distinctive species. I believe that Australian expertise could play a leading role in biodiversity protection regionally, and that a federal fund should be established to facilitate this.
Writing this essay has made me look at my society anew. Eighteen years ago I wrote The Future Eaters, which raised some of the issues discussed here. How much progress has been made towards sustainability since then? To answer that we need to revisit this essay’s epigraph. When I first read Sir Keith Hancock’s words, they seemed to leap from the page and sear themselves on my mind. Was ever a national narrative so perfectly distilled? Hancock’s words capture the trajectory of all settler societies since the dawn of civilisation, but are particularly apt for Australia, where the mismatch between land and people was so profound, and the experience is still so raw.
I’ve spent my life in a country which looks upon its fine tricks and hustles of nature as some of its greatest achievements. We crow about them on the front pages of our newspapers, and look upon some as inexhaustible sources of wealth. But in reality we Australians are mere squatters in our own country. That is all we ever can be until Australia has completed its experiment. Moreover, our tenure in this land is limited not by some governor’s pleasure, but by the rate at which we destroy its natural riches, including its species.
The great majority of Australia’s plants and animals are found nowhere else on earth. Many are the result of 45 million years of separate evolution, for that is how long Australia has existed as an island continent. As a result, many Australian species are precious repositories of unique genes and evolutionary strategies, living in unique ecosystems. They are important not just in and of themselves, but because they provide Australians with the best means we have of engaging nature and listening to our land.
By learning about our homeland and adjusting our beliefs, values and practices, we can achieve great things. Indeed, over the past half-century, significant progress has been made in both caring for the Australian environment and in placing our culture on a more sustainable path. Yet in recent years things have begun to go backwards, as the concept of practical, measurable environmental protection has been widely neglected – even abandoned in some instances. I believe that two things – a lack of awareness of the severity of Australia’s environmental problems, and the increasingly divisive, ideologically driven nature of our politics – are primarily responsible for this.
Although Australians profess to love their wildlife, there is an ever-growing sense among many of our politicians and business leaders that the natural world is something to be traded off – just another item in a ledger, or a criterion to be partially satisfied. This was highlighted to me recently in Kalgoorlie. I was talking to a group of school kids, one of whom asked me why trees were being knocked down to make way for new mines. When I responded that it was happening because our society values money more than Australia’s natural habitats, an employee of a major mining company objected that this was not true. So I asked him what he would do if he discovered Uluru was rich in gold ore. After a moment’s thought he replied: Come up from underneath.
In other words, hollow out the country: compromise its natural treasures. On a scale far beyond mere mining, that’s what we’re doing today.
In aspiring, as they increasingly seem to do, to little more than the accumulation of wealth, some Australians have cultivated an apparently benign indifference to the natural world. Moreover, among some on the right of politics there’s a growing hostility towards anything environmental,
which extends even to the science that supports wise management. As a result some Australians have begun to shoot the messenger, by cultivating a deep hostility towards all scientific expertise. Although this is most evident with respect to climate change, it affects all aspects of environmental and even medical science (think of vaccines) and is occurring just as a new wave of animal and plant extinctions is gathering pace.
Scientific research must set the compass for us when it comes to preventing extinctions. Hence I will focus in this essay on the science of biodiversity conservation – specifically on the conservation of species – and the political and social changes that must occur if we are to preserve our unique plants and animals. Many ideologies travel under the banner of nature conservation nowadays, including animal rights, landscape preservation and even resource management. All are arguably important in their own right, but none should get in the way of protecting species.
That is a rather unfashionable view at present. Many scientists and land managers prefer to focus on ecosystem protection rather than the fate of individual species, and this has led them to give priority to setting aside representative samples of each of Australia’s ecosystem types in reserves and national parks. Of course this is important work, but I will argue that in and of itself it will not result in biodiversity protection. Instead, experience shows that unless such areas are carefully managed, the outcome for biodiversity is likely to be very poor indeed. That’s why I believe that species, as well as ecosystems and landscapes, must once more become an important focus of our conservation efforts.
By way of illustrating how scientific research can guide conservation, and in order to show how science works, I will discuss in detail an interpretation of Australian prehistory published in my book The Future Eaters. It put forward the hypothesis that the first humans to colonise the continent swiftly hunted its large animals to extinction, and that this altered Australia’s vegetation, nutrient cycling, fire frequency and intensity, and even climate – changes that have great relevance for land management today. Some palaeontologists and experts in dating technologies set about testing the hypothesis almost as soon as it was published. As a result spectacular progress has been made in understanding Australia’s prehistory. But it took until 2012 for a truly rigorous test to emerge. The key was an elegant – indeed beautiful – piece of science which I’ll explain in detail later. It does not prove the Future Eaters hypothesis correct – for, contrary to popular opinion, it’s impossible to prove anything in science. But it does represent a major step forward, and was a strong factor in prompting me to write this essay at this time.
Most of Australia’s biodiversity consists of invertebrates such as insects and spiders (which make up 97 per cent of all animal species), and plants. Yet here I’ll be focusing on the fate of vertebrates such as wallabies and bandicoots. This is in part because large creatures such as mammals play a disproportionately important role in seed and spore dispersal and nutrient recycling, which are vital ecosystem services.
Nor will I write much about threats such as mining and agriculture, simply because, while agriculture was an important threat in the past, and mining can have a locally catastrophic effect, today there are greater threats.
THE EXTINCTION PROBLEM
In late August 2009 a tiny, solitary bat fluttered about in the rainforest near Australia’s infamous Christmas Island detention camp. We don’t know precisely what happened to it. Perhaps it landed on a leaf at dawn after a night feeding on moths and mosquitoes, and was torn to pieces by invasive fire ants; perhaps it succumbed to a mounting toxic burden placed on its tiny body by insecticide spraying. Or maybe it was simply worn out with age and ceaseless activity, and died quietly in its tree-hollow. But there is one important thing we do know: it was the very last Christmas Island pipistrelle (Pipistrellus murrayi) on earth. With its passing, an entire species winked out of existence.
Two decades earlier the island’s population of pipistrelles had been healthy. A few scientists had watched the species’ decline with concern, until, after the million or more years that it had played a part in keeping the ecological balance of the island, they could see that without action its demise was imminent. They had done their best to warn the federal government about the looming catastrophe, but they might as well have been talking to a brick wall. The bureaucrats and politicians prevaricated for three years, until it was too late. While Australians argued about the fate of the asylum seekers who shared the pipistrelle’s home, nothing effective was done to help the bats. Indeed, except for those few watching scientists, neither Australia’s press nor public seemed to give a thought to the passing of the species, nor what it might mean for Christmas Island